Here is Episode 9 of my never-ending redistricting series, in which I cover three states (Alabama, Arizona, and Kentucky) with little in common demographically other than all voting for John McCain.
This, Episode 8 of my never-ending redistricting series, is a diary of firsts. It is the first time I have covered three states instead of the customary two (the reason being that I was pairing a larger state with a smaller one, and this diary covers three mid-sized states), and the first time I have covered a state not expected to either gain or lose seats in the next reapportionment (Indiana, which should hold even at 9 seats).
Here is Episode 7 in my redistricting series. Episode 7 was meant to be Arizona & New York, but with NY-20 undecided and likely to be for a time, I thought it was time to press ahead with other states I've drawn. So here we have it: the Land of Lincoln and the founding state of the Confederacy, wrapped together at last in one diary!
Episode 6 in my redistricting series. By this point I'm tired of having these maps and data lying around burning a hole in my Microsoft Word documents, especially in light of the new Census county estimates for 2008. So I'm knocking out all the already-completed states for your and my nerdy enjoyment. Today, some keystones with your Jell-O?
Those strangest of bedfellows, Rust Belt Pennsylvania and booming Utah! (spelled with an exclamation point as on state license plates) just below the fold...
Episode 5 in my redistricting series, and as you can see, I'm picking up the pace, having just covered Georgia and New Jersey yesterday. Because the Census released 2008 county estimates last week, I feel like knocking out these diaries for the states I already mapped using 2007 numbers. Of course, because they're 2007 numbers, they're not quite up to snuff, but in most cases, the lines wouldn't look too dramatically different using newer stats.
(From the diaries with minor edits - promoted by DavidNYC)
As I'd promised in my diary on New Jersey, Pennsylvania would be the next state I'd tackle. This would have been done a lot sooner, but those things called work and exams kind of got in the way....
My goal, flat out, was to carve more Democratic districts. I'm all for compactness when it comes to suitcases and mp3's, but not when I'm gerrymandering states. Again, I kept Democratic Congresscritters in their homes.
Unlike New Jersey though, Pennsylvania is probably maxed-out when it comes to Democrats (save Gerlach and Dent, whose districts are certainly Democratic.) Pennsylvania is also losing one seat (most likely) in 2010, so I drew 18 seats on 2008 population estimates. I didn't "merge" two districts per se, but more like took the 16th, 17th, and 19th and produced two districts from them.
I had the following goals in mind:
Dislodge Gerlach (6th) and Dent (15th) by increasing Democratic performance in their districts.
Give Dahlkemper (3rd), Altmire (4th), Murtha (12th), and Holden (17th) more favorable territory. They represent McCain districts now, I wanted to change those to Obama districts.
Maintain strength for Sestak (7th), Patrick Murphy (8th), Kanjorski (11th), and Schwartz (13th). They have decently strongly Democratic districts, which I wanted to maintain at their current levels.
Keep Brady (1st), Fattah (2nd), and Doyle (14th) in strongly Democratic districts, but perhaps not as absurdly strong as before. Obama scored 88%, 90%, and 70% respectively, I felt this could afford to be lowered somewhat. A corollary to this goal is keeping Fattah's district majority Black. I didn't bother with Brady's currently plurality Black district, though it may still be.
Episode 4 in my series of diaries mapping out possible redistricting scenarios in the states is here! I was inspired to finally put it together after BigTentProgressive's excellent Texas redistricting diary. On the agenda today: some peaches for the First Lady's new garden. (Which is my not-so-clever way of saying that I'm covering Georgia and New Jersey in today's diary.)
Unfortunately, my districts are based on county estimates from 2007, and just this week the Census released 2008 numbers. Since my maps were drawn before the 2008 release, they are worth taking with a grain of salt. Also, I am using projected seat totals for post-2010 redistricting that are equally subject to change.
Again, the obligatory grain of salt alert: my districts are based on county estimates from 2007 which are due to be adjusted soon with 2008 numbers. Also, I am using projected seat totals that are equally subject to change.
Much geekdom, nerdiness, and dorkery lies below the fold...
Episode 2 in my series of diaries mapping out possible redistricting scenarios in the states has arrived! Today, I map Michigan and Nevada.
Grain of salt alert: my districts are based on county estimates from 2007 which are due to be adjusted soon with 2008 numbers. Also, I am using projected seat totals that are equally subject to change.
The number geeks among us will really enjoy what's below the fold...
With the 2010 Census just a year away and the next round of nationwide redistricting two or three years away, I've decided to start looking at the redistricting situations in different states and begin some conversation about what kinds of changes we can expect to see. These diaries will be sporadic, and the data is always subject to change (for now, county population estimates are from 2007; 2008 numbers will be out soon, meaning my number-crunching will need constant adjusting)...but for we super-geeks, merely the discussion of redistricting and speculation on its effects will be sufficiently entertaining.
My "state focus" redistricting diaries will cover two states, usually one large and one a bit smaller.
Today, I was feeling the vibes of 2004, so we'll delve into Massachusetts and Texas. Below the fold...
