Google Ads


Site Stats

SSP Poll Roundup: 10/8

by: James L.

Thu Oct 08, 2009 at 3:24 AM EDT


  • MA-Sen: Lake Research, the hired gun of Martha Coakley, has some pretty unsurprising results for the Democratic Senate primary in Massachusetts. Coakley, the state AG, leads Rep. Michael Capuano by 47-12. Despite having quite a bit of money in the bank, Stephen Pagliuca and Alan Khazei both look like non-factors at this point, at just 4 and 1%, respectively.

  • MO-Sen: Missouri continues to look like the brightest spot for Democratic pick-up hopes in the Senate next year. Momentum Analysis, another Dem pollster, finds Robin Carnahan ahead of Roy Blunt by 48-45.

  • WI-Sen: The wonks over at the University of Wisconsin decided to test the improbable match-up of ex-Gov. Tommy Thompson vs. Democratic Sen. Russ Feingold. Thompson leads Feingold by 43-39, but, as Josh Goodman notes, his recent endorsement of health care reform sure doesn't seem like the actions of a guy jonesing for another dip in the partisan electoral hot tub.

  • NH-Gov: UNH, home of the incredible gyrating sample, decided to test ex-Gov. John H. "Big Papa" Sununu against Democratic Gov. John Lynch. Lynch wins 50-37.

  • NYC-Mayor: Is something happening here? SurveyUSA's first post-primary poll of the NYC Mayoral election is showing a surprisingly close race: 51-43 for Michael Bloomberg. Sadly, I doubt that Thompson will be aggressive enough in the closing weeks to actually threaten the Royal Bloomsbury.

  • WA-Init: SUSA has dipped its thermometer into the latest civil rights battle in Washington. R-71, the referendum on expanded domestic partnership (i.e. marriage in all but name), has a slim 45-42 edge. (Note: this is the complete opposite of Maine in terms of ballot wording; here, "yes" is a vote in favor of keeping domestic partnership.)
James L. :: SSP Poll Roundup: 10/8
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Thompson
I don't think aggressiveness or the lack thereof is his problem. What's his positive message for why people should vote for him?

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


Boomie has gone quite negative
in the past few weeks. FWIW.  

[ Parent ]
Thompson's saved every $ for these final four weeks
If he's already closing the gap, Bloomberg could be in real trouble. If this is just another SurveyUSA outlier, he's probably still down by 12%.

Unfortunately, the only way Thompson can win this race is by going supremely negative. Luckily, Bloomberg's been weird (or not, if his internals show a close race), and he's going very negative too.

I'm still feeling an eight-point race here. It ain't '05, but I doubt Thompson can win Manhattan and make it closer to '01.

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast


[ Parent ]
True
But he is able to contrast his record (which he promotes as positive) with Thompson's (which he categorizes as negative). And Thompson's argument is? That he will "support the middle class"? And we know that because?

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
All I have to say in terms of Thompson taking out Feingold
in your dreams GOP.

WA R-71
The concise description of R-71 is pretty simple:

per http://approvereferendum71.org...

This bill would expand the rights, responsibilities, and obligations accorded state-registered same-sex and senior domestic partners to be equivalent to those of married spouses, except that a domestic partnership is not a marriage.



hahahahahaha
"except a domestic partnership is not a marriage"  Dont know why but having to put that in there just makes me laugh.

And just in case anyone was wondering why WA you vote yes and ME you vote no.  Washington is voting on the actual piece of legislation, should it be implemented and passed or no?  In Maine, they are voting to reverse the legislation already passed by the legislature.


[ Parent ]
The Almighty Field Poll of CA-Gov
Dem Primary
Brown 47%
Newsom 27%
Undecided 26%

GOP Primary
Whitman 22%
Campbell 20%
Poizner 9%
Undecided 49%

General Election
Brown 50%
Whitman 29%

Brown 48%
Campbell 27%

Brown 50%
Poizner 25%

Newsom 40%
Whitman 31%

Newsom 38%
Campbell 33%

Newsom 39%
Poizner 30%

http://www.field.com/fieldpoll...

What was that Rasmussen said about Newsom losing to all the Repubs? Piffle! I still support Jerry Brown mind.


Fantastic numbers
might be our easiest gubernatorial takeover in the country.  The winning margin may even be bigger than in Hawaii.

[ Parent ]
Not to mention, the greatest.
53 congressional districts worth of people.  The biggest cake of them all.

[ Parent ]
A republican
winning statewide in California in a non-scandal situation?  That's a funny joke.

23, Male, Democrat, OH-13

Between Obama holding a fundraiser and Clinton penning an e-mail
I love Dems' aggressiveness toward NY-23.  This is a CFG classic teamkiller.  I'll be interested to see fundraising numbers here, and I hope they give me the chance to point and laugh when Republicans screw up an easy win again.  

NJ-Gov: Christie Up 3
http://www.surveyusa.com/clien...

- Only 2% remain undecided.

- A 22% gender gap.

- Corzine only retains the support of 67% of those who voted for him in '05.

- Christie wins every age group except 65+.

- Christie nets 18% of Dems; Corzine takes 12% of Republicans.

- Daggett's winning nearly 20% of Hispanics.

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast



Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox