Google Ads


Site Stats

SSP Daily Digest: 6/15 (Afternoon Edition)

by: Crisitunity

Tue Jun 15, 2010 at 3:51 PM EDT


LA-Sen: Two different polls have very different pictures of the Louisiana Senate race, which is moving into the foreground with Charlie Melancon getting a lot more media exposure criticizing BP while David Vitter acts as one of their biggest defenders. PPP (in a poll leaked to Roll Call, although I'm not sure if it's a Melancon internal or on someone else's behalf) finds Melancon within single digits, trailing Vitter 46-37. On the other hand, Republican pollster Magellan gives Vitter a 51-31 lead. (Magellan has been doing a lot of recent public polling of Republican primaries; this is for the general, though, and I'm not sure if they're working for Vitter, for some other GOP interest, or just acting sua sponte.) Both polls find extremely high continued support for offshore drilling, not a surprise since that's Louisiana's bread and butter.

NH-Sen: Yesterday was Kelly Ayotte's day to testify before the state legislature about what she did and didn't know about the collapsed mortgage banker FRM; for the most part, she staked out claims of not knowing anything about them (saying that the buck stopped with her, but the buck never made it to her AG's desk). Legislators seemed underwhelmed by her responses, and even GOP state Rep. Rip Holden criticized her, saying she needed to accept some blame for the state's failings.

PA-Sen: Politico, always hungry for inside-baseball campaign drama, is highlighting a story titled "Sestak silence worries Pa. officials," detailing concerns the local establishment has with Joe Sestak not sufficiently linking up with them as he pivots toward the general election. It's actually an interesting article, but Pa2010's Dan Hirschhorn captures the overarching tone of it with his own meta-piece, "The Sestak-as-crazy-campaigner meme returns."

SC-Sen: Today's 538 look at the South Carolina puzzle focuses on how Census microdata suggests that the Greene/Green difference may not have been the racial dogwhistle that people think it is: nationwide, a higher percentage of Greenes are white than are Greens. (H/t to our commenter KCinDC, who pointed out this same data point over the weekend.) In fact, the first name "Alvin" may be a clearer dogwhistle instead. (And, of course, there's the danger in extrapolating national data to the state level, where things may be much different in South Carolina.)

WA-Sen: As I've opined before, attacking Dino Rossi for having made money off foreclosed properties, and teaching other people how to do it, has a whiff of "what else have you got?" But what's really weird here is that he just keeps scheduling more appearances at more real estate seminars, as he'll being doing today. (Today's burning question: "Is now the time to buy a waterfront home?") If I were the NRSC, I'd be worried about how committed he is to a race he seemed to get dragged kicking and screaming into in the first place, if he's still doing real estate seminars instead of campaigning 24/7. Is the Senate race a way to keep his name in the spotlight so he can get more money for more real estate seminar appearances?

AK-Gov: P'oh! Former state official Bob Poe was the first Dem to get in the gubernatorial race (back when it would have been against Sarah Palin). But not having made much progress on the fundraising front against the higher-profile Ethan Berkowitz and Hollis French in the Democratic primary, he pulled out of the race yesterday.

CA-Gov, CA-Sen: There's a poll of the California races out from CrossTarget research on behalf of right-wing new media outlet Pajamas Media, so you might keep the salt shaker handy (especially remembering their decidedly optimistic polling of the MA-Sen special). That said, though, the gubernatorial numbers look perfectly plausible, with Jerry Brown leading Meg Whitman 46-43. The Senate race may be a little further off the mark, pegged at a 47-47 tie between Barbara Boxer and Carly Fiorina. Speaking of Whitman, she just wrote herself a check for another $20 million from her seeming bottomless reserves, bringing her total self-funding investment to $91 million. The main Whitman story that's in the news today, though, presents a different picture of her from the rather serene Queen Meg that appears in all her advertising: it turns out she settled with an eBay employee for six-figures after shoving her during an argument.

FL-Gov (pdf): When you're reduced to leaking your own internal poll that has you tied with your opposition, well, let's just say you're in a world of hurt. But that's what Bill McCollum is doing today to prove his continued relevance in the Florida GOP gubernatorial primary. His poll by McLaughlin & Associates has McCollum tied at 40-40 with Rick Scott.

IA-Gov: As expected, the religious right isn't planning to do much of anything to help Terry Branstad defeat Chet Culver in November. The Iowa Family PAC, who had backed Bob Vander Plaats, confirmed (as they'd threatened months ago) that they won't endorse Branstad.

CO-04: Credit GOP nominee Cory Gardner with having some sense of decency (or at least knowing when it's not expedient to hitch his wagon to the crazy train). After Iowa Rep. Steve King's comments about Barack Obama's racist "default mechanism," Gardner abruptly canceled a $100/person fundraiser he had scheduled for Saturday with King. (King, for his part, is doubling down on the crazy, with his impassioned defense of racial profiling yesterday.)

KY-06: The Andy Barr campaign is out with an internal by the Tarrance Group showing him within sorta-striking distance of Democratic Rep. Ben Chandler. Chandler leads Barr 45-38. Chandler's spokesperson said that Chandler "has a strong double-digit lead" in his own polling, but didn't offer a polling memo.

NC-08: The list of GOP Beltway figures piling on to support Harold Johnson instead of Tim D'Annunzio is a veritable House GOP who's who. John Boehner and Eric Cantor are headlining a Thursday Capitol Hill fundraiser for Johnson, with Pete Sessions and Greg Walden also atop the list. Obviously plans for this must predate today's PPP poll showing the huge disparity in viability between Johnson and D'Annunzio, so the NRCC has clearly had their eye on this one for a while.

OK-02: Rep. Dan Boren is out with an internal poll as he faces a tough fight in a dark-red district... but he doesn't seem concerned enough with his minor GOP opposition to even poll on that. Instead, he's focused on a late-breaking primary challenge from the left from state Sen. Jim Wilson. His poll from Myers Research gives him a 68-24 lead over Wilson.

OR-01: Tis the season for internal polls, I guess: there's also one floating around out there from Rob Cornilles, the little-known but NRCC-touted businessman running against Rep. David Wu in the Portland suburbs. The Cornilles poll, by local Republican pollster Moore Information, gives Wu a 46-40 lead over Cornilles, suggesting that Wu is at least in for a tougher-than-usual challenge even if he has the district's D+7 lean working in his favor.

SC-06: The strange saga of the South Carolina Democratic primary is also playing out in the 6th, where Democratic House Whip Jim Clyburn easily beat Gregory Brown. Clyburn, who's led the charge that Senate candidate Alvin Greene was a plant, is crying "foul" here as well, though, pointing out that Brown has been linked to a Republican consulting firm. The Brown campaign paid $23K to Stonewall Strategies (run by former Joe Wilson aide Preston Grisham) for "marketing;" Brown says he worked with them because they were the only ones willing to take him on as a client. Several African-American state legislators tell TPM that they've talked with Brown and figure that his campaign, while quixotic, was still "on the level."

TN-08: Allegedly humble gospel singer Stephen Fincher has gone negative against his opposition in the GOP primary, not the usual sign of a confident frontrunner. He's launched a new ad against physician Ron Kirkland, attacking Kirkland for allowing thousands of dollars in contributions to Democratic candidates when he was head of the American Medical Group Association. He's also charging that the Jackson Clinic, which Kirkland ran at the time, gave $8K to state Sen. Roy Herron, who's now running for the Democratic nod in the 8th.

VA-05: The hope of party unity for state Sen. Robert Hurt seems to be running into quite a few hitches, in the wake of his 48% victory in the GOP primary against fractured teabagging opposition. The Lynchburg Tea Party leadership says they won't back Hurt (although they seem to be not backing anyone rather, than supporting right-wing indie Jeffrey Clark). TPM also claims that Jim McKelvey, who courted Tea Party support en route to finishing a distant second in the GOP primary, won't be backing Hurt either.

NRCC: Rep. Mike Rogers has a pretty easy job this year: he's in charge of incumbent retention for the NRCC. He says there are, at this point, only nine incumbents who are in need of continued financial support: Dan Lungren, Mary Bono Mack, Charles Djou, Joseph Cao, Pat Tiberi, Jim Gerlach, Charlie Dent, and Dave Reichert. (You'd think he's been looking at our House Ratings page or something.) There's one other stray bit of good news for the NRCC: they've finally settled their several-years-old embezzlement case, paying a $10K civil penalty for improper reporting; they've also received a payout from their insurance company, covering $500K of their lost $724K in funds.

Meanwhile, wags have been having some great fun at the expense of the name of the NRCC's offense program, named, of course, "Young Guns." Despite the fact that the average Young Gun is 50 years old. Only 7 of the 105 members of the program are women, so maybe at least the Gun part is right.

DCCC: Roll Call looks at the DCCC's continued outreach to K Street. An "adopt a member" strategy is being cooked up where sympathetic lobbyists will work directly with the most embattled members to shepherd them through the electoral cycle.

WATN?: If you're wondering whatever became of ex-Rep. John Doolittle, who retired in shame in 2008 after getting caught up in the Jack Abramoff scandal, it turns out he won't be facing any charges. The DOJ has finally closed the case on Doolittle, who had previously been named as a co-conspirator in the case against aide-turned-lobbyist Kevin Ring.

Crisitunity :: SSP Daily Digest: 6/15 (Afternoon Edition)
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Sestak
Sestak has disappeared since the primary.  His hit and run tactics worked well against Weldon and Specter, but I am not sure they are going to work against Tooomey.  The Toomey campaign has been pretty deliberate about attacking Sestak on a different issue every week.  

This week they are attacking him on Marcellus Shale drilling, which is a big provider of jobs in the swingy areas of southwestern Pennsylvania.  Sestak appears to be ready to flip flop at any moment on this one as the rest of the PA Democratic delegation knows they need the Marcellus Shale drilling to occur as a new source of revenue.  

Last week, they attacked him on off-shore drilling by pointing out Sestak supported more off-shore drilling at greater distances, but not close to shore.  By the end of the week, Sestak flipflopped on the issue.  Sestak cannot be flipflopping all over the place.  

At this rate, Sestak will have flipflopped on everything before November.  

23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7


I think Sestak's potential downfall is the lack of anti-Toomey aggression
In order to defeat a faux moderate like Toomey, Sestak needs to go super-negative and unleash a barrage of ads painting him as the uber-conservative that he is. The problem is, Sestak seems to run a low-key, decidedly un-Specter campaign, and that'll go nowhere against Toomey. My suspicion is whatever minor bump Sestak garnered after the primary has fizzled, and the race is now a legit dead heat.

Another fear of mine is that Toomey wins over a lot of conservaDems in the southwest, and, if that's the case, he probably wins. I could almost see a similar map to Clinton/Obama, although Sestak would perform 10% better than the latter in the southeast.

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast


[ Parent ]
Negative on Toomey
The problem with going negative on Toomey is that Toomey has never been a big pusher of social issues.  Toomey's voting record and statements are so all over the place on the social issues that Toomey cannot be nailed like Santorum was.  If he attacks Toomey on social issues, his attacks will be as effective as Creighton Deeds social issue attacks were.

Santorum one twice by focusing on economic issues.  Remember he crushed his opposition in the southeastern suburban counties by running on economic issues.  Going negative on economic issues probably does not help Sestak in the southeast.  Telling wealthier than average citizens that more spending is needed is typically not a winning formula regardless of the merits and demerits of such a situation.  If Sestak is dumb enough to get into an economic debate with Toomey, he is done.

23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7


[ Parent ]
You're saying attacking Toomey on social issues won't work
and attacking him on economic issues won't work. So do I take it, you think Sestak has no chance of winning, or do you have another suggestion on how he should campaign?

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Progressive problem
It is not easy being a progressive in Pennsylvania.  You either got to be a corporate Dem or a conservaDem.

23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7

[ Parent ]
Obama won the state by 10+%
he wasn't a progressive, not is neither a corporate or conservative Democrat.

[ Parent ]
Statewide officials
I am not counting presidential elections.  Name one statewide elected Democrat in Pennsylvania over the last 25 years that is a progressive.

Only one has been elected to any statewide office:  Harris Wofford, but he was elected in a special election.  

Rendell has been a thorn in progressive groups sides and is a DLC type.  Casey ran as a conservaDem.  The Auditor General Jack Wagner is a conservaDem.  Tresurer McChord is a DLC type.  

23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7


[ Parent ]
Please characterize current Democratic elected officials in Pennsylvania
I also tend to disagree with you. You seem to feel that Toomey is going to win.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Nonsense
There is plenty in Toomey's economic record for Sestak to challenge him on. Privatization of Social Security for a start. He can't ignore the economy when it is the most important thing on voters' minds.

[ Parent ]
Spending...
Attacking Toomey on spending is not going to work.  

23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7

[ Parent ]
Attacking
Toomey's draconian spending cuts would work better.

"Toomey wants to take away grandma's Social Security to give rich people a tax cut."

Or even better...

"Toomey wants to give grandma's Social Security to Wall Street fat cats to gamble with so he can give rich people a tax cut."

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


[ Parent ]
Yes it will
Toomey is so out of the mainstream on economic issues that he can be given the Rand Paul and Sharron Angle treatment.  


[ Parent ]
Then what do you suggest?
I really hate it when people bitch and moan without offering an alternative.

[ Parent ]
Ryan,
With do respect are you backing Toomey? If you feel it is too rude for me to ask then you do not have to answer. Thanks.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Be nice
He's been negative on PA since primary night, even though that was a GREAT night for Dems.  He constantly cites primary turnout numbers as foretelling GE results this fall and I have repeatedly shown using many, many recent elections that his assertions are false.

As much as he claims to be a Dem, I think he is a Tekzilla towards PA.  He may sound more informed certainly, but in his eyes the Dem party in PA is utterly hopeless and helpless this fall in his eyes.  Why he comments on PA politics any time anyone even mentions the words is beyond me.  

Just like the people who were anti-Blumenthal every time any article came up about him.  Same post every daily digest for 2-3 weeks.
 


[ Parent ]
No, he does not call himself a Democrat
Unless I am very much mistaken, he's identified himself as a moderate Republican, socially liberal and fiscally conservative, who sometimes votes Democratic.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Yep.
I remember Ryan identifying himself as a "Rendell Republican".

My blog
Twitter
Scribd
28, New Democrat, Female, TX-03 (hometown CA-26)


[ Parent ]
Not
trying to be rude but his argument would make more sense to me if I knew who he was supporting, that is why I asked. If I came off as rude or such I apologize. I think Ryan has past described himself as a socially liberal, fiscally conservative Republican and it would be nice to know how they are going considering the Republican nominee is a former club for growther. I would hope Sestak could win some moderate Republicans.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
So?
Sestak wasn't on tv until, what, three weeks before the primary?  His team has a proven strategy, and it works: hold your fire until the voters are paying attention, then executive massively and flawlessly.

No one's paying attention to Toomey either.


[ Parent ]
Sestak's strategy...
Has Sestak ever ran against a candidate that was not politically wounded?  No.  He has ran against a lunatic and a party changer.  

Roll Call had an interesting piece last week how Specter's staff (not the individuals who ran his primary campaign, but his old time machine) is working for Toomey.  If this is the case, which I would not doubt in this state, Sestak is going to face a massive onslaught.

23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7


[ Parent ]
It's not Sestak's strategy
It's his media consultants at The Campaign Group, and it's the same way they got city councilman Michael Nutter the Democratic nomination for Mayor of Philadelphia in 2007 ahead of two sitting congressman and a self-financing millionaire.  

[ Parent ]
That strategy worked
against a incumbent whom the voters have known for 30 years.  Everyone had an opinion of Specter, so there was little gain in Sestak going up early.

But it is quite the opposite with Toomey.  You need to go up early to define Toomey before he can define himself.


[ Parent ]
Marcellus Shale
Don't get me started about how pissed I am about Marcellus Shale. They're drilling in Northern PA (already one blow out in Clearfield County), and several of these once rich scenic towns have been devastated. It may become a bigger issue closer to election, if people start to see how much they messed up on this one.

23, Male, PA-05 (summer) PA-12 (winter)

[ Parent ]
It's June, who cares
Sestak should be doing basically nothing this month and next.

Hard campaigning in June is a great way to annoy voters.

He ran a solid campaign against Specter and should just as easily take down Toomey if he follows the same script.


[ Parent ]
Doing nothing?
No, he should be raising money.

[ Parent ]
I really hope D'Annunzio pulls it out
C'mon GOP primary voters.  You denied us Dale Peterson and Vaughn Ward, and the hours of fun that would have resulted.  I also had hopes for John Hostettler here in Indiana.  True, you gave is Rand Paul and especially Sharon Angle, and that's all good -- but I think you've got one  more round of crazy in you!

Harold Johnson...
I had lunch with my elderly parents today, and my dad asked me who the hell Harold Johnson is.  Johnson was the sportscaster on the Charlotte ABC affiliate for many years.  Johnson was a decent sportscaster, but he was fixated on NASCAR and professional wrestling.  He could be fairly obnoxious with his comments, but he was more of an entertainer than anything else.  He seemed more interested in what happened outside the sport rather than reporting on the sports.

I know that Tim D is stealing all the nut-ball limelight in NC-08, but Harold Johnson is somewhat flaky too.  I don't consider him much of a threat, but it's been a long time since I lived in the Charlotte area.  He made some friends with the likes of Rick Flair and Richard Petty too.  It could help him:  it could hurt him.  

40, male, Democrat, NC-04


[ Parent ]
Except Kissell is flakey as well.
I think Harold Johnson is a legitimate threat to Kissell, particularly with the progressive base being turned off. Tim D...not so much.  

[ Parent ]
It could get interesting if Johnson wins the primary
And yes, Kissell is a flake.  

I just can't take Johnson too seriously.  If Kissell stumbles, Johnson has a realistic chance.  Until that happens, I'm not losing sleep on this race.

On another front, some of the evangelicals in that area have bought Tim D's story.  Supposedly many think Tim D is a sign of what happens when you turn your life around.  This thinking could also help Kissell's reelection prospects.

40, male, Democrat, NC-04


[ Parent ]
NJ-06: Frank Pallone Handed Re-election
http://www.politico.com/news/s...
I can not tell you how pissed I am.  

GOP wasn't going to win anyway


[ Parent ]
Well,
now you can spend the money you would have basically wasted in places where it can be better utilized.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
That's exactly how I felt when the Dems
nominated Joel Gill over James Jackson and Shawn O'Hara to take on Gregg Harper in MS-03.  Jackson would have been competitive.  O'Hara would have mopped the floor with Harper.  DAMN IT DEMS!!!  YOU'RE GIVING IT AWAY!!!
 

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11

[ Parent ]
Wait am I reading this right?
You thought we had a chance at winning MS-3?  This year?  That district has a republican incumbent, with a PVI of R+15.  Even in the best of years a district like that is a longshot at best.  Either you know something that nobody else knows or this is way out in left field, or both.

23, Male, Democrat, OH-13

[ Parent ]
Yes
Harper's a freshman in a seat that is historically friendly to Democrats.

MS-03, before Chip Pickering, was Sonny Montgomery's seat. Montgomery is a legend in MS.

It's a Southern seat, so, like most Southern seats, the PVI is very misleading.

I'm not too familiar with the candidates listed, and maybe spiderdem was joking, but I can see why MS-03 would be a seat for us to target.


[ Parent ]
We didnt even target it in 2008
IIRC, this is the most black district in the country represented by a Republican at 33.3% black.  It most likely would have been heavily targeted in the event that we had gotten a stellar candidate, but Obama hadnt become the nominee in time for that to be realized.  

[ Parent ]
Actually
I was lampooning GOPVOTER's wide-eyed optimism about a Diane Gooch run in NJ-06 by comparing it to Joel Gill's quixotic run against Harper.

I do predict that Gill will get a higher percentage of the vote against Harper than Alvin Greene will against Demint in SC, FWIW.

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


[ Parent ]
Aah, lol
You got all three of us!  God I am really slow to pick up on sarcasm sometimes.

23, Male, Democrat, OH-13

[ Parent ]
It was a really elaborate and weird joke.
Can't blame you for not getting it and thinking I have the worst political instincts in the world instead.  On top of everything you said, Gill has raised no money and lost to Harper by 26 during the Dem wave of 2008.

MS-03 is a historically Democratic district, and former Congressman Ronnie Shows could have potentially picked it up for us in 2008, but he declined.  Gill, on the other hand, will have to resort to Alvin Greene tactics.

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


[ Parent ]
hahahahhaha
Now your comment is just hilarious.

[ Parent ]
WA-Sen. interesting about Rossi
First he takes forever and a day to make up his mind to run for the Senate in the first place. And now he's hardly running, but giving foreclosure seminars of all things?? Let's hope he's forgotten all about the story of Martha Coakley.
He's done two statewide campaigns in the past, so it's not like he's a newbie at this-  Weird
Or maybe he's thinking outside the box on us, and has created a new concept: a combination foreclosure seminar/campaign rally.

Is Lean D still the right rating here?


WA Senate
I think Rossi is still a reluctant candidate evidenced by the fact that he continues to give real estate seminars. Not only is he not campaigning fulltime, he is actually turning down campaign invitations to continue his real estate practice. That isn't the behavior of a candidate hungry to win.

Despite his behavior, he's moved up a few points in the latest Elway poll. Now Murray leads by 7. That really isn't good news for Rossi. The last Elway poll was taken weeks before he announced and those who supported him were expressing support for a potential candidate. He picked up 6 points in the June poll but Murray lost only 3 points.

Given that this is the first poll taken after his announcement, I would say "leans D" is still the appropriate designation for the race.

What I found really interesting in the new poll is that Didier improved his standing more than Rossi did. I don't think Rossi is going to breeze through the primary.


[ Parent ]
Is Laura Richardson in trouble?
http://www.fec.gov/DisclosureS...
She is in a D+26 district, but she has ethics issues and her challenger has more money than her. Parker may also get RNC support if they think Richardson is in trouble, because Michael Steele met with her today.  

No
Richardson is in a district that she is safe regardless of ethics issues.  And her ethics issues are nowhere near as bad as Bill Jefferson.

Exactly why I hate pro-incumbent gerrymandering.  It allows those who do nothing for their district and people with ethics matters to keep getting reelected rather getting the boot.


[ Parent ]
Well, she'll make it through 2010
Since California primaries have already happened and despite her weak-sauce (68%) showing, she's certain to make it through the 2010 cycle. A D+26 district is simply too liberal to dislodge a Democratic opponent in a general election, short of a freezer full of cash or a felony conviction.

But yeah, Richardson's had ethics problems from the beginning. If I could primary anyone in the California delegation and have them lose, it would be her ... right after Jane "This Conversation Never Happened" Harman.

State Sen. Jenny Oropeza, for example, would definitely be an upgrade over Richardson and if Oropeza runs in 2012, she wouldn't have to give up her seat (assuming she wins re-election in 2010, which she almost certainly will).

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


[ Parent ]
If
the GOP spent any money here it would be a royal waste.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Never, never
Never underestimate Michael Steele's ability to waste money...

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.

[ Parent ]
Don't get silly GOPVOTER
Pallone and Richardson? Give me a break! There is having confidence and then there is getting cocky.

[ Parent ]
Hey GOPVOTER
Here is a YouTube video of a super secret meeting between Michael Steele and Chakah Fattah's GOP opponent Rick Hellberg.  I just saw on RedState that Hellberg's internals have this very tight!  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...  

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


[ Parent ]
I never thought we'd beat them
Unless it got really bad. Pallone could. I dont know the extent of Richardsons ethics issues and found it surprising Steele would meet with her and that she had more CoH. Pallone its more about making him spend his money so he cant start the 2014 senate race with 5 or 6 million on hand. Maybe we could beat him if Gooch spent enough and ran a great campaign. Trust me, not cocky or too confident. Anytime Republicans have to depend on Michael Steele and Pete Sessions to take control of the House, I know I should always be very, very worried.  

[ Parent ]
Highly doubtful
Richardson may have her share of bad press, but Star Parker's maybe half a notch less Tea Party-friendly than Angela McGlowan. She's hardly a Joe Cao.

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

[ Parent ]
She is also a immoral hypocrite
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...

She had four abortions and now wants to ban the procedure?  What an atrocious person!


[ Parent ]
Well in fairness to her,
That was before she got her life back together.

[ Parent ]
I agree
I believe that as humans we have the right to change and learn from our own personal experiences in life.  I've known several women who have had abortions (albeit at a young age) who are now profoundly anti-abortion.  I don't think it makes them a hypocrite if later in life they changed their opinion based on their own personal experience.

Now, if she was spouting out that she's anti-abortion, and during this time actually had four abortions, then yes, I would say she's a hypocrite.  From the evidence provided, I think she changed her feelings/mindset regarding abortion based on her own personal experience.  I have no qualms about that, and this wouldn't make her a hypocrite.

40, male, Democrat, NC-04


[ Parent ]
No
But she also spent a very large portion of her life on welfare, and now wants to get rid of welfare all together.

To me, this is a case of "I screwed up and got fixed, but no one else can screw up!" Her past is what made her what she is today, but she doesn't want anyone else to have the same history. Getting rid of legal abortions or welfare doesn't make everyone happy Christians. I thought she'd realize that.

23, Male, PA-05 (summer) PA-12 (winter)


[ Parent ]
I think this is becoming a derail (n/t)


40, male, Democrat, NC-04

[ Parent ]
Kinda like COlin Powell
He was a beneficiary of affirmative action, or at least perceived to be, and yet he was against it later.  He claimed it actually made it harder for him to climb the ladder in his career path (military).

To me its kind of like some support programs are like a ladder allowing people to move up in socio-economic ways.  people who use them and want to get rid of them are like people climbing the ladder but kicking those people climbing below them and breaking the rungs after they climb them.

The abortion issue is separate.  Quite simply, I have no comment on that.


[ Parent ]
In political terms
I think there is quite a difference in the political appeal of a politician who has a compelling personal story of turning his/her life around and makes a personal appeal for people not to make the mistakes s/he made and for more support (whether government or/and private) for people in trouble, and someone who, having turned their life around, wants to punish people who haven't turned their lives around.

It's always popular for American politicians to be punitive toward criminals, but it is NOT always popular for them to be punitive toward people who have what the politician herself used to consider problems of character, morality, or sinfulness in her own life.

Note that I am deliberately focusing on questions of public reactions relevant to elections, and that although my views probably come across loud and clear in this post, I do not mean to debate the morality of safe, legal abortions vs. unsafe, deadly ones on this site, although that is a common slogan among pro-choicers.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Whitman
Let's not confuse the Meg Whitman money.  

Her latest $20 million to her campaign was her own money, earned the "old fashioned" way, e.g., from Goldman Sachs.  BUT when she physically assulated an E-Bay employee, the 6-figure payment was paid by E-Bay, just as all of her lavish, wasteful spending at E-Bay was with E-Bay's money, not her own.    


Unless
more stories about Whitman beating up employees she didn't like pop up, this will blow over like Brown's "Whitman's a Nazi" comment.

19, Male, Independent, CA-12

[ Parent ]
Angle Floated Idea of Armed Insurrection
in an interview  earlier this year, Nevada Senate candidate Sharron Angle (R) appeared to float the possibility of armed insurrection if "this Congress keeps going the way it is," reports Greg Sargent.

Said Angle: "You know, our Founding Fathers, they put that Second Amendment in there for a good reason and that was for the people to protect themselves against a tyrannical government. And in fact Thomas Jefferson said it's good for a country to have a revolution every 20 years. I hope that's not where we're going, but you know if this Congress keeps going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second Amendment remedies and saying my goodness what can we do to turn this country around? I'll tell you the first thing we need to do is take Harry Reid out."

I don't know whether to be happy this nutcase may hand Harry Ried re-election or scared that she may actually become a US Senator.

http://politicalwire.com/archi...

"Where free Unions and collective bargaining is forbidden, freedom is lost." - Ronald Reagan


Be scared. She raised $750,000 in less than a week
http://www.sharronangle.com/

I'm just providing a link for info basis, not for anybody to donate!


[ Parent ]
They can dnate
Think about it this way: your donation ensures she stays relevant and if she's relevant, she provides entertainment to SSP
So, Donate! ;)  

[ Parent ]
I almost wrote something admonishing conspiracy for overconfidence
Then I realized with Sharron Angle in the race, I'm overconfident about Harry Ried's chances. Seriously, there's just no way Nevada voters can vote in this nutjob into the Senate.  

[ Parent ]
In all probablity
I think I'm less bullish than most about Harry Reid's chances even against Angle. The fact she suddenly rasied a load of money is neither here or there.

[ Parent ]
Right, totally agree.
Anyway, I'm going to stick to being overconfident. To me, this all seems to bear a lot of resemblance to the 1994 Chuck Robb-Oliver North race, where Robb was able to pull it out in a Republican wave year because North was just not acceptable (although I realize there was a more viable third party candidate running in VA that year).  

[ Parent ]
Agree, and as moderators here have pointed out, LOW-HANGING FRUIT...
...is what you get early if you're in a race people care about, or you otherwise have rich and/or powerful connections.

Reid is raising and spending, actually reaching voters now.  And I imagine, or at least hope, he's got his own post-primary fundraising bump from Democrats nationally scared of Angle.  I can tell you I gave Reid $250 the day after the primary, motivated by keeping Angle out of the Senate.  I like Reid, but I wouldn't give him money when he's already loaded if his victory didn't suddenly become about something more than him.  And now it's about more than him.  Angle is the type to do real damage to America.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
The negative ads had better work
Because AFAIK, Reid has been running bio spots for months. (He seemed to be up on the air as if it were October '10 when we were in Reno in Nov '09.)

Speaking of 3rd party candidates, I could believe that "none of the above" may break 10% when the negativity is said and done in that race.


[ Parent ]
Agree completely, but I think he has to run positive spots anyway......
I think Reid has to find a positive message to define himself that works with someone, even if only with the the Democratic base.  To some extent the positive spots give him cover for the attack ads, since he otherwise risks being called "desperate" or other things that effectively add up to the attck ads backfiring by making his campaign, rather than Angle's extremism, the issue.  As long as he's running on his record, he's clearly not running from it and merely attacking Angle out of desperation.

Secondarily, a positive self-portrait is one piece of the puzzle in ginning up turnout among the Democratic base.  They're the easiest people to persuade that Harry is doing a good job, and reminding or persuading them that he's worth voting for is important and also goes a long way toward giving the phone-bankers and door-knockers something to work with.  Trust me on that, I'm a regular door-knocker for Democratic candidates where I live, and it's important for me to have something to sell at the doors.  Creigh Deeds gave me nothing to work with, but my Delegate Margi Vanderhye gave me plenty...she still lost thanks to Deeds' negative coattails, but she did a lot better than Deeds, and I'm convinced I might have turned a vote here or there with my door-knocking which I couldn't have done without her having something to sell.

Thirdly, Reid has enough money to play around and see if he can find a message that really sticks with a few swing voters who dislike him and make them revisit their image of him.  That's what he did last fall when, yes, he started positive ads with the now-discarded tag line, "determination that makes a difference."  Now he's trying "no one can do more."  It might not work, but he's doing the right thing, complete with a thematic tag line.  Elections are won and lost on the margins, and he doesn't need to rise to 50% job approval to win this one; if he can get into the fall with a job approval in the mid-40s, that definitely gets him over the hump, and even low-40s gives him a realistic chance against an opponent like Angle and with the alternative options on the ballot.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
Isn't some mix standard in campaigns with money?
A mix of positive and negative, going more positive starting in late Oct.

Reid certainly knows what to do. I'm just concerned about the effectiveness. Some of Angle's positions are so over the top, I don't know if such attack ads will be credible with swing voters. But I guess that depends on the quality of the attack ad.

Thus my comment about "none of the above". If that number goes above 10%, Reid would "only" need 45% of the vote, which is quite doable with his current approval levels.

AFAIK, Reid's positive ads have not yet raised his approval levels, But as I think you're suggesting, that may change with a different approach.  


[ Parent ]
Research 2000 polling showed Reid's favorables inching up......
The DailyKos/R2K polls, which weren't nearly as bad as some claimed, had Reid improving his favorability from 34-55 to 40-52 over the course of three polls in linear fashion.  Mason-Dixon still showed Reid at 35-52 which is worse, so that is a legitimate contrary data point.  But ultimately I see hope in the polls.

Where Reid can clearly improve his image is with Democratic leaners and whatever small portion of strong Dems who dislike him.  Those are the most persuadable of voters who've soured on him.  Get the base Dems and Dem leaners, and that gets Reid into the low 40s right there.  Then he needs to close the gap with indies.

Having Angle as the opponent makes both things a lot easier.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
Freedom Works endorse Haley
Bit late to the party.

SC-Sen: DeMint up 37%
http://www.rasmussenreports.co...

Greene's barely breaking the 50% mark among African-Americans.

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast


Greene will win by 40%
if history is to be our guide.

he just has to do nothing, spend no money, and surf porn.


[ Parent ]
DeMint is so weak
Look at Hoeven.  Hoeven polls at around >70%<, against a serious opponent.  

DeMint has a non-candidate, and yet he gets only 58%?  I remember people saying during the last primary when such and such an incumbant can't break 60% against token opposition something is wrong.  

I know that a win is a win.  But DeMint's unexpectedly weak showing is interesting.  Especially when you remember polls that had him at only a 49% approval rating, and barely breaking 50% against Vic Rawl.  I really don't think DeMint is as beloved in SC as everyone assumes.


[ Parent ]
No, he's not...
A more Democratic year, against a more legit opponent, and DeMint might be in trouble.  

[ Parent ]
Not to mention
a more competent State Democratic party. :-P If only the SC Dems had a good bench.

[ Parent ]
KS-Gov: Gov. Mark Parkinson
I'm sorry, no offense Tom Holland, you're a solid candidate for a Kansas Democrat, but OMFG why did Mark Parkinson refuse to run for Governor?!?!! Gah!  He just gave what is probably the single best speech about Kansas I've ever heard or read.

http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q...
-Kansas City Star

...and got a standing ovation and an approving newspaper headline. It's the kind of speech that gets Democrats elected in Kansas. Okay, granted...not a ton of competition for "best speech about Kansas." But still...good speech. And he even evoked the ole progressive spirit of Kansas, God bless him. Attention, KS Democrats--moar like this, plz.

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


NV-Sen: top state political analyst Jon Ralson having fun with Sharron Angle......
From Ralston's Twitter feed, 4 straight tweets I've strung together as they're really the continuation of a single thought:

Cornyn says Angle not ready 2 face media 4 weeks.."at some point that I think she needs 2 get staffed up and prepared."...Does it strike anyone else Cornyn & Co. are talking about Angle as if she's a child or some new species getting acclimated to planet Earth?...   News flash: This woman has been running for the U.S. Senate for the better part of a year. She won in a landslide. What are they saying?...Here's what they're saying: We're terrified that if Sharron Angle is herself that Harry Reid will shred her like Buscemi in the woodchipper.

Really, Angle is getting shredded in the Beltway, but I'm more interested in what is happening in Nevada.  We know Ralston is shredding her; I don't know how well-known he is, but he appears to have a nightly TV show so he's probably got some broader name rec; we know a local Fox station news reporter attacked her Fox & Friends interview; we know Reid is up with a TV attack ad, in what I read is a big buy even though I didn't see a numerical value for dollars or points; and we know Angle is dodging the Nevada media, not just national media.  I'm hopeful that more than just Reid's ad buy is reaching the Nevada public regarding Angle.  The faster we can take her down, the harder it will be for her to get back up.  If she loses control of her public image and can't rehabilitate it, then checkmate, Reid wins.  Stu Rothenberg tried to argue this week that Angle is the same as any generic Republican and is likely to win, and I say bullshit.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


Exactly why the GOP establishment secretly hates the tea-baggers
They'd have KY, and FL in the bag with NV having been a crap-shoot as Lowden tanked for the same reasons, unprepared for the game of politics.

Angle has said enough hasn't she?  KY will be harder because Rand Paul hasnt been on tv enough to be painted as a big nut job.


[ Parent ]
There are other bigger reasons why beating Rand Paul is harder......
The biggest reason is that Kentucky is a LOT more conservative than Nevada.  Obama won Nevada with 55% and by 12, and lost Kentucky with 41% and by 17.  So there is a bigger percentage of default GOP voters in Kentucky than Nevada.

The second-biggest reason is money.  Conway didn't have anything post-primary to get on the air the way Reid has and take advantage of Paul's awful rollout.  Angle learned from Paul's rollout and immediately into hiding, but Reid has the money to keep her insanity visible.

Conway can win, but it will take a lot more work, and very smart messaging.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
Agree with this...
Also, I'm not sure it's fair to group Marco Rubio in with the other two. He's not nearly as wacky, and apparently Crist really was a secret liberal - his new positions couldn't be the result of a need to become the unofficial Democrat and give himself a better chance of winning, right?

(and yes, I'd still vote for Crist over Rubio, but the cynicism in the Crist campaign has been rather breathtaking).  


[ Parent ]
I have a developing Grand Unifying Theory (GUT) on all this......
My theory, which one can reasonably argue is still just a hypothesis, is that in large states with big populations, politics is much more impersonal and distant, and detached voters are less inclined to hold a candidate's shortcomings against him.

So far this has been true in California with Whitman and Fiorina, who by all rights ran mediocre campaigns except for being rich enough to smother their primary opponents with ads.  I don't think you can pull that off in, say, Iowa, where TV ads alone won't move numbers for a self-funder with no record of public service against a more establishment figure.  We're seeing the pattern unfold again in Florida, with Rick Scott and Jeff Greene quickly overwhelming establishment candidates with perfectly respectable personal biographies and records of public service.  All these rich people overcame/are overcoming some pretty significant vulnerabilities with money alone.

And now I'm contemplating squeezing Charlie Crist into my Grand Unifying Theory, even though his facts and circumstances are different.  His strength is not money but, rather, a strong record of public service.  But the reason he still fits into my GUT is he's being forgiven by voters for a transparently self-serving party change.  No one questions he's doing this solely to get elected.  And everyone, myself included, thought it would be the end of him, that voters would decide he can't be trusted, same as Arlen.  Indeed, Crist's switch, the timing of it, was far more brazen than Specter's, which happened early instead of at the last minute, and still forced him to try to win a primary and get validation from voters before advancing to November.  But voters up to now are just not holding it against him.

Ultimately my GUT will be tested definitively in the Florida primary and eventually in November.

And one more example worth watching:  NH-Sen, Ayotte vs. Bill Binnie.  From what we can tell, retread Ovide Lamontagne has no traction, and Binnie is slowly consolidating the anti-Ayotte/anti-establishment vote.  Binnie is a rich guy with no record of public service, and although I have no idea if he has baggage otherwise, simply being a rich dude trying to "buy" a Senate seat is normally vulnerability enough.  If Binnie wins, it actually blows up my theory, since my GUT by its very terms applies only in large states.  If Ayotte wins, it supports my GUT because NH is too small, and voters too closely tied to their politics, for a rich self-funder to buy their votes.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
Your theory is interesting
But do note that Specter is already an exception, as PA is a very high-population state.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Random question
I'm in China for a bit, and I can't use my American phone here. I'm currently following SSP on Twitter and I meant to unsubscribe before coming here but it slipped my mind, and now I can't because Twitter is blocked in China. In the interest of not having a full text message inbox when I return to the States, is there some way one of the SSP admins could unsubscribe me? Thanks.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


Cedric Richmond Re-Announces LA-02 campaign, Sen. Karen Carter-Peterson Considering
http://www.nola.com/politics/i...
Newly elected State Senator Karen Carter Peterson is mulling over a La-02 race according to this. She lost in the 2006 run-off to Jefferson. She was Speaker Pro Tem of the state house before she was elected to the state senate this spring. She was succeed by another former loser in the run-off to Jefferson, Helena Moreno. She won the seat held by the DCCC's preferred candidate, former State Senator Cheryl Gray, who resigned to move to CT with her husband. I wouldn't be surprised to see the DCCC recruit Karen Carter Peterson. She would be much stronger than Richmond and LaFaunta and is considered a rising star in the LA Dem party. She would probably have a much more liberal record than Richmond or LaFaunta too.  

Interesting reading from TPM
Have Republicans Already Blown Their Chance to Recapture The Senate?

With nearly five months to go until Election Day, Republican hopes of retaking the Senate have dimmed and they're privately lamenting their lost opportunity. Until just a few weeks ago, Republicans considered winning a Senate majority a long shot but by no means out of reach. But the euphoria over Scott Brown's victory in Massachusetts in January seems a distant memory now, especially after the latest round of primary results last week.

Primary victories by Carly Fiorina in California and Sharron Angle in Nevada bolstered a growing national narrative that Republican candidates are lightweights, or too outside the mainstream, to survive in the fall, and that could harm even top tier Republicans.

"There's now a path to 'acceptable losses' for Democrats," notes one cautiously optimistic Democratic strategist.

"I totally see how the number stops at five to seven [Republican pickups]" says a Republican consultant, speaking of an optimistic scenario for the GOP.

Go to the link to read the rest. It's a good read and grist for the mill.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


Well there's no doubt
That the republicans screwed the pooch in Nevada by nominating Angle.  Probably California too, but it was never better than 50/50 that Tom Campbell would've beaten Barbara Boxer.  

The Republicans have also put themselves on defense in Kentucky with their nomination of Rand Paul, which has expanded democratic pickup possibilities to 3 (4 if you consider Charlie Crist a democratic leaning indy)

23, Male, Democrat, OH-13


[ Parent ]
Strictly speaking, I'd say our pickup opportunities are 5 or 6, not 3......
Ohio and Missouri are real tossups, we have very credible paths to victory there.

New Hampshire has developed into a tougher nut to crack, but I suspect our weak pooling there is generic party slippage, truly a product of the national environment, rather than anything specific to Hodes or Ayotte.  Once the candidates themselves become more important, we'll learn more.  And there's always a chance the Republicans get bloodied in their contested primary, whether Ayotte wins it or not.  But I'm not writing off NH yet, the late primary on the GOP side and lack of serious TV spending so far make it still an open question.

But to the extent you're limiting your list to cases where "the weaker choice won the nomination," then yes, you're right that there's 3 of 'em.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
My personal feeling is that
New Hampshire is the hardest of them for us to win.  I think it is more likely that we pick up North Carolina or even Arizona (if McCain somehow loses to Hayworth) than New Hampshire.

When the budget, deficit, and taxes become issues, New Hampshire seems to turn very conservative and Republican.    And unless the Dems can turn the campaign into something else, it will be tough this year.  The only Dems that generally in this kind of environment are ones who are sort of conservative on the deficit or taxes (i.e. Gov John Lynch).  I haven't seen anything from Paul Hodes that suggest that he is not a garden variety liberal.  


[ Parent ]
Yes but it IS still early
Let's not forget, in 2008 the US had similarly large deficits and taxes were exactly as they are today at the Federal level.

I agree Hodes might be to the right of the NH electorate on fiscal issues, but that doesn't mean he can't turn the election towards other issues.

Also, I'm unaware of any new tax initiatives in NH that would sour people towards the incumbent party.  And NH's unemplyment rate is well below the national average (as it almost always is).

And jsut last week Lynch signed into a law a bill eliminating the state's budget deficit.  With a relatively popular Dem at the top of the ticket who is doing a decent job fiscally (though Repubs will say mroe tax and spending cuts should have been given), NH isn't as toxic as one would think.

Hopefully Hodes can present himself as liberal where needed, and can tie himself to Lynch on fiscal issues.  And I still don't know that Ayotte can win solely on fiscal issues jsut yet, but maybe.


[ Parent ]
This is a great article
The GOP will have their hands full in retaining several states in 2010.  Ohio and Missouri probably lead the list, and Kentucky is definitely in play since Paul is the GOP candidate.  New Hampshire could be in play, and so could my state of North Carolina.

As far as Crist goes, if he should win Florida, I really don't know if he would caucus with the Republicans or the Democrats.  He'd probably have less static if he would choose to caucus with us.  Crist beats by his own drummer.  I'm not counting on Crist caucusing with the Dems.  The good side is that a Crist victory would mean a Rubio defeat, and that's okay with me.

40, male, Democrat, NC-04


[ Parent ]
Crist
is really a win-win for us. If he decides to caucus with us then we have another dem, albeit a moderate one but still a dem. If he caucuses with us he can be moderate but he can't be Joe LIEberman like because he will need us to clear the field for him in six years and if he is really conservative and a dick then it is not going to happen. Sure the party leaders could try to clear the field but Grayson or somebody would jump at the chance if Crist is a douche. That is assuming he runs as an Indy again, I would not be surprised if he goes all out Democrat if we ensure a clean primary field. However if he does caucus with the R's then he will have to be a liberal Republican who pisses off the leadership a lot, he will need to do all of this to ensure Democrat support. I think it would be plain and simply awkward if he caucused with the Republicans and I doubt he does it unless he is not worried about his re-election.

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Oh yeah, it's a win-win
Not having Rubio in the US Senate would be a victory, IMHO.  Crist has a lot of qualities that I do admire, and I think he'd probably fit in better with the Dems than the GOP.  I just can't gauge on whether he will actually caucus with us or not.  My mind says it's his only true option (the GOP hates him, and he needs to caucus with a party).  My gut tells me that Crist will play it by ear and do whatever the heck he wants to do.  I just can't get a handle on what he will ultimately decide to do.

40, male, Democrat, NC-04

[ Parent ]
Crist does NOT fully own the decision in the first place......
MSNBC's First Read blog posted this morning exactly what I've been saying on SSP for awhile, that Jeff Greene might be the domino that ultimately makes Crist the de facto Democrat.  First Read stated that a lot of Florida Democrats have noticed Crist's pivot to the left and Meek's decline and would love to have "cover" to back Crist openly.  A Greene primary victory would do just that, since Greene has enough baggage to make Democrats feel comfortable jettisoning him.

If Greene wins the primary, that pretty much settles it that Crist ends up caucusing as a Democrat, since Republicans are all-in for Rubio and Crist will be acknowledged in the media, by the party establishment, and by many (perhaps even a majority of) Florida Democratic voters as the "real" Democrat.  Crist beating Rubio under those circumstances means the Republicans can't even think about recruiting him.

If Meek hangs on in the primary, then it's much more awkward for Democrats, and Crist has more wiggle room if he wins, but ultimately Republicans are still all-in for Rubio and will be hard-pressed to recruit Crist after the fact.  Senate Democrats are a bigger tent on ideology and policy and have an easy time accepting dissenters into their fold, and they're also more coldly calculating on politics.  Those are the reasons they embraced Lieberman as a prodigal son, and in hindsight, as much as it pained me at the time, they were right.  We got stuff done, especially health care reform, that wouldn't have been possible without Lieberman's floor votes.  Republicans are a smaller tent on ideology and policy, and they're not coldly calculating enough to reposition themselves as neutral between Rubio and Crist the way the Democratic establishment did between Lieberman and Lamont.  The Democratic establishment is a lot more willing to risk the wrath of their base than the Republicans are.

So I think ultimately Crist is left with only a Democratic option.

The key things that will decide his fate are two things:  (1) the outcome of the Democratic primary; if Greene wins, game over, Crist is our de facto nominee; and (2) regardless of who wins the Democratic primary, how will the Republican Party establishment in D.C. talk and behave regarding Crist post-primary through election day?  If they pivot away from criticizing Crist and start saying anything nice about him, then that's a sign they're considering trying to recruit him if he wins.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
I agree that Crist's only option will be ultimately to caucus with the Dems
The bridge between the GOP and Crist has been set on fire, and I don't see how they could kiss and make up should Crist win the election.  In the same breath, this is politics we are speaking about.  5 months in politics is an eternity.

But yes, I tend to concur with your assessment.

40, male, Democrat, NC-04


[ Parent ]
Would that kill Crist's credibility with moderate Rs?
If Greene wins, and is put into an Alan Schlesinger (CT-Sen) type of irrelevance, I can see Crist being depicted as the de-facto D.

But would that perception hurt him among moderate Rs? Would Crist take enough Ds away from Greene to make up for that? (Schlesinger still got 10% in CT.)


[ Parent ]
I think the answer is clearly "NO," based on...
...the fact that Crist's switch from R to indy didn't already cost him moderate Rs.  His switch was transparently selfish, based purely on giving him a chance to win the election, and for that reason a lot of campaign analysts and enthusiasts on both sides, myself included, just assumed he would tank embarrassingly.  But that didn't happen.  Florida voters are showing they think differently than we thought they would, and they decided they just like Charlie Crist.

If Crist switching from R to indy driven purely by personal ambition wasn't enough to cost him moderate Rs and others, then they certainly won't abandon Crist because some Democratic public figures eventually endorse him over a flawed Democratic nominee.

And regarding Greene, the one thing that makes him potentially dangerous to Crist is his money.  Greene obviously will keep himself on the air after a primary win, and attack both Rubio and Crist.  But since Greene has to attack both to have a chance to win, I suspect it will end up a wash and not hurt Crist vis-a-vis Rubio.  Still, Greene as a legitimate primary victor with money to spend will do better than 10%, and could easily pull in 20% in the general.  Hell, we could all be wrong, and the guy could very well spend his way to a November plurality victory, although I think that's highly doubtful because I believe a general electorate is much more resistant and skeptical a bunch than primary voters, who are much more easily swayed by TV ads and publicity when choosing between candidates who ostensibly aren't very different on ideology or issues.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
Senate Results
I'll make this assertion, that the Republicans will have only a net gain of four seats in the Senate, and that as of this moment the only two definite flips are for Hoeven in ND and for Boozman in AR.  How the rest turns out I'm not exactly sure.  Coons is the underdog in DE, but if Dem fortunes improve he might be able to pull an upset.  I don't know why people are pessimistic about Indiana, since Coats has so much baggage.  For all the other talked about races (PA, IL, CA, NV, CT, FL), I think the Dem nominee has a good chance of pulling a win, with indy Crist likely winning in FL.  And Dems may even win some seats in MO, NH, OH, KY, and NC.

[ Parent ]
Here's what worries me a little bit...
This will sound a whole lot of Charlie Cook, but while the microtrends (i.e. bad candidates) look good for the Dems, the macrotrends are not looking so hot right now, at least to me (I qualify this because I realize there are some counterindicators, such as the AP poll from yesterday and the fact Obama's popularity hasn't declined that much in the past few months).

If the macrotrends continue to be bad, there are Dem seats, such as Washington and Wisconsin, which aren't in play now but might be come to be in October. It's easy to say there's no way someone like Feingold can lose against a first time opponent, but a lot of people might have said that about George Allen in VA in 2006 as well.

On the other hand, I don't see any macrotrends that would deliver a victory to Angle. That woman is just too crazy.

So that's my cautionary, tekzilla commentary. Also, my quibbles with the TPM article - Fiorna is a flawed candidate, but I doubt too many Republican strategists have given up on the seat - Boxer is arguably flawed as well. David Vitter still doesn't seem to me to be in much trouble. And Kirk, Rubio and Toomey still have chances to win.

I just like to see things get a little better before I'm confident in predicting we're out of the woods in the Senate. (I'd probably still give the Repubs a 10% chance of taking over the whole thing - the same as what I'd give the Dems to gain seats).  


[ Parent ]
Caution is always good
Hubris is always troublesome.

While I agree the macro trends suck, I'm curious how the economies in WA and WI are going.  Neither has close ties to Wall Street in a way that New England seats might.  Unemployment in both states is right abotu the national average, but certainly not above.

I also wonder if Wisconsin is more of a "personal responsibility" state, i.e. not blaming DC pols for the mortgage fiasco and some other economic problems.  I know a lot of rural areas in America skew Libertarian but not sure about Wisconsin.

Washington state I have no idea on.

I'm most concerned/intrigued about Florida, Illinois, Ohio, NC, Kentucky and a few others.  I feel good about PA, but won't really have any safe feelings until the post Labor Day stretch runs begin.  I still feel most of the competitive seats will go about 50-50, which gives Repubs 0% chance as of today, but 4 months from now who knows.

And I hate to say it, but I don't know how much we should put towards Louisiana.  I jsut dont see a path to victory for Melancon.  


[ Parent ]
Senate Results
I guess my original post was more a best case scenario than a prediction.  I sure don't think my prediction is in the bag.  So much can change in the next couple of months.  But here's hoping.

BTW:  Since you mentioned LA, how is it that Melancon isn't doing that well?  Melancon has been all over the news because of the leak.  More importantly, he seems to be the only politician whose work has gotten praised by people.  I would've expected a bounce due to the leak, but it's not happening.  Could this still be a reflection that a big chunk of the Democratic base was depopulated by Katrina?


[ Parent ]
Like Is aid
I just don't see a path to victory.  The state was trending R anyways, like much of the South, but Katrina certainly put that movememnt on steroids.  

I mean, I think Vitter and the CEO of BP could could get caught with a prostitute on an oil rig and Vitter would still win.


[ Parent ]
No New England seats have close ties to Wall Street
besides CT-04.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
NY Times
http://elections.nytimes.com/2...

New York Times interactive map rating

Joe Cooper


I love maps like this
Thanks.

[ Parent ]
Split personality
Gallup Generic Ballot (6/7-13/10)
Republican 49
Democrat 44

USA Today/Gallup Generic Ballot (6/11-13/10)
Democrat 48
Republican 43

http://content.usatoday.com/co...

"In fact, it's the lowest level of enthusiasm for Democratic voters since 1998."

Yeah, cos 1998 was soooo terrible for Democrats!



Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox