Google Ads


Site Stats

AZ-01: Ann Kirkpatrick (D) Says She'll Seek a Rematch

by: DavidNYC

Wed Mar 30, 2011 at 3:38 PM EDT


AZ-01 district map

This is unexpected - and interesting:

Former Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick, a freshman Democrat ousted in last year's Republican tidal wave, is angling for a rematch against Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz. She told AZ/DC Tuesday that she has made the decision to run for her seat again in 2012. ...

"It's clear to me, now that Paul Gosar has a record, that he is toeing the party line rather than serving the district," she said. "The real key for me is the number of people who I've been hearing from in the district -- and this is Democrats, independents, Republicans and even folks who are actively involved in the 'tea party' -- that they feel he is deeply out-of-touch with the district."

Kirkpatrick said she hopes the 2012 political climate will be more hospitable to her candidacy because it is a presidential year and likely will have a bigger turnout.

I'm not sure that this comeback had really been on our radar. In fact, I apart from randomly appearing in a PPP poll a little while back, her name hasn't come up on SSP since the November election. Most commentators wrote her off at one point or another last year - we eventually moved the race to Lean R. Kirkpatrick wound up losing, of course, but by a not-entire-horribly six points. (By comparison, Carol Shea-Porter was also universally considered to be in a "Lean R" race, and she lost by double that margin.) So perhaps she has enough mojo to stage a comeback.

(As an aside, I'd also point out that Kirkpatrick was the Dem in the reddest seat who both voted for healthcare reform and against the Stupak amendment-as a freshman, no less.)

Of course, there's the little matter of redistricting, but as the article notes, both Gosar and Kirkpatrick hail from Flagstaff, so if there's a district for them to run in after the state's independent commission gets done with its work, they'll both be in it. AZ-01 is also one of those seats that you're pretty much required to describe as "sprawling" - it is, in fact, the tenth-largest by area (and fifth among non-at-large states). So unless mapmakers get very creative, it's hard to imagine this behemoth won't still exist in some form or another come next year.

DavidNYC :: AZ-01: Ann Kirkpatrick (D) Says She'll Seek a Rematch
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Not sure how that will work out, but she must feel she has a chance
And seeing as it's not clear who else would step up here, Kirkpatrick could be a could option.

24, male, African-American, CA-24, Democrat. Chair of the SSP Black Caucus.

Good move.
I just hope she ups her campaigning.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


Wow. Did not see this coming.
Good. I do not think she will win but she is undoubtedly better than what I assume is a small bench. Honestly six points is really not a horrible margin when you factor in the year. There were some tossups in which incumbents lost by ten points. So not awful. Gosar would have to make some serious gaffes or run a bad campaign for Kilpatrick to actually win, but all in all good news for team blue.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

Hoosierdem...
I think you can change your sig back.  The IN House Dems got key concessions from the IN GOP and are returning.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
I know.
Yeah I guess it needed to be changed. I heard the term a lot on RRH and funnily enough I actually liked it. But as time goes on it loses it charm.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
What do you think of the concessions made?
Also, yeah, right-wingers tried to twist the word "teabagger" for some weird reason.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Probably best
To take that discussion to email. Getting a bit far afield here from SSP.

[ Parent ]
There are lots of uncertainty
in AZ1.  Lets do the numbers

37  That's number of maps I have seen in on AZ redistricting and about 1/2 make things worse for the D's in AZ1.  Your guess is as good as mine right now on what the map will look like and what the changes are .

44  That's the % of votes the President got in AZ1 in 2008.

44  That's the % of votes Kirkpatrick got in AZ1 in 2010.

62 That's how old Anne Kirkpatrick will be in 2012. This is a big district that requires alot of time & effort to campaign in.  

800,000 that's advantage congresswoman Kirkpatrick had in spending in 2010.  I suspect that number will be reversed in 2012.

I admire her for getting  into this race but due to the map, financial resources, the district and the uncertainty its seems a steep hill to climb.  


Reversed?
She still will have the same fundraising prowess.

Also, thankfully AZ is done by nonpartisan commission so most seats will see little change.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
So much of fundraising
has to do with being an incumbent. Naturally she will not be the incumbent in 2012.  That is a guess on my part but very few incumbents are out spent.

I am not certain of the map--who is?  I suspect AZ1 stays about the same. It could improve, however, we see a new Pinal county based seat taking in Gila, Graham and Cochise.  A move into Mojave county would help Gosar.

I also understand the Indian reservations may be reunited this year.  There are no major outstanding issues between the tribes in Congress.


[ Parent ]
Yeah, but I don't think the advantage will be reversed.
It'll likely be close, with a slight lead to the incumbent.

Also, the Hopi and the Navajo want to remain represented in different districts still, from what I've heard from Nico.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Thanks for the insight on the reservations


Male, 20; living in MN-6 (unfortunately), born NJ-7

[ Parent ]
Your concern is duly noted


[ Parent ]
LOL, especially this bit of concern:
"about 1/2 make things worse for the D's in AZ1"

My abacus is in the shop, so does this mean 1/1000 make things better for Dems...


[ Parent ]
Another number you forgot
6, the number she lost by, when many others in safer districts went down by double digits.  I was impressed by her margin and think it is one that can easily made up for heavily with Presidential turn-out.  She'll need to get herself over the finish line, but Obama should boost her at least 2-4%.

[ Parent ]
Repeat river-mander of last redistricting?
Does anybody have any idea as to whether the Hopi and Navajo reservations will stay split under a new map? I know there's always been tension between the tribes, but does that really need to lead to such nasty looking districts?

Male, 20; living in MN-6 (unfortunately), born NJ-7

With the growth in Arizona
I imagine this district will shrink a bit in total area.  I wonder if the parts of the district it will be losing are the more Republican parts or not.

In any case, this has always been a swingy area, and Kirkpatrick didn't embarrass herself last year, so this is a welcome development.

As I've mentioned before, I'm very curious to see how the numbers in Arizona shift this year with McCain not on the ballot...I strongly believe Obama would have won the state in 2008 had his opponent not been McCain.  Especially when you compare it to the massive shifts that happened in the nearby states of New Mexico, Colorado, Nevada, and even Utah.


Interesting that...
the commenters on DailyKos for this story had a much more negative reaction about Kirkpatrick.

Ann Kirkpatrick pissed off the Apaches by standing behind a public land swap deal for mining that McCain and Renzi - previous, corrupt, Rep. from AZ-01 - were supporting.  Some of the Renzi scandal was connected to that land deal that she went ahead and supported, too.

"She gave Indian Country a great hope," the [San Carlos tribal] chairman said on a recent Sunday morning at the Oak Flats Campground. "And now that's wiped clean." He paused. "Another politician. Another politician that played us good."

Does this make her damaged beyond repair with the Navajo population?


not likely
If that were the case, Gosar should have beaten her in Apache county, where the voters (despite the name) are mostly Navajo. She beat Gosar 14.2k-5.4k there.

http://www.azsos.gov/election/...

This wasn't much smaller than the 17.8k-5.5k margin she beat the hapless Sydney Hay by in 2008.

http://www.azsos.gov/election/...

41, Ind, CA-05


[ Parent ]
incumbents tend to do better on the Indian reservations.
Renzi only lost Apache county by 800 votes in 2006.

I assume Gosar will have a worker dedicated to handle case work on the reservations.  


[ Parent ]
Will He?
Not sure about Gosar specifically, but there's a lot about these freshmen GOPers that seems to scream "not ready for prime time." They rode in on a wave, and I could see a representative of an especially ideological bent decline to make moves like the one you describe that would tend to help them get re-elected.  

36, M, Democrat, MD-03

[ Parent ]
They'd rather shut-down the government
then making themselves look effective at being in office.  Favorite line from Al Franken, "Republicans say government doesn't work, and then they get elected and prove themselves right."

[ Parent ]
Renzi had good relations with the Navajo.


[ Parent ]
that's a huge margin of difference
between 2008 and 2010.  3.6k voters decided not to show up for us in 2010 compared to 2008 and that represented 16.5% of the total max electorate.  (Max electorate would be a measurement based on Presidential results, assuming Presidential turn-out has the highest turn-out of any given time and thus reflects what would be the max electorate for a certain location.)

[ Parent ]
off year
Every single Dem incumbent who ran had a huge dropoff from 2008 to 2010. Kirkpatrick kept over 80% of her votes in Apache county, which is damn good. What killed her was dropoff in Coconino county, which is where NAU is.

41, Ind, CA-05

[ Parent ]
this is good news
trying to figure out exactly how the election will go two years in advance seems kind of silly.  for now we have someone with name rec, fundraising ability and is reasonably popular - based on her two elections for this seat.

it will be a different district and a very different year and she's running against a freshman who will not be well-known in this giant district.  this will be a decent shot for a pickup and at this point, we don't get much more.  Go Anne!



Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox