Premium Sponsor


Featured Sponsor


Our Sponsors


Ad Networks

Advertise Liberally

Buy an ad on all of the top liberal blogs with just one click.

Site Stats

FL-13: Buchanan Hit With Allegations of Illegal Campaign Financing

by: James L.

Sat Jul 26, 2008 at 7:33 PM EDT


Earlier this summer, we wrote about GOP Rep. Vern Buchanan getting hit with a consumer fraud lawsuit by ex-employees of his various auto dealerships in Florida. Things have gotten even more interesting in recent days, as two ex-employees behind the lawsuit are detailing additional allegations that they faced pressure to donate to Buchanan's congressional campaign in 2006, and were offered cash gifts and other favors as inducements:

Bell, the former finance director at Venice Nissan Dodge, said the day he made a $1,000 donation to the Buchanan campaign, he was given $1,000 in cash from his boss at the auto dealership.

Bell gave the Herald-Tribune bank records, which included copies of a canceled check dated Sept. 17, 2005, to the Buchanan campaign for $1,000 and a cash deposit made to his account the same day for $960. He said he took the rest as spending money.

"I was told I was going to be reimbursed," Bell said. "I either had to do this, or I was told I wouldn't be considered a team player. I took it as a threat. There was no gray area."

This sort of thing is, of course, very illegal:

Federal election law prohibits "using coercion, such as the threat of a detrimental job action, the threat of any other financial reprisal, or the threat of force, to urge any individual to make a contribution or engage in fundraising activities on behalf of a candidate or political committee."

The law also prohibits a candidate's giving cash or other reimbursements to a donor in exchange for a contribution.

There's more:

Kezer, the former finance director at another Buchanan dealership, Sarasota Ford, wrote a $2,000 check to the Buchanan campaign after he said he was told it was important to support the candidate. In exchange for the donation, Kezer said, Buchanan personally promised him a week at Buchanan's Vail, Colo., resort home. Buchanan sold the home last month for $6.5 million.

"He put his arm around me and promised I could use his house in Vail if I donated," Kezer said.

Kezer, 50, said he never went to Buchanan's Colorado home because he feared it was a violation.

Buchanan's camp is pushing back aggressively against the chargest, but it's unclear what, if anything, will come of all this. One thing is certain: this isn't exactly the kind of press that Buchanan wants to have as he heads into the final months of his first re-election campaign.

SSP currently rates this race as Likely Republican.

James L. :: FL-13: Buchanan Hit With Allegations of Illegal Campaign Financing
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
: )
I hope this is getting local media attention over there big time. I hope these scandals blow up even bigger and are found to be 100% reliable. Democrats and Jennings got screwed in 2006 with the "voting machines," and to see justice come in 2008 would really put a smile on my face.

Joe DioGuardi
Pulled exactly the same stunt in Westchester County, NY and was booted from office in the next election.  And yes it involved auto dealership employeed forced to contribute illegally. His successor in this once solidly Republican district, Nita Lowey, is still serving in the House.  DioGuardi keeps running for Congress in adjoining districts but gets nowhere.  The auto dealer was forced to sell out his chain.

Buchanan is both worse (he is the employer as well) and has more room (DioGuardi is a CPA and asdvertised himself as an accountant in Congress).  The similarity is astounding.


what is it
What is it with car salesman? I mean, there has to be an honest one out there SOMEWHERE, right?

[ Parent ]
Buchanan is at the top of my list
of GOPers who need to go down this year.  This seat more than any other I am sure was stolen from us.  The House ethics committee, if not the DoJ, needs to look into this.  How is Christine Jennings' fundraising?

I feel disgusted just hearing Buchanan's name
The 2006 FL-13 election is the most obvious case of a stolen election I think I've ever seen.  I'd love to see Jennings win this seas (AGAIN) this year.

Could anyone fill me in as to why this is Likely R
I'm just trying to understand how a race we lost by 600 votes last time gets rated a Likely Republican. I was looking at the fundraising and it looked pretty steady for Jennings. Not stellar but decent. Am I missing a poll or two?

I'm also thinking that it doesn't look too good on Jennings's part
to have pushed for recounts several times and then keep the district's representation technically up in the air.

But then again, I'm way more involved in electoral politics than the average person, and I may also be more sensitive to issue-pushing than the average person.  (That last reason is also why I don't really like political ads.)

These are the reasons I'm not bullish about this district.

Of course, I don't know how to gauge the mood in FL-13.  If people felt significantly that the election was done unfairly, or particular dislike Vern Buchanan or like Christine Jennings, then that might make a difference.  Going purely by their professions, I'd say a car salesman would seem to have more "common man"-ish-ness to exploit than a banker, but then again, I don't actually know either candidate well, nor do I know the district.

Bill Posey is not half-alligator...and is outclassed by Davy Crockett anyway: http://www.washingtonmonthly.c...


[ Parent ]
I thought it was beause of Jan Schineder running a Indepedent
campaign I could be wrong but thats what I heard.

[ Parent ]
Jan has raised next to nothing
I woudn't count on her having much impact.  Still, any impact hurts Jennings.  I have the race as Lean R, with the race being closer to tossup than Likely R.

[ Parent ]
We've only seen one poll so far
POS for the NRCC, which had Buchanan up 53-37.

On the "Likely R" rating, I will say a few things:

1) Rematches tend not to be favorable to the candidate who lost the first round -- but of course there are exceptions (Boyda, McNerney, and Hodes, for instance -- who all had the luxury of running for a second time in a wave year)

2) Jennings' long, drawn-out challenge of the 2006 election results probably hurt her in the court of public opinion due to the sexist media's portrayal of her as a whiner. Contrast this with how Dino "He Wuz Robbed" Rossi's treatment after the 2006 elections.

3) Schneider's independent candidacy certainly does not help.

4) Buchanan's wide fundraising lead is formidable -- and let's not forget, this is one race where the Millionaire's Amendment would have really helped us close the gap. Now, Buchanan can spend with impunity.

However, this recent Buchanan scandal is the first real break that Jennings has gotten in a while. We'll be watching closely.


[ Parent ]
Buchanan isn't viewed as a rubber stamp for Bush
I'm in FL-13. I've had to repeatedly point out his actual voting record. People here think he's a moderate, because he talks that way and the local media doesn't call him out on it. His voting record doesn't match his rhetoric.

This district is flush with northwest liberal retiree money and can easily support a Democrat, but I'm not sure Jennings is progressive enough or sharp enough, honestly. Schnieder, OTOH, seems to be motivated by bitterness, never a good thing.


[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

Talk to your supporters, not tech support. Campaign Engine is the powerful, affordable Progressive Campaign Software.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

SSP Race Ratings

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox