| With the 2010 election season starting to heat up a bit in the House, we thought we'd take a look back at all the incumbents who didn't seek re-election to the 111th Congress, along with the date they officially announced they weren't running again (and their reasons).
Note: Mark Udall planned to run for Senate long before the 2008 cycle began, so we've just slotted him in at the top. And if you'd like to take a look back at Republican retirements in the 2006 cycle, click here.
As you can see, things unfolded rather differently over the last two Congresses, especially compared to what we've seen so far this year. Last cycle, there were already a number of outright retirements at this point (including several shockers, like Deborah Pryce and Chip Pickering), while only three reps had announced campaigns for higher office. There were also many more retirements to come, especially on the GOP side; the most fertile months for announcements turned out to be October-November and January.
This time, we have zero retirements and a whopping eighteen members of Congress who are running for a different job. It's easy to see why we have no retirements yet - Dems are in power, and the GOP is feeling better about its chances these days. I'm personally hoping that the combination of a real healthcare bill passing, plus some Dem victories in the three key races on Nov. 3 (NJ-Gov, VA-Gov & NY-23), will help re-demoralize the Republican Party and encourage some geezers to head for the exits. At the very least, barring some kind of crazy collapse on our side, we are extremely unlikely to see a repeat of 1994, when thirty Dems announced their retirements, and the GOP picked up twenty-two open seats. So far, there are just seven blue open seats this cycle, and only three are potentially competitive. |
