Google Ads


Site Stats

Election Night Results Wrapup

by: Crisitunity

Wed May 12, 2010 at 4:26 PM EDT


The main event last night was Rep. Alan Mollohan's slightly surprising loss in the Dem primary in WV-01 to state Sen. Mike Oliverio. Maybe not that surprising, given Mollohan's seeming lack of preparation (the guy hasn't had a competitive primary in literally two decades) and weak fundraising and GOTV organizing. Compounding that: increased attention on Mollohan's ethics woes (although Mollohan had formally been cleared, that didn't keep the cloud from going away, or Oliverio from exploiting that), as well as, of course, the generalized anti-incumbent anti-Washington sentiment in both parties, a residual of voter anger over the crappy economy.

The DCCC was notably cool to Oliverio in their post-election statement, as there seems to some wait-and-see regarding how Oliverio clarifies his anti-Nancy Pelosi comments as they size him up. Still, even with their apparent distate for Oliverio, that's probably part of a bigger ambivalence on their part (paralleled by some NRCC disappointment), as it's quite possible that Oliverio may perform better in November than Mollohan would have, being a "fresh face" free of the taint of incumbency, and free of Mollohan's ethical baggage and his tough pro-HCR vote (I don't think HCR in itself is as much of anchor in this district as the Beltway media might have you believe, but the abortion angle on HCR seemed to be a liability, compounded by the Susan B. Anthony List's involvement in the race).

And while conservative Dem Mollohan was no prize overall, it's worth noting that he was about as liberal a guy as we were going to get in this R+9 district; the PVI/Vote Index has him as 2008's 11th most overperforming Democrat according to National Journal scores (consistent with Nate Silver's math, who finds him 8th most valuable Democrat). Of course, if Oliverio goes on to win in November and moves the ball a few paces to the right, even he'll probably still be overperforming the district's lean; while most of what came out of Oliverio's mouth during the campaign was pretty alarming, he at least has a solid pro-labor record, in the form of strong AFL-CIO ratings.

In the GOP primary, ex-state Rep. and former state GOP chair David McKinley pulled out a decent victory, with 35% of the vote (to 27% for Mac Warner and 21% for Sarah Minear); he'll face Oliverio. Anti-incumbent sentiments were on display in the WV-03 and NE-02 primaries, where Dem Nick Rahall and GOPer Lee Terry pulled in only 67% and 63% respectively against small-time opponents. Rahall will face off in November against ex-Dem ex-state Supreme Court Justice (and BFF of Massey Energy head Don Blankenship) Spike Maynard, who prevailed over a fractured GOP field with only 30%. Finally a couple state legislative results: the GOP held Scott Brown's former Massachusetts state Senate seat in the outer reaches of Boston's suburbs, with state Rep. Dennis Richard Ross winning, while in Georgia, Jason Carter, the grandson of Jimmy Carter, is the newest member of the state Senate after holding a safely-Dem district in DeKalb County.

Crisitunity :: Election Night Results Wrapup
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I don't agree that Mollohan wasn't aggressive enough
or was caught off guard. He spent $700k in ads trying to paint Oliverio as a Republican with tea party roots.
It's not like Mollohan was lazy. He just was overwhelmed by an anti-incumbent electorate.  
http://www.politico.com/news/s...

He spent money, yes
But from what I've heard, his organization was pretty paltry.  

[ Parent ]
You can certainly throw together an ad campaign
but not fieldwork.  That takes months of preparation.

[ Parent ]
Wake Up Call
I think this is real warning to Democrats in swing districts that they have a LOT of work to do on healthcare.  As a party we did a really bad job explaining it and its benefits.  Clearly this is still a lot of misinformation out there about it.

I think groups like SEIU should have done more to protect vulnerable members who supported HC then attacking vulnerable members who voted this against it.


The news that HCR will cost more than a trillion didn't help Mollohan
When did the CBO release that news? Monday? Tuesday?

Bad timing for Mollohan.


Wasn't remotely about that.
Oliverio's message was about corruption, corruption, and corruption.  HCR was mentioned for 2 seconds in one Oliverio ad as far that I know of, and only to say he opposes the Medicare cuts.  Oliverio has not even staked out a clear position on HCR as far as I know.  Here's his statement on his website:

Although access to affordable quality health care is a necessity for every American, I have serious reservations about the bills now before congress. We can all agree about the need for portability in our health insurance and keeping those with pre-existing conditions from being bankrupted. But there are hundreds of additional inserts within the bill that is keeping it bogged down in both chambers, by members on both sides of the aisle.

We need to drive down costs while we provide care for those who can't get it. That should be our fundamental, constant goal. But I believe another basic essential is that we should avoid allowing a government takeover of something as private and personal in nature as health care. I don't want the government determining whether I can get my appendix taken out.

We need to start by passing the pieces we can all agree on. Sick Americans cannot afford to wait. Further, simply arguing over the best way to pay for everyone's health care ignores the root cause of the huge increases in cost we see every year.

Clear as mud.

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


[ Parent ]
Republican line
we should avoid allowing a government takeover of something as private and personal in nature as health care.

And anyone who actually believed that would oppose Medicare.

But clear as mud? Yeah, I agree.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
I don't think it's that clear as mud
I think Oliverio made it clear in his position on healthcare, favors reform but dosen't want a government takeover of it, only problem is this is not a government takeover of it and the fact he believes that makes me think less of the man.

22, Male, Democrat, PA-18.

[ Parent ]
Did he ever make clear he believes that
the HCR bill that passed actually constitutes a government takeover of health care? Because, taken at face value, his position could just mean that he didn't support single payer.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
I think loosely he believe it's a government takeover


22, Male, Democrat, PA-18.

[ Parent ]
I'm just not sure what he believes.
A lot of right wing talking points mixed in with a lot of populist hedging.  Nowhere does he take a firm position on THE bill.

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11

[ Parent ]
You're kidding right?
Do you really think HCR had nothing to do with his lose?  If Mollohan had voted against it he would probably still be in office today.

The ethics issues have been around Mollohan for a long long time.  They are nothing new.  What sparked the outrage in his district is the public's misunderstanding of HCR and if dems don't address there will be a lot of other big losses in Nov.


[ Parent ]
No I'm not f#$%ing kidding.
It was a Democratic primary.  A yes vote on HCR is not going to lose a 14-term incumbent a Democratic primary, even in WV.  Oliviero mentioned HCR obliquely once in his ads and corruption 100 times.  Mollohan lost because of his ethical cloud, plain and simple.

I agree with you that Dems have done a poor job of messaging HCR, but that isn't going to lose ANYONE a Democratic primary.

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


[ Parent ]
So
he must be okay with insurance corporats determining what kind of care we receive. That's worked wonders.

My blog
Twitter
Scribd
28, New Democrat, Female, TX-03 (hometown CA-26)


[ Parent ]
Yeah
Must be, seems like judging by reading his views on the major issues, he one of these people that believe the government is this big scary monster that can do nothing right and it's up to the private sector (NOT the government) to save our ass. Yeah I think he be okay with it.

22, Male, Democrat, PA-18.

[ Parent ]
WV-1
I pretty much consider this seat gone now.  An R+9 open seat in this environment, in a state that is turning more red by the day?  Doesn't look good.

Even a "win" gives us a guy who's probably between Bobby Bright and Parker Griffith.

23, Male, Democrat, OH-13


I dont consider it gone
It's a toss-up to me but well, quite the downgrade nonetheless.

[ Parent ]
Really?
It's a downgrade from a progressive standpoint, but not at all from an electoral standpoint.  How can we not realize that David McKinley would have exposed all of the same flaws that Oliverio exposed against Mollohan in November had their not been a primary?  Mollohan is a badly flawed candidate.  Oliverio is an upgrade from a "winning isn't everything, it's the only thing" standpoint.

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11

[ Parent ]
Tough seat, incumbent just beat in primary
Who knows where the race will turn, you may be right, or it may just finally go GOP like it's been itching to do.  Toss-up to me.

[ Parent ]
Just read your post below
but well, Capito certainly got into office somehow....  And if 2010 is a shit storm, this seat seems quite likely to be one to go then.

What has Oliviero said about voting for Pelosi as speaker?  


[ Parent ]
She
got into office mainly do to the fact her father was the very popular former Governor.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Nothing firm.
Just wouldn't commit to voting for her.

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11

[ Parent ]
I'm with you on the toss-up.
Where I disagree is on the proposition that it wasn't a toss-up 24 hours ago.

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11

[ Parent ]
But winning isn't the only thing
One should take what one can get, and I am not making an argument that it's somehow better to support a right-wing Republican than an otherwise right-wing Democrat who has a good AFL-CIO rating. But of course, anyone who cares about governing and policy (things tangential to this site) has to care about the nature of the Democrats who win primaries. And because ideology, except where it affects elections, is off-topic for this site, that's all I have to say right now.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Don't you think ideology is on-topic
Because it was Oliverio running to the right of Mollohan helped him beat him in the primary. I mean sure ethics was a issue but Oliverio was attacking Mollohan on HCR and cap and trade big and I think that mixed with Mollohan's poor campaign helped push Oliverio over the top.

22, Male, Democrat, PA-18.

[ Parent ]
Yes, in that sense it is definitely on topic
And I have to wonder if, had Mollohan voted for HCR but against cap and trade, he might not have lost. I'm guessing that cap and trade might be the bigger deal in coal-mining WV, but I don't know.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Cap and Trade...
Oliverio hammered that and ethics but I think cap and trade could of done him in because the ethics cloud has been Mollohan for awhile and cap and trade was a issue because coal is a very big deal in WV

22, Male, Democrat, PA-18.

[ Parent ]
Cap and trade
is a significant issue in WV, but he voted against it for crying out loud.  

Corruption, corruption and corruption.  Even though Mollohan was cleared, he was named one of CREW's most corrupt congresspeople and the stench is lingering.  He's been lucky to escape primary and serious general election opposition for the past few cycles.  This time, the jig was up.

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


[ Parent ]
Mollohan did
vote for HCR and against cap and trade.  Did you just say that wrong?

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11

[ Parent ]
No, I was just misinformed
Ignore what I said. :-)

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Three things did Mollohan in.
Corruption, corruption, and corruption.

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11

[ Parent ]
How often have WV politicians
been defeated for the odor of corruption, after being legally cleared of charges? Has that happened before?

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
I don't know the answer to that.
Maybe Spike Maynard will serve as your test case.  He's pretty odoriferous.

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11

[ Parent ]
The seat is safer for us than it was a day ago.
Turning redder by the day?  Really?

Both Senators - Democrats
2 of 3 Congressmen - Democrats
Governor - Democrat
Secretary of State - Democrat
Attorney General - Democrat
Treasurer - Democrat
Auditor - Democrat
Ag Commissioner - Democrat
House - 72-28 Democratic
Senate - 26-7 Democratic

Looking for a Republican holding higher office in West Virginia?  Meet Shelley Moore Capito.  She's the only one.

Democrats get elected in West Virginia all the time and will continue to do so in the short-term to intermediate future.  It's just not the type of Democrats we tend to like here on SSP.  It's often Democrats like Mike Oliverio.

To boot, 66,500 Democrats showed up on primary day, compared to 43,000 Republicans.  Mike Oliverio only needs to do a halway decent job of getting Mollohan supporters into his camp to win.  I really don't think that many people who were supporting Mollohan (presumably from the left) over Oliverio are going to choose McKinley in November.

Oliviero will more likely than not win, unless the DCCC refuses to support him, which might make things a lot tougher.  

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


[ Parent ]
WV is on borrowed time
I bet it will turn Republican in the next decade. I bet most of those Democrats in the state House and Senate are to the right of Ben Nelson. I would give Olivierio the same chance of winning as Mark Critz in his neighboring historically-Democratic district.

26, male, Dem, NJ-12

[ Parent ]
I think Critz has a better shot of winning
I've grown more hopeful of his chances - I think the primary competition is hurting Burns, and turnout for the primary elections in Pennsylvania will be on the Dem side.  

[ Parent ]
I think it's a good comparison.
I think they both have about the same odds of winning - just slightly better than even.

Where I disagree with some of the posters here is that Oliverio is a downgrade from an electoral standpoint.

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


[ Parent ]
It
really annoys me because honestly I think Oliverio has a much better chance of winning in November than Mollahan did. Now I really don't like him by any means, but he is definitely an upgrade when it comes to electability. I really think we'll keep this seat. I would rank it as tossup tilts D for now.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
That's where I am too n/t


34, WM, Democrat, FL-11

[ Parent ]
Critz
currently leads by 6 points, so I assume you give him a very good chance then?

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
MA -Sen
Richard Ross, not Dennis  

Bad news from UK

The LibDem going with conservatives for the new government.


Oliverio- Bush's favorite Democrat??
Oliverio was also thanked in a 2006 speech by President George W. Bush for his assistance in securing the confirmation of Samuel Alito to the United States Supreme Court. Bush said, "I appreciate Senator Michael Oliverio, he's here. Mike I think did the country a great service when he worked on behalf of Judge Sam Alito to get him confirmed by the United States Senate. I appreciate your -- I want to thank you for that, Mike."

Just read this on DKOS. I'm sure this gives ya'll some comfort that he will be a good Democrat and never switch parties  

Thanks for that nugget
In what capacity did he help secure Alito's confirmation?

It's interesting that I could point to Bush saying similar things about the incumbent senator from Pennsylvania.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
I saw that on his wikipedia page
I just don't get how a State Senator can help get someone confirmed to the High Court.

22, Male, Democrat, PA-18.

[ Parent ]
Phone calls I guess
Maybe he helped persuade some Senators? IDK how he could persuade anybody. Threatening a primary challenge to Byrd?  

[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox