Google Ads


Site Stats

AZ, ID, and WI: Population by CD

by: Crisitunity

Thu Mar 10, 2011 at 6:41 PM EST


Arizona is gaining one seat, from eight up to nine, and that means that its new target is 710,224, up from 641K in 2000. Interestingly, despite the fact that it's gaining a new seat, there are still three currently-composed districts that are in a deficit and need to pick up people from elsewhere: the 3rd, 4th, and 5th. These are the three central districts in the Phoenix area that are essentially built out and can't expand in any direction (except up); meanwhile, the 2nd, 6th, and 7th can continue to expand every which way into the desert, which is precisely what they did over the decade, so look for one additional GOP-friendly seat to be carved out of Phoenix's endless suburbia (although whether it's centered in Phoenix's west or east suburbs remains to be seen... between the commission's role in deciding, and possible multiple incumbents opening up seats to run for the Senate, there really aren't any clues what will happen).

Like the other border states, Arizona has become signficantly more Hispanic over the decade, up to 29.6% Hispanic now compared with 25.3% in 2000. The Hispanic growth wasn't concentrated any one particular place: that 4% increase was closely mirrored in all the districts. The 2nd had the biggest Hispanic shift, at 7% (from 14% to 21%), while the 1st had the smallest shift, at 3% (from 16% to 19%). That dissipation of the Hispanic vote means that it's not terribly likely that a third VRA seat will be carved out, despite the fact that Hispanics are close to 1/3 of the state's population.

District Population Deviation
AZ-01 774,310 64,086
AZ-02 972,839 262,615
AZ-03 707,919 (2,305)
AZ-04 698,314 (11,910)
AZ-05 656,833 (53,391)
AZ-06 971,733 261,509
AZ-07 855,769 145,545
AZ-08 754,300 44,076
Total: 6,392,017

I'm not the first one to observe that Idaho redistricting is pretty much drama-free. Nevertheless, there's at least something interesting going on here in this small but fast-growing state: growth is very heavily concentrated in suburbs and exurbs west of Boise. For instance, the state's 2nd and 3rd biggest cities used to be Pocatello and Idaho Falls; now they're Meridian (a large suburb west of Boise) and Nampa (in Canyon County, the next county to the west). That means that the districts are kind of lopsided, and it looks like much of Boise proper, currently split down the middle, will wind up being given to ID-02. While Boise is certainly the most urbane part of the state, and it should tip the balance a bit in the blue direction (as for the past decade, the two districts have had almost identical PVIs), the 2nd should still be a long way away from somewhere the Dems can compete. (Idaho's target is 783,791, up from 646K in 2000. Look for it to get a 3rd seat in 2020.)

District Population Deviation
ID-01 841,930 58,139
ID-02 725,652 (58,139)
Total: 1,567,582

Wisconsin held steady at eight seats this year, and even its districts held pretty steady, too. Its target is 710,873, up from 670K in 2000. That means the only district that lost population is the Milwaukee-based 4th and even it only lost a few thousand since 2000. The main area of growth is the state's other blue stronghold, the Madison-area 2nd (must have something to do with THE BLOATED STATE GOVERNMENT AND THOSE GREEDY PUBLIC EMPLOYEES MULTIPLYING LIKE LOCUSTS!!!!1!!), which needs to give about 40,000 people to the 4th (although they'll have to pass through the suburban 5th, which sits smack dab between them). Also, it looks like Dairyland is gaining a little at the expense of the North Woods, as the 3rd will need to pick up 20K from GOP freshman Sean Duffy's 7th. Although the GOP controls the redistricting process here, thanks to their House gains in 2010 and the overall uniform swinginess of the rural counties, they're probably just going to be playing defense with their map.

District Population Deviation
WI-01 728,042 17,169
WI-02 751,169 40,296
WI-03 729,957 19,084
WI-04 669,015 (41,858)
WI-05 707,580 (3,293)
WI-06 705,102 (5,771)
WI-07 689,279 (21,594)
WI-08 706,840 (4,033)
Total: 5,686,986
Crisitunity :: AZ, ID, and WI: Population by CD
Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Is the Idaho deviation numbers right?
Just seems werid they would be identical +/-.  

CO-02 (college)/FL-15 (home).  

Are* eh I feel like midterms have thrown my brain out the window.


CO-02 (college)/FL-15 (home).  

[ Parent ]
Two districts
The target population is exactly the mean -- so yeah, a two-district state would always need an identical +/-.

[ Parent ]
Check out the big brain on Brett!


[ Parent ]
Oh okay I didn't get that before so basicly
The deviation goes from whether a district is above/below the target population for each CD in a state correct?.

CO-02 (college)/FL-15 (home).  

[ Parent ]
Right
It's deviation from the new ideal population for the state, which is the 2010 pop divided by the number of districts the state will have after reapportionment.

[ Parent ]
AZ
Interesting, the estimates I was working with earlier had Flake's AZ6 a fair amount ahead of Franks' AZ2. Looks like there was a little more growth in the west valley and a little less on the east side. Between those two and Grijalva's AZ7, you have nearly enough excess to make a full "east-west" district in the southern exurbs without mangling any of the current districts too much. When I did this with the old data the new district was heavily Hispanic and probably tilt-D or lean-D overall.  

When I put the new district entirely in the west valley, the most straightforward (compact districts, etc) map I could draw was a disaster for Republicans, so I would not expect that to happen. When I put it in the east valley the new district was very red, and the overall result was more neutral.  

41, Ind, CA-05


A factor for the growth in WI-3
 May also be St. Criox County which is an exurb of the Twin Cities area. The growth there has been so strong that it's filtering into Wisconsin too.  

for more election analysis, visit  http://frogandturtle.blogspot....




17, CA-06,  


What makes me so curious about population growth there
is that there is quite a bit of undeveloped land in between St. Paul and the border.  While there is development east of St. Paul, it either goes sharply south or sharply north.  Why are these people moving that far from where they work when the area in between isn't even close to being developed.  Maybe simply explained by Wisconsinites who get jobs in the Twin Cities but cluster to the border so they don't have move out of the state.

[ Parent ]
Not sure
But it might be partially explained by the fact that lake elmo and afton are made up of wealthy nimbys who don't want their town looking like woodbury or something close to that, i think west lakeland township next to lake elmo is built up but its just really low density.
Of course reasons to move to the Wisconsin side may be as simple as land being cheaper for developers or various tax advantages to living on the border

20, male, independent, WI-07.

[ Parent ]
GOP-Friendly
How friendly to the Republicans do you expect this new district in Arizona to be?

Also, despite the growth not being concentrated to give the Democrats an overwhelming advantage in any particular seat(s), I'm not sure that's a bad thing. Those who are more familiar with the map can tell me if I am wrong, but if it's expanding as quickly as it is and shows no serious signs of slowing down, and if the Democrats continue to benefit from the Hispanic vote, it's going to make all districts more competitive. That won't necessarily mean much of anything in some districts, of course, since an R+10 district is just as Republican in practice as an R+13 district, but as long as Democrats are being drawn out at a disadvantage, they could compete in more places.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?


It's complicated
The new seat might be pretty Republican, but its presence might push an existing seat or two into a more favorable position. Say AZ-05 drops the rather Republican Scottsdale-Fountain Hills to AZ-03 due to the ramifications of a hypothetical new West Valley seat. Then AZ-05 would could consist of its current territories south of the Salt River (which, btw, I believe Obama narrowly won), plus some of the surprisingly purple Chandler/West Mesa territory currently in AZ-06. AZ-09 might be totally out of reach, but it would still open up new opportunities.  

22, Democrat, AZ-01
Peace. Love. Gabby.


[ Parent ]
ID-2
would have to absorb some of the most Republican areas of ID-1 in Ada County. Contrary to popular belief, Ada County isn't just one large moderate pool of voters. It's extremely, extremely polarized. The north end of Boise as whole voted 60% for Allred and he was a really weak candidate for Boise. Otter struggled to get into the mid 30s. Meanwhile Meridian, outer Boise and Eagle posted up gigantic margins in favor of Otter with him garnering nearly 70% of the vote.

There are only two Democratic precincts for ID-2 to absorb, more likely the population shift is only going to make ID-2 more of a GOP stronghold.  


So basically, it's status quo in Idaho...
At least until it gets that third district. Would a Boise-Nampa district be winnable for a non-Blue Dog Democrat?

20, center-left independent, Auckland Central resident, MD-05 voter, OR-01 native

[ Parent ]
no
i'd predict R+6 or so

18, Dem, CA-14 (home) CA-09 (college, next year). social libertarian, economic liberal, fiscal conservative.   Everybody should put age and CD here. :)

[ Parent ]
More like R + 11 or 12
The only way to get a Democratic district in Idaho is to have three districts and do a ridiculous gerrymander that goes from southern Boise all the way up to downtown Coeur d' Alene, taking in Lewiston, Moscow and McCall. Then have a finger that goes into Blaine County and then goes into Pocatello. Even then the district would have a Republican PVI.

The advantage would be that the Republicans would continually nominate absurdly awful candidates and that there is a big Democratic trend in Boise via the North End increasingly becoming a Democratic bastion. It was only a mere 25 years ago that Ada County was more Republican that the rest of the state and 40 years ago that it was a bastion of Republicans. It voted for Goldwater with 56% of the vote. Of course in the 60s it was pretty tiny (40,000). It's growth is turning it into a little oasis of liberalism.  


[ Parent ]
...
Is a third district in Idaho in 2020 likely? Count me as skeptical.

21, Conservative Gay Democrat, NM-2 (Childhood) TX-10 (Home) TX-23 (School);   DKos: wwmiv.

[ Parent ]
.
Montana would have been the 440th seat apportioned, I'd sooner say that Montana will get back its second seat than Idaho will get a third.

21, Conservative Gay Democrat, NM-2 (Childhood) TX-10 (Home) TX-23 (School);   DKos: wwmiv.

[ Parent ]
No, not at all. It's just a hypothetical
it really isn't a large chunk of the population is really abnormal suburban sprawl from Nampa/Meridian/Eagle/Kuna. That won't last with high gas prices.  

[ Parent ]
Non-Blue Dog?
No, of course. It will be difficult even for Blue Dog, like Minnick. Even 10 years from now, and with 3rd district crated  it will be not easy to create "national Democratic" district there..

[ Parent ]
Good news for Kind
Not that there was much that they could do to his district anyway, but it's good they don't have room to play around. Duffy will get some assistant, but he'll still have a marginal and have to work hard.

24, male, African-American, CA-24, Democrat. Chair of the SSP Black Caucus.

Good to see
That the much-worried-about discrepency between Arizona's 2009 population estimates and the actual census results doesn't look like as much a result of a Hispanic undercount. Perhaps the was more general problem with the population model the census used in deriving estimates for Arizona, but either way, these district sizes look more or less like we expected, just slightly less populous. If AZ-04 had turned out to be the smallest district and AZ-07 had only been in the middle of the pack, I would have been more worried.

22, Democrat, AZ-01
Peace. Love. Gabby.


Arizona under 18 population
Hispanic 43%
Non Hispanic White 41%

Another state where the demographics could spell trouble in the future for Republicans if they do not improve their minority outreach.

"Where free Unions and collective bargaining is forbidden, freedom is lost." - Ronald Reagan


[ Parent ]
They're doing the opposite
of minority outreach.  Their new Senate President associates himself with neo-Nazis.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Yes, but, probably, no sooner then in 15 years
Hispanics vote far less actively so far then whites.. And serve as "big irritants" for at least some of these whites. So, in short-term i expect anti-immigration sentiments in Arizona's Republican party to be at least as strong as they are now, may be - stronger. In mid-to-long term - well, there can be some changes..

[ Parent ]
If the only
thing standing in the way of an impact on elections is registration and mobilization, then the effects could be seen a lot sooner than you think.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

[ Parent ]
Could, but not neccessarily WILL...


[ Parent ]
There is an argument that it's working quite well
In some parts of the state anyway. Exhibit A would be Legislative District 18, which happens to be represented by none other than Russell Pearce. Far from our typical image of the reactionary gringo suburb, the census data confirms that it has slipped to majority-minority status (47% White, 43% Hispanic), down from 61% Non-Hispanic white a decade ago. Yet Obama only got into the low 40s here and Republicans like Pearce continue to dominate, despite a strong challenge in 2008 when the seat was open.

In another decade, when more of those Hispanics gain citizenship, gain an interest in voting, and especially when more of their children come of age, the Russell Pearce types are royally screwed. The political shift in this area of western and downtown Mesa will be particularly strong due to white flight, which the census confirms is already well underway (about 30K whites left a 170K District over the last ten years; they were replaced by about 20K Hispanics but the district actually has about 10K fewer people than in 2000).

This is getting sort of rambling and chock full of random interesting statistics but the point is, watch what happens out in West Mesa very closely over the next few election cycles if you want to see what's to come for Arizona as a whole. If Republicans manage to scrape together a way to appeal to Hispanics, they may be able to stave off demographic disaster. But if Russell Pearce remains one of the faces of the party, that does not bode well.

22, Democrat, AZ-01
Peace. Love. Gabby.


[ Parent ]
Arizona
The Census Bureau grossly overestimated the population of Arizona (along with Georgia), and I was not surprised to see this was the case at the municipal level, too, with them estimating Phoenix to have grown nearly 25% over the decade, and really only growing 9.4%, and nearby mega-suburb Mesa only growing by about 11%.

25, independent liberal, MI-08

Recalls in WI
I wonder if the some Republicans in the WI Legislature will actually get recalled; maybe the Dems could take control of one of the chambers before redistricting....

18, Blue Dog Democrat, Male, NC-09 (Home), LA-06(College)  

Politically, Kapanke is a dead man walking...
Darling, Olsen, Harsdorf, and Hopper are going to have a tough slog, too.

Ultimately, I think Kapanke, Darling, and Hopper (in descending order of probability) will be recalled, and Dems have an outside shot at booting Harsdorf (who ran unopposed in a Bush/Obama district last time) as well. That would give Democrats the chamber, of course.

20, center-left independent, Auckland Central resident, MD-05 voter, OR-01 native


[ Parent ]
I put Hopper before Darling on that list.
I base that on this: http://voices.washingtonpost.c...

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Refresh my meory on WI recalls
Is it a recall and then select a repalcement all in the same vote?  Is it laid out as the current Senator versus a whole cas tof characters (like Gray Davis in CA)?  

The actuall recall process could determine the results as much as the current political climate I'd think.


[ Parent ]
Whoops, wrong thread (sorry)


[ Parent ]
From what I understand
The recall target is put on the ballot along with anyone else who gets the required signatures, then the top two finishers go to a runoff. It's not a "yes/no" thing.

[ Parent ]
It would be soooo helpful if you would add one more column
The name and party ID of the current seat holder i.e.
Current Rep   District Population Deviation
Bishop D         NY-01 728,042 17,169    

names
AZ1: Gosar R
AZ2: Franks R
AZ3: Quayle R
AZ4: Pastor D
AZ5: Schweikert R
AZ6: Flake R
AZ7: Grijalva D
AZ8: Giffords D

ID1: Labrador R
ID2: Simpson R

WI1: Ryan R
WI2: Baldwin D
WI3: Kind D
WI4: Moore D
WI5: Sensenbrenner R
WI6: Petri R
WI7: Duffy R
WI8: Ribble R

41, Ind, CA-05


[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox