Google Ads


Site Stats

Primary Maps, May 4th Edition

by: jeffmd

Mon May 24, 2010 at 8:04 PM EDT


As promised, I would make maps of primary election results. I started with the three big contests on May 4th - the Democratic Senate contests in North Carolina and Ohio, and the GOP Senate contest in Indiana.

This diary is a bit lengthy with all the images, so most of them will go over the flip!

But a taste first (Green is Marshall, Orange is Cunningham, and Purple is Lewis):

As you can see, Marshall did well in most parts of the state, with the notable exceptions being the Piedmont Triad, which went strongly for Cunningham. Lewis won four counties, Durham and three others located in GK Butterfield's majority-black district.

More over the flip...

jeffmd :: Primary Maps, May 4th Edition
More North Carolina:

Marshall, Cunningham, and Lewis' performances statewide:




Of course, as we all know, Marshall only got 36%, less than the 40% needed and the race is going to a runoff. Here is Marshall's performance against the 40% threshold. A red circle indicates a loss of votes against the threshold for Marshall, a green circle indicates a gain. As you can see, those are some mighty big red circles in Forsyth and Guilford Counties of the Triad, accompanied by sizable circles in Durham and Charlotte.


However, I'd still call Marshall the favorite heading into the runoff: Looking at her performance directly against Cunningham, we get the following. Cal ran up the margins in a few counties, but a large part of Marshall falling short of 40% is Lewis' strong draw on the African American vote.

O-H. I-O..(Hey, I can spell Ohio by myself! No love for the Buckeyes here...)

Ohio is a story of regions: Brunner did exceptionally well in the far Northwest, Metro Cincinnati, and the Ohio River counties. Fisher did admirably almost everywhere else, even taking Brunner's home county of Franklin. (Brunner in green, Fisher in orange.)



While you might be tempted to think this looks relatively evenly matched, Fisher cleaned up in his base area in the Northeast. There are two ways to visualize this:


Brunner did very well in the counties she won, but the juggernaut of votes that is Cuyahoga County can't be underestimated in a Democratic contest:

Finally, Ohio's next door neighbor: Indiana.

Dan Coats hobbled to a 40% victory over two people who split the anti-establishment, and it shows. (Coats in orange, Hostettler in green, Stutzman in purple). IN-03 (Souder's open district where Stutzman might run) and IN-08 (Hostettler's former district) are highlighted.



John Hostettler might have been bounced from the Bloody Eighth by a margin of 61-39 in 2006, but GOP primary voters in the district still seem to like him: Hoss' support is VERY regionalized, doing the best in the southwestern corner and dropping off as you progress northeast. Stutzman seemed to have two stronger areas: a stronghold in the 3rd CD, and a belt across the center of the state including Marion County and Columbus.

Coats, again, I think got the benefit of a divided field, something you can easily tell when you compare Coats v. Hoss+Stutz (Green being Coats, Red being the aggregate of Hostettler and Stutzman), as well as the customary pie chart map:

Next edition of the SSP atlas: May 18th.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Great work!
Can Ellsworth take advantage of the weak Coats support in his home turf and use that to get him to 50%?

26, male, Dem, NJ-12

IN Sen
Indiana does not hold run offs, so Coats is the nominee.  

25, Male, CT-01 (home), Perth-Wellington riding (sometimes)

[ Parent ]
I meant to say
Is Ellsworth likely to substantially outperform Obama in his district, not only because it's his district, but also because Coats was weak here in the primary? Will this be enough to push Ellsworth over the top in the Senate election, even if Ellsworth falls behind Obama in other parts of the state?

26, male, Dem, NJ-12

[ Parent ]
Well,
on one hand, Ellsworth has never won his own district by less than 30 points.

On the other hand, he's never faced top-tier opposition. Hostettler was the first troubled incumbent who the NRCC tossed off the boat back in '06 (mainly because he "wasn't listening") and the first competitive race of election night to be called for the Dems. In '08 all they could find was Some Dude.

The main danger here is that Hoosiers like to stick to their expectations, even if they're completely backwards. They expect Ellsworth to be a typical Dem and Coats to be the same boring but moderate dude he was 15 years ago. This campaign is won or lost on whether or not Ellsworth can define it - both defining himself as the guy more in touch with Hoosier values (which he is), and defining Coats as an out of touch carpetbagging lobbyist from North Carolina who only ran because it was convenient. Remember, this is the same state that tossed out Birch Bayh for Dan Quayle, and it really hasn't changed a whole lot in the last 30 years - at least not compared to any other state. Let me put it this way: when I first visited Indianapolis a year ago before moving here, I could never quite shake the vague feeling that somehow Reagan was still president.

Indiana is winnable - very much so - but it'll take a lot of effort and money on Ellsworth's part, and I'm afraid the national party will write it off, as they usually do.  


[ Parent ]
First of all, Birch Bayh was a LIBERAL Democrat
Secondly, the prospects of the national Democratic party writing off a winnable Senate race are just about nil. The national party usually writes off Indiana in Presidential races, not Senate races. And even that trend was snapped in 2008, with positive results.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
That Ohio map sends chills up my spine
After seeing it, I can't help but feel that Lee Fisher might be in real trouble if the primary map translates at all to the general election.  I don't feel geography is working to his advantage.

Think about this.  Where were the three areas of the state (outside of the democratic stronghold of Cleveland) in which Barack Obama did exceptionally well, helping him to carry the state?  

1.Greater Columbus/Franklin County - Obama won by 19%, the biggest margin of victory for a democrat in Ohio history that I'm aware of.

2.Greater Cincinnati/Hamilton County - Obama carried Hamilton by 5%, becoming the first democrat to win there since Lyndon Johnson in 1964.

3.Northwestern Ohio - Barack Obama's biggest improvements over Kerry came in rural Northwestern Ohio, where he jumped upwards of 15% in many counties.  

Now, what do you see here?  First of all, Lee Fisher get destroyed in Cincinnati.  Crushed.  Battered.  That's not a good sign because this is an area, at least within Hamilton County, where you have to run close to even if not winning outright if you want to win the state.  It looks as though the anti-establishment vote came out pretty heavily here, and I draw that conclusion because Cincinnati-area democrats are usually not as numerous and not as liberal as those from the rest of the state, especially northeast Ohio.  From a politics standpoint, you would think they would support the slighly more moderate Fisher over the more unabashed liberal candidate, Brunner, especially since Fisher outspent Brunner 10-1.  But clearly, Fisher's establishment ties didn't go over well.  That concerns me because greater Cincinnati is the tea party's HQ in Ohio, and if democratic primary voters there are going anti-establishment, that's NOT good for Fisher in the general as it means many of them may vote against the party in power in November.  Plus, Rob Portman is from the Cincinnati area, heightening the possibility of a republican rout there.

Northwestern Ohio is an area without a great deal of population, but as with many states, winning the cities is sometimes not enough, a democrat must also hold down the margins in the rural areas as much as possible.  Fisher got dumped in virtually every county here, with the exceptions of Lucas County (Toledo), and Allen County (Lima).  Perhaps not coincidentally, those are the two most urban/built up counties in NW Ohio.  Everywhere else, Brunner hammered him, including Wood, Sandusky, and Ottawa counties which flipped from Red to Blue in 2008.  That's fairly disturbing, and it makes me think that like in Cincinnati, either a lot of first time Obama voters from 2008 aren't supporting Fisher, or that conservative and moderate democrats voted anti-establishment and might be willing to do so again in November.

The third area, Columbus, is a bit less clear.  This was Brunner's home region and I expected her to carry Franklin County in the primary.  Maybe that was a bit of an unrealistic expectation, but the good news is that Fisher did win there, if only by a few points.  Basically, Columbus is an area where the Democrat has to win and win by double digits in order to carry the state, and I have a certain amount of faith that Fisher can do that.  Still, I can't help but wonder if Brunner would've done a lot better here.  

The fourth area to watch in the state this election cycle is the southeast corridor by the Ohio River.  Obama underperformed Kerry here, but the special election last week in PA-12 confirmed that democratic wins are still possible in upper Appalachia.  Unfortunately for Fisher, he didn't perform well here in the primary either, losing every county from Stubenville to Ironton down at the bottom of the state.  Brunner's generally populist (aka: broke) campaign may have resonated with voters here.  A victory in Charlie Wilson's district (OH-6) and a decent showing in Zach Space's district (OH-18) would certainly help Fisher in the case that he doesn't do well in Cincinnati or in the rural areas of the west and northwest, but again, based on the primary results, he's got some serious work to do.  

Of course, we all know that Fisher, being from Northeast Ohio, is going to run up the margins big in Cleveland, Akron, and Youngstown, and will probably win most of the counties in between.  But let's face it, any democratic candidate that is worth his campaign manager's salary will be able to do that.  Fisher has some major problems that he needs to sort out downstate, in Cincinnati, in the northwest, in Columbus, and in the industrial working class southeast.  He has to perform well in 3 of those four regions to win, and based on the primary map, well, I'm not convinced that he can do it.  Us Clevelanders can't be expected to do ALL the heavy lifting.

Devil's advocate on my own gloominess - The one county where Fisher did really, really well in the primary outside of the northeast was Montgomery County/Dayton.  If Fisher is able to put up a big number in Dayton in November, that will certainly help his cause.  This is an area that has been trending away from the democrats at the national level a bit, as Obama only won by 5% in 2008.  A 10% or greater win for Fisher would put a decent amount of pressure on Portman to win big in Cincinnati and in rural counties.

23, Male, Democrat, OH-13


Lee Fischer's Strong Areas
 Look pretty similar to Kerry's strong areas in 2004. In that election, Kerry had gigantic margins in Cuyahoga County (which were still smaller than Obama's)and increased margins in the smaller cities over 2000 in that area. Kerry's problem was that he did poorly in the Cinncinati area and his margin in the Columbus area was large but not large enough. Also, Bush had large margins in NW Ohio and if Fischer's map appears similar to Kerry's...

for more election analysis, visit  http://frogandturtle.blogspot....




17, CA-06,  


[ Parent ]
Two points
One, while Fisher is an establishment candidate, former Bush OMB director Portman is not perfectly positioned to take advantage of this.

Two, primary results do not always translate to strength in the general election. A good example is the Philly suburbs where Obama cleaned up even though he lost Montgomery and Bucks in the primary.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
I'm not sure that's a great example
You got the feeling just from looking at the map that Obama did much better in metro Philadelphia than he did anywhere else in the state.  He won Philadelphia County by a wide 30% margin, and won both Delaware County and Chester County by double digits.  Montgomery County, yes Obama did lose there, but it was only by a 51-49 margin, well ahead of his statewide average.  The only county in metro Philly where Obama did poorly was Bucks County, which was also his worst county in the general election in that region of the state, aside from maybe Chester (I think the margins were about 8% in both).

Really though, the story of the Philly burbs in 2008 was Sarah Palin, not Barack Obama.  Her being on the ticket, to quote Chris Mathews, "scared the bejesus out of people" in that region.  


23, Male, Democrat, OH-13


[ Parent ]
there are plenty of other examples
upstate New York, much of California/Indiana, etc. honestly, I agree that Fisher's margin is a little bit troubling, but if he gets good help from the DSCC and runs a good campaign exploiting Portman's weaknesses, OH-Sen might be good news for us on election night.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
Yeah
Stephen's whole argument sounded especially Clintonian. "Hillary won the big states and in places where you need to win!" So what? It was nonsense then and is nonsense now.

[ Parent ]
Wow, jeffmd, you never cease to amaze me with these
The Ohio map is my favorite--I was shocked to see that Brunner, whom most considered the more "progressive" in the primary, cleaned up in some pretty culturally conservative areas in the southeastern part of the state.  

20, CD MA-03/NH-01/MA-08

Wasn't that where we mocked her
For campaigning? I think it was.

[ Parent ]
Marshall will win the June runoff easily
She starts with a 9 point edge from the primary and adds an endorsement from Lewis that will deliver tons of votes in Durham and other Eastern / urban counties. By comparison, Cunningham's campaign appears to be in shambles.

At this point, I would say Marsahll wins 58-42. Now if she can just raise some money, Burr is seriously vulnerable.


I agree with you
In addition, I think you will see many women vote for Marshall.  After my wife heard Cunningham deliver a campaign speech, she said he is eerily similar to John Edwards in approach, looks, and charisma.  That's not a good thing for Cunningham this year.

Burr is vulnerable.  If Marshall can raise the moola, she will have a decent shot of beating Burr.  Money won't be a problem for Burr, but his voting record will be a problem.

40, male, Democrat, NC-04


[ Parent ]
Indianapolis primary voters went for STUTZMAN?!? Wow.
I suppose I shouldn't be THAT surprised - Indianapolis is one of the few places in the state that realizes that Coats is a carpetbagging lobbyist, and nobody knows who Hostettler is, but I'd have thought that Coats would have the Indy moderate vote sewn up a little bit better than that.

I think it's fair to say this: Ellsworth should focus on the red counties on that turnout map. Those are the Republican voters least receptive to Coats who might support a pro-life, law and order Democrat. It goes without saying that he needs to run the table in IN-08 and in Metro Indy, but I might consider popping up to the NE corner of the state to poach some of those alienated Stutzman fans as well. Coats' turnout percentages in most of the counties he won are also pretty small, so most of those areas are poachable - except for Ft. Wayne, Porter/LaPorte and Metro Louisville, none of which Ellsworth really needs to win. Lake County I suppose is an afterthought; neither candidate will play well there, so turnout will probably be low.

Now that I've seen these pretty graphics, I'm feeling a lot better about Ellsworth's chances (and I've always been betting on him), so long as he gets enough money to close the gap and introduce himself to, well, 2/3s of the state's voters.  


From what I heard, Stutzman had a strong organization in Indianapolis.
He did barely win Marion County, though -- 35-33 over Coats.

[ Parent ]
NC Precinct Map
Here is a map of the NC results by precinct I created using Dave's App.

Photobucket

Blue=Elaine Marshall
Purple=Cal Cunningham
Light Green=Ken Lewis
Dark Green=Marcus Williams
Dark Teal=Ann Worthy
Maroon=Susan Harris
Tan=Tie

I also have maps of the specific regions of the state that I can post as per request. Looking at the map, you can see that Elaine actually ran about even with Ken Lewis in terms of the number of +50% black precincts won and dominated in the 40-49% black precincts, Cal did terrible in both of those groups. Great job though Jeff and thanks for the maps!



Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox