Google Ads


Site Stats

Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, and Minnesota Primary Previews

by: Crisitunity

Tue Aug 10, 2010 at 1:35 PM EDT


CO-Sen (D): The Democratic heavyweights are out in this marquee race on our side in Colorado, splitting between appointed incumbent and former Denver Schools Superintendent Michael Bennet and Colorado House speaker Andrew Romanoff. Obama's recorded a robocall for Bennet, while the Big Dog's been stumping for Romanoff (who, yes, endorsed Hillary in 2008). While Romanoff's bid seemed quixotic at first, he's managed to gain some traction, with the most recent polling in the race offering a split decision, with PPP saying Bennet 49-43 and SurveyUSA saying Romanoff 48-45. Much hay was made about Bennet's accidental incumbency, and the newest scuttle in the race takes the form of Bennet's financial dealings while Superintendent. While that news may have broken a little late, Romanoff still has the momentum -- but will it be enough? (JMD)

CO-Sen (R): The Devil Wears Prada! Or, perhaps more appropriately, former Lt. Gov Jane Norton wears high heels, according to her rival, Weld County DA Ken Buck. The two have been duking it out for the conservative mantle. Buck's been endorsed by GOP would-be kingmaker Jim DeMint and has had some airpower in the form of shady 501(c)(4) group Americans for Job Security; Norton's earned the endorsements of both John McCain and the star of Saved By The Xenophobia, Jan Brewer. Norton and Buck remain close in polling, with PPP giving Norton a narrow edge at 41-40 and SurveyUSA giving Buck some more breathing room at 50-41. All of this remains in complete flux though, and any result tonight could be rendered moot by a switcheroo with the Governor's race, should the Colorado GOP somehow manage to cast off their albatross in Scott McInnis. (JMD)

CO-Gov (R): Former Rep. Scott McInnis was at one time considered a major get for the GOP, and the strength of his candidacy was such that he helped push incumbent Dem Gov. Bill Ritter out of the race after just one term. No more. While some initially dismissed McInnis's plagiarism scandal as a minor white-collar affair that wouldn't interest average voters, his transgressions in fact proved unusually potent, leading to his campaign's utter ruin. Polls now show a dead heat between McInnis (whose fundraising has dried up) and crazy fringer Some Dude Dan Maes (who never raised squat to begin with). The primary may be completely moot, though: Rumors have abounded that if McInnis were to win, he'd step down in favor of a less-damaged candidate. We should probably be rooting for Maes, though, who has explicitly said he'd do no such thing. (D)

CO-03 (R): Former state Rep. Scott Tipton, who represented a large swath of Southwestern Colorado before running against incumbent Dem. John Salazar in 2006, looked like he would easily earn the right to challenge Salazar a second time, but was held to only 45% at the state nominating against the teabaggish Bob McConnell, who also earned 45%. As a result, the two square off tonight, with McConnell running to Tipton's right, even boasting a Sarah Palin endorsement. Both candidates have some cash to play with, Tipton having spent $213k and McConnell having spent $132k so far. Given the relative low profile of this race - Salazar bested Tipton with 62% in 2006 and seems to be more entrenched than most vulnerable Dems - the race remains unpredictable. (JMD)

CO-07 (R): The primary field in this suburban Denver district is also down to two after the convention, with Aurora City Councilman Ryan Frazier having earned 49% and carpetbagging former Democrat Lang Sias having earned 43%. Frazier is winning the money race by quite a distance, $252k to Sias's $89k cash-on-hand. Sias -- who lives in CO-02 and became a Republican in 2007, however, boasts endorsements from both former 7th CD Rep. Bob Beauprez, the one and only Tom Tancredo, and John McCain, who Sias campaigned for (but didn't vote for). Again, Perlmutter doesn't seem particularly vulnerable, leading to a lower-profile -- and less predictable -- race tonight. (JMD)

CT-Gov (D): Connecticut Democrats are hungry for a win this November -- which would be their first gubernatorial win since William O'Neill's re-election in 1986 -- but they'll have to get through a fast-closing primary tonight to see who their nominee will be. '06 Senate nominee and Lieberman primary-slayer Ned Lamont is facing off against former 14-year Stamford Mayor Dan Malloy, and this race looks like it's going down to the wire. After lagging in the polls behind Lamont for months, Malloy has used some well-timed punches to turn Lamont's business experience against him, releasing TV ads criticizing Lamont for layoffs at his telecommunications company. The latest Q-poll shows that Lamont's lead has eroded to a mere three points -- certainly not a margin to bet the farm on tonight. (JL)

CT-Gov (R): While technically this one is a three-way decision, the only candidates with a shot at winning the Republican nomination tonight are ex-Ambassador Tom Foley and Lt. Gov. Michael Fedele. Like Lamont, Foley has used his personal fortune to catapult himself to an early lead. Fedele has had a rough time keeping pace, highlighted by his failures to secure endorsements from Gov. Jodi Rell and the state GOP convention. Still, Fedele has swung back at Foley with TV ads drawing attention to layoffs at one of Foley's textile factories in Georgia. The latest Q-Poll shows some juice for Fedele, but he still lags behind Foley by 38-30. (JL)

CT-Sen (R): Little Bobby Simmons announced that he was taking his ball and going home, but it turns out that he was just lingering behind the bleachers until he could muster up the courage to take another at-bat. The results aren't pretty: a 50-28 lead for controversial WWE Queen Linda McMahon in the latest Q-Poll. Next! (JL)

CT-02 (R): Now this one's getting down in the weeds, but Republicans are trying to prod as many Dem-held seats for potential weakness as possible. The crop of candidates going up against two-term Rep. Joe Courtney, however, leaves much to be desired. After their most well-funded recruit, former Hebron Board of Finance vice chairman Matthew Daly, dropped out in May, Republicans are picking between former TV anchorwoman Janet Peckinpaugh, former State Department official Daria Novak, and farmer/attorney Douglas Dubitsky. Peckinpaugh, the most "hyped" of the trio, failed to raise more than $50K for her campaign, and her candidacy drew early fire for her most recent employment stint as a shill for a now-defunct mortgage company in deceptive, TV news-like ads. As much success as Republicans have had in expanding the map this year, this race stacks up as a glaring recruiting failure. (JL)

CT-04 (R): State Sen. Dan Debicella is the clear front-runner in the race to take on Rep. Jim Himes. He faces a couple of Some Dudes who, as befits their Some Dude status, haven't raised squat: Rick Torres and Rob Merkle. (A more credible opponent, Tom Herrmann, dropped out in June after petition fraud meant he couldn't qualify for the ballot.) Debicella won his party's backing at the state convention earlier this year. (D)

CT-05 (R): Though the 5th district would seem to be a tougher GOP target than the 4th, the Republican primary here has attracted quite a bit more money, and a larger number of credible candidates. Another state senator, Sam Caligiuri, is also the presumed front-runner here, having won 70% of the delegate vote at his party's nominating convention. But Afghanistan vet Justin Bernier, who was running in this race (and got some favorable notice) before Caligiuri dropped down from the senate contest last November, has raised a creditable sum and hasn't given up. Like many others in his position, though, it seems he's had a chip on his shoulder ever since Caligiuri hopped into the race, and that's usually not very appealing. Wealthy businessman Mark Greenberg actually leads the money race, with over a million raised (most of that from his own pockets), but most of the media attention devoted to this contest has seemed to focus on the Caligiuri-Bernier matchup. The winner, whomever he may be, gets to challenge sophomore Rep. (and all-time SSP hero) Chris Murphy in the fall. (D)

GA-Gov (R): The big ticket race in Georgia is the Republican gubernatorial runoff, between Karen Handel, the former SoS who finished a dominant first in the primary, and Nathan Deal, the former U.S. Rep. who was second. The Beltway media tends to emphasize that this is a proxy fight between possible presidential candidates (with Sarah Palin and Mitt Romney backing Handel, and Newt Gingrich and Mike Huckabee backing Deal), but the important post-primary endorsements here may have been the NRA, and third-place finisher state Sen. Eric Johnson (who has a strong base in the Savannah area), which both seemed to have consolidate conservative and rural Johnson and John Oxendine votes behind Deal. With that, Deal has pulled into a polling tie with Handel, promising a down-to-the-wire race tonight. (C)

GA-07 (R): With the surprising third-place finish of state Rep. Clay Cox (who'd had the backing of the Club for Growth and many local endorsers), meaning he's not in the runoff, it's anybody's guess as to who has the upper hand tonight in the Republican runoff in the dark-red open seat 7th and be the district's next Rep. (Actually, this part of Atlanta's northern suburbs is going through a lot of demographic change that will be beneficial to Democrats in the long run, but this isn't going to be the year to capitalize on that.) John Linder's former CoS, Rob Woodall, faces off against radio talk show host Jody Hice. (C)

GA-09 (R): Few candidates are as well acquainted with each other as newly-minted Rep. Tom Graves and former state Sen. Lee Hawkins, who, thanks to a special election, special election runoff, and primary, are now poised to face each other for the fourth time this year. Graves has won the first three rounds, and barely missed winning the primary outright (with 49% of the vote), so it would be a pretty monumental turnaround for Hawkins to finally win it, on the time it really counts (as November will be of little import in this dark-red district). Maybe having been in Congress for five months is enough to give Graves the unacceptable taint of incumbency, though. The county to watch is Hall, where Hawkins has his geographic base and which tends to report late. (C)

GA-12 (R): Democratic Rep. John Barrow -- who overcame his main challenge this year, a challenge from the left from former state Sen. Regina Thomas, in the primary -- will be watching with some interest tonight to see who his Republican opponent will be: nuclear power plant project manager Ray McKinney, or former fire chief of the small town of Thunderbolt, Carl Smith? Neither one is particularly well-funded or has an imposing profile, but this race could be competitive if the Republican wave is particularly large. (C)

MN-Gov (D): Minnesota Democrats will finally have a chance to participate in some real democracy today, rather than having their gubernatorial nominee chosen for them by a bunch of elites at a party convention. State House Speaker Margaret Anderson Kelliher did in fact win the endorsement of state delegates, but former Sen. Mark Dayton and former state Rep. Matt Entenza forged on with primary challenges regardless. It was probably a wise move for the wealthy Dayton, seeing as recent polls have all shown him to be in first place, with MAK in second and Entenza (who also has access to family money) in third. While this race may not wind up being very exciting, in a low turnout three-way with one woman and two men, the outcome could be unexpected. (D)

Crisitunity :: Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, and Minnesota Primary Previews
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Time to redeem myself, post-Basil Marceaux
CO-Sen (D):
Andrew Romanoff - 53%
Michael Bennet - 47%

CO-Sen (R):
Ken Buck - 52%
Jane Norton - 48%

CO-Gov (R):
Dan Maes - 51%
Scott McInnis - 49%

CT-Gov (D):
Ned Lamont - 52%
Dan Malloy - 48%

CT-Gov (R):
Tom Foley - 48%
Michael Fedele - 38%
Oz Griebel - 14%

CT-Sen (R):
Linda McMahon - 60%
Rob Simmons - 21%
Peter Schiff - 19%

GA-Gov (R):
Nathan Deal - 51%
Karen Handel - 49%

MN-Gov (D):
Mark Dayton - 45%
Margaret Anderson Kelliher - 37%
Mark Entenza - 18%

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast


Majority Maker: CT-04
The fourth district of Connecticut is in play in 2010.  The district was the last New England district to have a Republican representative.  In 2008, Democrat Jim Himes was able to squeak by incumbent Republican Chris Shays in large part due to a surge in newly registered Democrat voters in Bridgeport who turned out to support Barack Obama.  If historical voting patterns return in 2010, then Himes will be in trouble.

Himes is a vulnerable incumbent who has not earned re-election.  The Cook Political Report lists incumbents by risk factors from zero to five. According to Cook, "even Democrats with just three risk factors could find themselves in serious political risk in 2010".  Himes has five risk factors - he supported the unpopular cap and trade bill, he supported Obamacare, his district leans Democrat only slightly, his opponent has over $200 k in cash, and he received under 55% in his last election (in fact, only 51%).

Debicella is a worthy candidate who could benefit from a strong year for Republican challengers.  If 2010 is a normal election year, Himes could be in trouble.  If 2010 is a good year for Republicans, then Dan Debicella could be a new majority maker.  That being said, Himes sits on powerful committees and he is well funded by the companies that he oversees.  Himes has spread around a lot of taxpayer money and will be able to raise a lot of money in return. Anyone interested in an effective way to level the playing field can do so here: https://debicella.blue-swarm.c... .  Dan is a reformer in the mold of Paul Ryan. He is an effective advocate for the values of free enterprise and individual liberty who would well serve Fairfield County in Washington.  


You say hello
And I say goodbye.

[ Parent ]
I hope Debicella is in the mold
of Paul Ryan. Paul Ryan's regressive, far-right views on welfare, state government, and even social issues are extremely far removed from the political reality of a well-educated, diverse district like CT-04 that has been trending more Democratic for several decades now due to the infusion of NYC liberals.

The fact Debicella is running such a right wing campaign, (as opposed to Shays who cultivated a long-term image as one of the most liberal Republicans), makes me confident. That and the fact that Himes seems to be a fundraising machine. That being said, I do agree with one thing this lacky said, and that is that this is majority-maker race for Republicans.

Frankly I'm slightly more worried about Chris Murphy. Caliguri holds his old state Senate seat, so they'll be competing for the came base. He beat an initially hyped state senator by a larger than expected margin last time, and before that crushed Nancy Johnson, so I'm still giving him the edge right now.  


[ Parent ]
Stop
The spinning is making me dizzy.  0_o

26, Male, Democrat, TX-26

[ Parent ]
Wow, Over $200K! Compared to Someone Set to Raise Over $4 Million!
First, disclosure: I managed Himes' campaign in 2008.

But really, you think Himes is in trouble in a district that went for Obama by TWENTY POINTS???

Shays hung on because he was the most craven politician I've ever worked for or against. That district is quite liberal, and he moved wherever he had to move to keep getting elected. But in 2008 his luck ran out, because Jim was a good candidate, Shays' record of being a toady for Bush was too much to hide from, and because Shays was no longer able to sneak by running several points above the base in the African-American and Latino precincts.

But hey, please, convince Republicans to spend money in that district. I'm all for that. Himes will win anyway, but it's that much less money being spent in places where there's a Democrat who's actually vulnerable.  


[ Parent ]
Wow, I didn't know you were
a past campaign manager for the Himes campaign.  

[ Parent ]
Don't sweat too many answers to this guy
He's already been banned.

[ Parent ]
OK, I Know This Is A Troll....
Can't help it.

" If historical voting patterns return in 2010, then Himes will be in trouble."

Like when Kerry, Gore, and Clinton all carried the district too?

It stayed in GOP hands as long as it did time for one reason - Chris Shays. Someone in that mold (A son of Stuart McKinney, Shays' predecessor, talked about running but decided not to) could be a contender in some years. Paul Ryan, OTOH, is a hero to the sort of movement conservatives who are badly outnumbered in this area, and someone looking to emulate him is not going to win.  

36, M, Democrat, MD-03


[ Parent ]
I think he's talking about
how Taft totally dominated that unsavory ruffian William Jennings Bryan.

[ Parent ]
LOL
I lived in this district for 12 years up until last year. You got it completely wrong, buddy. Though this is a competitive district, it's traditionally been a Yankee Republican district, not a blue collar, social conservative district where the Tea Party has flourished. Cap and trade is popular in the district, even among Republicans.

And though the rich and wealthy from Greenwich, New Canaan, and Darien probably don't care for the healthcare bill, they're not bitterly opposed and it's probably very popular in the district's big cities, Bridgeport and Stamford.

Plus Jim Himes is a very savvy candidate who's from Republican-leaning Greenwich, but still appeals a lot to middle class voters from the big cities. And I guarentee that Himes will have boatloads more cash than Debicella. I think he has around a 3-1 CoH advantage right now, plus he has the ability to self fund down the stretch.

Voters in this district are too intelligent to buy the bullshit the GOP dishes up these days. The further the GOP shifts to the right, the more they alienate voters in CT-04.

19, male, Dem, CT-04 (home) PA-02 (college and registered)


[ Parent ]
Abstention
I, as a registered voter in Minnesota, will not be voting in today's primary. I caucused for Mayor Rybak a couple months ago, and when he lost to MAK, I said I would vote for the DFL candidate. I don't feel anywhere nearly strong enough about any of these races to go out and vote for them. One of them has my vote in November, but I am very apathetic towards which one that will be.

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


But what you should not be apathetic toward...
Is the possibility of a moron wingnut like Tom Emmer being your next governor.  

[ Parent ]
Certainly not
I am not indifferent to that at all. I am on several numbers banks, and if they need volunteers to go door to door, I will put on my walking shoes and do it. But I don't care which person I do that for. Hence the fact I am staying in today.

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
tom horner might need your vote though
the GOP voters are supposedly going to vote for nutball hahn so independence candidate horner won't steal all the country clubbers from emmer in november.  you should make sure that doesn't happen.

[ Parent ]
What interests me most at this point
about CO Senate is that it appears, for a second time this year, The NY Times has taken an opposition story and run with it, with little fact-checking and little consideration of the other side of the story, (the first being when they pumped out an article attacking Blumenthal that was practically written by McMahon's people and which was full of inaccuracies and overstated the extent of his oddly vague prepositions).

Other thoughts of mine include that the previous Q-Poll of CT might have been a bit more Republican; as a lot of the numbers seemed to shift. I'll wait for their next poll before I make up my mind.

I'm rooting for Deal to narrowly eck by in tonight's Georgia primary. I think he offers the best shot to Barnes, as Handel isn't corrupt and actually has some appeal among white suburban moderates in the Atlanta metro area; voters Barnes has to dominate in order to have any chance at all of winning in November.

As for MN-GOV, I'm really hoping for a Margaret Anderson Kelliher victory. She's a young, fresh face, and even though she's not the best, or most natural politician among the three, I think she'd make the best Governor, and it looks like she shouldn't have any trouble besting Emmer, whose campaign has been in full implosion ever since he won the primary.

So, to postulate a few numbers:

CO-SEN:
52-48 Bennet
53-47 Ken Buck
I'd say Bennet would have the advantage here.

CO-GOV:
I think its important for Democrats that Maes win tonight, because McInnis, I think, will come to his senses and drop out for some other candidate to replace him. Maes seems to have left reality far behind and would definitely stay in the race, unfunded and left for dead by national Republicans.
55-45 Dan Maes, surprisingly large margin due to excitement on the conservative far-right, and McInnis supporters being too discouraged to turn out.

GA-GOV:
51-49 Deal, this one keeps us up a while tonight.

CT-Gov:
55-45 Lamont
59-41 Foley

CT-05:
No numbers, but I have a feeling that Justin Bernier might get an upset here.

GA-09 & GA-07:

Woodall and Graves win.  


OOPS CT-GOV (R)
forgot about the Oz guy. I suppose he'll pick up a few votes. 54-38-8 Foley-Fedele-Oz

[ Parent ]
Kelliher
Like Dayton and Entenza, she has her share of flaws and faults personally. Honestly as far as policy goes, the three of them are nearly indistinguishable. I would have no reservations voting for her in November. However, Kelliher has been the only candidate that has been 100% absent on my TV and radio, and I fear that she would not go on the attack against Emmer like she needs to. Dayton, Entenza and a 527(c) have been absolutely blasting Emmer for a slew on things, but Kelliher has been quiet, and not even running ads that I have seen.

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
I think she's trying to
save her more limited resources for October. I think Kelliher is just the freshest face, the one who hasn't been a failure in some form of another. Dayton was a miserable Senator, I don't want to risk him being a miserable Governor. Kelliher seems like the candidate who could really govern the best, and get things done with the legislature. Democrats will certainly still control it; they may lose a nice chunk of seats, but after slaughtering Republicans two cycles in a row, they hold massive margins in the State Senate and State House; they have padding in other words.

I think its good, because they'll draw Paulsen's out of the job; give him a much more Democratic district by splitting up Minneapolis some. If the state loses a district they'll combine Kline and Bachman into one, uber-Republican district taking in the outer Twin Cities suburbs.  


[ Parent ]
Correction
"give him a much more Democratic district by splitting up Minneapolis some."

Are you from Minnesota? If you are, you should realize that this simply is not going to happen. It goes against the core of the DFL platform and beliefs. St. Paul anchors a district (4th) and Minneapolis anchors a district (5th). The iron range gets its own district without extending to the North Dakota border (8th). Those 3 things are nonnegotiable to the people that run the redistricting process. Anything that excludes one or more of those preconditions is nothing but a pipe dream.  

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
I seem to recall
the Democratic map from 2002 made MN-03 a lot more Democratic with the intention of picking it up.

And, sorry, but the Iron Range isn't going to get a district that doesn't extent to North Dakota, unless the DFL wants to turn it into a Republican district. They'd have to extend it further into highly Republican, growing exurban areas. To keep it Democratic, and to keep it from being influenced by a chunk of exurban voters as opposed to Iron Rangers, it has the be extended westward, this makes it more Democratic and will help Democrats hold it when Oberstar finally retires.  


[ Parent ]
Iron Range
If you run the 8th to the North Dakota border, you take up Peterson's house. Do you REALLY think that the DFL legislature is going to combine their 2 senior-most congressmen of theirown party? Not gonna happen. It won't be a Republican district at all. You take up the rest of Beltrami county, and Lake of the Woods County, and you have plenty of people for the district. Outstate Democrats have as much if not more say that Minneapolis/St. Paul Democrats at the legislative level. You can fantasize about getting rid of Peterson, or making a giant northern district, or splitting Minneapolis into 2 districts, but come next spring, that isn't going to be the reality. I worked as a staffer for a state representative, and he would tell you the same extact thing.

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
I'm not getting rid of Peterson at all
I gave him another District, just slightly shifted southward. Walz's district becomes slightly more suburban, though I tried to include more Democratic areas of Washington and Dakota counties. Peterson's new district contains much of his old territory, but is a bit more conservative, which is fitting considering how stringently conservative Peterson is for a Democrat.  

[ Parent ]
I mean the map example
I was using doesn't get rid of Peterson at all.  

[ Parent ]
Wow
"I gave him another District, just slightly shifted southward. Walz's district becomes slightly more suburban, though I tried to include more Democratic areas of Washington and Dakota counties. Peterson's new district contains much of his old territory, but is a bit more conservative, which is fitting considering how stringently conservative Peterson is for a Democrat. "

Peterson couldn't get elected if you remove the northern part of his district, no Democrat could. You would be giving the district to the Republicans, which would be stupid. Walz is a small-town high school teacher, he won't be put in a suburban district.

You never answered my question about if you live in Minnesota or not

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
I don't, but I've always followed
it's politics fairly closely. Peterson seems conservative enough to win over the rural territory in the southern and central tier of his district. And really, looking at the map again, Waltz's district remains fairly south-eastern centric, not as much suburban territory was added as I seemed to remember, looking at the Dave's Redistricting APP made I made. Really just a loop reaching out and taking the northern suburbs of Dakota county, the more Democratic areas, to help make his district a little safer. It was far better than extending it a long ways into more Republican rural territory.  

[ Parent ]
1st.
Why would you need to expand the 1st at all? L:eave the 7th where it is, and the 1st where it is. Neither Walz nor Peterson is going to lose their current districts. The population (and culture) require 3 rural districts, and currently they are all safe-DFL. Why are you so set on screwing that up?  

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
Because the southeastern
rural counties are very flippant and conservative, and other than Olmstead most have been losing population so it need a few mild adjustments anyway.  

[ Parent ]
Walz is safe
The current district was won by Obama, and won by Walz twice. Walz is exactly the kind of DFLer that wins districts like that. If it's not broke, don't fix it.

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
BTW
I just drew Oberstar's district like you said, and found it stil needed another 250,000 people. That's without including the Repulican trending, exurban southern counties of his district. It's not a matter of things being broken now, it's anticipating and preparing for them to break sometime in the near future.  

[ Parent ]
You removed which counties?
I got the numbers to mesh pretty easy. My maps from photobucket are linked below

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
Walz probably has quite a few terms left in him
as for afterwards...anyone know if Owl City is a Dem? :P

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
Also, I think the DFL
should be very intent on lopping off the southern tier of the first because that's all Republican trending, exurban territory. In a way I'm thinking in terms of keeping the 1st rural, relatively. It's aging and bleeding population, more than you might have thought. I'm also assuming that MN loses a congressional district, as it appears likely.  

[ Parent ]
1st
I have to assume you are refering to the northern Tier of the 1st, as the southern tier is Iowa's border. Keep the first the southern part of the state, and encroach into the exurbs only as far as you need to go. Walz won't lose an agricultural-based district, but he could easily lose a suburban district if you move to far into Dakota, or heaven forbid Washington Counties. He could be primaried out, and the infighting could hand the district to an ambitious Republican

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
Sorry, wrong district
I meant Oberstar's, my numbers are all jumbled.  

[ Parent ]
Obama won Washington County...


[ Parent ]
Shifting the population
To a moderate suburban population center would cause a primary rift. I would be astonished if a Democrat from a place like Oakdale could carry the rural counties that Walz routinely carries by wide margins. If there is a significant enough population shift to the suburbs, there will almost certainly be a primary challenge.

There are HUGE sociological and economic rifts and all sorts of bad blood between the outstate voters and the city voters. Yes, most of them vote DFL, but they couldn't be further apart on a personal level. That is not the kind of infighting we need in my state.

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
again, talking about Oberstar.


[ Parent ]
Isanti, Mille Lacs, Chisago, and Morrison
Counties are all 50-55% Republican, the Rest of the district is at LEAST 60-60% DFL, and the DFL part has a population twice that of the aforementioned districts. Oberstar is 100% safe, and his heir apparent Tony Sertich will be safe in that district until he is Obersatr's age. It's a cultural thing.

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
Nonnegotiable though?
you pretty much crossed out any changes to 50% of the current map, which pretty much places the other 50% in stasis too, and I highly doubt that will be the case because the current map was drawn by a panel of judges attempting to make an unbiased, fair map. I doubt Democrats will do the same thing, not if they're smart.  

[ Parent ]
Here is where the DFL will start with their redistricting
The 1st. (Walz), 7th (Peterson) and 8th (Oberstar) will be tweaked slightly to accommodate changes in populations, but will be left the same. 3 outstate districts, 3 Democrats. Minneapolis will get a circle around it, and St. Paul will get a circle around it, those will be the 4th and 5th. Then you draw a 3rd district within hennepin county but not containing Minneapolis (if done right, this should be a D+5 or better district). You fill out the 4th and 5th districts to fit in populations. Then you take what is left and make a swing district, and a hard-core conservative district.

Minnesota is very non-gerrymander friendly. There are laws that require that districts be compact. You can scream that it would be better if they did it another way, but that's how it's going to work. The 5 districts in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area will change quite a bit, but the 1st 7th and 8th will not change hardly at all.

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
Minneapolis -St. Paul
won't change at all if they each retain one district based on them.  

[ Parent ]
Population
You need to add people to Minneapolis, and quite a few people to St. Paul to get to 1/8 (or certainly 1/7) of the population of Minnesota. Suburbs need to be put in there as well.

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
I can't
imagine them making Paulsen's district even more Republican and moving it further out into the suburbs just to keep two perfect districts on each of the major cities.  

[ Parent ]
Why in the world would they move it outward?
The 5th has all of the liberal inner-ring suburbs in Hennepin County. Remove the outer cities from the 3rd like Minnetonka, Eden Prairie, Maple Grove, Dayton, Rogers, Minnetrista etc, and replace them with the solid-DFL suburbs of St. Louis Park, Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Crystal and New Hope.

Paulsen's district becomes much more liberal, without splitting Minneapolis

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
and what?
give the minneapolis based district the outer suburbs?

I redrawing a map right now to see I can visualizing the situation you are putting forth.  


[ Parent ]
I already have maps of various scenarios posted
In another diary. I will send you a link so you can see what I am talking about. I have 7 and 8 district maps already made up, with and without Clark taking out Bachmann this November.

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
Photobucket
http://s877.photobucket.com/al...

I am happy with all of these maps, with the exception of the 7 district map if Clark prevails (The least likely of the 4 scenarios) It is just too damn cumbersome, and at best a D+1 district

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
I just can't seem to do it without adding
areas of Dakota county that are even more Republican.

[ Parent ]
Where do Plymouth and
Bloomington fit into this?

[ Parent ]
Plymouth and Bloomington
would stay in the 3rd. Bloomington is strong-DFL, and Plymouth is moderate-DFL.

Did you look at my photobucket link even? That would answer these questions pretty easily.

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
Just wondering, looked at it now
Your 2nd map's 1st district looks just like mine, with the small loop coming around the northern portion of Dakota County.

[ Parent ]
7 district map
When you eliminate a district (about a 50% chance) then you have to seriously expand districts in population. I am not 100% happy with the two 7-district maps. But when you have to add a couple hundred thousand people, you do what you have to do. The outstate portions of those maps aren't visible, but on that second map, the 7th stretches from Canada to Iowa, so it takes up a lot of the rural counties I was alluding to before. I really hope we don't lose that 8th district, but you have to prepare for every situation. A primary battle in that district would probably cost the DFL the seat.

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
interesting that Dayton & Entenza
are running anti-Emmer ads already when they haven't even won their primary election. Wouldn't it make more sense to focus on that, then turn aim at Emmer (especially since you mention there's a 3rd party presently running anti-Emmer ads softening him up).

Also, it's really disturbing Kelliher hasn't been airing advertising at all... Someone tell her about SC's Vic Rawl.


[ Parent ]
actually margaret has been advertising decently
i think she will be more limited than the two millionaires, but she is advertising.

mn laws are very strict about raising money and it does worry me without a senate race to carry us.


[ Parent ]
Doubt we'll stay up late for GA-Gov
GA polls close early, 7 Eastern, and it reports pretty quickly. I think it'll be over fairly soon but it will do a good job tiding us over until CT (8:00), CO (10:00?), and MN (9:00) report.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
aren't the rural areas pretty slow?


[ Parent ]
I think the rural
areas tend to come in first. It's the Atlanta area that lags behind a bit if I recall correctly. Even so unless it's super-close I don't think it will keep anybody up. (well, maybe me since I'm jetlagged and will probably nod off around like 8 or 9, lol.)

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
No
There are a few very small rural counties that tend to report slow, but overall it's usually the larger counties that take awhile.

I'm hearing turnout is low outside of the Metro area, which, if true, fares well for Handel. Obviously I'm pulling for Barnes in November, but if I had to choose Handel or Deal, I'd choose Deal in a heartbeat.

There's also a Primary on the Democratic side for Secretary of State that's been ignored by most. State Senator and 2006 SoS nominee Gail Buckner is facing off against Former State Representative Georganna Sinkfield. The winner takes on Brian Kemp, the current appointed SoS who has never seen an elected office that he does not like.


[ Parent ]
That's the scary thing
he formerly moderate Fulton County politician has gone even further right than Deal. Her whole campaign is based around eliminating the state income tax, and replacing it with I don't know what. Handel is just unacceptable as a Governor. So Deal would be a slightly less terrible Governor should he win, and he's the easier candidate for Barnes to face up against.

So, do Democrats have good shots at picking up the SoS Seat and holding the spots of Attorney General and Agricultural Commissioner, as well as Labor Commissioner that are all up this year?


[ Parent ]
Well
Handel would make Sonny seem like Zell Miller or Richard Russell. I'm all for moderates, and I do lean conservative on many issues, but I do not trust a word Handel says.

Yeah, Deal will be an easier candidate for Barnes. Unlike the GOP candidates, Barnes has traveled throughout Middle and South Georgia constantly. He's crafting a coalition that resembles the majority party we used to have in the state.

As far as the statewide races you mentioned, our best shot is the seat for Attorney General. Labor and Agriculture are going to be very tough but we could keep them. SoS is going to stay Republican.


[ Parent ]
Speaking of strange things
Zell Miller was in the progressive wing of the Georgia Democratic party when he was elected Governor in 1990, and he was a fairly good Democrat throughout the 1990s. He just slowly got more unhinged over the years.

I just can't believe Handel was elected to a countwide position in Fulton in 2004. I simply can't believe it. She disguised her views well then, running as a social liberal and moderate politician.  


[ Parent ]
Well
Zell is unique, because he was fairly conservative before becoming Governor as well. I would not classify his administration as being liberal. As far as his actions post-office, he simply felt the party left him, and he's certainly not alone in that view. If you ask him, he's still a Georgia Democrat.

Handel is an opportunist, that's all. She came off as a moderate in 2004 and 2006. She could have stayed in Maryland and been a successful moderate-liberal leaning Republican. Instead, she comes to Georgia trying to be something she's not.


[ Parent ]
From what I've read
Obvious changes in Miller, more so than the Democratic party.

Let's start with Miller himself. Here is Miller in 1992, at the Democratic Convention:

I know what Dan Quayle means when he says it's best for children to have two parents. You bet it is! And it would be nice for them to have trust funds, too. We can't all be born rich and handsome and lucky. And that's why we have a Democratic Party. My family would still be isolated and destitute if we had not had F.D.R.'s Democratic brand of government. I made it because Franklin Delano Roosevelt energized this nation. I made it because Harry Truman fought for working families like mine. I made it because John Kennedy's rising tide lifted even our tiny boat. I made it because Lyndon Johnson showed America that people who were born poor didn't have to die poor. And I made it because a man with whom I served in the Georgia Senate, a man named Jimmy Carter, brought honesty and decency and integrity to public service.

Here he is in 2004:

Fiscal responsibility is unbelievable in the face of massive new spending promises. A foreign policy based on the strength of 'allies' like France is unacceptable ...A strong national defense policy is just not believable coming from a candidate who built a career as an anti-war veteran, an anti-military candidate  and an anti-action senator. ...When will national Democrats sober up and admit that that dog won't hunt? Secular socialism, heavy taxes, big spending, weak defense, limitless lawsuits and heavy regulation - that pack of beagles hasn't caught a rabbit in the South or Midwest in years.

And in 2005 he went and gave a rabid speech attacking the Judicial system and making radical comments about gays and abortion at Justice Sunday, with the likes of James Dobson, this from the man who once voted for the Matthew Shepard hate crimes bill, and was once pro-choice. He appears to have been a centrist Democrat as Governor, along the lines of Barnes. It seems hard to tell what made him go so far off the reservation later on. Miller went completely berserk on Chris Matthews too, when Matthews criticized some of his more ridiculous assertions.  


[ Parent ]
Hrmm
Miller's reasoning is that the party has changed. Again, check out A National Party No More.

Also, those two quotes have nothing to do with each other.

He praised FDR, Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, and Carter.

He bashed Kerry.

I surely hope you're not attempting to put Kerry in the same category as someone like FDR.


[ Parent ]
You can't see the difference
Between those statements? The policies aren't much different whoever he was talking about which negates the whole argument that the party left him.

[ Parent ]
Exactly
In the first statement he is a loyal Democrat sticking up for the party, and in the second one he is bashing the central principles of the party's platform, many of which he stood for in the previous statement, and he's doing it using a Republican laundry list of political fears and delusions and talking points that have little in common with his previous, populist speech about fairness, and welfare, where he ironically praises a few of the most liberal, socialist leaning Presidents we ever had, FDR and LBJ. More ironically he attacks Kerry from a National Security angle, yet waxed on Jimmy Carter before; and he is the most hated Democratic President from a security standpoint.

[ Parent ]
No, but Miller went
from praising Welfare to attacking secular socialism. Like I said, I think Miller's full of shit; he simply became more and more conservative after the early 1990s. In particular he went from being a reasoned moderate on social issues to a rabid, Christian Conservative giving a raucous speech at Justice Sunday.

What I meant was previously he praised Welfare, praised Democratic leaders, attacked Republicans, then 12 years later he was slashing Democrats. I know he's a hard-rightist neocon on National Security, but that changed his whole outlook on a host of other views.

Plus, his speech at the Republican national convention was both inaccurate, and idiotic. As someone studying International Studies and Politics, I read it recently with shock. It was just another example of how idiotic American politicians can be. I mean the guys knowledge and understanding of the world is moot. He sounds like a 4th Grader, and he apparently can see nothing in the world other than Good versus Evil, and because he's labeled his enemies as evil he conveniently cannot see them as having their own reasoning as well and what the common ground might be. Simply shameful that whole speech. And later he showed himself to be completely unhinged to Chris Matthews, saying he wished he could challenge him to a duel for a perfectly innocuous statement.  


[ Parent ]
Ok
Then how can you explain his record prior to being Governor?

[ Parent ]
You back when he was endorsing
segregation and whatnot? Well he modernized his views that time, the second shift he missed the bus on. He spent a large portion of his career as LG, which doesn't entail too many sticky political positions or responsibilities, so it's hard to tell what happen between 1974-1990, other than challenging Herman Talmadge for being ethically corrupt.  

[ Parent ]
1980
I still remember the 1980 Democratic primary for GA-Sen, when Zell was the "liberal" candidate against Herman Talmadge.

[ Parent ]
What's more is I've heard nothing
from him supporting Barnes, and in 2008 he backed Chambliss. I haven't heard of him supporting any "Georgia Democrats' in quite some time.  

[ Parent ]
Um
I'd recommend reading one of his books, A National Party No More.

He backed Perdue over Taylor in 2006 as well, so I'm not sure what you're trying to prove there. He backed Bill Stephens for SOS in 2006 as well. Ralph Reed for Lt. Governor too.

He's still a Democrat. He supports quite a few Republicans these days, but, he's said time and time again he'll die a Democrat.


[ Parent ]
I'm no purist
and I'm not saying you can't be a Democrat and a conservative at the same time. Maybe even not endorsing Democrats and just staying neutral would be ok. And I'm sure most of us even on this liberal site have supported some non-Democrat at some point or another. But if you go around handing endorsements to Republicans like candy on Halloween, calling yourself a Democrat starts to lose its meaning (esp in a state like Georgia where you can't even register as a Democrat because there's no party registration).

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
Good Point
Hey, that's a good argument and I can understand why someone would feel that way.

Zell served our state honorably for many years as a Democrat, and while he supports some Republicans, he's said he'll always be a Democrat. That's fine with me.

I think it says a lot about our party in the state. Mark Taylor, Cathy Cox, Zell Miller, etc. Some of our state's political giants are not active in the party anymore.


[ Parent ]
I think Miller was a good Governor
and a decent Senator at first. I never said anything to the contrary. However that doesn't excuse his views or behavior now, nor do they mean he's a real Democrat now.  

[ Parent ]
RuralDem
Do you mind if I ask you a personal question? If you do not want to answer then you do not have to, I am honestly just curious. Don't worry I am not going to bombard you with nasty comments or call you a DINO or shit like that. But I was just wondering how many Republicans you have personally voted for? I am just curious, I do not question you are a Democrat but I am just wondering if you are like my dad or not. He is a social conservative with a capitol S and C and opposes gun control and denies global warming but he almost always votes Democrat, even in Presidential elections and I am wondering were conservative dems like you are tilting, if you don't feel comfortable answering you don't have to. Thanks.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Haha
I don't mind at all.

I'm trying to think, and honestly, I cannot recall voting for a Republican in any race yet. I've either voted Democratic, or in certain cases, skipped the race.

There have been quite a few close calls though.

It is important to realize though that my area is heavily conservative and ancestrally Democratic.

I cannot speak for other Conservative Democrats because we're all different. Some of us are socially conservative, yet more moderate/populist fiscally, others are the opposite. My area tends to fall into the socially conservative / fiscally populist mold, though like most of Georgia, we're not union friendly.


[ Parent ]
No thanks
I've seen blurbs and no he's full of shit. His mind is gone and he can't understand changes in the American Political system. His own views have changed, (though he can't see this, but its easy for me, to go from praising welfare to attacking Democratic socialism in 2008), and he sees that the views of other white Southerners have changed and he thinks that makes the Democratic party irrelevant. Its reactionary rural and suburban white voters in the south like him that are out of whack and irrelevant, especially compared to the rest of the nation.

What he dies at means nothing; he's for all effective purposes not a Democrat anymore. If you don't back any Democratic ideas, other than mythical, golden age ideals that were supposedly so different from today, and you don't back Democratic candidates or causes, then you aren't a Democrat, when you campaign for dozens of Republicans on a variety of levels, many of whom over Conservative, state Democrats, you aren't a Democrat.

What part of Georgia are you from, might I ask?


[ Parent ]
Go Dayton!
He's the Dem's strongest candidate, and I think he'd make a great governor.

...that's all.

23, Male, PA-05 (summer) PA-12 (winter)


I'm highly skeptical
about part two of your claim. As far back as I can tell, he's always been a lousy politician and an unambitious backbencher when it came to his other jobs as Auditor and Senator.  

[ Parent ]
I think he's always hated the political grind of it all
But I also think he's always had the best interests of Minnesota in mind, and he doesn't appear to be a man who's easily influenced or bought out. He's just not much of a politician.  

23, Male, PA-05 (summer) PA-12 (winter)

[ Parent ]
That's why I want someone else
Someone who can stand the political grind and get things done. I think its important for the MN-DFL to have a strong, competent, and popular Governor in order to counteract the slow Republican trend of the state.  

[ Parent ]
Kelliher would be great
She's not my first choice, but at least the voters of Minnesota get to decide and have a choice. Either way, I think the Dems are in good shape here.

23, Male, PA-05 (summer) PA-12 (winter)

[ Parent ]
David, you sure about CT-05 being easier for us than CT-04?
Though Chris Murphy is slowly getting entrenched, it is the most Republican district in the state and just barely voted for Kerry. Can someone please explain why the CT districts have such weird shapes btw? Was there incumbent protection gerrymandering?

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


I think so
Connecticut has had a Republican governor and Democratic legislature for a long time. The weird shape of the 5th came from efforts to give Nancy Johnson the most Republican district possible without undermining Chris Shays. Larson and DeLauro benefitted from this by getting super-safe districts of their own.

20, CD MA-03/NH-01/MA-08

[ Parent ]
that makes sense
also explains the 4th's weird-looking thumb into Shelton.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
Predictions:
Colorado Senate

Bennet 52.6%
Romanoff 47.4%

Buck 50.6%
Norton 49.4%

Colorado Governor

Maes 50.7%
McInnis 49.3%

Georgia Runoff

Deal 51%
Handel 49%

Those are the only ones I'm comfortable with predictions.

Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01, Chairman of the Atheist Caucus, and Majority Leader of the "Going to Hell" caucus!


Primarys
CO-Senate-Bennent will preveil.I have more faith In PPP as
a pollster than Survey USA.

CT-GOV-Lamont will preveil In my oporion.I hope he wins.

MN-Gov-I think Dayton will preveil.

As a Democrat these are the primarys to watch tonight.
And CT and MN could elect Democratic Governors doe the first time In Years In November.


MN-Gov (I)
Watch for possible mischief by Republicans in the Independence Party primary. Republicans fear Tom Horner, a former Republican who would likely take votes away from Emmer, so without a major race on the Republican side and an open primary there is some buzz that they will try to swing what is likely to a very low turnout election to one of Horner's opponents.

"Where free Unions and collective bargaining is forbidden, freedom is lost." - Ronald Reagan

Hadn't thought of that
That seems really hard to see happening though. Is Horner even facing a primary opponent? That would require large-scale interference, and I would be astonished if that happened.

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
5 opponents...
... which would split the anti-Horner vote. Rob Hahn has been the most visible and would likely be the beneficiary of any Republican mischief. In 2008 only about 11,000 people voted in the IP primary so it would not take a huge number of Republicans to sway the election. Unlikely I know but something to watch.

"Where free Unions and collective bargaining is forbidden, freedom is lost." - Ronald Reagan

[ Parent ]
Independence Party
I thought they usually took votes away from our DFL candidates and helped MN Repubs get elected.
When did they suddenly become conservative and endorse that  GOP guy Horner for their Gov. candidate? Nice.

[ Parent ]
Centrist
The Independence Party is truly a centrist party. Conservative Democrats in Minnesota are more likely to be swayed by it. It isn't that the IP is center-left, it's that the centrists on the DFL side are more likely to vote for the moderate than the centrists on the right.

26 White Male. Born and raised in MN-8, currently living in MN-5.

"A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything."


[ Parent ]
Except in 2006
where Tim Hutchinson actively won lots of idealistic young voters thinking they were making a difference in the political system by voting 3rd party. That also happens a lot, as well as liberal, overly activist and idealistic independents who often send their votes that way to protest a less than perfect Democrat.  

[ Parent ]
i really appreciate the informed views of OG, jaalk and MN Mike
but the ind party has no platform or ideas.  it has hurt the DFL more because it had selfish former democrats tim penny and peter hutchinson running.  now if has a selfish republican tom horner so it might finally hurt the GOP.

and it would take very small interference to swing it to some clown if the GOP got themselves organized.


[ Parent ]
Peter Hutchinson,
Sorry, I'd gotten the name wrong.  

[ Parent ]
Im glad somebody said this
Because I didnt quite want to.  I think it totally depends on the candidate, some are kind of centrist, some are Republicans in disguise and some are DFLers in disguise.  Barkley and Ventura seem more the centrist route, with the above mentioned fitting the bill.  A gubernatorial and senate debate were held at my alma mater when I was there for 2006 MN-Gov, Hutchinson didnt see a single thing different from Hatch save for explaining how he'd pay for things.

Horner is the GOP version of the Indy candidate so we finally get to see the GOP get fucked over.


[ Parent ]
weak predictions
I don't want to put any numbers to my predictions.  But I want to say that Bennett, Buck, and Maes all have single digit wins.  McMahon wins by 15 points while Lamont has a single digit win.  Deal wins by single digits.

Is it too early for wrestling metaphors?
Because I was just going to say I'm prepared for Linda McMahon laying the smack down on Rob Simmons tonight :-P

Here I go
Not worth much, but confirming my fears:

Handel beats Deal by ~3% (Palin's endorsement carries a lot of weight)
Norton beats Buck by ~1% (ditto Handel, year of Mama grizzlies continues unabated)
Romanoff beats Bennet by about ~4%, way too many liberals/progressives dominating the electorate and Romanoff is more familier to them than Bennet, thus diminishing likelihood of D retention.

Indepedent/Lean D. Dude.
All 5s (now TX-5; frmly VA-5 and CA-5)  


Mama Grizzlies don't always win
for instance Angela "McGowen" and also, awkwardly enough, Todd Tiahrt. I would hope Gingrich's endorsement would mean more since he is actually from Georgia.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
"McGowen"
Was a special case for 2 reasons: Palin endorsed her on primary day, and mispelled her name. Palin's mama grizzlies do better than her papa grizzlies. I don't know if any habe lost yet (other than McGlowen)  

[ Parent ]
Oh yeah
CeCe Heil lost the TN-05 primary last week.  

[ Parent ]
off the top of my head
Cecile Bledsoe in AR-03 (I think Palin spelled her name "Cecil" as if she were a guy), probably others.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
CT-02
I think it will be Novak. Are we gonna have a predictions thread later, or is this the predictions thread?  

Predictions
Screw it, everyone else here is predicting, so I'll go ahead and do it too-

CO-Sen
Bennett: 52
Romannoff: 48

Buck: 49
Norton: 48
other: 3
(recount)

CO-Gov
Maes 54
McInnis 46

CO-03
McConnell: 47
Tipton: 45
Others: 8

CO-07
Frazier: 57
Sias: 43

CT-Gov
Malloy: 51
Lamont: 49

Foley: 45
Fedele: 42
Griebel: 13

CT-Sen
McMahon: 53
Simmons: 40
Schiff: 7

CT-02
Novak wins

GA-Gov
Handel: 50
Deal: 50

GA-09
Graves: 64
Hawkins: 36

GA-12
McKinney: 60
Smith: 40

MN-Gov
Dayton: 39
MAK: 33
Etenza: 28



Candidates I am rooting for.
CO Senate D
Bennet, he stands a better chance in November and I like him.

CO Senate R
Buck, I do not care who the dem nominee is I do not think Buck can win in November.

CO-Gov R
Maes, he has little chance in November and I think McCinnis would drop out and I do not think Maes will.

CT-Gov (D)
Lamont, I like Lamont but I really could care less. I am mildly rooting for him but I will not be upset if he loses.

CT-Gov (R)
Michael Fedele, meh neither of them are perfect but I think Fedele will not be able to get his finances together. I think either would lose to Lamont so I am not that concerned

CT-Sen (R)
Rob Simmons, this is the only Republican I actually want to win not just because it helps us. I saw his hardball interview and I was impressed with him. He sounded smart and I think he would be a good Senator. If I lived in CT I would be tempted to vote for him in the general. McMahon sickens me and does not belong in the US Senate.

GA-Gov (R)
Deal, he is corrupt and I think he is the easiest to beat.

MN-Gov (D)
Dayton, I think he is the strongest GE candidate and I love the thought of him making a comeback.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  


Predictions
CO-Sen (D)

Bennet 52%
Romanoff 48%

CO-Sen (R)

Buck 51%
Norton 49%

CO-Gov (R)

McInnis 53%
Maes 47%

McInnis then resigns as nominee, and is replaced by Norton.

MN-Gov (D)

Dayton 40%
Kelliher 31%
Entenza 29%

GA-Gov (R)

Deal 51%
Handel 49%

CT-Gov (D)

Lamont 54%
Malloy 46%

CT-Gov (R)

Foley 51%
Fedele 49%

CT-Sen (R)

McMahon 62%
Simmons 38%


Guessing
Colorado

Maes - 51
McInnis - 49

Bennet - 52
Romanoff - 48

Buck - 54
Norton - 46

CO-03: Tipton.
CO-07: Frazier.

Connecticut

Lamont - 52
Malloy - 48

Foley - 48
Fedele - 35
Griebel - 17

McMahon - 54
Simmons - 27
Schiff - 19

CT-02: Peckinpaugh.
CT-04: Debicella.
CT-05: Caligiuri.

Georgia

Deal - 51
Handel - 49

GA-07: Woodall.
GA-09: Graves.
GA-12: McKinney.

Minnesota

Dayton - 44
Kelliher - 36
Entenza - 20


I'm definitely hoping for a Peckinpaugh win
While I'm sure she'd get creamed in the general (and I'd be rooting for Courtney of course), candidates with cool names aren't doing so hot this election cycle. She must avenge Tim Gobble and Chester Falling.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
CT-Comptroller
Michael Jarjura, the mayor of Waterbury, the capital of the armpit of Connecticut (Naugatuck Valley, apologies to those who may live there), is running for comptroller, and hopefully he goes down hard.

This guy's a real piece of work: endorsed Lieberman, hired ex-Gov and felon John Rowland after he got out of prison to work for the city, rallied with the Teabaggers this summer, and is as conservative as a Democrat can be outside of Alabama.

Because the Dems always win the downballot races, I hope he's crushed. His opponent is Kevin Lembo, a quasi-Some Dude who has actually managed to run radio and tv ads statewide for this run at a position that I'm sure most Connecticuters have no idea actually accomplishes, or even exists. So good luck to him.  

25, Male, CT-01 (home), Perth-Wellington riding (sometimes)



Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox