Google Ads


Site Stats

MO-Sen: Carnahan Leads Blunt By 1

by: Crisitunity

Wed Nov 18, 2009 at 1:05 PM EST


PPP (pdf) (11/13-15, registered voters, 1/10-11 in parentheses):

Robin Carnahan (D): 43 (45)
Roy Blunt (R): 42 (44)
Undecided: 15 (9)

Robin Carnahan (D): 42
Chuck Purgason (R): 35
Undecided: 23
(MoE: ±3.6%)

Roy Blunt (R): 53
Chuck Purgason (R): 16
Undecided: 31
(MoE: ±5.5%)

In a sign of how consistently this race has polled, Democratic Secretary of State Robin Carnahan has the same one-point lead over Republican Rep. Roy Blunt today that she did in January, according to PPP. Almost everyone else who has polled the race finds a similar narrow lead for Carnahan or a tie. Carnahan is the only figure polled with positive favorables at 40/36 -- not Blunt, at 30/38, not Chuck Purgason at 7/14, and not Barack Obama, at 43/52. Given Obama's negative in Missouri, it's impressive that Carnahan is doing as well as she is, but that's got to be a combination of her respected family name and Blunt's unlikeability.

The most interesting change to this story is the addition of state Sen. Chuck Purgason, who's flying the anti-establishment flag for the hard right. PPP had leaked that Purgason was polling in the "double digits" against the insidery Blunt, setting off all sorts of breathless speculation -- however, while 16% does certainly qualify as double digits, that really doesn't put him close to Blunt (although, given the current depths of feeling for many right-wingers, his numbers seem likely to go up as he gets better known). Sarah Steelman, who already has a statewide profile and who'd been anticipating a run earlier in the year, may now be kicking herself for not staying in the race. (She landed some good anti-establishment blows on Blunt, calling him a "white guy in a suit," but then dropped out prior to the summer's teabagger ascendancy.)

RaceTracker Wiki: MO-Sen

Crisitunity :: MO-Sen: Carnahan Leads Blunt By 1
Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I would guess Obama is actually
More popular than that. PPP has him lower across the board in individual states for some reason. Having said that Blunt's disapproval seems reasonable and means he will probably lose unless the national environment gets worse.

I think it's worth noting...
They talk about favorability ratings for the senate candidates, then talk about job approval for Obama.  While they are usually fairly close, I think commontrend is that job approval ratings are usually 3-8 points spread lower than favorables.  

[ Parent ]
It is
But they consistently had his job approval in both NJ and VA much worse than the exit polls.

[ Parent ]
Roy Blunt
is a pretty awful candidate, but in a state that swings Republican and in a climate that will likely swing Republican, he may not have to be.

Just remember 2002 was a republican leaning year
and Talent was polling 5% ahead of Carnahan. The final margin was..
50% Talent
49% Carnahan
I'm guessing in 2010 the results will be around
52% Carnahan
45% Blunt

Same here
My thinking is this race Dems are liekly to pickup regardless of the environment in Nov 2010.  My trip to southern Missiouri a couple months ago talking to locals only increases my belief that this one is Carnahan's to lose.  Blunt's name is very unpopular right now in MO.

[ Parent ]
^Agreed
The race is still a year out, but I concur that a good bet for a winning percentage for Carnahan is 51-52%. The race could easily flip by election day though, so lots of hard work lies ahead for Missouri Democrats to bring this campaign across the finish line in first place.

Democrat: TN-8

[ Parent ]
Close statewide races
seem to be the rule rather than the exception in Missouri. Especially for federal office.  

Probably for open seats
But Kit Bond, despite being very low profile had a firm grip on that Senate seat for a long time.  I believe his only marginally close race was against now Governor Nixon several elections ago.

[ Parent ]
Actually,
While Bond has won everytime, his best showing was 2004 when he received 56% of the vote.

[ Parent ]
I thought he won in 1992
by a landslide over Geri Rothman-Serot. Was that close?  

[ Parent ]
I looked it up
He beat Rothman-Serot by a 52-45 margin.  His winning margins were 5.6, 5.2, 7, 8.9 and 13.2.  Very consistent - 5 elections all within a range of 5 and 13 points.  Ironically that 8.9% win was against now Govenror Nixon in 1998.

[ Parent ]
I posted a giant analysis on here and on ShowMeProgress
Republicans still don't like their politicians very much. And the "message test" on Blunt is more like a test for Robin. 65% say Roy's part of the problem in DC, and that's a winning message.

"Republican leader Roy Blunt" might be just as lethal as invoking GWB and Matt Blunt. The people who drove the country into a blizzard want to take the wheel again.


They could have run anyone else
even some state legislator, and had a better shot of retaining this.  Blunt has to deal with negative fallout from his role in congressional leadership AND negative fallout from his son's disastrous tenure as governor.  They really picked about the worst candidate they could.  Well, besides Ashcroft, maybe.

No Ashcroft is a better candidate
than Blunt.  Blunt is about as popular as George W Bush or Dick Cheney.

I put both Missouri and Ohio as Lean Democratic because I think Blunt and Portman are just too easy for the Dems to completely rip up.  


[ Parent ]
Blunt is as popular as John McCain
Blunt has base problems. His favorable/unfavorable rating in the Springfield/SW MO area code is 38/38.

[ Parent ]
Yep
I was in Springfield a few months ago for a family reunion.  Everyone I talked to, even conservatives, think Blunt is a douchebag and have a good opinion of the entire Carnahan family.

[ Parent ]
Ashcroft is better than Blunt
for one thing, Ashcroft has distance from the last 4 years, is only tied in to problems in the DOJ from 2001-2005, and won several elections easily before losing to one of Missouri's most popular governors ever.

[ Parent ]
Hard to believe
But Ashcroft was by far the better Attorney General under Bush.  That's just how bad Alberto "I don't recall jackshit" Gonzalez was at the job.

[ Parent ]
Ascroft was a pretty competent AG
as much as I hate to admit it. There were a few Bush appointees who were really good at their jobs; Powell, Gates, Dana Perino. I have a little crush on Dana Perino...one of these people who was so good at her job it ticked me off.  

[ Parent ]
If by competent you mean
covering up the breasts of Lady Justice to "protect children", I guess so.

[ Parent ]
He may have been crazy
But he was fairly competent.

And at least that kind of prudery is less harmful than Gonzalez's focus on trying to gut the constitution and sidestep the law.


[ Parent ]
competent...not sane
if I were a right winger, I'd think he was the best AG ever.  

[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox