Google Ads


Site Stats

SSP Daily Digest: 8/4 (Afternoon Edition)

by: Crisitunity

Wed Aug 04, 2010 at 4:42 PM EDT


CO-Sen: It looks like the Michael Bennet camp, and his Beltway backers, are taking the recent polling surge by Andrew Romanoff in the Dem Senate primary, very seriously. Barack Obama just did a remote appearance on behalf of Bennet, for five minutes at a Bennet town hall.

KY-Sen: Well, he finally got around to it. It was buried in the fifth and final paragraph of a press release. Nevertheless, Dan Mongiardo finally endorsed Dem primary victor Jack Conway. Despite previous rumors that he was holding out on his endorsement to get his $77K campaign debt paid off, a Mongiardo spokesperson says he didn't receive anything in exchange for the nod.

PA-Sen: Bill Clinton will be in Scranton to campaign for Joe Sestak next Tuesday. Frankly, that's a really good fit of candidate, backer, and locale. I wonder if Paul Kanjorski will be allowed to tag along, though? Seems like he could use some Clinton love, too. (No, not that kind of Clinton love.) On the GOP side, Pat Toomey got some campaign fundraising help in Philly from moderate Maine GOP Senator Susan "Comrade of the Month" Collins, who seems to have forgiven or conveniently forgotten all those Club for Growth attempts to knife her in the back.

WA-Sen: Patty Murray seems to be taking a page from the John Hickenlooper campaign in Colorado, dropping a huge amount of money right now on advertising reservations, all the way through November, while they're still cheap. She spent $3.4 million, nearly half her CoH, on ad buys in July. She can count on her coffers being replenished, though, as Barack Obama will be hosting a fundraiser for her later this month.

WI-Sen: Dueling ads in Wisconsin. Russ Feingold is out with a sobering ad rattling his saber at Wall Street, while Ron Johnson levels accusations of being a "career politician" at Feingold. Double NWOTSOTB.

CO-Gov: Is there blood here in the water, or what? Colorado Ethics Watch just filed a complaint with the state bar, which could lead to disciplinary action against Scott McInnis's license to practice law in Colorado, over his plagiarism scandal. McInnis's former campaign manager (until last December, so he was out long before the scandal) also just asked McInnis for a refund of all the contributions he's given him. The DGA is also starting to pour money into this race, striking while the iron is hot; they've plowed $100K into a new third-party group airing a new anti-McInnis attack ad. And if you were thinking that Dan Maes might turn out to be a reasonable alternative to McInnis, guess again. He ventured not just into Michele Bachmann territory (about how we'll all have to live in tenements and take mass transit to work) but clear into UN-black-helicopters-are-fluoridating-my-water territory. And what's the nerve center of the one-world-government's scurrilous plot against Coloradan sovereignty? Denver's program for public bike shares and more showers for bike-riding commuters!!!!1!

"At first, I thought, 'Gosh, public transportation, what's wrong with that, and what's wrong with people parking their cars and riding their bikes? And what's wrong with incentives for green cars?' But if you do your homework and research, you realize ICLEI is part of a greater strategy to rein in American cities under a United Nations treaty."

GA-Gov: This seems like a big Deal for Nathan: the third-place finisher in the gubernatorial primary, state Sen. Eric Johnson, is backing ex-Rep. Nathan Deal in the runoff. (Oddly, Johnson hasn't said anything about it himself, but Rep. Jack Kingston, another Johnson backer-turned-Deal backer, made the announcement.) Johnson's support should help Deal in the Savannah area, where Johnson seems to have a strong base.

MD-Gov: I wonder if Sarah Palin is playing three-dimensional chess here, in some sort of strange gambit to help Bob Ehrlich in the general election... or just playing tic-tac-toe, and losing badly at it. At any rate, she endorsed Ehrlich's barely-registering primary rival, businessman Brian Murphy, in the GOP gubernatorial primary. (Which, if you think about it, doesn't jibe at all with her endorsement of centrist and likely victor Terry Branstad in Iowa instead of wingnut Bob Vander Plaats... but then, Maryland's not an early presidential state.) Ehrlich is now publicly doing the happy dance over her endorsement of his rival, saying that it just confirms his moderate credentials for the general, where he has a shot at knocking off incumbent Dem Martin O'Malley.

AZ-01: Rogue dentist Paul Gosar has a lead in the Republican primary in AZ-01 for the right to take on freshman Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick, if his own internal is to be believed. The poll from Moore Info puts him at 30, with '08 candidate Sydney Hay at 10, Some Dude Bradley Beauchamp at 7, and, surprisingly, former state Sen. majority leader Rusty Bowers back at 6. Gosar seems to have consolidated many big-name movement conservatives behind him, ranging from Sarah Palin to Joe Arpaio. My main question, though, is: Sydney Hay is running again?!? Why weren't we informed? (You may remember her legacy of fail from her 2008 run.)

AZ-03: This is at least the second time a childless GOP candidate has gotten busted for playing up his "family man" credentials by romping with children in advertising (the first time was Kevin Yoder in KS-03). At least Yoder was able to claim the kids were his nieces and nephews... Ben Quayle apparently had to borrow some of his aides' kids for his photo shoot.

IL-17: After seemingly no one found their internal poll from last week credible (which gave the previously-unheralded, if not unknown, Bobby Schilling a lead over Democratic Rep. Phil Hare), there's another Republican poll out that seems to at least be on the same temporal plane as reality, in this swing district where the GOP hasn't competed hard in a while. POS (on behalf of a state party committee... Magellan did the Schilling internal) gives Hare a 33-31 lead over the political novice and pizza restauranteur. The poll also gives 7% support to the Green Party candidate, which somehow doesn't seem likely to hold.

WV-01: As heartburn-inducing Mike Oliverio will probably be in terms of his voting record, here's some confirmation that we at least got an electoral upgrade here from the guy he defeated in the Dem primary, Rep. Alan Mollohan, who had ethical clouds following him and seemed to be phoning in his campaign. Oliverio is out with a new internal from Hamilton Campaigns that gives him a 52-36 lead over GOP opponent David McKinley. With Joe Manchin at the top of the ticket in a November special election, now, too, here's one Tossup seat where our odds seem to be getting noticeably better. (As a bonus, they find Manchin leading John Raese 62-30 in the district, which is West Virginia's reddest.)

DCCC: CQ looks at the DCCC's attempts to enforce dues-payment this cycle. While their "Frontline" members (the ones in the trickiest races) are exempt from paying dues, they're winding up giving de facto passes to a number of other vulnerable incumbents, not having had any luck at stopping them from hoarding their own cash in preparation for tough races. 88 House Dems haven't paid any dues at all this cycle, while many others are in arrears. There's also, buried in the article, a statement that the DCCC doesn't plan to further extend its Frontline program, even as the number of potentially vulnerable Dems seems to keep increasing.

California: For people who just can't get enough campaign finance reports, the Sacramento Bee has a helpful table of filings for all the candidates for the downballot statewide races. Dems have a cash on hand lead in most races, except for two (Secretary of State and Insurance Commissioner). It's particularly pronounced in the Lt. Governor race, where Gavin Newsom leads GOP incumbent Abel Maldonado $495K to $91K. In the very tight AG's race (also the downballot race that's seen by far the most expenditures), Dem Kamala Harris leads GOPer Steve Cooley $186K to $121K (and Cooley also has $170K in debt).

Redistricting: Ohio, unfortunately, won't be having a referendum on a constitutional amendment on the ballot in November, that would limit parties' ability to gerrymander by requiring bipartisan support for new maps. The problem? The parties in the state legislature couldn't agree on the exact framework for the plan. At least there's good news on the better-districts front in New York, where the state Senate just passed legislation that will make sure that incarcerated persons are counted in their home communities, when legislative lines are redrawn next year.

Rasmussen:
FL-Gov: Alex Sink (D) 31%, Bill McCollum (R) 27%, Bud Chiles (I) 20%
FL-Gov: Alex Sink (D) 31%, Rick Scott (R) 35%, Bud Chiles (I) 16%
OH-Sen: Lee Fisher (D) 40%, Rob Portman (R) 44%

Crisitunity :: SSP Daily Digest: 8/4 (Afternoon Edition)
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

There are few phrases more awesome than "rogue dentist" (nm)


LOL
I wish I could call myself a rogue dentist. I am too boring though.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
LOLWUT?!
Rasmussen has Sink beating McCollum, and Bud Chiles at 20%?!

That seems mighty odd that Chiles is soaking up so many votes

And Lee Fisher down only 4% to mega Fundraiser Rob Portman?!?!

20, Male, Democrat, CA-44 (home) CA-12 (college)


Portman = Ohio's Meg Whitman?


My blog
Twitter
Scribd
28, New Democrat, Female, TX-03 (hometown CA-26)


[ Parent ]
One can only hope


20, Male, Democrat, CA-44 (home) CA-12 (college)

[ Parent ]
say what
Portman had nearly two decades in public service. Whitman didn't even bother to vote most of the time.

41, Ind, CA-05

[ Parent ]
I'm using the analogy
of having and spending tons of money not being able to buy voters' votes. If Portman has only a 4% lead despite having much more cash than Fisher, then maybe "money can't buy you love" applies to Ohio too.

My blog
Twitter
Scribd
28, New Democrat, Female, TX-03 (hometown CA-26)


[ Parent ]
Unfortunately
He hasn't spent much of it on ads so far.

[ Parent ]
if
more than half of scotts voters won't vote for mccollum and vice versa, those votes have to go somewhere.  i suppose the obtuse chiles candidacy is better than "communcrat" sink.  like the left leaning voters who went for perot in 92.

Top ten signs you're an SSPer #1: your favorite song is "Panic At Tedisco" and no one understands what you mean.

[ Parent ]
Are those people really so dumb
That they would vote for a person to the left of McCollum just to spite him.  That's the Modern GOP I guess...

20, Male, Democrat, CA-44 (home) CA-12 (college)

[ Parent ]
is chiles to the left?
I know he's the (grand?)son of a famous liberal senator, but that doesn't mean he himself is.  

Top ten signs you're an SSPer #1: your favorite song is "Panic At Tedisco" and no one understands what you mean.

[ Parent ]
Well, if there is anything I learned in my AP gov class senior year of high school
Peoples political views are most determined by their parents political views.  I mean honestly, I know some Republicans in Orange County who definitely WOULD NOT BE (I.E. voting against themselves) if their parents weren't.

20, Male, Democrat, CA-44 (home) CA-12 (college)

[ Parent ]
That's not me!
My parents are conservative and vote for Republicans. I became Republican-free 8 years ago and have not looked back since. (And I have no plans to until the party changes its attitude towards science and jobs BIG TIME.)

My blog
Twitter
Scribd
28, New Democrat, Female, TX-03 (hometown CA-26)


[ Parent ]
I
hear this a lot but if memory serves correctly Chiles was fairly conservative. I could be wrong but that is the way I remember it, I am sure he was uber popular but I think he was moderate.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
In all seriousness, when a contest has ONLY major party nominees, Rasmussen will still show...
..."some other candidate" with 6%.

That's one of their quirks.

Like everything else, they get better as the election gets close.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
People here
Don't get the fact that just because someone has a ton of money doesn't mean they have spent it enough to have a huge lead.  

[ Parent ]
Since when?
What a strange statement. Examples please?

[ Parent ]
To GOPVoter's defense
We sometimes use money raised as an indicator to how the campaign is doing, and we get worried when our candidate doesn't have a Cash On Hand lead.

23, Male, PA-05 (summer) PA-12 (winter)

[ Parent ]
I don't think that was what he was saying
Actually, I don't still don't know what he meant.

[ Parent ]
Why did Mongiardo expect Conway to
have to pay off his outstanding campaign debt?

And from that article it seems the Democratic Party Chairman as well as a bunch of other people practically had to pry this "endorsement" out of Mongiardo.

This is less than stellar behavior from him. But I guess no surprise.


I didn't get that from this article at all
Where did it say he was expecting Conway to pay off his campaign debt?

I just don't get why people blame Mongiardo for so much of Conway's trailing Paul.  The primary was in May and Conway has been losing ground to Paul ever since.  Mongiardo hasn't been actively campaigning against COnway.

Now Conway ahs Mongiardo's endorsement, but the complaint's will continue.  I can only assume that any Conway loss will contine to be blamed on Mongiardo.


[ Parent ]
Er no
Conway has been losing ground because Rand has kept quiet. People just don't like Dr Dan and it is justified. Now, he has done the right thing here but it should have been done a long time ago.

[ Parent ]
The belief that people don't know Paul
is kind of insulting to the voters' intelligence.  Sure some may not know, but people don't vote based on endorsements so why exactly did Paul win his primary?  Maybe Paul is the candidate that the people favor.


[ Parent ]
Obviously people favor him
Since he is in the lead. But are you seriously saying there is no correlation between his wacky statements being in the news and the margin over Conway? Don't be ridiculous!

[ Parent ]
in the news ot not
The statements have been made and are on record.  The support has moved back to Paul.  People know his views and he is still leading.

[ Parent ]
I don't disagree
But will it stay that way? He can't hide forever. You can be sure there is more coming and Conway will pound him on it.

[ Parent ]
Not
everyone pays attention to politics like we do. A lot of people just plain and simply do not think about politics this early. I doubt they want to. They will pay closer attention to race later on. The "R" by Paul's name explains the high lead. Paul will have to explain his views, like another user said he can't hide forever. The question is whether Conway has the funds to display Paul for the nut job he is. He can self fund and I think he will. Paul could absolutely win but I expect it to be closer than this.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
IMO, your answer is closest to the truth
In a way, it's like advertising. If Paul says something wacky once, it gets imprinted on just a few people. If Paul says the --same-- thing three times (or is it 6, I forget the lessons from marketing class), then it begins to imprint on viewers.

Of course, such effects can be magnified by appropriate ads from Conway. Has he been running any ads?


[ Parent ]
I
do not believe he has since the primary.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Paul won his primary because a bunch of nut job
morons came out to vote for him.  Not everyone in KY is a nut job and not all of them pay attention to politics.  Paul winning his primary says very little about his GE prospects.

[ Parent ]
OMG
Not this again. I hope you are not referring to the discussion we had the other day. I never said Conway's less than excellent polling is because of Dr. Dan, just that Conway is a better candidate than Dr. Dan. Please do not tell me that is what you were stressing about then. I do not know of anyone who has been blaming Dr. Dan. The reason Conway is not doing perfecto right now is because Paul has actually not said anything stupid lately and has kept his teabagging mouth shut. I am not saying Conway will win but expect it to be closer when Conway starts advertising and people become familiar with Paul's wackiness.  



Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  


[ Parent ]
The things you said in that thread
Shall stay in that thread.  I should learn not to respond to any post that says "everyone who knows him hates him".  Its an obvious misstatement of fact and as such, it should just die away from memory.  

[ Parent ]
Oh Please
Its called sarcasm. Obviously not everyone who knows him hates him but it is common fact he is not popular among much of the establishment for a lot of different reasons. Nothing I said was false, nothing and I do not take anything back. Conway is a much better candidate than him, I was just trying to explain that. I did not say anything that was over the top but I agree, let's drop it.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Basil Marceaux's 'Official' Ad

Okay, a few things about this one.

Is it just me, or is this guy plastered while shooting this ad? He keeps swaying from side to side.

The guy's going to write in blood because he wants to swear in blood he won't take campaign contributions. Okay.....

How DO you make a flag fly right?

Anyway, enjoy this one. I'm still ROFL over it.


Are you kidding me?
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!

I think he is worse than Alvin Greene.

20, Male, Democrat, CA-44 (home) CA-12 (college)


[ Parent ]
omg
I was going to suggest the Funny Or Die folks should parody this (like their great Dale Peterson ad parody).
But I really doubt this can be improved on for ineptness.  

[ Parent ]
No way
Still referring himself to Basil Marceaux Dot Com!!

NY-14, DC-AL (college) Distraught Mets fan

[ Parent ]
Uhh....
I'm still trying to dissect what I just saw here....

23, Male, PA-05 (summer) PA-12 (winter)

[ Parent ]
There's nothing surprising about Gosar's internal poll
Except for Sid Leiken, Rusty Bowers has been the worst NRCC recruit of the cycle.  His entire fundraising for the cycle is less than $100,000, and he doesn't seem to be mounting any sort of credible campaign.  Many voters here in AZ-01 don't even know he's in the race.  Instead of actually, y'know, working for the nomination, Bowers has replaced the homepage of his website with a defensive statement attacking his opponents for not having records in government (though Bowers' own record ended 18 years ago).  The quarterly reports from the previous cycle were even worse: Bowers has less than $20k on hand and was outraised last cycle not only by Gosar but by Bradley Beauchamp and Steve Mehta.  Plus Bowers has no name rec in the district, since his congressional district was in Phoenix (where he still lives, just barely inside the rural district's borders).  At the recent Fourth of July parade in Flagstaff, a required campaign stop in the district's largest city, Bowers was nowhere to be seen, even though Kirkpatrick, Gosar, Beauchamp, and Mehta all showed up (it's a two-hour drive for Mehta and a four-hour one for Beauchamp).

Meanwhile, Gosar has raised over $400,000, though his latest fundraising quarter was not quite so impressive, and has waged a very active campaign.  Instead of backing Gosar and admitting they screwed up with Bowers, the NRCC has seemingly decided to just cede the seat to Kirkpatrick -- a baffling call given that the 2012 redistricting will probably make her seat safe if no Republican takes it this year.  Epic fail on the part of the NRCC.

As for Sydney Hay -- well, let's listen to her reasons for running again:

Hay said she had been looking for a candidate she could support and planning to vacation this summer, but that the other Republicans had "anemic fundraising" and weren't well known.

"I have a lot of name recognition and a lot of face recognition, from being plastered all over television," Hay said, referring to her last campaign.

Her claim about "anemic fundraising" is disingenuous on two counts, first because she'd seen Gosar's impressive Q1 haul before deciding to run, and second because she hasn't raised any money this time.  She seems to have put her name on the ballot in the hopes that name rec alone would pull her over the line.  Gosar's poll tells us exactly what that name rec will do for her: 10% of the vote.

The Crolian Progressive: as great an adventure as ever I heard of...


lol
if you take that Hay quote and cut off "all over television" it explains why she's so crazy. ;)

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
California
Lt Gov Maldonado may have $91K COH but also has $262K debt; under water just like Cooley with lots more debt than COH.

The CA top line race will be a nail-biter with eMeg's zillions, but down ballot looks OK (though someone may need to wake up SoS Debra Bowen).


Someone
tell Zach Wamp that the concept of "Separation of Church and State" still exists. Fucking bible thumper...



19, Male, Independent, CA-12


hew kinda looks like huckabee
except the eyes go in the proper direction

Top ten signs you're an SSPer #1: your favorite song is "Panic At Tedisco" and no one understands what you mean.

[ Parent ]
there's even something cross shaped in the background
nt

[ Parent ]
Did anyone see
 That Tennessee Gubernatorial candidate who says you must pay a $10 fine if you DO NOT have a gun?

for more election analysis, visit  http://frogandturtle.blogspot....




17, CA-06,  


[ Parent ]
This is all from a political perspective
The Senate voted today to and now the House may return back from recess to vote on the bill.

Yes, yes yes, do it, tons of free, excellent press, you can say you came back from your summer vacation to save teacher's jobs.  The Sherrod thing kind of screwed up the press momentum of all the recent bills to help the economy and this will get us back on track with the press.

If we're lucky maybe some GOPer's wont bother to show-up and that in itself can be another story about how the GOP isnt even showing up to voice their opinion on the economy and are instead lounging at home enjoying the weather.

I definitely think the Democrats have a much better 3 month-out plan than the GOP and it's things like this that'll save us a seat.


PA-Sen
Bill Clinton > Susan Collins

Though I'm guessing the Collins appearance is more about appearing moderate than raising big money or getting her name linked with his.  I can't imagine she is that well know in PA.

I expect we'll see a lot of Bill CLinton in PA this October...


CO-Sen
Most intriguing primary since Arkansas.

This one will be interesting to watch.  Bennet must be the favorite today, but it will be interesting to see the geographic breakdown of each candidates supporters throughout the state.  The same will be true of the Republican primary.


And my favorite, GA-GOV
I can't wait to hear form Unknown on how this will impact the runoff.

I remember being in GA on the night of the primary, and thinking if Johnson endorsed Deal and could actually deliver, how close the runoff would get.  Johnson's best performances seemed to be in Handel's strongest places, so if Dela can somehow take Johnson's support in these areas and not let it leak to Handel, this race could be very close.


Baffled at Romanoff's sudden surge
If there's one thing this primary season has shown, it's that longshot candidates can catch up with the incumbent very quickly.

The only thing that boggles my mind about the Bennet v. Romanoff race is that there's really very little daylight between them on the issues. Halter ran to Lincoln's left while Sestak was successfully able to portray Specter as a craven opportunist with no convictions.

What's Romanoff's angle for attacking Bennet? Being a Washington insider? Besides the fact that Bennet is an (appointed) incumbent, Romanoff is the true insider in this race considering his years in the state house. He got passed over for the Senate appointment by the hated Bill Ritter and saw an opening to challenge Bennet.  

I worry that Bennet got caught off guard by Romanoff and is firing back too late to hold him off.  


^^^THIS
That is the first time I did that, I hope I did it correctly.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
It certainly THIS
but, as a Romanoff voter, it's also that while Bennet may be a decent one or two term senator when all the votes are counted, he's usually (except for the public option leadership), the last guy to the punch bowl. The Colorado Springs Indy endorsement had it right:  Bennet's not a bad guy, but Romanoff could be an amazing leader...and I really don't get the DLC connection.  Certainly, he held together a wide coalition of members as Speaker of the House and was genuinely well-liked by members on both sides of the aisle, but he wasn't significantly more conservative than any other Denver-based state rep.  

30, male, Democratic, CO-01

[ Parent ]
I
am rooting for Bennet but I expect Romanoff to win. Perhaps if Obama stumps really hard for him he will make it through, but Obama probably does not want to be there if he thinks a loss is likely (ala Specter). I see it the other way though, I suppose Romanoff could be a great Senator but I think Bennet has already shown that he could be the next Kennedy. I really do think so. Honestly I have been fairly harsh towards Romanoff but I guess his winning would not be the worst thing in the world. Sucks for Bennet though, do you think Hickenlooper would consider Bennet or Romanoff for LG  after the primary? That would be a good unity ticket I would think. Honestly you would know best but I think Bennet and Romanoff are probably about the same on most, if not all, issues.    

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Issues
It's not issues in the traditional sense that's the issue.  The two aren't that far apart, though Romanoff is staking some ground to Bennet's populist left (and/or forcing Bennet left...I suspect many of the good things we've seen out of him have been because of the primary).  It's a matter of leading or following and until the public option, Bennet was the guy who voted right after all the other guys voted right.

I don't doubt Hick would consider either, but once you've tasted the Senate or come close, a photo-op job like Colorado Lt. Gov. may not be what either wants, especially Romanoff.  For good or ill (I believe, good), the guy's a serious wonk and would be much more at home doing think tank work at The Bell Policy Center, Center for American Progress, etc., than sitting around looking pretty.

30, male, Democratic, CO-01


[ Parent ]
I still think Bennet wins
But I think that Bennet has been challenged so easily points to a potential weakness as a GE candidate.  

At least Romanoff has been fighting along the way.  Bennet seems to be sitting on his cash pile for no apparent reason.  Its almost like he retired mid-primary season with a pile of cash (Evan Bayh).

What was Bennet waiting for, an invitation to the primary?  I also have no problem with Romanoff wanting to be in this primary.  If this were an open seat, it would certainly be okay.  The fact an unpopular governor appointed him to me means that he is an incumbent by default, not voter will.


[ Parent ]
Hmm...
Romanoff has every right to run. I think it's right that Bennet has to face a serious primary challenge since: (A). he was appointed to that seat by the will of one man and (B). he never ran for office before. Bennet should have to earn the nomination of the Colorado Democrats.

My confusion is with how Romanoff is able to successfully prevent himself as a contrast to Bennett since they mostly agree on the issues and Bennet has done nothing to upset the party faithful. How do convince the voters to throw out a guy who's been on the job for 19 months?

As to whether the close primary points to a GE weakness for Bennet, I think it's too early to tell. Maybe. Maybe not. What's clear is that regardless of whether he wins the primary, Bennet should have taken Romanoff seriously earlier. If he survives, maybe this teaches him a lesson when he goes up against Ken Buck or (less likely) Jane Norton.


[ Parent ]
Those
are some fair points. Really, I like your argument a lot but I disagree with it. I am all for primary challenges occasionally in super red or blue districts that would never elect someone in the opposite party. I think the voters deserve an option and occasionally a primary like that is a good thing (see last night in Michigan) however I can honestly say that had Ritter appointed Romanoff or Hickenlooper or pretty much anyone I would oppose primarying them unless I honestly thought the opposition stood a much better chance in the general. My view is that nine times out of ten a primary hurts the incumbent in the general. It gets played up a lot that primaries somehow help a candidate, and sometimes it does but the majority of time you get a divided electorate and a financially depleted nominee who spent all of his or her much needed money for the general getting the nomination. This is a swing state and I said from the beginning that we should unite behind whoever Ritter appoints and to be honest I was a bit disappointed when I heard it was going to be Bennet (although I now like Bennet) but I said look for the sake of the general we need to unite. Romanoff offers nothing Bennet does not already have ( except he has less cash) and his candidacy only causes trouble for us. I would have said the same thing had he ran against a Senator Hickenlooper or anyone else or I would have defended him had Hickenlooper or someone else ran against him had he been the incumbent. Now you really do make an excellent point in your first paragraph, that is your view to hold, an a intelligent one. I personally do not feel the same way but I respect that view.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Smart
Don't add to the Frontline. Don't give Republicans any additional information to the other side. I heard from one Democratic op here that they think one advantage they have is that the GOP is barking up the wrong trees in terms of vulnerable seats.  

California: Court strikes down Prop 8
may at least briefly highlight social issues in CA. On the one hand I fear that that could help the detestable Andy Pugno since I'm fairly sure the assembly district he is running for supported Prop 8. On the other hand if people have mistaken beliefs that Whitman or Fiorina are social moderates, maybe this could be a good chance to expose them (especially Whitman, I think she contributed to Yes on 8).  

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


NV-Sen: Reid out with a new ad and more proof that Angle is off her rocker.

And now this: http://www.lasvegassun.com/blo...

And no this is not satire, she really said that.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


*jab* *right hook* *jab* *jab*
FINISH HER!

UPPERCUT!

26, Male, Democrat, TX-26


[ Parent ]
Poor Angle
It is not her fault she is batshit crazy. Although she should really not have ran for office. Oh well, I'm not complaining!!!

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
her parents clearly had a hand
you can only create so much crazy all by yourself.  Angle's was clearly a team effort.

[ Parent ]
I don't want to start counting chickens
But I'm not sure this individual could even get elected in the Deep South with some of the batshit crazy soundbites she's gifted the Democrats. The only reason this is still in the single digits is because she's running against a hated incumbent.

We've got months to go still, but the Angle campaign has got to be an early contender for the worst run statewide campaign of the last generation.

The video of her telling Carl Cameron on FOX News that the press should "be our friend" and only ask her the questions she wants to answer is beyond priceless.

Harry Reid truly won the GOP Senate primary.


[ Parent ]
Harry Reid truly won the GOP Senate primary
While Mayor Hickenlooper won the '10 cycle easily.

22, Male, Democrat, PA-18.

[ Parent ]
Her response to this news of her views:
"Only the supreme arrogance of Senator Harry Reid would believe that he has a divine right to rule over mere mortals by ramming through Obamacare, billions in reckless spending, and yes, buying cocaine for monkeys. The fact is, Senator Reid has acted like he's all-powerful and accountable to no one. Citizens are frustrated because, like Sharron, they understand Washington has become a giant, unseen, omnipotent force whose presence is felt in all our lives whether we like it or not."

Um, that sounds like a reiteration of the above to me.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
The whole "buying cocaine for monkeys" line
Just makes her look ridiculous if you ask me. Now, I know I'm biased but if roles were reversed I would think there were many better stimulus items to focus on than that.

[ Parent ]
Republicans
look good in Washington in 2012. They did not poll Inslee though, and I thought he was the most likely candidate.

http://www.publicpolicypolling...

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  


Methinks that poll doesn't say any such thing......
McKenna has 45% with no opinion of him, and the Democrat they polled, Lisa Something (I already forgot her last name after a minute!) has 81% with no opinion.

And it's in 2012, with Obama surge voters returning to the polls.

So that 47-29 "lead" McKenna has is illusory.

One mistake PPP consistently makes in their narratives is to take their own 2012 polling too seriously.  It's going to look completely different, and especially with unknown candidates you can't really say anything except based on what we can learn about the underlying foundations various candidates have built (e.g., proven vote-getters, fundraising ability, appeals to various demographics and interest groups).

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
Considering Washington hasn't had a Republican governor since 1984
it's hardly surprising that the Republicans might have a chance at winning there in 2012. Incidentally, Washington is currently the state with the longest streak of Democratic governors. (South Dakota is the same with Republican governors, since 1978).

[ Parent ]
Harry Reid looked dead, too
Polls from 2 years out are ludacris (LUDA!). I don't put much stock in them.

23, Male, PA-05 (summer) PA-12 (winter)

[ Parent ]
Woolridge aides back Crawford in AR-01
http://www.politico.com/news/s...
I now see why everyone rallied to Causey during tue runoff.  

I now see why everyone rallied to Causey during tue runoff
Yep your finally seeing it. Because Woolridge could possible more conservative than Dan Boren or Ben Nelson and have said stuff that makes everyone question why he's a Dem. I'm not suprised to see his aides do this. Woodridge and it's workers are more in line with Crawford's views than Causey's views. No shock here but to James and David this should be mentioned in tommorrow's roundup.

22, Male, Democrat, PA-18.

[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox