Swing State Project Race Ratings Changes, 10/5/2009

The Swing State Project announced changes to eight race ratings recently. Since then, we’ve added one more race to the list (VA-Gov), and we’re changing the rating once more on another (AR-Sen). Our writeups for all of these are below. You can find our complete ratings here: Sen | Gov.

Senate races:

  • AR-Sen (Lincoln): Safe D to Lean D
  • When we were debating our ratings changes a few weeks ago, we decided to push the Arkansas Senate contest to Likely D. But that was then. We’re now moving the race to Lean D, and even that is probably pretty generous. All the recent polling on this race has shown Blanche Lincoln to be in pretty dire shape – R2K, PPP, and Rasmussen all have her mired in the 40s. The latter two both have her losing to the most recent & credible entrant into the race, non-crazy state Sen. Gilbert Baker.

    Arkansas is a rough state which really hates Obama. While it had for a long time been much friendlier to Dems than most of its Southern neighbors, it now seems to be playing catch-up with a vengeance. In a word, Lincoln is in trouble. Probably the only thing keeping this race out of the Tossup column at this point is that Gilbert is still something of an unknown quantity. We’ll be watching him, and especially his upcoming fundraising reports, very closely. (D)

  • CA-Sen (Boxer): Safe D to RTW
  • You might recall this race started out as a Race to Watch, then vanished once it was clear that Arnold Schwarzenegger was not going to run against Barbara Boxer. We’re giving it a second look, though, because the NRSC has found another lesser celebrity, former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina. Fiorina (assuming she runs – she’s still in exploratory mode) has a few things going for her: She’s moderate enough to get some traction in the general (assuming she gets by conservative Assemblyman Chuck DeVore in the primary), the NRSC clearly will go all out to help her out, and, most of all, she has gobs of money she can spend on herself. On the downside, she was very publicly and unceremoniously dumped from HP after presiding over its downfall, and she doesn’t have much political discipline yet, as seen by her getting muzzled after a brief stint as a McCain surrogate. Polls have ranged from single-digit to 20-point gaps in favor of Boxer, so the race bears further watching. (C)

  • NV-Sen: Likely D to Tossup
  • Harry Reid may have more coin the in the bank than the Bible’s got psalms, but that can’t cover up for the fact that Nevadans have downright frosty feelings for him. Despite avoiding a challenge from any top-shelf GOPers, poll after poll after poll after poll after poll has shown that Reid’s B-grade opponents are all clobbering him in the court of public opinion. (It also looks like Reid might have even mustered a B+ challenger, in the form of state Sen. Mark Amodei.)

    Making matters worse for the embattled Majority Leader is the fact that son Rory Reid has a clear, uncontested path to the Democratic gubernatorial nomination. Rory seems to be one of the weakest candidates the Democrats could muster for this race, and pappy is apparently unhappy that the Reid name will be so over-exposed on the Nevada ballot next year. Like a major collision that can’t be prevented, the trajectory of this race is both catastrophically ugly and mesmerizing at once. (J)

  • NY-Sen-B (Gillibrand): Safe D to RTW
  • The New York State Republican Party is in a shambles, and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand looks strong, with lots of money in the bank, endorsements galore, and powerful friends behind her. The only possible wrinkle here is named George Pataki. The former governor has been floated as a potential challenger for some time, but he doesn’t seem to have actually indicated any interest. Still, out of an abundance of caution, we’re going to slot this in as a Race to Watch, in case Pataki does get in. (D)

    Gubernatorial races:

  • CO-Gov (Ritter): Lean D to Tossup
  • Bill Ritter is being squeezed from all sides. Not only is there new evidence that Democrats are beginning to lag in Colorado after several cycles of strong growth, Ritter has succeeded in making enemies out of friends by vetoing every major labor-friendly bill that the Democratic legislature has churned out over his first term. Polls have shown Ritter in trouble against his Republican opponents, and it wouldn’t be surprising if many rank-and-file Democrats don’t feel compelled to bail Ritter’s ass out at on Election Day next year. (J)

  • IA-Gov (Culver): RTW to Likely D
  • Freshman Gov. Chet Culver’s approval ratings have been hard to pin down – as low as 36% in August according to SUSA before rebounding to 41% this month, but 50% according to a recent Selzer survey, down from 55% in April. Luckily, though, Culver hasn’t drawn much in the way of opposition – yet. But in this toxic political environment, few incumbents are truly safe, and regardless of which pollster you believe, it would be hard to describe Culver’s approval ratings as “good.”

    Even more worrisome, former Gov. Terry Branstad is supposedly considering the race, and his favorables are quite strong. The good news, though, is that Branstad hasn’t been in office for a decade, and his numbers now are a lot better than they were at the end of his tenure. That will change once he faces a real campaign. Plus, Branstad’s entrance might trigger a civil war between his “moderate” faction and the conservative base. Still, Branstad would be a very formidable opponent and if he does face off against Culver, we will very likely revise our rating once more. (D)

  • MA-Gov: Lean D to Tossup
  • With the long-rumored but now-official entry of Treasurer Tim Cahill into the race, we’ve got a serious shot at seeing Massachusetts elect its first-ever Independent Governor. Cahill, who recently dropped his Democratic affiliation in order to challenge the unpopular incumbent Democratic Governor Deval Patrick without the hassle of a primary, seems to have as good a shot as anyone at winning this race. Polls of the race that have just focused on a head-to-head between Patrick and Republican challengers (convenience store czar Christy Mihos, health care magnate Charlie Baker) have given narrow edges to the GOP, while three-way polls have generally shown Cahill either leading or tied with Patrick, as Cahill seems to eat up the protest votes of a lot of Democrats who’ve lost patience with Patrick. Massachusetts has a bad habit of electing moderate non-Democrats as Governor to counteract its Democratic supermajorities in the legislature, so this race is truly anybody’s ball game now. (C)

  • VA-Gov (Open): Tossup to Lean R
  • We’re a little late on this one, but we had wanted to give Creigh Deeds the benefit of the doubt. At this stage, though, it’s hard to see how Bob McDonnell doesn’t have the edge. While the race has tightened somewhat lately, Deeds has not led in a single poll since a very brief post-primary bounce back in June. In 2005, this race also tightened up very late, so we’re not ruling out a move back to Tossup status before the end. But Tim Kaine’s move began in September, and now it’s already October. Time’s running out. (D)

  • WI-Gov (Open): Lean D to Tossup
  • Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle’s decision to retire rather than to seek a third term may actually prove helpful to Democrats in the long run, as “incumbent fatigue” will not be an issue in retaining this office next year. Still, it’s a wide open race in the near-term, and the GOP has a pair of credible candidates in Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker and ex-Rep. Mark Neumann. Democratic Lt. Gov. Barbara Lawton is in the race, but she may have to campaign against popular Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett for the nomination. (J)

    48 thoughts on “Swing State Project Race Ratings Changes, 10/5/2009”

    1. Kaine was running to succeed Mark Warner, whose approval rating was around 70% when he left office. Also, by November 2005, Bush’s approval ratings had started to sink like a stone. He was also helped by Kilgore’s rather inept campaign, which imploded in October with the Hitler death penalty ad.

      Today? Kaine is lucky if he’s in net positive territory now, and he’s taken the highly-partisan job as head of the DNC. Obama in the White House has whipped the teabagger right into a frenzy. McDonnell, up until the thesis came out, had been running a slick, pitch-perfect campaign.

      Really, the Democrats would have probably been helped had Kaine gotten an appointment to the Obama administration so Bolling took over as Governor and then ran for a full term. He would have been a much weaker opponent than McDonnell.

    2. Either the GOP nominates a vapid imbecile who managed to drive a major company into the ground and has cut her own campaign off at the knees with arguably one of the stupidest websites in modern political history, or they nominate yet another 36 percenter wingnut who’s too conservative for the state as a whole. Both will be crushed by Boxer, who always shows better than she polls.

      At this point, given DeVore’s fundraising and the fringe, anti-NRSC ‘kingmaker’ inclinations of most GOP primary voters upset with that talk show guy being pushed out by John Cornyn, I wouldn’t be at all surprised if Fiorina not only loses the primary but loses big. Frankly, I don’t really care which race she loses as long as she loses.

      Oh, and excellent post overall. Frankly, if the Dems’ only incumbent losses in 2010 are DINO Lincoln and terrible majority leader Reid, we’re still doing pretty well. Frankly, I think both need to lose to send a message to the rest of the DLC do-nothings. If we pick up MO (likely) and OH (probably), we break even.  

    3. expect Branstad to announce within the next couple of weeks. A “Draft Branstad PAC” has supposedly been raising big money. They started running statewide radio ads a few weeks ago.

    4. It’s just over 4 weeks before election day, and I feel like I can’t even say “toss-up” – more like “not a clue.”

      While DeDe has higher name recognition, it’s only in the western end of the district.

    5. Republicans are responding more, or Democrats are responding less, or Republicans are more committed against her, or Democrats are less committed for her?

    6. AR-Sen: toss-up

      CA-Sen: safe Dem

      NV-Sen: lean GOP

      NY-Sen: likely Dem

      CO-Gov: toss-up

      IA-Gov: lean Dem

      MA-Gov: lean Dem

      VA-Gov: lean GOP

      WI-Gov: toss-up

    7. Can’t say I know the whole story, this is disappointing….

      I’ve been trying to defend Bill Owens, singing his praises where its deserved, putting down Scozzafava where I can, but then I hear that he didn’t show up in his own home town at a pre-election forum.

      Congressional candidates address health-care issues at forum

      It was no surprise that the two candidates participating in Sunday night’s 23rd Congressional District forum are not in favor of the president’s proposed health-care reform plan.

      Eyebrows were raised, however, when the third candidate did not show up.

      Apparently, Owens was in Oswego, on the other side of the district. Yeah, it’s about 5h away, but you’d think he’d either know about this event in advance – or his staff is incompetent.

    8. You should change it to at least Tossup.  Two separate polls now show Goddard trashing all comers, including the incumbent Governor and State Treasurer.  No way it’s Lean GOP at this point.

    Comments are closed.