Google Ads


Site Stats

Maryland, My Maryland !

by: silver spring

Mon Feb 21, 2011 at 9:14 AM EST


This is my version of Maryland using Daves Redistricting 2.1.  Looking at the 2010 Census data incorporated into the Application, I see no reason at all why Democrats should not create an 8-0 map.

Actually, I drew a couple versions of a map.  The main part of this diary deals with "Version 1", an 8-0 map which I believe would have the best chance of being enacted in Maryland.  My alternative "Version 2" is discussed at the end of the diary.

silver spring :: Maryland, My Maryland !
VERSION 1

This map preserves both black majority seats, keeps the districts of all six Democratic incumbents safely Democratic and creates two additional Democratic seats -- all without creating a "monstrous" looking map.

Another very important goal for me was to keep as much of each incumbent's current territory (population-wise) in the new district.  The percentages of current constituents that each district gets to keep are below:

MD-1 - 64.8%
MD-2 - 65.1%
MD-3 - 58.2%
MD-4 - 57.9%
MD-5 - 64.6%
MD-6 - 60.1%
MD-7 - 51.8%
MD-8 - 58.0%

I feel that the set of numbers above is just as important as the partisan numbers for each district.  In many cases, if an incumbent loses too much of his or her existing constituents, they may not like the map even if their district becomes more favorable in terms of party identification.  Thus any map that has a realistic chance of being enacted in Maryland must pay close attention to how a proposed district resembles the existing district.

As you can see from the numbers above, each incumbent save one gets to keep at least 58% of their current constituents.  As for MD-7, Cummings keeps only 52%.  However, that number comes with a caveat -- because an additional 13.9% of the proposed MD-7 here comes out of African-American areas in Baltimore City (Cherry Hill, for example) or Baltimore Co. (Randallstown) that are currently part of MD-2 or MD-3.  These added areas are 75% black, so even though Cummings currently doesn't represent them, there's no reason these new constituents would not be receptive to being represented by Cummings.

UPDATE: please note that per suggestion from one reader, I have adjusted the map to do a better job at keeping suburban Baltimore communities together; this change had the added benefit of making Cummings keep more of his current MD-7 constituents -- now 55.1% (please see comments section for more info.)

The black percentage in the two black majority districts goes down slightly from the current percentages, but the proportion of African-Americans as a percentage of the Democratic primary vote in both districts is very high -- by my estimate it's at least 77% in MD-4 and at least 82% in MD-7 (sic) ! -- so these districts should have no trouble in electing an African-American representative.

The districts of all six Democratic incumbents are kept at least 60% Obama and at least 60% Democratic Average 2006-2008.  The two new Democratic districts are made to be 53.7% Obama for MD-1 and 55.6% Obama for MD-6.  Both the new MD-1 and the new MD-6 are at exactly 52.9% Democratic Average 2006-2008.  I feel that is enough of a cushion in both cases.  For MD-1, Kratovil should easily win a 53-54% Democratic district.  Most of the area in the new MD-6 (Frederick area and northern Montgomery Co.) is becoming more and more Democratic every year, as evidenced by the Democrats take-over of State Senate District 3 (Frederick) this past November.  I could have made the new MD-6 a bit more Democratic, but I did not want to endanger Van Hollen or make the lines too convoluted (for example, you could add Carroll Co. to MD-4, like I did in a previous diary and here under "Version 2", but it just seems like a bridge too far in any map that has a realistic chance of being enacted; in this respect, much of what constitutes drawing a map is quite subjective).  The new MD-6 here should turn blue, unless a very, very moderate Republican is the nominee -- which isn't going to happen these days !  

Partisan numbers for new districts are below:

MD-1 - 53.7 Obama; 52.9 Democratic Avg. 2006-2008
MD-2 - 60.9 Obama; 63.8 Democratic Avg. 2006-2008
MD-3 - 60.2 Obama; 60.7 Democratic Avg. 2006-2008
MD-4 - 82.5 Obama; 79.1 Democratic Avg. 2006-2008
MD-5 - 60.9 Obama; 60.9 Democratic Avg. 2006-2008
MD-6 - 55.6 Obama; 52.9 Democratic Avg. 2006-2008
MD-7 - 73.5 Obama; 69.7 Democratic Avg. 2006-2008
MD-8 - 64.7 Obama; 64.9 Democratic Avg. 2006-2008

Where possible, I tried to respect county and community lines while drawing this map (see the fourth map down where city lines and Census-designated community lines in central Maryland are mapped).  

The population deviation for this map is +/- 132 persons, with the caveat that Maryland has a new law now where the prison population may have to be "reassigned" to district of origin.  For demographics below, I noted ethnic/racial group if 5%+ of the population. Please note that all the data below for current and proposed districts is obtained from Daves Redistricting Application.  I drew in the existing districts into the Application to obtain demographic data as it currently stands for each district.  Please note that for partisan data, it appears that the percentages provided in the Application are percentages as a proportion of the two-party vote.

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

District 1:

Current District Population: 81.0 white, 11.4 black
Proposed District Population: 66.0 white, 24.7 black, 5.2 hispanic

Current District 18+ Population: 82.8 white, 11.1 black
Proposed District 18+ Population: 68.5 white, 23.8 black

Current District President: 41.5 Obama, 58.5 McCain
Proposed District President: 53.7 Obama, 46.3 McCain

Current District Partisan Avg. 2006-2008: 41.8 Democratic, 58.2 Republican
Proposed District Partisan Avg. 2006-2008: 52.9 Democratic, 47.1 Republican

District 2:  

Current District Population: 55.2 white, 33.1 black, 5.0 hispanic
Proposed District Population: 62.6 white, 24.9 black, 5.4 hispanic

Current District 18+ Population: 59.2 white, 30.8 black
Proposed District 18+ Population: 66.5 white, 22.4 black

Current District President: 60.8 Obama, 39.2 McCain
Proposed District President: 60.9 Obama, 39.1 McCain

Current District Partisan Avg. 2006-2008: 63.4 Democratic, 36.6 Republican
Proposed District Partisan Avg. 2006-2008: 63.8 Democratic, 36.2 Republican

District 3:  

Current District Population: 65.2 white, 20.0 black, 6.8 hispanic, 5.3 asian
Proposed District Population: 60.0 white, 21.9 black, 8.7 asian, 6.1 hispanic

Current District 18+ Population: 68.2 white, 18.7 black, 6.0 hispanic, 5.2 asian
Proposed District 18+ Population: 62.9 white, 21.0 black, 8.6 asian, 5.4 hispanic

Current District President: 60.5 Obama, 39.5 McCain
Proposed District President: 60.2 Obama, 39.8 McCain

Current District Partisan Avg. 2006-2008: 62.3 Democratic, 37.7 Republican
Proposed District Partisan Avg. 2006-2008: 60.7 Democratic, 39.3 Republican

District 4:

Current District Population: 55.7 black, 20.6 white, 14.2 hispanic, 6.9 asian
Proposed District Population: 53.2 black, 24.7 white, 13.0 hispanic, 6.5 asian

Current District 18+ Population: 55.5 black, 22.3 white, 12.9 hispanic, 7.2 asian
Proposed District 18+ Population: 53.0 black, 26.2 white, 11.9 hispanic, 6.7 asian

Current District President: 86.1 Obama, 13.9 McCain
Proposed District President: 82.5 Obama, 17.5 McCain

Current District Partisan Avg. 2006-2008: 82.6 Democratic, 17.4 Republican
Proposed District Partisan Avg. 2006-2008: 79.1 Democratic, 20.9 Republican

District 5:

Current District Population: 48.0 white, 36.7 black, 7.9 hispanic
Proposed District Population: 56.4 white, 27.9 black, 9.5 hispanic

Current District 18+ Population: 50.8 white, 35.6 black, 6.9 hispanic
Proposed District 18+ Population: 58.7 white, 27.2 black, 8.4 hispanic

Current District President: 67.0 Obama, 33.0 McCain
Proposed District President: 60.9 Obama, 39.1 McCain

Current District Partisan Avg. 2006-2008: 65.8 Democratic, 34.2 Republican
Proposed District Partisan Avg. 2006-2008: 60.9 Democratic, 39.1 Republican

District 6:

Current District Population: 85.0 white, 6.4 black
Proposed District Population: 66.4 white, 11.0 hispanic, 10.6 black, 9.2 asian

Current District 18+ Population: 86.8 white, 6.4 black
Proposed District 18+ Population: 69.0 white, 10.0 black, 9.9 hispanic, 9.3 asian

Current District President: 41.3 Obama, 58.7 McCain
Proposed District President: 55.6 Obama, 44.4 McCain

Current District Partisan Avg. 2006-2008: 40.0 Democratic, 60.0 Republican
Proposed District Partisan Avg. 2006-2008: 52.9 Democratic, 47.1 Republican

District 7:  

Current District Population: 55.7 black, 31.6 white, 6.7 asian
Proposed District Population: 55.0 black, 38.2 white

Current District 18+ Population: 54.6 black, 33.6 white, 6.7 asian
Proposed District 18+ Population: 54.1 black, 39.9 white

Current District President: 81.8 Obama, 18.2 McCain
Proposed District President: 73.5 Obama, 26.5 McCain

Current District Partisan Avg. 2006-2008: 76.6 Democratic, 23.4 Republican
Proposed District Partisan Avg. 2006-2008: 69.7 Democratic, 30.3 Republican

District 8:  

Current District Population: 47.5 white, 20.0 hispanic, 16.3 black, 13.3 asian
Proposed District Population: 63.3 white, 13.6 black, 12.6 hispanic, 7.9 asian

Current District 18+ Population: 49.6 white, 18.6 hispanic, 16.1 black, 13.5 asian
Proposed District 18+ Population: 65.0 white, 13.6 black, 11.5 hispanic, 8.1 asian

Current District President: 76.0 Obama, 24.0 McCain
Proposed District President: 64.7 Obama, 35.3 McCain

Current District Partisan Avg. 2006-2008: 75.1 Democratic, 24.9 Republican
Proposed District Partisan Avg. 2006-2008: 64.9 Democratic, 35.1 Republican

VERSION 2

The map below is my alternative version.  There's only one difference from Version 1:  Carroll Co. is added to MD-4 while almost everything that's in Montgomery Co. and part of MD-4 under Version 1 is now added to MD-6.  This exchange between MD-4 and MD-6 produces the following demographic and partisan numbers:

District 4:

Proposed District Population: 50.5 black, 33.1 white, 10.5 hispanic

Proposed District 18+ Population: 50.3 black, 34.5 white, 9.7 hispanic

Proposed District President: 75.7 Obama, 24.3 McCain

Proposed District Partisan Avg. 2006-2008: 72.6 Democratic, 27.4 Republican

District 6:

Proposed District Population: 58.0 white, 13.4 hispanic, 13.3 black, 12.1 asian

Proposed District 18+ Population: 60.9 white, 12.5 black, 12.3 asian, 12.2 hispanic

Proposed District President: 62.3 Obama, 37.7 McCain

Proposed District Partisan Avg. 2006-2008: 59.3 Democratic, 40.7 Republican

Photobucket

The "Version 2" map turns MD-6 into something that's safely Democratic (instead of just a lean/likely Democratic seat under Version 1), but reduces the black percentage in MD-4 -- though it remains above 50%.  The reduction in the African-American population in MD-4 may be retrogressive -- however, it should be noted that the white population remains a relatively low percentage, and amazingly, according to my estimate, the proportion of African-Americans as a percentage of the Democratic primary vote in MD-4 now goes UP to 84%.  Another problem would be that Edwards would only get to keep 39% of her existing constituents under these revised lines.

Last, but not least, I must add that I absolutely love version 2.1 of Daves Redistricting Application !

Poll
Which version do you like better ?
Version 1
Version 2
Neither - MD Dems. should wuss out and do 7-1 map.

Results

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

I think you've pretty much convinced me
that 8-0 can be done. I still have a feeling that 7-1 is a safer bet, though.

no reason not to ..
when you can keep all Dem. incumbents as safe as they are today ... with a 7-1 map, you could prob. get the Obama percentage close to 64-65% for the 6 Dems. and make MD-1 60% or so Obama (could even get all 7 Dem. districts at 64-65 Obama if you got creative and packed all the GOP into just one district) ...

but w/ this map, I really don't see any of the 6 Dem. incumbents or Kratovil losing -- MD-2 & MD-3 are just as Democratic as the existing map; Hoyer gets a less Dem. district (around 5-6 points less) but may like it better as risk of primary challenge from Afr-Am. candidate is greatly reduced; Van Hollen still has a 65% Dem. district he's not going to lose; and Edwards and Cummings are totally safe here.

and the way the new MD-6 is drawn (and MD-1 for that matter) kind of throws a bone to the GOP in that if they run a moderate enough candidate in the mold of Mathias or Morella (or Gilchrist in MD-1) they could actually win there ... that ain't going to happen ofcourse, but that's just the GOP's fault for being taken over by the tea party folks ...


[ Parent ]
The Best 8-0 Map Yet
I like this one better than the one I made. Tortured shapes, but not really worse than the one we live under now.  

36, M, Democrat, MD-03

thanks ...
I feel that, overall, the districts are more compact than the existing map:

Photobucket


[ Parent ]
On the prisoner residence. Is that done for him /her
or can the prisoner decide where he resides?  If someone has been in prison for 15 years perhaps he has more connection to his prison town & the people who work there.  As opposed to the hometown that wrongely convinced him of his crime.  Plus being without a residence does he consider his out of prison home to be Mommy's house or his girl friend's home.  Maryland's convoluted congressional lines split neighborhoods and towns.  Perhaps he feels connected to CD7 as opposed to CD2.


now, now ... no sarcasm here :)
I only read about this the other day myself so don't have any details ...  

[ Parent ]
Catty comment for sure.
I have an issue or two with the census forms.  My bad.  My child, lives in a dorm, 8 miles from here.  She was home most weekends in 2010 and almost certainly slept here over 1/2 the year.  She was even home on 04-01-2010.  Yet the census people and residence life at this college insisted she should be counted at the dorm.  I consider her a resident,   and so does she,  here at our house.  They had their way and I am thinking who says so?  She is registerd at this home, driver license is here and all of her mail comes here.  Some person, somewhere, decided where she should be counted at a college dorm.

The thought just occured to me that if Prisoners have the right to be counted in their homes why not college kids?


[ Parent ]
umm...
pretty sure college students are double counted...and besides we're allowed to register at whichever location we choose, which is the important thing.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
The art of the 8-0 Maryland
silver spring, you keep getting better at it.

26, male, Dem, NJ-12

use it as a bargaining chip for other states
"We'll give you a Republican district in Maryland if you give us a Democratic district in Utah."

26, male, Dem, NJ-12

I'd rather have an 8-0 delegation
from Maryland.

19, Self Appointed Chair of the SSP Gay Caucus (I claimed it first :p), male, Dem, IN-09 (College IN-09) (Raised IL-03, IL-09)

[ Parent ]
Did you really have to split Towson in 3?
I'm sure you can move the lines a little so that it's only split in 2.

26, male, Dem, NJ-12

that can be fixed ...
good point, maybe better to just divide between MD-3 (Sarbanes' home is in the western-most part) and MD-7 ... some of the lines here can be refined to do better job of not splitting communities ...

[ Parent ]
So Elijah Would Have to Run in a 50/50 District?
I'm not sure how excited he'd be about that. Probably should give some of Kingsville/Monkton (Eastern Baltimore County) to Dutch and give Elijah some more of the city. Dutch is more of a moderate so he can handle it. Besides that it looks good.

20 M MD-01

50/50 ???
not sure what you mean -- unless you're referencing the 52% of his constituents that he gets to keep under my original map -- but I have now increased that to 55% -- see my map in comments (response to duffman re. Towson) ...

in addition, as I mention in diary ... the 52% comes with a caveat -- because an additional 13.9% of the proposed MD-7 here comes out of African-American areas in Baltimore City (Cherry Hill, for example) or Baltimore Co. (Randallstown) that are currently part of MD-2 or MD-3.  These added areas are 75% black, so even though Cummings currently doesn't represent them, there's no reason these new constituents would not be receptive to being represented by Cummings ...

all in all, (using my revised map per comments section) 69% of the new district's population comes out of either Baltimore City or African-American areas in western Balto. Co.; only 31% comes out of more GOP areas north of the city ... it just "looks" like it's 50/50 on a map ...

in terms of partisanship ... Cummings is as safe as can be under this map, he cannot lose the Dem. primary b/c African-Americans are almost 80% of the Dem. primary vote here, and he cannot lose the GE b/c the district is over 70% Dem. (and almost 3/4 voted for Obama) ...


[ Parent ]
correction -- actually, AA pop. appears to be ..
over 80% of the Dem. primary vote in the new MD-7 ...

[ Parent ]
Misread it
I was looking at the 52% of constituents + the large GOP areas... at first glance it looked like a lot less of Baltimore.

20 M MD-01

[ Parent ]
black percentage ?
in case you were referencing the AA percentage, the new MD-7 becomes 55.3 vs. 55.7 under existing lines -- so the slightest of decreases (but the percentage of AA as percent of Dem. primary vote goes up from the existing lines as more Dem. areas in Howard Co. are replaced by significantly more GOP areas in Harford and northern Balto. Co.)

[ Parent ]
Hah.
   I like the idea of Donna Edwards representing Carroll County. She would get some hilarious constituent mail!

24, Male, GA-05

Great suggestion from duffman re. Towson …
I redrew to make Towson split just 2 ways ... also adjusted lines around Randallstown, Owings Mills, Catonsville, Perry Hall, White Marsh and Charles Village neighborhood in Balto. City to make districts more respectful of communities and stay within the +/- 132 person deviation per district (also changed lines slightly south of Bel Air ... you can see all changes on map below) ...

As added bonus here, using these revised lines does the following:
- makes Sarbanes keep more of his current constituents -- now 61.6% vs. 58.2%
- makes Cummings keep more of his constituents -- now 55.1% vs. 51.8%
- Ruppersberger still gets to keep 61.4% of his constituents
- MD-3 Obama percentage goes up slightly to 60.5 (while MD-2 Obama percentage goes down slightly to 60.1 but the 2006-2008 Democratic Avg. in MD-2 is still at a healthy 63.1)
- black percentage in MD-7 goes up slightly -- now 55.3 (vs. 55.0 before) and the partisan numbers there go up to 74.0 Obama/70.3 Dem. Avg.

Photobucket

just goes to show you that every map can be improved upon !


Towson
Towson (I used to live there) identifies more with Parkville and White Marsh than with Pikesville and Owings Mills. I would put all of Towson east of the the 139 in the green district and west of the 139 in the gray district. Then if you need more population for the purple district you can take it out of Catonsville (which belongs with Arbutus)

26, male, Dem, NJ-12

[ Parent ]
have there been any 8-0 maps
that don't involve snaking the rural panhandle down into Montgomery county?  I mean, it's devious as all hell and I like the idea of it (imagine what could be done in Illinois if the Chicago districts shot tendrils out across the rest of the state), but as far as likelihood, it just seems like something that Democrats would be hesitant to do.

The answer to that is NO
and I suggested on the 1st 8-0 map that politically this  sort of map would not fly in MD.

I do not want to get into an arguement over whether it can be done.  It can be done. 8-0 is possible.

I think this sort of map would be unaceptable to the democratic incumbents, the legislative leadership and probably the governor.  Its a lets rip the state apart  for political purposes map.  So no I don't think this type of map gets passed in MD. Just my IMO.  


[ Parent ]
You have seen the current map of Maryland, right?
This is not a state known for the good-government principles of its congressional redistricting.

30, male, MI-11 (previously VA-08). Evangelical, postconservative, green.

[ Parent ]
Oh yes I have glanced at it a time or two
I might add that many a GOP mapmaker in other states have justified their horrid maps by saying "look at Maryland".

The gist of the current map is that the 40% of the state outside of the big four (Baltimore city, Baltimore county plus Montgomery & Prince George's county) have over controling influence over 2/8 seats in Maryland.

Under this 8-0 Map the controling influence over all 8 of the congressional districts will be the big four counties.  The dominating influence in GEs & primaries will the big four counties.  

Yes the Obama numbers look strong but go back to 2002, 2006 and 2010 Gov numbers.  You can't divide the state 8 ways be certainly D. As I said the incumbents and regional state legislators will not do a map like this.  


[ Parent ]
you're right when you say ...
"You can't divide the state 8 ways be certainly D." -- that's true if you implement something like Version 1 here where MD-6 would really be only a lean D...  

However, if the MD Dems. are bold enough to go for Version 2, then the 7 seats other than MD-1 would be guaranteed Dem. and MD-1 would be guaranteed Dem. too if Kratovil is the nominee ...

a potential problem for the GOP is that in MD the areas that get "messed with" in a map like this have no Dem. legislators ...


[ Parent ]
I'm not saying it's a good idea
I'm rather fond of pretty, compact maps myself. I'm just saying that Maryland is not a state that shares my values with regards to Congressional districts. I can see why the Eastern Shore is highly unlikely to be broken up. I don't see why the Democrats wouldn't be willing to drown out the panhandle with Montgomery County voters.

30, male, MI-11 (previously VA-08). Evangelical, postconservative, green.

[ Parent ]
i'm not sure if the fate of the "rural panhandle" is ...
politically that important anymore in MD ... don't mean to sound harsh but those 3 western counties only have enough population to comprise 35% of a Congressional district -- so the other 65% has to come from somewhere ... it can come from either the Balto. suburbs/exurbs (Carroll Co., northern Balto. & Harford Co's.) as is currently the case or it can come from the DC suburbs/exurbs (Montgomery and/or Frederick) ... partisan factors aside, not sure why one is preferable to the other (yes, there's a difference between the "type" of suburb Silver Spring or Rockville is and what Carroll Co. is, but just not sure if the Dem.-dominated MD legislators will give a hoot esp. if the result is an additional Dem. seat one of those legislators can run in) ...

in this respect the panhandle is different from the E. Shore which still commands something like 60% (or more ?) of a congressional district and is a very unique, compact entity due to the Chesapeake Bay ... indeed, the 3 southern MD counties should carry more "heft" in this respect as they are now equal to almost half (47%) of a congressional district in population and (unlike the panhandle) actually have a significant number of Democratic reps. in the Legislature who may give a hoot ...


[ Parent ]
i was going to add ...
as far as Van Hollen caring -- ??   I don't think he'd have a problem w/ a MD-8 that's still 70% in Montgomery Co. (as is the case in this map) and one that's 65% Dem.

[ Parent ]
Another Masterpiece!
I always look forward to your diaries.


Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox