Google Ads


Site Stats

PA-Sen: Sestak Surges, Mixed Results Against Toomey in New Polls

by: James L.

Fri Aug 14, 2009 at 3:18 PM EDT


Research 2000 (8/10-12, likely voters, 5/4-6 in parens):

Arlen Specter (D-inc): 48 (56)
Joe Sestak (D): 33 (11)
Undecided: 19 (33)
(MoE: ±5%)

Sestak still has a lot of work ahead of him in convincing Democratic primary voters to reject an incumbent they generally like (R2K finds Specter's approval among Dem voters to be a pretty sturdy 74-21 compared to Sestak's 51-8), but he's made some pretty significant progress already. (Rasmussen's primary poll, released on Wednesday, pegged the race at an even-narrower 47-34 for Specter.)

General election nums:

Arlen Specter (D-inc): 45 (55)
Pat Toomey (R): 40 (31)

Joe Sestak (D): 42 (37)
Pat Toomey (R): 41 (32)
(MoE: ±4%)

It's clearly getting a bit hairier for Democrats everywhere lately, but these numbers are a far cry from Rasmussen (8/11, likely voters):

Arlen Specter (D-inc): 36
Pat Toomey (R): 48
Other: 4

Joe Sestak (D): 35
Pat Toomey (R): 43
Other: 5
(MoE: ±3%)

For what it's worth, I find the R2K numbers a bit easier to believe, but in any case, this election isn't shaping up to be the cakewalk that it appeared to be in April. With a protracted Democratic nomination battle in place until the spring and the national environment getting sunnier for the GOP, SSP is changing its rating of this race from Likely D to Lean D. Pat Toomey is still a seriously flawed nominee with a lot of weaknesses to exploit, but the Democratic nominee (and the DSCC) will have to work harder than expected to keep him down.

James L. :: PA-Sen: Sestak Surges, Mixed Results Against Toomey in New Polls
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
R2K is much more transparent than Ras
Looking at the crosstabs, I am not especially worried about the general election. Toomey just doesn't have much room for growth against either Democrat.

Toomey trails against both in the Philly suburbs, where PA elections are decided. Moreover, look at blacks and the city of Philadelphia itself: there are lots of voters claiming to be undecided who are guaranteed to vote for the Democrat.  


Familiarity will not do Toomey any good
Six months of general election campaigning will doom Toomey (just imagine how far to the right Specter would move to marginalize Toomey).

This is a safe seat, which means absent a sleeping with sheep scandal we win.


Toomey only stands a chance
If he keeps on his current path of 'moderation'. If he stops doing that then even an unpopular Specter will beat him. And even if he keeps moderating he will still have skeptics who worry he will just revert back to being a far right Republican. And just generally are distrusting of him ala Mitt Romney.

[ Parent ]
Toomey will win ONLY IF.....
we have a 1994 type scenario in 2010 (unlikely since partisan voting habits have hardened since then) or Sestak/Specter completely implode (more likely with Sestak than Specter). I think Toomey would slightly prefer Specter since the latter has 100% name ID, however, its still a long ways off and 3 months of heavy political bombardment will finish Toomey, even among the Dems who really never liked Specter.  

Indepedent/Lean D. Dude.
All 5s (now TX-5; frmly VA-5 and CA-5)  


Sestak implode?
Why do you think it's more likely for Sestak to implode than Specter? Does he have a history of gaffes or intemperate remarks?

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Not saying he would...
but Sestak only came to office in 2006 while Specter's been around longer than Moses. Just saying that a less experienced pol is more prone to make mistakes. In any event, I think Sestak may be a slightly better general election candidate than Toomey since he is from the Philly burbs and his military background will go down well with the more conservative parts of PA, even though he is not as socially conservative as Casey. I would caution that progressives should not get their hopes too high with Sestak, especially after the Netroots convention, he may easily move right if he gets into the Senate.

Indepedent/Lean D. Dude.
All 5s (now TX-5; frmly VA-5 and CA-5)  


[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox