Google Ads


Site Stats

Swing State Project Race Ratings Changes, 10/5/2009

by: DavidNYC

Mon Oct 05, 2009 at 8:11 AM EDT


The Swing State Project announced changes to eight race ratings recently. Since then, we've added one more race to the list (VA-Gov), and we're changing the rating once more on another (AR-Sen). Our writeups for all of these are below. You can find our complete ratings here: Sen | Gov.

Senate races:

  • AR-Sen (Lincoln): Safe D to Lean D
  • When we were debating our ratings changes a few weeks ago, we decided to push the Arkansas Senate contest to Likely D. But that was then. We're now moving the race to Lean D, and even that is probably pretty generous. All the recent polling on this race has shown Blanche Lincoln to be in pretty dire shape - R2K, PPP, and Rasmussen all have her mired in the 40s. The latter two both have her losing to the most recent & credible entrant into the race, non-crazy state Sen. Gilbert Baker.

    Arkansas is a rough state which really hates Obama. While it had for a long time been much friendlier to Dems than most of its Southern neighbors, it now seems to be playing catch-up with a vengeance. In a word, Lincoln is in trouble. Probably the only thing keeping this race out of the Tossup column at this point is that Gilbert is still something of an unknown quantity. We'll be watching him, and especially his upcoming fundraising reports, very closely. (D)

  • CA-Sen (Boxer): Safe D to RTW
  • You might recall this race started out as a Race to Watch, then vanished once it was clear that Arnold Schwarzenegger was not going to run against Barbara Boxer. We're giving it a second look, though, because the NRSC has found another lesser celebrity, former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina. Fiorina (assuming she runs - she's still in exploratory mode) has a few things going for her: She's moderate enough to get some traction in the general (assuming she gets by conservative Assemblyman Chuck DeVore in the primary), the NRSC clearly will go all out to help her out, and, most of all, she has gobs of money she can spend on herself. On the downside, she was very publicly and unceremoniously dumped from HP after presiding over its downfall, and she doesn't have much political discipline yet, as seen by her getting muzzled after a brief stint as a McCain surrogate. Polls have ranged from single-digit to 20-point gaps in favor of Boxer, so the race bears further watching. (C)

  • NV-Sen: Likely D to Tossup
  • Harry Reid may have more coin the in the bank than the Bible's got psalms, but that can't cover up for the fact that Nevadans have downright frosty feelings for him. Despite avoiding a challenge from any top-shelf GOPers, poll after poll after poll after poll after poll has shown that Reid's B-grade opponents are all clobbering him in the court of public opinion. (It also looks like Reid might have even mustered a B+ challenger, in the form of state Sen. Mark Amodei.)

    Making matters worse for the embattled Majority Leader is the fact that son Rory Reid has a clear, uncontested path to the Democratic gubernatorial nomination. Rory seems to be one of the weakest candidates the Democrats could muster for this race, and pappy is apparently unhappy that the Reid name will be so over-exposed on the Nevada ballot next year. Like a major collision that can't be prevented, the trajectory of this race is both catastrophically ugly and mesmerizing at once. (J)

  • NY-Sen-B (Gillibrand): Safe D to RTW
  • The New York State Republican Party is in a shambles, and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand looks strong, with lots of money in the bank, endorsements galore, and powerful friends behind her. The only possible wrinkle here is named George Pataki. The former governor has been floated as a potential challenger for some time, but he doesn't seem to have actually indicated any interest. Still, out of an abundance of caution, we're going to slot this in as a Race to Watch, in case Pataki does get in. (D)

    Gubernatorial races:

  • CO-Gov (Ritter): Lean D to Tossup
  • Bill Ritter is being squeezed from all sides. Not only is there new evidence that Democrats are beginning to lag in Colorado after several cycles of strong growth, Ritter has succeeded in making enemies out of friends by vetoing every major labor-friendly bill that the Democratic legislature has churned out over his first term. Polls have shown Ritter in trouble against his Republican opponents, and it wouldn't be surprising if many rank-and-file Democrats don't feel compelled to bail Ritter's ass out at on Election Day next year. (J)

  • IA-Gov (Culver): RTW to Likely D
  • Freshman Gov. Chet Culver's approval ratings have been hard to pin down - as low as 36% in August according to SUSA before rebounding to 41% this month, but 50% according to a recent Selzer survey, down from 55% in April. Luckily, though, Culver hasn't drawn much in the way of opposition - yet. But in this toxic political environment, few incumbents are truly safe, and regardless of which pollster you believe, it would be hard to describe Culver's approval ratings as "good."

    Even more worrisome, former Gov. Terry Branstad is supposedly considering the race, and his favorables are quite strong. The good news, though, is that Branstad hasn't been in office for a decade, and his numbers now are a lot better than they were at the end of his tenure. That will change once he faces a real campaign. Plus, Branstad's entrance might trigger a civil war between his "moderate" faction and the conservative base. Still, Branstad would be a very formidable opponent and if he does face off against Culver, we will very likely revise our rating once more. (D)

  • MA-Gov: Lean D to Tossup
  • With the long-rumored but now-official entry of Treasurer Tim Cahill into the race, we've got a serious shot at seeing Massachusetts elect its first-ever Independent Governor. Cahill, who recently dropped his Democratic affiliation in order to challenge the unpopular incumbent Democratic Governor Deval Patrick without the hassle of a primary, seems to have as good a shot as anyone at winning this race. Polls of the race that have just focused on a head-to-head between Patrick and Republican challengers (convenience store czar Christy Mihos, health care magnate Charlie Baker) have given narrow edges to the GOP, while three-way polls have generally shown Cahill either leading or tied with Patrick, as Cahill seems to eat up the protest votes of a lot of Democrats who've lost patience with Patrick. Massachusetts has a bad habit of electing moderate non-Democrats as Governor to counteract its Democratic supermajorities in the legislature, so this race is truly anybody's ball game now. (C)

  • VA-Gov (Open): Tossup to Lean R
  • We're a little late on this one, but we had wanted to give Creigh Deeds the benefit of the doubt. At this stage, though, it's hard to see how Bob McDonnell doesn't have the edge. While the race has tightened somewhat lately, Deeds has not led in a single poll since a very brief post-primary bounce back in June. In 2005, this race also tightened up very late, so we're not ruling out a move back to Tossup status before the end. But Tim Kaine's move began in September, and now it's already October. Time's running out. (D)

  • WI-Gov (Open): Lean D to Tossup
  • Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle's decision to retire rather than to seek a third term may actually prove helpful to Democrats in the long run, as "incumbent fatigue" will not be an issue in retaining this office next year. Still, it's a wide open race in the near-term, and the GOP has a pair of credible candidates in Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker and ex-Rep. Mark Neumann. Democratic Lt. Gov. Barbara Lawton is in the race, but she may have to campaign against popular Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett for the nomination. (J)

    DavidNYC :: Swing State Project Race Ratings Changes, 10/5/2009
    Tags: , , (All Tags)
    Print Friendly View Send As Email
    Deeds just doesn't have the situational advantages that Kaine had
    Kaine was running to succeed Mark Warner, whose approval rating was around 70% when he left office. Also, by November 2005, Bush's approval ratings had started to sink like a stone. He was also helped by Kilgore's rather inept campaign, which imploded in October with the Hitler death penalty ad.

    Today? Kaine is lucky if he's in net positive territory now, and he's taken the highly-partisan job as head of the DNC. Obama in the White House has whipped the teabagger right into a frenzy. McDonnell, up until the thesis came out, had been running a slick, pitch-perfect campaign.

    Really, the Democrats would have probably been helped had Kaine gotten an appointment to the Obama administration so Bolling took over as Governor and then ran for a full term. He would have been a much weaker opponent than McDonnell.


    Unfortunately it is too late
    Really, the Democrats would have probably been helped had Kaine gotten an appointment to the Obama administration so Bolling took over as Governor and then ran for a full term. He would have been a much weaker opponent than McDonnell.
     

    This is as good as a Bobby Fisher gambit.


    [ Parent ]
    Bobby Fischer didn't believe in poison pawns
    But I agree with the gist of your point.

    [ Parent ]
    Huh?...Kaine's approval is good, Obama's is net positive......
    Johnny, take a second look at recent approval ratings.  These same VA-Gov trial heat polls usually query them.  Kaine is in the 50s I think in every poll, and Obama orbits 50 but is net positive (even when below 50) in most recent polls.  Even Rasmussen had Obama at 52-48 in the same VA-Gov poll that showed Deeds down 51-42.

    Deeds has been tying himself to Warner and not so much to Kaine because Warner is wildly popular while Kaine, despite being popular, also has had to make tough budget decisions.  But Kaine neither is any drag on Deeds.

    Deeds' entire problem is a bad campaign, specifically on message and mechanics.  He's never developed a self-defining message, and "I'm Mark Warner's love child" doesn't count.  And on mechanics, Deeds was very slow out of the gate on basic infrastructure, not getting field off the ground until very late.  He was still doing in August what his campaign should have been doing in June.

    As a Virginia resident and voter, I'm very frustrated, because McDonnell really is a disaster in the making.  He really is the hard right wingnut Deeds' ads make him out to be, and his ideas on transportation and other stuff are stupid.  But he's a better candidate running a better campaign, and that's what always matters most in a purple state.

    In spite of everything, Deeds still has an outside chance to pull this off.  But he needs Obama to invest in a downstate rally (already did NoVA) to help black and liberal white turnout, and he needs most importantly a positive message to hit the air hard, right away, and saturate.

    43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


    [ Parent ]
    I find it incredibly hard to believe
    that Bill "Empty Suit" Bolling is leading the rest of the Republican ticket.

    [ Parent ]
    CA-Sen
    Either the GOP nominates a vapid imbecile who managed to drive a major company into the ground and has cut her own campaign off at the knees with arguably one of the stupidest websites in modern political history, or they nominate yet another 36 percenter wingnut who's too conservative for the state as a whole. Both will be crushed by Boxer, who always shows better than she polls.

    At this point, given DeVore's fundraising and the fringe, anti-NRSC 'kingmaker' inclinations of most GOP primary voters upset with that talk show guy being pushed out by John Cornyn, I wouldn't be at all surprised if Fiorina not only loses the primary but loses big. Frankly, I don't really care which race she loses as long as she loses.

    Oh, and excellent post overall. Frankly, if the Dems' only incumbent losses in 2010 are DINO Lincoln and terrible majority leader Reid, we're still doing pretty well. Frankly, I think both need to lose to send a message to the rest of the DLC do-nothings. If we pick up MO (likely) and OH (probably), we break even.  


    And New Hampshire
    I'm not sure why the NH polling is so uniformly terrible, but I haven't seen a single poll that looks credible, although I think it's quite plausible that Ayelotte is running ahead of Hodes right now. (I also think that it's quite likely that Ayelotte doesn't make it out of the primary.)

    [ Parent ]
    NH polling has been all over the place
    for the two cycles Ive followed elections religiously.  While national polling firms have their own troubles of finding sync results, NH polling firms are downright atrocious.  

    [ Parent ]
    Polling a year out is very poor in low name-rec races......
    There's no way to poll Hodes-Ayotte "accurately" beyond providing respondents with party labels and reading the results as the present-day generic ballot leaning.

    The outcome on NH-Sen depends on the quality of the candidate and campaign on each side and the state of the national environment in the summer and fall of 2010.  And there's no way to confidently predict anything today on any of those variables, although I'm on record that the issues hurting Dems today will no longer drive voters next year, and I really believe the GOP is peaking way too soon.  Other things may pop up and hurt us in the midterms, but the economy will be improving and health care reform of some kind will have been long since enacted and no longer be a source of voter fear.

    43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


    [ Parent ]
    Like this you mean?
    A whopping 86% undecided!

    http://www.wmur.com/politics/2...


    [ Parent ]
    nice train of thought
    thinking Democrats could pick up Missouri and Ohio while losing two non-scandal incumbent held seats.  

    [ Parent ]
    The poll averages right now
    say Dems will do just that, so the comment is hardly mockable, Gomer...

    34, WM, Democrat, FL-11

    [ Parent ]
    two recent polls makes an average
    there have been like 1 recent poll for Missouri which shows a tie and two recent ones for Ohio that show +1 for Portman and +11 for Fisher. How do you come up with an average with so few polls this far out to make that prediction of likely switch. Anyway, it has been difficult to knock out incumbent Democrats in last 5 cycles so losing at least two (is Dodd really that safe?) doesn't really bode well for other potential pickups as Senate seats may tend to favor one side or the other because of national mood. I would not like to give up on incumbent Senators that quickly.  

    [ Parent ]
    How did Salazar win in 2004 then?
    Candidates matter.

    [ Parent ]
    Salazar won by running
    as a DLC type/moderate "new" Democrat that some people here want to purge from the Democratic Party. Plus, Pete Coors was a terrible candidate.  

    [ Parent ]
    Terrible candidate
    So are Blunt and Portman. And this isn't Daily Kos.

    [ Parent ]
    most Iowa politicos
    expect Branstad to announce within the next couple of weeks. A "Draft Branstad PAC" has supposedly been raising big money. They started running statewide radio ads a few weeks ago.

    Any ratings for NY-23?
    It's just over 4 weeks before election day, and I feel like I can't even say "toss-up" - more like "not a clue."

    While DeDe has higher name recognition, it's only in the western end of the district.


    It's three-way territory
    just like MA-Sen at this point.

    party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01

    [ Parent ]
    I mean MA-Gov
    MA-Sen is likely D, if not safe D.

    party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01

    [ Parent ]
    Are Blanche Lincoln's numbers this bad because
    Republicans are responding more, or Democrats are responding less, or Republicans are more committed against her, or Democrats are less committed for her?

    party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01

    Damn good question....
    A part of me wants to say it's simply time for AR to switch from us.  They've held on for a loooooong time but when it comes down to it, there is nothing differentiating it from the rest of the South save for it holding onto its Yellow Dog roots for much longer.

    Particularly when you look at the statistics, states with lower education and lower per-capita incomes have generally been more Republican leaning (and make up the entire southern base of the country.)  AR ranks near the bottom in both of those statistics and well, I cant help but feel like AR left the Democratic Party LOOOOOOOONG ago and that they are truly DINO's.  And not in a bad connotation, they just have never switched to the Republicans once they became the conservative party, unlike the rest of the South which has taken this long to do so.


    [ Parent ]
    there's also the question of how much Clinton postponed the process of the state becoming republican
    Having the former governor become president almost certainly kept local dems in power for longer than they would have been otherwise (hutchinson not withstanding).  maybe Clinton's influence is just starting to fade.

    Top ten signs you're an SSPer #1: your favorite song is "Panic At Tedisco" and no one understands what you mean.

    [ Parent ]
    I think that is likely the key


    [ Parent ]
    Apologies for a dated question
    Why did Al Gore decide not to ask Clinton to campaign for him in Arakansas?


    [ Parent ]
    Lewinsky
    This was the reason behind their big bustup late in 2000.

    [ Parent ]
    Excellent post
    My one slight demurral is that I think AR-Sen should be Tossup.

    "I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
    --  Will Rogers  


    If I had to label these races...
    AR-Sen: toss-up
    CA-Sen: safe Dem
    NV-Sen: lean GOP
    NY-Sen: likely Dem
    CO-Gov: toss-up
    IA-Gov: lean Dem
    MA-Gov: lean Dem
    VA-Gov: lean GOP
    WI-Gov: toss-up

    For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

    Similar to me
    Except I have MA-Gov and NV-Sen: tossup and CA-Sen: likely.

    [ Parent ]
    No way is NV-Sen Leans GOP
    Polling aside, Reid still has very real advantages over the GOP field, and can very easily turn it around with his massive war-chest.

    Reid's race is a Toss-up, but I'd like to say for the record, that I believe that the Senate race will probably end up like KY-Sen did in the end.

    Politics and Other Random Topics

    24, Male, Democrat, NM-01, Chairman of the Atheist Caucus, and Majority Leader of the "Going to Hell" caucus!


    [ Parent ]
    And now Owens misses a candidate event in Plattsburgh
    Can't say I know the whole story, this is disappointing....

    I've been trying to defend Bill Owens, singing his praises where its deserved, putting down Scozzafava where I can, but then I hear that he didn't show up in his own home town at a pre-election forum.

    Congressional candidates address health-care issues at forum

    It was no surprise that the two candidates participating in Sunday night's 23rd Congressional District forum are not in favor of the president's proposed health-care reform plan.

    Eyebrows were raised, however, when the third candidate did not show up.

    Apparently, Owens was in Oswego, on the other side of the district. Yeah, it's about 5h away, but you'd think he'd either know about this event in advance - or his staff is incompetent.


    Or
    the event was set up to embarass him and his invite got "lost" or delievered very late.  I don't know any of the facts but I have certainly heard of this type of thing in an attempt to make a candidate look bad.  Who organized the forum?  Who are these UNYTEA people?  I am not from New York so it is not surprising I've never heard of them but has anyone else?

    [ Parent ]
    The TEA
    Gives it away.

    [ Parent ]
    Kudos to Owens
    Why would you want him interacting with Teabaggers?

    [ Parent ]
    I missed that detail, and apologize
    Seems like the Plattsburgh Press-Republican (local paper) was hoodwinked too.

    [ Parent ]
    No problem
    Does day something about Scozzafava though doesn't it? I knew she would start to waffle and pander.

    [ Parent ]
    Hmmm, suggests a DK diary title
    "Did Kos endorse a Teabagger?"

    Gosh, I wish I had a bit more time to write that.....


    [ Parent ]
    AR-Sen
    Gilbert Baker announced he raised a little over 500,000. I guess in a cheapo state like Arkansas, thats very good, but maybe not so when Lincoln has over 3 million. Lets see what he does with a full quarter. http://www.wxvt.com/Global/sto...

    In the last two cycles
    A lot of Democrats beat Republicans who outraised them by massive margins.

    The reason they won is that despite being outraised, the incumbent Republicans could not withstand the center-left voting bloc they were representing.

    Arkansas is a reverse situation...it's a batshit insane state...Baker can beat Lincoln despite being outraised in a state with a population that thinks like Arkansans do.

    That said, I'm sorta thinking Lincoln might survive after all.  


    [ Parent ]
    60%
    Based on the 2006 races, an opposition candidate needs 60% of the funds of the incumbent to have a shot.  Baker would need $1.8 million if Lincoln got no more funding.  Overall, about $2.5 to $3 million would put him in the ballpark.  Unless Lincoln just leaks advertising dollars, this is a doable amount.

    Remember the Thune upset.  He was outspent $21 million to 16 million.  At some point, I hink dollars in a small state become irrelevant.  We are a long way from that but her $ lead is no security blanket for Lincoln.


    [ Parent ]
    NY-Sen-B: So IF Pataki were to run, what would the rating change to?
    Toss-up?

    My guess?
    Likely-D

    "I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
    --  Will Rogers  


    [ Parent ]
    AZ-Gov should be on this list
    You should change it to at least Tossup.  Two separate polls now show Goddard trashing all comers, including the incumbent Governor and State Treasurer.  No way it's Lean GOP at this point.

    The Crolian Progressive: as great an adventure as ever I heard of...

    We changed it
    to Tossup on the 29th in its own post. Unfortunately, that kind of fell into the lacuna between our teaser post about the 8 ratings changes and our somewhat belated explanations of them that came along today. (I've always wanted to use "lacuna" in a blog post.)

    [ Parent ]
    Crap!
    I completely forgot about that.  Sorry for the unwarranted criticism. :)

    The Crolian Progressive: as great an adventure as ever I heard of...

    [ Parent ]
    They already changed it to tossup (n/t)


    [ Parent ]

    Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

    Primary Sponsor

    You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

    Menu

    Make a New Account

    Username:

    Password:



    Forget your username or password?


    About the Site

    SSP Resources

    Blogroll

    Powered by: SoapBlox