Premium Sponsor


Featured Sponsor


Our Sponsors


Ad Networks

Advertise Liberally

Buy an ad on all of the top liberal blogs with just one click.

Site Stats

IA-Sen: Conlin To Run

by: Crisitunity

Fri Nov 06, 2009 at 11:52 AM EST


Democrats got their woman in Iowa, expanding the Senate playing field a bit:

Des Moines lawyer Roxanne Conlin plans to file paperwork with the Federal Elections Commission next week to run for U.S. Senate next year, adviser Mark Daley said today.

Conlin, a Democrat, has said last month she is more likely than not to seek the seat held by five-term Republican Chuck Grassley, but had to work out how she was going to handle her law practice and staff a campaign first.

Conlin is best known for running for Governor in 1982 (ironically against Terry Branstad, who's back for another gubernatorial run). She was only 38 then, meaning she's a spry 65 now. While she might not have that much residual name rec leftover from 27 years ago, her main asset is money. She's gotten wealthy from her involvement in some class action suits, and she plans to spend up to $10 million on her bid.

She'll be helped along by the precipitous decline in Grassley's approval numbers, which just happen to coincide with his transparently bad-faith negotiating on health care reform. The one poll of this matchup, an R2K poll from last month, shows Grassley leading Conlin 51-39.

RaceTracker Wiki: IA-Sen

Crisitunity :: IA-Sen: Conlin To Run
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
What does this mean about Vilsack then?
The wife said no, the husband has been rumored.

Tom Vilsack running for senate would be one of bests news for me
I glad see Roxanne Conlin in because she have so good numbers in last poll.

[ Parent ]
It means no Vilsack
He and Roxanne are good friends and allies.  Tom Vilsack agreed to be Secretary of Agriculture I don't want him bailing on people before the end of Obama's first term or otherwise I would do everything I could to personally torpedo any future political plans of his from within the Iowa Democratic Party.  I say this as someone who agrees with Vilsack 9 tomes out of ten and despises so called "progressives" like Ed Fallon.  

Please donate to amcharities.org to help build more after school centers in the Miami area.  

[ Parent ]
Not credibly rumored
That right-wing blog post that everyone got worked up about was pretty thin material, IMO.

[ Parent ]
No Chance
Grassley is safe no matter who he runs against.

I think Tom Vilsack would have had a shot,
but he probably wasn't inclined to run.

As it is, I agree that it's unlikely she'll win, but a rigorous challenge to Grassley will be a great thing nonetheless.  Keeping in the low-to-mid 50s when his previous four elections have all scored around 70% would be something.


[ Parent ]
Yep.
Just like George Allen in 2006, and Hilliary Clinton in 2008.
Oh wait...

[ Parent ]
Do you mean Elizabeth Dole? lol


[ Parent ]
I think
he means Clinton's Presidential campaign.


[ Parent ]
ooooooh ok
I didn't expand my assumption outside the Senate realm

[ Parent ]
Allen is particularly apt...
...as Grassley is as likely as anyone in the Senate to have a Macacca moement.

[ Parent ]
Coburn
If Tom Coburn had a maccaca moment who'd know the difference?

[ Parent ]
Coburn makes news only when he...
...says something reasonable and rationale.

My wife caught me intellectually masturbating looking at dirty polls on Swing State Project.

[ Parent ]
What do you mean "IF"?
n/t.

[ Parent ]
Good.
I wonder if Grassley's approvals will keep going down due to health care once health care reform is passed and people notice that it passing didn't result in Armageddon.
I also wonder if Conlin really does plan to spend 10 million of her own money, isn't 10 million about the same amount most challengers raise total?

In all seriousness
If Conlin ran the best campaign she could, and if Grassley has the same favorables come this time next year, what are the odds Conlin could win?

And is this who the Iowa Democratic party chair meant when he said he'd give grassley the race of his life?

Bill Hedrick for Congress


Grassley hasn't had a serious challenger since 1980
when he defeated John Culver, who was an incumbent. Conlin may not be well known, but she is indeed his most formindable opponent in his Senate history as an incumbent.

Can she win? I don't know, but I didn't expect Kay Hagan, Sheldon Whitehouse, Jim Webb, or even Al Franken to win a year out.  


[ Parent ]
Grassley needs a new big problem for Conlin to win......
Grassley's bad faith on health care has brought down his job approval numbers to the low/mid-50s, but he can't be beaten unless they come down another 10 points.  And the damage is done on health care, he's not going to suffer any more on that one.

There has to be something new come up for him to actually lose.  He's a smart political animal, and his bad behavior on health care is the first time in his nearly 30 years in the Senate that I can remember him getting himself in trouble.  So I'm not holding out hope for more mistakes.

Plus he's not going to be caught sleeping.  He knows Conlin has money and has statewide campaign experience, even if it was long ago.  I can't imagine Grassley failing to run a serious campaign this time.

That said, you never know what might happen, and that's why you need to recruit good candidates who are prepared to take advantage of opportunities that arise unexpectedly.  So I am very happy with Conlin.

And as desmoinesdem has pointed out before, Conlin's entry might help gin up volunteering and turnout among some key Democratic constituencies when Culver, too, needs the help.

My wife caught me intellectually masturbating looking at dirty polls on Swing State Project.


[ Parent ]
People who think Grassley is unbeatable need to smell the coffee
All incumbents are less popular now than perhaps anytime since Korea.

All polls show Grassley as vulnerable.  Vilsack was five points behind him before Grassley's approvals tanked; Vilsack would likely be ahead now, but he doesn't want the job.

Conlin is an underdog, but except for being a little older, she is the type of candidate that should give an incumbent fits this cycle... non-politician who can take shots at everything screwed up and blame them on Grassley/Bush.

Even if she loses, she'll make him run hard, maybe move him to the left a bit, and help improve the chances of Culver.

This could be the marquee health care race in the country.


At the very least
he will be forced to defend his record and spend the money in his bank.

Best case we kick him out of Congress.

Very glad we've got a serious candidate.  


This has a real potential to be an upset


Let's hope that this isn't another Slattery or Rice
I always thought Slattery's background made him a rather lackluster candidate, but I didn't think so about Rice, and they both got clobbered.  Granted, Inhofe is an asshole.

Also, granted, the polling here is more hopeful.

Bill Posey is not half-alligator...and is outclassed by Davy Crockett anyway: http://www.washingtonmonthly.c...


Clarification
I mentioned Slattery and Rice since both of them were talked up to be potentially impressive candidates.

I agreed with this talking up for Rice, but not for Slattery.

Bill Posey is not half-alligator...and is outclassed by Davy Crockett anyway: http://www.washingtonmonthly.c...


[ Parent ]
Rice
Also ran in the only state that went for McCain more so than it did for Bush.  He was fighting an uphill battle, but I hope that this sets him up for a future statewide run.

[ Parent ]
Is there any word on whether
he is running for Fallin's seat?

Bill Posey is not half-alligator...and is outclassed by Davy Crockett anyway: http://www.washingtonmonthly.c...

[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

Talk to your supporters, not tech support. Campaign Engine is the powerful, affordable Progressive Campaign Software.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

SSP Race Ratings

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox