Google Ads


Site Stats

North Carolina, South Carolina, & Utah Primary/Run-Off Preview

by: James L.

Tue Jun 22, 2010 at 11:02 AM EDT


Here's what's on-tap for tonight:

  • NC-Sen (D): They take a long time to get around to their runoffs in North Carolina, but we're finally here. The marquee contest pits Secretary of State Elaine Marshall against former state Sen. Cal Cunningham. Marshall led 36-27 in the first round, with 17% going to third-place finisher Ken Lewis, who endorsed Marshall a few weeks after the primary. As evidenced by Lewis's backing, Marshall seems to have rallied the black political community to her side, while Cunningham still retains the support of the DC establishment (DSCC chair Bob Menendez's PAC recently gave him $5,000). The only public poll of this race was from PPP, which showed things tied at 36. However, that survey was taken just after the primary, at the beginning of May, and it's hard to say how things may have changed since then. But if Marshall can consolidate Lewis's vote (see Jeff's maps here), she ought to be in good position to win.

  • NC-08 (R): It's hard out there for a nutter - really, it is. There's so much competition these days - from Rand Paul, from Sharron Angle, even from Vaughn Ward. But Tim D'Annunzio's tried his best. In fact, he's tried everything, from claiming he knows where the Ark of the Covenant lies buried (Arizona) to suing his opponent, former TV sportscaster Harold Johnson (for defamation). The entire Republican establishment from chimpan-a to chimpan-z has rushed to get behind Johnson, but he's only raised about $363K. Meanwhile D'Annunzio has been flushing money like a smack addict (which he once was), to the tune $1.3 million. In a recent survey, PPP nonetheless had Johnson leading 49-39, but we can - nay, we must - still root for Timmy D!

  • SC-Gov (R): Despite some misgivings from elements of the SC GOP establishment (including the Chamber of Commerce), it appears that state Rep. Nikki Haley is the smart money bet to win the Republican gubernatorial run-off against Congressman Gresham Barrett. Haley came oh-so-close to an outright victory in the first round of voting, scoring 49% to Barrett's 22%. Third-place finisher Henry McMaster, the state's attorney general, threw his support to Haley while Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer backed Barrett. It's been mostly smooth sailing for Haley in the runoff, though, and an internal poll released by her campaign a week and a half ago gave her a commanding lead over Barrett. (J)

  • SC-01 (R): The run-off for the nod to replace GOP Rep. Henry "Smokey" Brown in the House of Representatives is coming down to African-American state Rep. Tim Scott and attorney Paul Thurmond, the son of Strom. Scott has a lot going for him, including the support of the NRCC and other Washington power-players who are exited by the prospect of finally electing another black Republican to the House. Scott also has the muscle of the Club for Growth behind him, so it would probably be a serious upset if Thurmond, who won only 16% of the vote to Scott's 31% in the first round, prevailed. (J)

  • SC-03 (R): Businessman Richard Cash, who finished with a surprisingly strong 25% in the first round, and Laurens County State Rep. Jeff Duncan (who received 23%) are squaring off to replace outgoing would-be governor Gresham Barrett. The pair have split the endorsements of some also-rans, Duncan earning the support of 5th place finisher Neal Collins and Cash that of 6th place's Mike Vasovski. Third and fourth place finishers Rex Rice (who was widely expected to make the runoff) and Joe Grimaud haven't endorsed either. Duncan is the institutional candidate, but both are somewhat teabaggish. Regrettably, regardless of who wins, he will likely be the next Congressman from this R+17 district. (JMD)

  • SC-04 (R): Bob Inglis version 2.0, and his rare voice of rationality in the House GOP caucus, seem to be going the way of Windows 3.1. His 28% tally in the first round against Spartanburg County Solicitor Trey Gowdy (who received 39%) and assorted teabaggery is the weakest of any House incumbent so far. Though none have made endorsements, Inglis' other opponents in the first round, seem to be more in line ideologically with Gowdy. Given this, and despite a late endorsement from Stephen Colbert, we can likely chalk this one up to America Glenn Beck 1, Sanity 0. (JMD)

  • UT-Sen (R): With three-term incumbent Bob Bennett having been unceremoniously retired at the GOP convention, Utah Republicans are deciding between the two insurgents who beat Bennett, former Utah County GOP chair Tim Bridgewater and Mike Lee, the former counsel to ex-Gov. Jon Huntsman. Bridgewater may have the mantle of "establishment" thrust upon him, thanks to the endorsement of Bennett, and correspondingly, while Lee is running with the conglomerated FreedomWorks/Club for Growth/Jim DeMint/RedState axis backing him -- but, as Ed Kilgore points out, that doesn't really make Bridgewater appreciably any less ultra-conservative than Lee. Bridgewater leads the most recent public poll of the race, 42-33, but Lee is out with his own internal giving him the lead. (C)

  • UT-02 (D): Rep. Jim Matheson shouldn't have trouble winning tonight's Democratic primary against activist and teacher Claudia Wright; it's more a question of by what margin? It was something of a surprise when Matheson got forced into a primary at the Democratic state convention, but (like the flipside of the GOP convention) that's dominated by the activist base, some of whom seem eager to punish Matheson over his 'no' vote on health care reform. A number of other anti-HCR Blue Doggish Dems (Heath Shuler, Tim Holden, Larry Kissell) in red districts have been held in the 65% region by no-namers in their primaries; the one poll of this primary, giving Matheson a 52-33 lead, suggests a similar outcome here. (C)

Bonus race:

  • CA SD-15: There's one other race to watch tonight: the special election to fill the 15th Senate district in California, left vacant by Republican Abel Maldonado's ascension to Lt. Governor. If there's one good place left in California for a Democratic legislative pickup, this is it. It's a D+5 district on California's Central Coast, where Democratic former Assemblyman John Laird faces off against GOP Assemblyman Sam Blakeslee. Don't forget, though, under California's unusual special election system, this probably isn't the decisive night. There are also an independent and Libertarian on the ballot, and if nobody clears the 50% hurdle, there's a runoff on August 17. (C)
James L. :: North Carolina, South Carolina, & Utah Primary/Run-Off Preview
Tags: , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

So happy...
I know I'm a total nerd for being excited about these races, but I'm happy that I don't have class tomorrow in the afternoon, meaning I can be up for these races (since the first polls close 7:00 AM China time).

Good night, and may I wake up to an Inglis upset victory (hey, a man can dream).

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


NC-Sen runoff
The turnout as always will be the key.  I'm afraid we are looking at about 1/3 of the turnout from the primary.  I haven't felt much enthusiasm over who wins the Democratic nomination.  Hopefully we will have some enthusiasm come November.

As a side note, my wife and I cancelled each other out at the polls.  I voted for Cal, my wife voted for Elaine.  I really could have gone either way in this race, but my wife was dead set against Cal.  I didn't like her reasoning for it seemed to be flawed.  Her reasoning was that "Cal sounds and appears to be a John Edwards clone, and since John Edwards is a loser, Cal is probably a loser too".  I looked at both men, and physically they don't look much alike at all.  But both have(had) a youthful appearance, so I wonder if psychologically if Cal is at a disavantage with the voters.  I don't know.

I also can count on one hand the number of times my wife (of soon to be 15 years) and I have cancelled each other out.  The last time was in the 2000 US Presidential primary:  she voted for Gore, I voted for Bradley.  Besides thinking that Bradley would have been a great President, he had one of the best jump shots of all time.  I say this only in jest...  

40, male, Democrat, NC-04


just to clarify
My wife and I have been married for almost 15 years.  I don't want anyone to believe that my wife is almost 15 years old.  I'm not Jerry Lee Lewis!

40, male, Democrat, NC-04

[ Parent ]
Sleepy primary over there in the NC
I think Elaine's got the edge because her pace matches the tone of this race: not hurried, measured, polite--basically all the things that set apart NC as the paragon of gentility that it is.

Yes, I just got all poetical and stuff.

I just think that Elaine will win because voters are looking to her experience and Cal has a bit of the "upstart" about him.

My prediction, which is way off from the final: Elaine 53, Cunningham 47.


[ Parent ]
Agree on 53-47 Marshall


[ Parent ]
I expect anything tonight
If it wasn't for the fact that not many people will be voting in this runoff, I would say that Marshall would win 55-45.  

Being that it is a runoff, I could see this race anywhere between a narrow Cunningham victory to Marshall obtaining 60% of the vote.

I would be happy with either Marshall or Cunningham winning tonight.  Both would be a huge improvement over Burr.

40, male, Democrat, NC-04


[ Parent ]
Is no-one concerned about
Marshall's 8 seconds of dead air when asked about raising taxes? (I never watched the clip, so I'm basing the question on the description I read on these pages, but if that description was accurate, expect Burr to use it devastatingly in campaign commercials if she is victorious tonight.)

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Pause...Pause...Pause
Yes, that was very awkward.  I had already made up my mind that I would vote for Cunningham, but if at the time should I have been on the fence, I might have been pushed towards Cunningham.  Her overall answer wasn't well articulated either.

My wife had a different take on "The Pause".  She thought that Marshall gave as good of an answer as a person could have given under the circumstances.  She felt that Marshall shouldn't make a blanket statement at this juncture of time.  I disagree, but hey, I'm married to her!

40, male, Democrat, NC-04


[ Parent ]
Your wife is right about the answer, but that doesn't justify the pause......
The pause was awful.  Whatever she said, she needed to be quicker on her feet.

Part of campaigning for high office is you have to be nimble on your feet.  You just do.  Or else it gets used against you.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
my wife is biased
Elaine could have probably paused for a minute, and my wife would have been okay with it.  She loves Elaine.  Unconditionally.   Hell, I love Elaine too...I voted for her in the 2002 Sen primary, and if she wins the runoff I'll vote for her in November.  But the pause made me wonder if she's not going to be taken to the cleaners by the Republicans.

The saving grace for Elaine is that Richard Burr is not quick on his feet either.  Richard Burr visited my office 3 weeks ago to answer our questions regarding his campaign plank.  Richard also gave some long, noticable pauses.  Burr's saving grace was that no one was videotaping his answers.    

40, male, Democrat, NC-04


[ Parent ]
She was saved by Etheridge
I heard hardly anything about the pause and the media didn't pick up on it b/c of Etheridge.  

[ Parent ]
That's interesting
But still, you know that Burr will use it in TV commercials.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
I'm concerned. It reminded me of Patricia Madrid, who lost for that EXACT thing......
Madrid froze solid in response to a tax question in a debate against Heather Wilson in 2006, about 10 days before the election.  Before that, everyone thought Madrid would win.  She ended up losing by a hair, and you can bet her infamous moment in that debate was the reason.

That debate clip of Marshall's silence is the stuff of Republican TV ads.  She's going to have to have talking points on taxes well-rehearsed the rest of the way, assuming she wins tonight.  The only advantage she has over Madrid is that at least this happened:  (1) in a Democratic primary before an electorate OK with taxes; and (2) waaaaaay before November, plenty of time to recover and make it a non-issue.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
Patricia Madrid Is Way Different From This
Patricia Madrid was a total meltdown.

Marshall one could tell was actually struggling with the absurdity of the format and the question!

Madrid totally turned off.

Marshall moved her head slightly to compose herself and give the best answer. Totally different from Madrid in my opinion.

Also, the format of the debates was different. The Marshall/Cunningham deal was more informal, almost conversational while Madrid dropped the ball in a formal atmosphere. The dumbbells at the NC TV station changed an informal piece into a rapid-fire thing and it blew up in everyone's face! Marshall did the best she could with a poor change-up. Madrid's meltdown is devastating to watch--but I'm gonna get on my iPhone and take another look just for old times' sake.

Will the Republicans use this against Marshall? Probably. Will it stick? Depends on how much they don't like, know or trust Burr? I don't think it hurts Marshall.


[ Parent ]
My family is 4-0
For Elaine! There are sporadic reports of turnout on BlueNC. I was #30 at 7:45 but I also have a GOP runoff for NC-13 and I have a heavily populated box. Some places have next to nobody though.

28, male, NC-13 formerly NC-01, 04, 05, 07, 11

[ Parent ]
Your family voted for a good candidate
I have no problems at all with anyone voting for Marshall.  She's a good candidate, and a good person.

40, male, Democrat, NC-04

[ Parent ]
Meh…
I know it borders on insanity to admit it but I always liked Edwards. Yes he turned out to be a sleaze bag but overall he was not that bad of Senator, considering he represented a conservative state.  I am rooting for Marshall because I do not see what Cunningham offers, he brings very little to the table and I just like Marshall. I am not Dan Coats though (Not a North Carolinian) so I do not have a say in it.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
John Edwards and Cal Cunningham
In 2008, Edwards was my 3rd or 4th pick in the race for the US Dem President nomination.  Many of us felt that he abandoned our state around early 2003 to run for President.  I voted for Edwards in 1998, but I ended up supporting Kerry in the 2004 NC Democratic Presidential caucus.  Many of us were openly questioning whether Edwards had much desire to be our senator those last 2 years.

I really can't tell much difference between Marshall and Cunningham.  Both seem progressive enough for me, and both are leaps and bounds better than Burr.  Marshall is more experienced, but Cunningham is more articulate, IMHO.  I'll support whomever wins tonight between these two.  

40, male, Democrat, NC-04


[ Parent ]
NC-Sen runoff
This is my first comment on SSP, even though I've been a daily reader for the last two years.

I voted for Marshall in the primary last month, but I flipped over to Cunningham and voted for him in today's runoff.  My feeling is that Cunningham will win this race, and here's why...

Ever since the primary campaign started, I (and most other Dems in NC that I know) have been waiting for one candidate to step up and win us over.  I supported Marshall from the beginning mostly because of her long experience as Secretary of State and my perception that she was more liberal than Cunningham.  But I kept an open mind and was willing to consider other candidates.

In the last month, Cunningham was able to win me over.  In my opinion, he dominated the two debates.  He's just as liberal as Marshall on all of the important issues, and he's able to articulate the reasons behind his positions much better than Marshall.  He also seems much more willing to go on the attack against Burr.  Finally, in an election season where people are looking for fresh faces, Cunningham is one.  Marshall has been Secretary of State for 14 years, and people in NC are less than thrilled with the state government right now.  The fact that Cunningham was a state Senator from a red part of the state and his military background make him a much better general election candidate to beat Burr.

4 members of my family, none of whom voted in the primary in May, also voted for Cunningham today after watching the debates.  I really think that a lot of people are moving over to Cunningham after learning more about the candidates and watching the recent debates.  It'll definitely come down to turnout, and whose supporters are more motivated, and my bet is that it's Cunningham.

But with the lack of polling, it could easily go either way and I'll enthusiastically back either candidate this November.


[ Parent ]
Glad that you joined us!
My parents have an Apex address (they live in a sub-divison off of Ten-Ten road, close to the Holly Springs Road intersection.  Glad to have another NC voice on this site!

I'm like you...I'll support whomever wins tonight between Marshall and Cunningham.  Both are fine, and I think both have a chance of defeating Burr.

40, male, Democrat, NC-04


[ Parent ]
On the races I'm following, predix...
NC-Sen:
Elaine Marshall - 56%
Cal Cunningham - 44%

SC-Gov:
Nikki Haley - 65%
Greshem Barrett - 35%

SC-01:
Tim Scott - 53%
Paul Thurmond - 47%

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast



Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox