Premium Sponsor


Featured Sponsor


Our Sponsors


Ad Networks

Advertise Liberally

Buy an ad on all of the top liberal blogs with just one click.

Site Stats

SSP's Competitive Senate Race Ratings (7/19/08)

by: DavidNYC

Sat Jul 19, 2008 at 3:40 PM EDT


Likely D Lean D Tossup Lean R Likely R
NM (Open) CO (Open)
LA (Landrieu)
NH (Sununu)
AK (Stevens)
MN (Coleman)
MS (Wicker)
NC (Dole)
OR (Smith)
KY (McConnell)
ME (Collins)

Safe D:

     VA (Open)

Races to Watch:  

     GA (Chambliss)
     KS (Roberts)
     NE (Open)

     NJ (Lautenberg)
     OK (Inhofe)
     TX (Cornyn)

Today's Ratings Changes:

  • Virginia (Open): Likely Democratic to Safe Democratic

    Under the rubric we use, if a race is in a "likely" category, that means "an upset cannot be completely ruled out." We no longer think an upset is imaginable in Virginia under any reasonably foreseeable circumstances. Mark Warner is still wildly popular while Jim Gilmore's name is mud. Warner has a 44-to-1 cash advantage while Gilmore barely eked out a win at a party convention his supporters had orchestrated to favor him. Obama now leads by three in a state that Kerry lost by more than eight. Oh, and Warner himself, who has never led by less than twenty, has now staked out a nearly thirty-point advantage.

    Obviously in politics, anything is possible. A hidden scandal could always destroy a candidate at the last minute. But such unknowns can't factor into race ratings - if they did, no race could ever go into the "safe" category. What's more, Warner is a highly skilled politician who is adept at playing it safe; he is probably among the least likely to get ambushed by a late-breaking surprise. If he were to somehow lose at this point, it would be one of the biggest shockers in political history. But we feel quite confident that nothing like that is going to happen, and that Warner will cruise to victory.

  • New Mexico (Open): Lean Democratic to Likely Democratic

    Democrats, already in the driver's seat here, got an added boost when winger Steve Pearce narrowly edged out "moderate" Heather Wilson for the GOP senate nomination. And the more New Mexico gets to know Steve Pearce, the less it seems they like him - Tom Udall is about thirty points ahead in the latest polling. And it's more than shown in fundraising, where Udall now has five times what Pearce has on hand. What's more, NRSC chief John Ensign all but admitted his commimttee was writing off this race. There's no question that Udall has a strong lead here now.

  • New Hampshire (Sununu): Tossup to Lean Democratic

    Jeanne Shaheen has staked out a remarkably consistent ten-point lead in New Hampshire, leading many to ask if John Sununu is this cycle's Rick Santorum. We think it's certainly starting to look that way. No Republican, it appears, has ever come back from such a large deficit with this little time left on the clock. Sununu's biggest advantage right now is that he's the most endangered GOP incumbent, which means he's first on the NRSC's list of priorities. That's not a place any Republican really wants to be, but it means that Shaheen can't afford to let up, despite the advantages she now has.

  • Colorado (Open): Tossup to Lean Democratic

    This race is not as clear-cut as, say, New Hampshire, but we no longer feel that it's a true tossup. It looks as though recent unrelenting attacks on Bob Schaffer have taken their toll, giving Mark Udall nine- and ten-point leads in four consecutive polls. Colorado, like Virginia, is another state that Kerry lost but where Obama shows a lot of promise. (And of course, we have our convention there.) However, Schaffer is pretty competitive in the cash department, and the NRSC hasn't yet bailed here. Nonetheless, it's hard to say that his chances of victory are equal to Udall's, hence our change.

  • Oregon (Smith): Likely Republican to Lean Republican

    Jeff Merkley won a tough primary contest back in May and then went on to post far better fundraising numbers in the second quarter than he ever had before. His polling trend line looks good, and Obama has had consistent ten-point leads here. Gordon Smith's "moderate" image still holds a lot of power, though, and he's squeezing every advantage out of his incumbency. Merkley has a lot more work to do here, but this race is starting to get closer.

  • Georgia (Chambliss): Safe Republican to Races to Watch

    If two things happen here, this race might go from snoozer to potentially, maybe, possibly interesting: First, Jim Martin needs to win the August 5th Democratic run-off and second, Barack Obama needs to follow through on his plan to register a half a million new black voters in Georgia. If, however, the Bush-loving walking train-wreck that is Vernon Jones is the Democratic nominee, then this will still be a race to watch - but for all the wrong reasons.

  • DavidNYC :: SSP's Competitive Senate Race Ratings (7/19/08)
    Tags: , (All Tags)
    Print Friendly View Send As Email
    Maine vs. Minnesota
    Hard to see how ME is Likely R, while MN rates just Lean R.  The R money advantage is about the same in both races, and the polling is virtually identical (but for the weird Ras outliers in MN).  Seems to me that MN should be moved to Likely R -- it looks a lot more like ME than AK, MS, and OR.  

    SurveyUSA pollls on MN are as bad as rasmussen's
    So I'd hardly call Rasmussen the outlier.  Last SUSA poll on MN gave Dems a 1% democratic voter edge.  That is just ridiculous.  Most other pollsters give Dems at minimum a 8-10% edge in voters.  If you think Coleman is really up by more than 5 points you're nuts.

    [ Parent ]
    agreed
    The MN DFL probably has at least a 10% voter indentification advantage over the GOP atm.  If 2006 was an indicator (winning 19 state house seats) then the DFL is on the rise and it makes the SurveyUSA poll really flawed.

    It's kind of sad that it's being touted all over the place as the downfall for Franken while the Rasmussen poll is being completely ignored.

    The race is certainly within the single digits, probably no more than an 8% deficit for Franken all the way up to a few point lead for Franken.  That would be my estimate for where the race is.  


    [ Parent ]
    My guess
    that if the election was this Tuesday Norm would win something like 52-47 with one percent going to whoever wins the IP primary. I would also guess that barring major events Franken will win by something like 50-47-3 beacuse he will get major help from the DSCC and Obama's coatails will likely push him over the top.  

    [ Parent ]
    I wish I was as optimistic
    I think Dean Barkley (IP Party) will get at least 10% of the vote. He was polling at 8% (SUSA) before he got in. There is a lot of disatisfaction with both the major party candidates and Minnesota has a history of 3rd part candidates getting support (And not just Jessie).

    If I had to guess I would say the Obama turnout lifts Franken but not enough and Norm wins 45-40-15.


    [ Parent ]
    I'm not so sure he will even win
    Jack Uldrich is in. The IP endorsed candidate is in and so are a bunch of others, their primary is up in the air.

    Also Tim Penny started out close to leading in 2002. I doubt the IP candidate will get more then Hutchinson.


    [ Parent ]
    Idaho?
    Does it not warrant at least a mention in 'Races to Watch'?

    I have Maine Lean R because I look at it kind of on the same level as North Carolina. And Kentucky deserves to be at least Likely R.

    Favored D
    VA
    NM

    Lean D
    CO
    NH
    LA

    Too Close to Call
    AK
    MS
    OR

    Lean R
    MN
    ME
    NC
    KY

    Favored R
    TX
    KS
    OK
    GA
    NE
    ID

    Outlook: D +6-9


    Alaska leans repub?
    Is there a single poll out there giving Stevens more than a 2 point lead?  I know he has a primary challenger, but I don't think anyone believe Stevens will lose his primary.  This one is easily a tossup.

    Probably because of the bad luck we've had in AK in the past
    Such as in 2004, where Knowles had a narrow lead in almost every poll, and still lost on election day.

    Or 2006, where polls showed the race to be a virtual tie, and Knowles still lost by 6 points.

    Hopefully those won't happen again this year.


    [ Parent ]
    No, not true about 2006
    In 2006 after Palin won the primary she was ahead in every every poll expect for Other Source.  The last Ramsussen poll has Palin up 5 points, Field Research Corp has Palin by 9 and Moore Information has Palin up 11.  Only Other Source has Knowles ahead, and I believe they are a Dem pollster.
    http://www.uselectionatlas.org...

    I'm unable to find polling on the 2004 Senate race.  But you may be right about that one.  I do recall Knowles leading most polls by a couple points.  Then again, it did seem that republicans outperformed most of the polls in 2004.


    [ Parent ]
    you have to remember,
    the polls might have been right, but Bush won in a landslide, 60-39, his coattails probably pulled Murkowski over the edge, and gave her the two point victory she got.

    But, he is right, Knowles lost by nine points in 2006, and the average poll right up to the election had Palin winning by 6-9 points and that's just what she did.  

    Call no man happy until he is dead-Aeschylus


    [ Parent ]
    Knowles wasn't the best candidate
    A friend of mine from AK gave me an ear full a few years back about Knowles. The main reason she didn't like Knowles was because of his stance on gun rights. From what she said he took a pro-gun control stance, which is shocking considering the support for pro-gun rights in any western state. Talk about a political killer. Also, his stance on capital punishment might not be the best in AK.

    Overall, Knowles was the best the Dems could come up with and not to shabby. The Democratic bench in AK is incredibly empty. After Knowles, all we have are state reps, state senators and the mayor of Anchorage. Go Begich!


    [ Parent ]
    Well our bench is slim in AK
    Knowles may have lost two straight elections, but he probably did better than any other dem we could have come up with in AK for 2004 and 2006, except maybe Begich.

    [ Parent ]
    Mayor of Anchorage
    Anchorage has over 40% of the population of the state.  The Mayor of Anchorage is equivalent percentage wise to the Mayor of New York City in New York .  No too shabby.  Knowles was the Mayor of Anchorage before being elected Governor.  IIRC, Sarah Pallin was the Mayor of Wasilla, a much smaller town (although part of the Mat-Su Valley, the key Republican area in the state).

    [ Parent ]
    Minor Quibbles
    Alaska--move up to toss up.

    Maine--move up to lean R.

    North Carolina--move down to likely R.

    Kentucky--move up to likely R.

    Idaho--move up to watch.


    DSCC has reserved 6 million in air time.
    That more than makes up the COH defecit.  Dole is only polling well because of her big ad buy.  It's no secret.  

    [ Parent ]
    and, Hagan
    had her best quarter yet, and Dole's huge two million dollar ad buy failed to put the race in the bag. Because of this, the two candidates have only about a one million dollar disparity in CoH, and, like he said, the DSCC has reserved 6 million dollars in advertising, something the RSCC will in no way be able to match. Additionally, Obama's targeting this state heavily, and though there's a good chance he won't win it, but I don't see McCain getting more than 49% with Barr on the ballot; so now coattails.  

    Call no man happy until he is dead-Aeschylus

    [ Parent ]
    I disagree about NM-Sen
    Even though the CoH and fundraising isn't as lop-sided as VA-Sen, Udall's lead has been consistantly on par with Warner's lead, and there hasn't been any sign of Pearce getting any traction. On top of that, Udall has been blanketing the airwaves with ads (here in Albuquerque, since the middle of June there has not been a single day where I haven't seen a Udall ad) while Pearce has had nothing going on since the end of the Republican primary (I haven't seen a single ad from Steve Pearce). I don't see any reason for this race not to be ranked as Safe right now.

    Your go-to source for great sarcasm

    It appears that Udall
    is trying to deliver a knockout punch. I guess he's trying to maintain that 20-25 point lead he had just after the primary. Do that, and he maintains the momentum for a while and keeps the fundraising and excitement edge, and Republicans get pessimistic, and without that same amount of energy they can't win.

    Call no man happy until he is dead-Aeschylus

    [ Parent ]
    and help out downballot
    with cleaning house in NM!

    Bill Posey is not half-alligator...and is outclassed by Davy Crockett anyway: http://www.washingtonmonthly.c...

    [ Parent ]
    I'm optimistic about a sweep
    We have a good chance at taking all 3 House seats and the Senate seat.  NM-02 is a sleeper.  Teague is a good candidate and is doing well fundraising.  I think that race will be a tossup eventually.

    [ Parent ]
    Sleeper?
    I would call it a top tier race right now. The DCCC has put a million into the district and Teague is rich enough that he can self fund. I would say we have a 50-50 chance of winning.

    [ Parent ]
    Well, not exactly what I meant
    By sleeper I meant to imply that many are overlooking this race.  I agree that we at least have close to a 50% chance of winning it.  I have the race at leans R, but I'm close to pushing it to tossup.  I'd just like to get an independent poll or 2 to gauge where the race is at.

    [ Parent ]
    Overall good
    But how can you not have KS-Sen as Likely R?  Why is everyone writing Slattery off just days after an independent poll showed him down by only single digits?

    Also, I agree with the commenter above that AK-Sen as GOP-lean is one slot too conservative.


    Wrong poll
    The most recent Rasmussen poll actuallt has Roberts ahead of Slattery by 27 points.

    http://www.rasmussenreports.co...

    I still agree that we have a shot in KS, even if it's a very longshot.


    [ Parent ]
    Right
    But with two competing polls, why should we take one any more seriously than the other?  I still think the difference could be nine points.

    [ Parent ]
    They aren't competing polls
    They were both done by the same company.  One taken over a month ago and another taken last week.  

    I do agree that the difference could be and probably is closer to 9 points than 27.  Rasmussen is a good pollster but inconsistent this far out from election day.  I still consider the race likely R rather than Solid R.


    [ Parent ]
    Ah yes
    I read "July" instead of "June."  Sorry about that!

    [ Parent ]
    somebody said that
    in the last month Roberts just hit the airwaves with a mid-summer advertising blitz. So that would explain the 15 point increase in his lead.

    Call no man happy until he is dead-Aeschylus

    [ Parent ]
    Getting closer but still too conservative
    AK and MS ought to be moved to tossups, ME should be moved to Lean R, Kentucky should be moved to Likely R and Idaho should replace it on Races to Watch, IMO.

    I don't disagree with any of them.
    I'm tempted to throw Oregon to the tossup category with the latest polling but objectively we need more data for that.

    Alaska due to it's past partisan bent you have to be careful with (particularly given what happened with the Knowles-Murkowski race where an unpopular Republican incumbent rallied the base to win).  Also no matter how inept or corrupt you have to be careful with these old incumbents.  Just look at Conrad Burns who was hellbent on his own personal destruction and still only lost by the most narrow of margins.  Also need to see if his primary opponent gains any tractions.

    Mississippi I might move into the tossup category.  History shows it should break Republican at the end.  However historic black turnout might be enough to save Wicker (even if it's not enough for us to actually take the state).

    North Carolina polls are not as positive as they were in the past.  Tempting to move that back to likely Republican.  But the fact the Republicans are panicking is a good sign.  Or is it a better sign when they are over confident like Allen was in Virginia?


    the polls
    went up because Dole spent nearly two million dollars on an ad blitz. Now, she and Hagan are only about one million dollars apart in CoH, and the DSCC has bought 6 million dollars in ad time. Hagan also just had her best quarter yet. This is definitely leans repub, and I'm optimistic on this than MS, and I want to win this race more.  

    Call no man happy until he is dead-Aeschylus

    [ Parent ]
    Kentucky
    Hey folks; I'm not sure why, but as we were posting this, we didn't include Kentucky as "Likely Republican".  We actually moved that race to Likely R from Safe R last month. I've edited the post to clear up the confusion.

    As for the rest of the changes you want us to make, make your own damn charts. :)


    Okay
    That just seemed a little weird.

    And I will make my own damn charts and they will have nothing to do with NAFTA.


    [ Parent ]
    Heh
    Been there, done that :D

    Your go-to source for great sarcasm

    [ Parent ]
    Wonderful!
    Good call on that one.

    [ Parent ]
    Thoughts on Race Ratings & General Diary Text Update Needed
    First off, we just need to get a few technical things cleaned up. In the "Today's Ratings Changes" section:
    - Oregon (OPEN)...Is Senator Gordon Smith not an incumbent? This should say: Oregon (Smith)
    - Georgia (OPEN)...Same as above, I believe Senator Chambliss is the incumbent, so: Georgia (Chambliss)

    As for the ratings themselves:
    - Glad to see someone finally agrees to take Virginia to the "SAFE D" and move New Mexico to "LIKELY D" column, although I understand what people saying with why not NM in the "SAFE D" as well. One column shift at a time.
    - No arguments with CO & NH being in "LEAN D" given the circumstances. Hopefully they get closer to Likely later.
    - NO TOSSUPS? I think given the circumstances, I'd put both Alaska and Mississippi-B in the toss-up, with Oregon being real close, but Lean R now.
    - Lean R should include Oregon, Minnesota, North Carolina, & Maine.
    - Likely in my mind are those that are pretty much going to be out of reach, just not quite safe, so that goes Kentucky, Idaho, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Kansas, & Texas.
    - Not touching AL, GA, MS, TN, SC, WY, WY-B  

    KELL


    Thanks Ryan
    We were in a rush to get this post up before our Netroots Nation panel, and somehow we didn't catch those OR/GA slip-ups.  I've edited them now.

    [ Parent ]
    I like the list.
    If the election were tommorrow we would pick up 4 seats. However, this would give Mitch McConnell  and the RSCC some degree of satisfaction. Those bastards think that only losing 4 seats is some show of victory. This might be true taken in the context of 2008's political landscape. We have to beat them, and that means gaining at least 5 seats.

    I know we need to pick up one or two more, but I'm not sure which ones should be targets. My gut feeling tells me that Musgrove, Allen, Begich and Merkley have the best chance of toss-up race. I don't think that Kay Hagan or Al Franken have a chance. Dole is just too strong a candidate and I don't think Franken has an appealing background (it is MN, so I guess anythings possible). I'm not sure what the rest of you think, but the races in Maine, Alaska, Mississippi and Oregon are on my list of important races.

    Also, I'm seriously let down by Noriega. He's a great candidate but he doesn't have a chance unless he raises 4 or 5 million in the next few months. What a shame.  


    nah, I think if the election were
    held today we'd definitely win five, NC, MS MN, ME, OR or AK, at least one of those seats, most probably MS would D, because we haven't had enough time to campaign in OR, NC, and AK. In the end, I think we will lose MS narrowly, but force them to spend tons of money here and elsewhere. But, I think AK and NC will shift decidedly in our favor for a total pick up of at least six seats in the general election.

    Call no man happy until he is dead-Aeschylus

    [ Parent ]
    NC?
    I really don't think we'd come within 5 points if the election were held today in NC.  However I do think we'd win VA, NM, CO, NH with a 50/50 shot at OR, AK and MS.  MN and NC would proably be around a 4-7 point loss today.

    [ Parent ]
    Don't forget 46% is the floor for a D in NC
    NC is growing more purple by the day too.  Short of a major gaffe or scandal, Hagan will win 48% no matter what.  

    Dole's totally brainless Helms-naming AIDS bill shows she is more style than substance.  She has a record now, she has to run on it.  It won't be the 'pagaent' like '02 was.  Also '02 was a GOP year and her opponent was quite weak.  

    The history of NC is that GOP years nationally produce GOP victories at the state level. Neutral and D years nationally produce Dem victories in NC.  

    If NC doesn't go Dem, then 5 seats is probably all the Dems will get.  I expect more like 7-9 D wins with NC being one of them.  

    'held today' conjucture is meaningless until at least October.  Dole has had the airwaves to herself and she still barely cracks 50%, and in some polls not even doing that.

    ME and NC are very close together in the rankings IMO.  Oregon is now ahead of both of those.    


    [ Parent ]
    Ya I'd look at the Erskine Bowles runs
    Erskine Bowles was a pretty sub-par candidate and even he 45 and 47% of the vote in his two Senate runs in 2002 and 2004.  Hagen is a much better candidat than he was and NC is more favorable this year to us than it was in 02 or 04.

    [ Parent ]
    On Nov 4 we win 8 seats, maybe 9
    I'd guess we will win VA, CO, NM and NH, and then also OR, AK and NC because the DSCC puts big bucks into it, and then also maybe ME and/or MN, as squeakers.  In the end money will save Wicker in MS, McConnell in KY and Kyl in TX, and also the R seats in NE and KS, but that won't also be enough to cover AK and one of ME and MN. n (Stevens will be left to fend for himself.)

    Collins' loss (or squeaker win) in ME will push Olympia Snowe more toward cooperating with the Dems, along with McCain's replacement as he will retire, also Specter. Voino and even Gregg as they decide to retire.  Filibusters will be broken, and progress will be made on health care and global warming as we pull out of Iraq.


    [ Parent ]
    Pretty much agree with that take.
    But the DSCC will easily be able to close that small money gap in MS and are already going up on the air.

    Kyl is from AZ also not TX and I think the DSCC will have enough to win Nebraska but I do think we have a real good shot at 8-11 seats.


    [ Parent ]
    DSCC isn't jumping in to Nebraska
    End of Story.  Want to know how I know that?

    http://www.dscc.org/news_item?...

    They don't even list Kleeb OUTRAISING Johanns in Nebraska.  That is BIG news.  They aren't going to reach out to the red states like some people are hoping they might.  There are enough purple and blue states to piss money in.  


    [ Parent ]
    Not yet they are not
    They have made their current targets clear. The big 10 and Kentucky.

    They are watching Nebraska, Oaklahoma and a few other states though and if they get close enough the DSCC will jump in.


    [ Parent ]
    Maybe later
    That DSCC bulletin makes it pretty clear what the top 11 races are for them.  This is probably all the races that will get attention for the moment.  But, if any of the other races start to tighten in the polls, I fully expect the DSCC to jump in.  So, if Kleeb wants financial help, he'll probably get it only by showing he's close; good fundraising by itself won't be enough.

    [ Parent ]
    North Carolina
    I think North Carolina is likley to flip and am not sure how popular Senator Dole is. North Carolina has a history of throwing out conservative Republicans and replacing them with Democrats, sometimes even liberal ones (ie, Broyhill to Sanford, Faircloth to Edwards).

    The problem is perception of Dole
    She has fooled a lot of NC voters into believing she's somewhat moderate.

    [ Parent ]
    More Talk On Oklahoma!
    I'd like to hear more about the Oklahoma contest. Rice is a very good candidate. Inhofe is waaaaaay right. And the state does elect Democrats to statewide office (including the present governor). Rice believes that the state isn't as hard-core right as the rest of the nation often thinks it is, and that a moderate Democrat has a shot against a fanatical conservative, especially in what has the potential to turn into a big Democratic year.

    I'm not saying Rice will win. He's still the underdog. But it seems to me he's got a shot, and the political payoff would be huge. A June Research 2000 poll had Inhofe's reelect number at 39%, and most people don't yet know who Rice is.

    Certainly a "race to watch," I'd think.


    Oklahoma is still my most important Senate race
    even beating out the Republican-morale-killing Idaho and the Republican-fang-breaking Kentucky.

    Also, Inhofe is not way right, he is way wrong.

    Bill Posey is not half-alligator...and is outclassed by Davy Crockett anyway: http://www.washingtonmonthly.c...


    [ Parent ]
    word on the street is
    that Rice is going up on TV tomorrow. Things will get interesting.

    [ Parent ]
    Alaska Belongs as tossup
    The most recent polls still show Begich leading narrowly
    Research 2000 Poll
    Stevens (R) 45 (43)
    Begich (D) 47 (48)

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/...


    And Rasmussen has us down 2 points
    If all of the polls have this race within 3 points I don't see how it can not be considered a tossup.  The DSCC will probably be backing Begich to the tune of millions in funding, which makes it doubtful the NRSC can keep up.

    [ Parent ]
    Well, while I keep Alaska as a Toss-up myself

    They aren't out of line for considering the race to be leaning Republican, especially considering that in 2004 Republicans outnumbered Democrats by over 2-1 in the 2004 elections and that even doing extremely well among Independents didn't save Knowles. On top of that, Ted Stevens may be a corrupt asshole, but he's still an institution in the state and we've had our hearts broken by Alaska before.



    Your go-to source for great sarcasm

    [ Parent ]
    I believe self ID of repubs in AK has fallen
    Alaska has always had a huge number of independents compared to other states anyway.  Plus, Kerry did horribly in Alaska in 2004 which probably hurt Knowles.  Obama will definately come within 15 points, with a good shot at holding it to a 6-10 point race.  Not only do I rate this as a tossup, I'd give Begich a slight edge.

    [ Parent ]
    New Rasmussen: Begich up by 9
    Very good results.  Rasmussen notes the poll was taken 9 days after Begich's TV ads started.  Also notes 20% of Repubs support Begich.

    Alaska's U.S. Senate race between Republican incumbent Ted Stevens and Anchorage Mayor Mark Begich has been a toss-up for several months now, but the Democratic challenger is now ahead 50% to 41%. When "leaners" are included, Begich leads 52%to 44%.

    http://rasmussenreports.com/pu...


    [ Parent ]
    Ratings are okay
    in my opinion, they are a bit too conservative.  I would rank them
    Republican Seats:
    Safe D
    1. Virginia
    Likely D
    2. New Mexico
    Leans D
    3. Colorado
    4. New Hampshire
    Tossup
    5. Alaska
    6. Mississippi-B
    7. Oregon
    8. Minnesota
    Leans R
    9. North Carolina
    10. Maine
    Likely R
    11. Kentucky
    and Louisiana is leans D

    "[Rush Limbaugh] is a sorry excuse for a human being and a has-been hypocrite loser who was more lucid when he was a drug addict." Congressman Alan Grayson (D-FL)

    yeah
    those are mine pretty much except New Mexico really is a safe Dem pick-up.  We only all rate it as likely because while Udall was our best recruit, he is no where near the God-like status of Mark Warner in Virginia, who had this seat in the bag the day he announced.  With Udall, we all knew he would do the best but I don't think any of us dreamed that he would put this one in the bag almost from day one as well.

    [ Parent ]
    New Rasmussen VA-Sen poll - nothing to see here
    Warner still holds a massive lead.

    http://www.rasmussenreports.co...

    Warner (D)- 57
    Gilmore (R)- 34

    Favorable/Unfavorables:
    Warner - 66/28
    Gilmore - 47/44

    Crazy as it sounds I think Gilmore has peaked.  Warner has a ridiculous cash advantage and once he starts to really spend it should drive up Gilmore's unfavorables.


    I still have
    Colorado rated ahead of New Hampshire. I know Udall doesn't poll as well as Shaheen, but Schaffer is a dunce who is a walking scandal. Sununu is much too conservative for his state, but he's still a very competent campaigner, remember this is the same guy who beat an incumbent senator and governor in the same cycle.

    In 2002 - a pro-republican year
    Dirty tricks and all.  Shaheen should win it something like 56-44.  I suspect the NRSC will completely abandon Sununu by October to focuz on winnable races.

    [ Parent ]
    It was a
    Republican year, but its not like it was a 1994-redux, democrats like Lanrieu, and Mark Pryor and Tim Johnson all won close races that year.

    Being a conservative and all, you simply don't beat the people Sununu did without being a helluva campaigner and you can't sleep on him.


    [ Parent ]
    Oregon!
    This one is going to move in to tossup in a hurry.  Smith's VERY negative campaigning has been backfiring--manifesting it Merkley's rise in the polls and increased fundraising.

    Merkley has begun to raise his profile. Making a point to visit 100 towns in Oregon--getting excellent write-ups in every hometown newspaper.  Oregon's wide swath of independent voters will feel good about voting for him because of his background, experience and obvious intelligence.

    The "tax and spend liberal" line isn't working here--and Smith keeps pushing it.  His campaign lacks spark--and Smith is being criticized for essentially sleepwalking through the process.

    I also wonder if the negative campaigning isn't tarnishing Smith's "affable" image as well.

     



    Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

    Primary Sponsor

    Talk to your supporters, not tech support. Campaign Engine is the powerful, affordable Progressive Campaign Software.

    Menu

    Make a New Account

    Username:

    Password:



    Forget your username or password?


    About the Site

    SSP Resources

    SSP Race Ratings

    Blogroll

    Powered by: SoapBlox