Premium Sponsor


Featured Sponsor


Our Sponsors


Ad Networks

Advertise Liberally

Buy an ad on all of the top liberal blogs with just one click.

Site Stats

NY-13: Losing Faith

by: James L.

Thu May 08, 2008 at 1:16 PM EDT


From the NY Daily News Blog:

National Republican leaders have "lost all faith" in Rep. Vito Fossella and are poised to begin polling in the 13th CD on potential candidates to take his place on the ballot, despite the fact that he has yet to make a definitive statement about his future political plans.

The poll could start as early as today, according to a Washington GOP source, and will likely include at least two names: Sen. Andrew Lanza and Staten Island DA Dan Donovan.

Another national GOP source said Fossella's fellow House minority members were "shocked" to learn of his "double life," and his admission that he fathered a child out of wedlock with retired Air Force lieutenant colonel, Laura Fay.

While the Democratic field for this seat includes Brooklynites Stephen Harrison and Domenic Recchia, national Democrats may be looking for an upgrade:

Crain's reported this morning that the DCCC has been calling Assemblyman Mike Cusick in hopes of coaxing him into the race. Certain Senate Democrats, meanwhile, are floating Sen. Diane Savino's name.

Cusick hails from Staten, so he's probably the best bet here.  Savino's seat is too precious for Senate Democrats, who need two pick-ups this fall in order to take the majority.

James L. :: NY-13: Losing Faith
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
NY-13: Losing Faith | 15 comments
wouldn't mind
having Recchia forced from the race... but i hope Harrison gets a shot. no reason to throw to the dogs a principled progressive campaign already making improvements on his strong showing against an unbesmirched Vino in '06... wish i knew more about Cusick, don't suppose there's any way to tell whether he'd sign onto an anti-war platform like harrison or where he stands on most national issues at this point.

It is difficult to get the news from poems, but men die miserably every day for lack of what is found there. --William Carlos Williams

"no reason to throw to the dogs a principled progressive campaign"
well other than that he might not be the best candidate to win a D1 district - or hold it.

Aww shoot
I just blew a diary writing aobut Cusick.

So aside from what part of the district the candidate is from...
what is our ideal candidate for NY-13?  I'm assuming fiscally conservative/socially liberal?

It's D+1 - You'd think we could have a solid chance
even running a liberal.  But it sounds like the ideal candidate won't be based on the issues, but where the candidate is from, and how strong of a candidate is he.  

[ Parent ]
A liberal?????
Dude, this is Staten Island we're talking about.  Working-class, largely Catholic, and, after 9/11, very hawkish.  Constituents of this district only lean left on economic issues, but are to the right on most everything else.  Running an outright liberal could be disastrous.  We need to run someone who will emphasize economic issues above all else, just the way Travis Childers has done down in Mississippi.


[ Parent ]
Well, they voted for Gore or Kerry over Bush.
Don't think it's a far stretch to say it's possible.  

[ Parent ]
Bush won Staten Island 56% to Kerry's 39%.
And while Staten Island is only 2/3 of the district, that makes it the district's center and sets up how far we can go toward the liberal side.

[ Parent ]
yeah, but....

There is baseline national trend to liberal/Democratic, mostly to do with generational change.  Around 1% per year in fairly age-balanced and ethnically mixed districts and communities.  

Don't know quite how to peg SI in those metrics now- it's been five years since I was last there- but R performance should be down at least 2-3%.


[ Parent ]
Even down 2-3% and they still have us beat.
Let's face it.  This is not your typical, liberal NYC district.

There's a reason why a Republican has represented it for so long.


[ Parent ]
Oh yeah, and I finally found it. The whole district went
for Bush in 2004 - 55% to 44%.

Staten Island really is the center of gravity there.


[ Parent ]
Charlie Cook changed NY-13 from Likely R to Tossup
And he's known for being cautious this early in an election cycle.

He made many ratings changes today.  Here they are according to whether they are positive or nagative for us.  The only move I really disagree with is moving OH-02 to likely R.  That race has a slight R lean at most with a great chance of being tossup by November.

Races moving in our favor
AK-AL   Young    Lean Republican to Toss Up
CT-02   Courtney   Likely Democratic to Solid Democratic
FL-21  L. Diaz-Balart Solid Republican to Likely Republican
FL-24   Feeney    Likely Republican to Lean Republican
IN-02   Donnelly   Likely Democratic to Solid Democratic
IN-07   Carson    Likely Democratic to Solid Democratic
MI-07   Walberg      Lean Republican to Toss Up
MI-09   Knollenberg  Likely Republican to Lean Republican
MO-06   Graves      Likely Republican to Lean Republican
NY-13   Fossella    Likely Republican to Toss Up
NC-11   Shuler      Likely Democratic to Solid Democratic

Races moving against us:
CA-11   McNerney  Lean Democratic to Toss Up
KS-02    Boyda    Lean Democratic to Toss Up
KY-03   Yarmuth  Likely Democratic to Lean Democratic
OH-02   Schmidt   Lean Republican to Likely Republican
OH-14   LaTourette  Likely Republican to Solid Republican


Source: http://www.cookpolitical.com/default.php
It's on the front page - no need for a subscription.

[ Parent ]
Yup
I agree with all of those changes.  I am not entirely sold on the Schmidt race still but I really didnt follow Congressional races in 06 like I am now.  It ended in 06 with a 51-49 win for Schmidt and this time Wulsin is outraising her so I guess we'll have to see.  But dont you think presidential coattails will really help this race out?  Republicans stayed home in 06, I doubt they will again.  What is going to help us win is that there will be a lot more Democrats coming out to vote but with this districts insanely strong Republican district (R+13), the Republicans coming back out to vote will easily top the number of Democrats coming out to vote.  And this part of Ohio doesn't really seem like an area that will be fired up by Obama, conservative white voters and all.  (I am only making an educated guess on that though)

[ Parent ]
Republicans didn't stay home in "06...
That is essentially a myth.  In 2006 numerous exit polls showed that it was independents combined with slightly higher than normal Dem turnout which caused the Dem wave.  Heck, 2006 wasn't even that great of a year for Dems in OH at the local level (we only gained OH-18) and lost numerous close races including OH-02.  Schmidt is as despised as ever and will be even worse off this year financially compared to Wulsin than she was in 2006.  Add in the fact that the Republican leadership has far less money to dump into the race to save her and I cannot see this race being won by either candidate by more than 2-3% as it was in "06.  No way it's a likely Rep hold.

[ Parent ]
NY-13: Losing Faith | 15 comments

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

Talk to your supporters, not tech support. Campaign Engine is the powerful, affordable Progressive Campaign Software.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

SSP Race Ratings

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox