Google Ads


Site Stats

SSP Daily Digest: 12/13

by: Crisitunity

Mon Dec 13, 2010 at 3:48 PM EST


AK-Sen: Everyone's watching Joe Miller's next move, as tomorrow is the day he has to decide whether or not to appeal a trial court decision in order to keep fighting his largely-hopeless fight with Lisa Murkowski. On Friday afternoon, a state superior court judge ruled against Miller's lawsuit, and in pretty withering fashion, saying he presented no evidence of fraud or malfeasance, only "hearsay, speculation, and... sarcasm." This comes on top of other comments on Friday by state elections director Gail Fenumiai strongly disputing one of Miller's cornerstone issues, that there was a strange sudden influx of felons voting in the state.

CT-Sen, CT-04: Rep. Jim Himes confirms that he isn't going to run for Senate in 2012 against Joe Lieberman (if Lieberman even decides to stick around). It's also pretty clear confirmation that Rep. Chris Murphy is ready to run on the Dem line, as Himes said he's deferring to his slightly-more-senior colleague and might consider running if Murphy changed his mind. (The article also mentions that Rep. Joe Courtney is "considering" the race. Ex-SoS Susan Bysiewicz's interest is well-known as well, although I doubt she'll be able to manage to file her candidacy papers successfully.)

HI-Sen: Sometimes the Beltway media's parsing of every innocent word from a potential candidate gets a little maddening, but this throw-away line from Linda Lingle's website flagged by David Catanese is actually pretty suggestive of a future run (probably against Dan Akaka in 2012): the site is titled "Looking Back, and Forward," and her first blog post is "Continuing the Journey."

MD-Sen: Contrast that with Bob Ehrlich, who seems ripe to fall into the Dino Rossi trap but has just made it pretty clear that he won't be running for anything else again. He says a Senate run would be "very highly unlikely."

ME-Sen: The only story that seems to be here is that the viable Tea Party candidate that has been promised to emerge to take on Olympia Snowe is starting to look like more of a mirage. A must-read (for sheer hubris and wtf?ness) interview with the state's self-appointed head teabagger, Andrew Ian Dodge, makes it sound like the candidate that Dodge is allegedly talking to is either imaginary, or else is Dodge himself (seeing as how he's from southern Maine and has his own money).

MI-Sen: PPP includes a GOP primary portion in their Michigan Senate poll, and like a lot of other polls this far out, name rec seems to rule the day. Ex-Gov. John Engler, despite eight years out of the picture, has the lead (in fact, that may be good news, as the general electorate doesn't remember him fondly; he underperforms Debbie Stabenow, losing by 7, compared with Peter Hoekstra, who loses by 1). It's Engler 31, Hoekstra 24, with 12 for ex-AG Mike Cox, Terri Lynn Land (who may be interested in this race after all) at 7, Candice Miller at 5, Mike Rogers at 4, Thad McCotter at 3, and Tim Leuliette (the most-interested candidate so far) at 0.

NJ-Sen: The Hill has an article that's mostly about how no GOPers are stepping up to express their interest in an uphill fight against Bob Menendez, but it does include the obligatory list of possible contenders. Top of the list is a rematch from state Sen. (and gubernatorial progeny) Tom Kean Jr., but also mentioned are Lt. Gov. Kim Guadagno, state Sen. Joe Kyrillos, Anna Little (a small-town mayor who was competitive against Rep. Frank Pallone this year), state Sen. Jennifer Beck, former state Sen. Bill Baroni, and state GOP chair Jay Webber if all else fails.

NY-Sen: Rep. Peter King does some coulda-woulda-shoulda in a recent interview, saying he definitely would have run in 2010 had Caroline Kennedy been the appointee. As for a run in 2012 against Kirsten Gillibrand (when she's up for election for her first full term), he's only "keeping his options open," apparently leery of her fundraising prowess.

PA-Sen: Rep. Charlie Dent is usually at the top of the list for Senate race speculation, but a recent interview has him sounding rather un-candidate-ish: he's about to land a plum spot on Appropriations, and speaks of it in terms of "one never rules anything out," which to my ear sounds a few steps down the Beltway-ese totem pole from "considering" it. One other interesting rumor bubbling up is that ex-Gov. Mark Schweiker is being courted to run. The question is whether anybody even remembers Schweiker; he spent less than two years on the job in the early 00s after getting promoted after Tom Ridge moved to the Bush administration, and declined to run for his own full term.

VT-Sen: Could Bernie Sanders see a real opponent? While he isn't specifically threatening to run yet, State Auditor Tom Salmon is taking to Facebook to attack Sanders over his anti-tax deal agitating (including attacking Sanders for being a socialist, which doesn't quite have the same effective power with Sanders as with most Dems since he's likely just to say "guilty as charged"). At any rate, going after the entrenched Sanders seems like an odd move if it comes to pass, as Peter Shumlin, who narrowly won the open gubernatorial race, seems like a much easier target in a blue state that's willing to elect Republican governors but has sworn them off at the national level.

CA-Gov: Steve Poizner sounds likely to make another run at the governor's mansion in 2014, publicly telling various people that he would have made a much better candidate than Meg Whitman. Poizner will have to step it up on the financial situation next time, though; self-funding only to the tune of eight digits, instead of nine, was pretty weak sauce.

IN-Gov: With Evan Bayh apparently out of the gubernatorial sweepstakes, Brad Ellsworth seems to be jockeying to the front of the line today, although with some of the requisite hedging. The other main contender, of course, is Evansville mayor Jonathan Weinzapfel, although the impact of redistricting changes (at the hand of the now-GOP-held legislature) could drive Reps. Joe Donnelly or Baron Hill into the race. Two lesser Dem names who've been bandied about, Hammond mayor Thomas McDermott and former state House speaker John Gregg, are already taking their names off the table, lining up behind others for now: McDermott backing Ellsworth and Gregg backing Weinzapfel. One final new Dem name to keep an eye on: Lake County Sheriff Roy Dominguez.

MS-Gov: For now, the Democratic side on the Mississippi governor's race seems to be between two men: Hattiesburg mayor Johnny DuPree (that city's first African-American mayor) and businessman Bill Luckett, who has his own money (and the backing of Morgan Freeman... apparently for real, unlike with NC-04's B.J. Lawson).

WA-Gov: Here's a good take from Joel Connolly (dean of the local press corps) on the 2012 gubernatorial election in Washington state, which the Beltway press seems to treat like an open book but everyone local knows is going to be between Rep. Jay Inslee and AG Rob McKenna, who's probably the best shot the GOP has had in decades of winning the governor's race. (Chris Gregoire can, by law, run for a third term, but, in practice, that would be unheard of even if she weren't already too unpopular to do so feasibly.)

NY-15: Is the Charles Rangel era actually coming to a close? He's not ruling out another run in 2012 but saying he'll have to think about retirement. And in public comments he is actively pointing to a generation of successors, citing state Sens. Adriano Espaillat and Robert Rodriguez, and state Assemblyman Keith Wright. (Although Harlem is the core of the district, it now has more Hispanics than it does African-Americans... and the wild card is that the fastest growing group in this district is white regentrifiers.)

LA-St. Leg.: The hemorrhaging of Dem state legislators to the GOP in Louisiana continues apace, with one of its most prominent state Reps., the mellifluously-named Noble Ellington, sounding about ready to pull the trigger on a switch. He'd follow two state Sens., John Alario and John Smith, who also recently crossed the aisle.

Philly mayor: You'd think that at age 80, you'd want to think about retirement, but not if you're Arlen Specter, apparently. There's word of a poll making the rounds (from Apex Research, with no mention of who paid for it or why) that not only links the outgoing Senator to a mayoral run (in the city where he got his start generations ago as the DA) but actually has him in the lead. The poll has Specter at 28, with incumbent Michael Nutter at 19, Sam Katz at 9, Anthony Hardy Williams at 8, Tom Knox at 7, Bob Brady at 6, and Alan Butkovitz (anybody care to let me know who he is?) at 6.

WATN?: Try as he may, Artur Davis just can't get the douchiness out of his system. On his way to the private sector, he's still taking the pox-on-both-your-houses approach on his way out the door, writing an op-ed calling for an independent party as the solution to all of Alabama's woes. Meanwhile, Mariannette Miller-Meeks has landed on her feet, after losing a second run in IA-02 in a rare setback for the Ophthalmologists (who elected at least two more of their own to Congress this year): Terry Branstad just named her head of Iowa's Dept. of Public Health.

Census: Finally, this may be the most exciting news of the day: we have a reporting date for the first real batch of 2010 Census data. Dec. 21 will be the day the Census Bureau releases its state population counts, which also includes reapportionment data (i.e. how many House seats each state will get... at least prior to the inevitable litigation process among the most closely-bunched states).

Crisitunity :: SSP Daily Digest: 12/13
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Alan Butkovitz
is City Controller, according to a quick Google search.

30, male, MI-11 (previously VA-08). Evangelical, postconservative, green.

Yep. And not considering the race, AFAIK
Bill Green and Tony Williams are the more serious contemplators and, yes, I did see Arlen 2011 buttons at Pennsylvania Society this weekend.

(The oddest rumor I heard?  Sestak to primary Casey.  I don't believe it.  But if it happens, you heard it here first.)


[ Parent ]
Bill Green?
Is that the ex-Mayor (1979-83), Congressman (1964-76) & 1976 Senate nominee? He's 72 now. Is it a relative? Or is it no relation?

[ Parent ]
If Green had stayed in Congress
he'd be #2 in seniority now, behind only John Dingell.

[ Parent ]
Son of the former mayor
And a first-term City Councilman.  Would run on an economic development/tax reform/Nutter-has-lost-Council platform.

[ Parent ]
Marking my calendar now...
21 December. Hoping Oregon gets that sixth seat.

20, center-left independent, Auckland Central resident, MD-05 voter, OR-01 native

Hopefully MN keeps its eighth
As I think with the GOP controlling the state legislature, they will do a number messaging wise on why we should combine the Twin Cities into one district.  And this time, with seven seats, it's going to be a lot more compelling because the map will look downright ugly and stupid otherwise.  With eight seats, it becomes three metro, three Greater, and two hybrid districts that are more metro than Greater, which leaves a lot more room for play.  Seven seats will be a strict three Greater MN and four metro.  It's not hard to make a map that keeps the two cities separate while still making this central seeming district, but that isn't what will be proposed or seen by anyone who will say something in the paper.

However, the current MN-4 and MN-5 take in a lot of 60%-65% DFL voting inner suburbs so these new suburban districts could be fools gold for the GOP and it be a dummymander for them.  The map could be at the very worst 2/5 (this assuming only Ellison and Walz are still around and Cravaack some how wins) and at best 7/0 (until Peterson retires.)


[ Parent ]
If they do
could they make it swing or lean Dem?

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Oregon's redistricting requirements are pretty strict
And partisanship can't be taken into account.

[ Parent ]
It would almost definitely be a swing district
I drew a map a while ago, but this is probably my favorite:

http://www.swingstateproject.c...

20, center-left independent, Auckland Central resident, MD-05 voter, OR-01 native


[ Parent ]
As I said, Oregon's laws prevent this kind of gerrymandering
http://www.leg.state.or.us/red...

There's no way the law would allow splitting up Portland into three districts.


[ Parent ]
Depending on the final numbers
OR districts will be about 650k (6 districts) or 770k (5 districts) each

Metro Portland will come in at around 2.4m

If OR gets 6, I can see 1 mostly Portland city (pop under 600k) and 3 mostly suburban districts, with one district taking in Salem.

If OR stays at 5, there will be more mixing, just because the numbers don't in some cases support whole districts in true "communities of interest". But that's not too different from the current situation, e.g. Wu's district from the Portland west hills to the coast do take in different communities of interest.


[ Parent ]
Depending on the final numbers
OR districts will be about 650k (6 districts) or 770k (5 districts) each

Metro Portland will come in at around 2.4m

If OR gets 6, I can see 1 mostly Portland city (pop under 600k) and 3 mostly suburban districts, with one district taking in Salem.

If OR stays at 5, there will be more mixing, just because the numbers don't in some cases support whole districts in true "communities of interest". But that's not too different from the current situation, e.g. Wu's district from the Portland west hills to the coast do take in different communities of interest.


[ Parent ]
I disagree with your interpretation
And here's why: "communities of interest" is an incredibly broad term. Considering the Portland metropolitan area is literally about half of Oregon's population, three Portland-area districts really isn't unreasonable. And the way this map is drawn preserves communities of interest as well as possible, with industrial southeast Portland going into the same district as the Clackamas County suburbs and exurbs, the West Hills included (as they mostly are now; by the way, under the exact letter of the law, the current drawing of OR-01 to include Rep. Wu's house is highly dubious) in the same district as the Washington County suburbs and exurbs, and north and northeast Portland ending up in a Columbia River district.

The preference, in terms of communities of interest, would probably be to create a new district culturally more aligned with Bend (rather than drawing Bend into a district including Eugene and other Willamette Valley cities roughly at its latitude, which still isn't that egregious), but the fact of the matter is that while population growth in Deschutes County has been prodigious, the Portland metropolitan area is still half of the state population. Any reasonable six-district drawing will have half of the districts centered around Portland.

That map has seven districts. I'll probably work on a six-district variant tonight.

20, center-left independent, Auckland Central resident, MD-05 voter, OR-01 native


[ Parent ]
NJSen
I hear both Rep. Smith (NJ-4) & Lance (NJ-7) are exploring statewide bids if they get the short end of the stick in redistricting, but are both prepared to take on Rush Holt (NJ-12) if they get thrown in with him in a lead R or true swing district. Both are keeping their cards pretty close to the vest, which is smart since (even if it is a non-partisan redistricing committee) showing signs of leaving an open seat makes your district an appetizing target.

"Earnestness is stupidity sent to college"
P. J. O'Rourke


Also, Andrew Ian Dodge?
What a weird guy. I can't decide whether I like him or I think he's bats.

20, center-left independent, Auckland Central resident, MD-05 voter, OR-01 native

Certainly is blunt
At the very least, it would be one heck of an entertaining race. Plus, I could definitely see an internal spasm in the Tea Party when you run a guy who openly doesn't care about social issues and I might take a guess has a different perspective on drugs and foreign policy too.

19, Male, libertarian Republican, TX-14 and MN-04

[ Parent ]
I think the article mentions
him supporting the legalization of marijuana.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
Question about California and the DRA
As anyone else noticed that if you use the Test Data option for California in Dave's Redistricting App, the data provided for racial stats by precinct reflects 2000 census data, not more recent estimates? According the Census' American Community Survey for 2009, California is now 42% Non-Hispanic White and 37% Hispanic, while in 2000 (and according to the app's test data) these stats were 47% Non-Hispanic and 32% Hispanic. When you get to the business of trying to draw a new map for 2010, this becomes a big problem (like, for example, there are plenty more than enough Hispanics in western Riverside County living close enough together to make a majority-Hispanic district there, but that can't really be done with the Test Data).

So I wanted to contact Dave and make sure that he's aware of the discrepancy and see if there's anything I or anyone else can do help fix it, but I wanted to see if someone else had contacted him about this before (and maybe even if there's already a fix on the way) so that he's not inundated with messages.  

22, Democrat, AZ-01
Peace. Love. Gabby.


I'm pretty sure this is a known issue
And is true for all three of the states with their partisan data under the "Special Data" clickbox. IIRC, if you're particularly concerned about the racial stats for districts, you have to draw your map twice -- once with the normal data set and once with the special data set.

30, male, MI-11 (previously VA-08). Evangelical, postconservative, green.

[ Parent ]
Gillibrand, (Sherrod) Brown, Ensign, Sanders vote against the tax cuts package
How does this impact their 2012 prospects? My hunch is this signals Ensign plans to retire. As for Gillibrand, this development may well entice Peter King into pulling the trigger.

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

Huh, what?
It'll have no effect on their futures at all.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Peter
King isn't going to give up that chairmanship at the Homeland Security committee come January.  

19, Male, Independent, CA-12

[ Parent ]
I don't think a no vote will hurt anyone
If talking to a liberal audience you say you did it to prevent the tax cuts for the rich, if talking to a conservative one you say you were worried about the deficit.

28, Unenrolled, MA-08

[ Parent ]
I'm pretty sure Sen. Gillibrand just wants to keep...
Her honorary position as Sen. Gaga. And Lady Gaga would not support tax cuts for the rich.

20, center-left independent, Auckland Central resident, MD-05 voter, OR-01 native

[ Parent ]
Uhhhh.....
Huh?

19, Self Appointed Chair of the SSP Gay Caucus (I claimed it first :p), male, Dem, IN-09 (College IN-09) (Raised IL-03, IL-09)

[ Parent ]
I was referring to this...
http://www.mediaite.com/online...

In all seriousness, though, Sen. Gillibrand has been bending over backward since her Senate appointment to stake out a position to the left of the Democratic caucus. Considering her rumored ambition, I think she's counting on the political center continuing its overall leftward trend, because I think she wants to be either president or Senate majority leader someday.

20, center-left independent, Auckland Central resident, MD-05 voter, OR-01 native


[ Parent ]
If you've got to make a Lady Gaga reference
 Make it about her charisma, her talents and/or her success.

Lady Gaga probably would not support tax cuts for the rich. I imagine she's liberal on everything. It would be funny though if she ran for Senate in six years when she's 30.  

for more election analysis, visit  http://frogandturtle.blogspot....




17, CA-06,  


[ Parent ]
Pretty big considering that
Gillibrand represents NY.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Yeah we get it
You don't like Gillibrand. What I like about this vote is how it flies in the face of the people that wanted a primary because she couldn't be trusted. As many of us said at the time she knows her constituency.

[ Parent ]
yup
And if she had the proper two-to-six years to plan for a Senate run, I bet her voting record would have changed in accordance to preparation.  Just like any other politician would.

[ Parent ]
Why would Peter King run, in a presidential year
no less? He's not the worst choice the Republicans could make, but I don't why he'd be anyone to fear. Even if he ended up winning Long Island, he wouldn't destroy her there. She didn't do that great in Nassau and Suffolk Counties this year, believe it or not, but she still killed DioGuardi. She'd demolish him in New York City and do no worse than holding her own in Upstate New York.

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

[ Parent ]
Oh, I agree that he wouldn't win
I'm just making the observation that, given Gillibrand's tax cuts vote (which, in all likelihood, isn't the view supported by a majority of New Yorkers), Peter King might be more inclined to consider a run. With Dan Senor, who can self-fund, looking intent on running, I doubt he actually pulls the trigger, but you never know. 2012 could see the likes of King and Newt Gingrich, two of the great teasers of American politics (that is, they toy with upper-tier runs, but never actually go forward), jump into the scene.

The truth is, barring a substantive primary challenge from downstate, Gillibrand is probably unbeatable statewide. She's got that rare combo of unusual upstate support and typical NYC support that all but ensures a comfortable Democratic win. Geographically, her only weak spot is indeed on Long Island, which is something of a curiosity. Joe DioGuardi lost his old Westchester district by 20 points, and yet he kept Gillibrand to single-digits on LI. That means King could probably win comfortably there...which, still, only gets him to about 43%.

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast


[ Parent ]
I don't know
why it is, but I don't pay a lot of attention to local politics. Maybe it's because I went off to college just as I was starting to take more of an interest in national issues and never really stopped even as I moved back home. Maybe it's because I don't read the local paper and don't want the local news. Whatever the case, a lot of this stuff becomes news to me later than it does for other people. So perhaps I have missed something, but I don't recall Gillibrand ever really making any effort to do any retail politicking here. I don't mean that as an insult, but I legitimately don't remember hearing anything about her making appearances or doing the stuff that Schumer does so well, like speaking at high school graduations. I could be wrong, and in the end, it might not make a huge difference as she already won huge while only winning the Island narrowly, but if she hasn't reached out, her numbers can still probably improve a little.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

[ Parent ]
I can't speak for the experience of others,
but Gillibrand spoke in my town on Long Island. She was quite good.  

NY-01/NY-19

[ Parent ]
Isn't Long Island trending away from us?
Or at least seems to be stagnant.  It seems like it might have been mildly Democratic a few years ago, but is pretty much locked in at 50/50, or perhaps 53/47.


[ Parent ]
Up Island is the suburbs, so it's always somewhat swingy, but
Long Island as a whole is moving in our direction. Each year more and more liberals from New York City move permanently into their summer houses in Eastern Long Island. Historically rural and workingclass, the 1st District is actually trending leftward, despite Bishop's wafer thin margin of victory this year. It's an interesting dynamic, Gore won the 1st District, Bush won it in 2004 by a few hundred votes (Michael Barone referred to this as a "9/11 effect," I believe), and Obama bested McCain there, but by a slimmer margin than Gore. Demographic changes don't happen overnight, but Long Island used to be the GOP's base downstate. Now two decently liberal Congressmen (Steve Israel and Tim Bishop) represent much of the island. If ex-urbanites keep retiring to the Hamptons and elsewhere, Long Island should continue to move to the left.  

NY-01/NY-19

[ Parent ]
I live there,
and while there are plenty of elections that Republicans win, as a whole Long Island seems to be reliably Democratic. It doesn't surprise me that King won, since even in 2006 he managed to win by eight to ten points, but Bishop managed to win this year, and Israel won by 13 points and McCarthy won by eight to ten, margins that pretty much anyone would be happy with. The latter two will probably go back to winning by 20 to 30 points soon.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

[ Parent ]
On the local level GOP still rules
Almost the entire State Senate delegation is now GOP. GOP re-took Nassua County Ex in 2009 and Steve Levy switch to GOP giving them Suffolk County too.

LI was trending Dem but I think GOP made some serious gains there in the last 2 yrs.

Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


[ Parent ]
Well, if the Nassau Co. Exec. Mangano continues to screw up...
it's something we can win back.  In the middle of a recession, he cut taxes and cut nothing else.  Now, the County has a $350 million deficit, its bond rating is sinking, and an NY oversight agency is threatening to cut off the county's ability to borrow and spend so freely.  His budget for next year is full of prayers (like cutting union contracts well before they expire, which is illegal) and things are probably going to get worse.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12...

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
I'm interested to see MMM in that job
I think she is one of Branstad's stronger appointees. The head of the health department isn't one of the most high-profile jobs, but she could be in the middle of some important policy battles. If she wants to run for office again someday (perhaps statewide, or for a redrawn Congressional seat, or for a state legislative seat), she may feel she needs to go along with the Republican plans for her department, which probably involve significant budget cuts. On the other hand, state department heads usually lobby against legislative efforts to axe their programs.

The Iowa Department of Public Health oversees so many different programs. One that Republicans have wanted to put on the chopping block for some time is the "just eliminate lies" anti-smoking public relations campaign. They were also critical of a Democratic bill to mandate lead testing for children, but I don't know whether they would go so far as to try to repeal that. Will Mariannette Miller-Meeks argue publicly against budget cuts that would harm Iowans' health?

County recorders are also part of the Iowa Department of Public Health bureaucracy. In the spring of 2009, as some Republicans were urging county recorders not to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, the IDPH sent recorders a clear message: "All county recorders in the state of Iowa are required to comply with the Varnum decision (following issuance of procedendo from the Supreme Court) and to issue marriage licenses to same sex couples in the same manner as licenses issued to opposite gender applicants."

I haven't heard any Republicans try to reopen that can of worms lately, but I wonder how MMM would respond if some Republicans encourage her to change the IDPH's official instructions to county recorders regarding marriage licenses.


When I saw your headline
I thought you meant ex-Rep. Marjorie Margolies-Mezvinsky (D-PA, 1992-94), who is best known today as the mother-in-law of Chelsea Clinton.

[ Parent ]
Wheels within wheels
Didn't her husband actually represent Iowa in Congress? And 3M is headquartered in the state just to the north. I think I need a tinfoil hat.

32, M, MI-6, Iconoclastic Leftist

[ Parent ]
yes, he did
for two terms in the 1970s. He lost to Jim Leach in what was then IA-01 in 1976.

[ Parent ]
Ex-Husband
They divorced in 2007.

[ Parent ]
my sister
volunteered on that MMM's 1992 campaign. But in Iowa that MMM is best-known as the ex-wife of former Congressman Ed Mezvinsky of Iowa.

[ Parent ]
a.k.a. Hillary's SIL, n/t


[ Parent ]
idk
I don't think my mom considers my wife's mom her Sister in Law....

[ Parent ]
Also
the deciding vote for Clinton's budget. I've always liked her for some reason.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
What made her
"the deciding vote"?

[ Parent ]
Had
she voted no it would not have passed. She was heckled after the vote. Other members of Congress said bye bye Margie and what not. She was from a very wealthy district and was labeled DOA after that.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
From what I remember reading..
.. she was literally the last Democrat to vote, and cast a tie-breaking vote - but maybe my memory has embellished the story.

It was, in any case, a momentous vote -- and one that she recalled when she penned a surprise op-ed in the WaPo earlier this year calling on Democratic members of Congress to vote for the health care bill.

She seems like a wonderful woman - see also this interview with her in the Daily Beast.

38, Male, SP, NL / LMP, HU


[ Parent ]
MMM
She came to speak to a Foreign Relations Council luncheon in Iowa City, and while she might have tailored her message to her clearly liberal audience, I liked her. I don't think she is the ideologue that she thought that she needed to be during the past two cycles when being a crazy tea partier was an asset.

So, I'm also curious as to whether she will be as reactionary as she was during the campaign, or if she'll resort to a more traditional role.  


[ Parent ]
I liked her
the one time I heard her speak in person. I don't agree with her about much on policy, but I love how she won two hard-fought GOP primaries despite not being the party hacks' choice in either year.

[ Parent ]
Miller is going to appeal (shocker)
Here's the link:  http://www.adn.com/2010/12/13/...

20, Ind, Fl-13 & Fl-6 (college)

I know I shouldn't be surprised
but I keep thinking one of these days Miller is going to realize he's just making himself look like more of an ass. This guy has no concept of losing with dignity.

[ Parent ]
Yep, it's good in a way.
It'll make sure he isn't viable to go up against Begich.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
That would be a nightmare
Miller would probably find some random variant of Mark Begich to run as a write-in and challenge that all of his voters' intent couldn't be discerned.

20, Ind, Fl-13 & Fl-6 (college)

[ Parent ]
I certainly hope he does run against Begich
He's easily the best candidate begich could face, and even if he loses the primary to someone, he'll lose in a hissy-fit way, and might even run as a write-in.

At this point, he has humiliated himself enough to destroy himself.  Any further silliness will go to far even for wingnuts and he won't get anywhere in 2012.


[ Parent ]
" Any further silliness will go to far even for wingnuts and he won't get anywhere in 2012. "
yes it will.  he can say he's doing this to combat "Electoral fraudTM" and that "We wuz robbed!!11!"  

Top ten signs you're an SSPer #1: your favorite song is "Panic At Tedisco" and no one understands what you mean.

[ Parent ]
I'd love to see an AK poll
His unfavorability rating has to be above 70% now.  

[ Parent ]
Norm Coleman looks statesmanlike
by comparison

[ Parent ]
VA Judge Decision...
does anyone think we have a shot at overturning this ruling on appeal?  I looked at wiki and it showed that the 4th circuit has a majority of its justices appointed by Clinton and Obama.  Does this case even get appealed to the 4th circuit since it is a federal law?

I think that's where it could go.
It could also go to an appellate judge panel.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
one way or another
the U.S. Supreme Court is going to end up settling the question of the individual mandate.

[ Parent ]
I think the natural course,
based on my reading of a NYT article this afternoon, is that it would go to the 4th Circuit. I didn't realize that that court was mostly Dem-appointed, as you point out. That would explain why Cooch, Cantor, and others are urging the president to bypass that court to go directly to the Supremes.

I'd imagine the administration would want to let the process take its time, especially if a 4th Circuit ruling is likely to work in its favor.


[ Parent ]
Well,
As of now, there are 7 justices appointed by Democrats, and 5 appointed by Republicans and 1 appointed by Clinton who was not voted on, so Clinton recess appointed him and he was reappointed by Bush.  There are also 3 senior judges, 2 appointed by Republicans and 1 by a Democrat.  

So I guess the total is 9 Democrats to 7 Republicans (though one of the Democrats is questionable).  This seems to be semi-favorable, though it is certainly not impossible to get an unfavorable panel.


[ Parent ]
WATN? Brenna Findley edition
Iowa Governor-elect Terry Branstad announced today that Brenna Findley will be his legal counsel. Findley was Steve King's chief of staff for seven years before running unsuccessfully for Iowa attorney general this year. (Tom Miller winning that race was one of the few bright spots for Iowa Democrats.)

Everyone here expected Branstad to appoint Findley to something. He talked up her candidacy at virtually every campaign stop and appeared in one of her television commercials. The national Republican money came in big time for Findley, which probably had something to do with Branstad too. She has very little experience in the practice of law, so in some ways that's a strange choice for legal counsel. I had heard rumors she might be appointed head of the department of public safety; that was a major theme of her campaign commercials.


Thoughts.
Today is my one year anniversary of joining here.

AK Sen- PLEASE let this guy be the R nominee against Begich.

CT-Sen, CT-04- Go Chris Murphy!

HI-Sen- Who cares? Seriously, she might get a whole 40% of the vote if she's lucky. She's very unpopular and Hawaii is moving to the left like crazy. I could care less if she runs. I'm not even slightly scared.

MD-Sen- Funny how that race was a tossup up for such a long time. Bob's done.

ME-Sen- I think this will be our best pickup opportunity as long as Snowe loses.

MI-Sen- This race will be tough.

NJ-Sen- LG's the best bet.

NY-Sen- Yeah, King isn't stupid. He's not giving up a Chairmanship to get his ass handed to him.

PA-Sen- The Gov is probably a good get, the GOP bench isn't really that good.

VT-Sen- Why bother?

CA-Gov- Who's better him or Abe?

IN-Gov- Ellsworth could be a good candidate. Happy about Greg not getting in. Weinzapfel has a lot of potential.

MS-Gov- Yawn.

WA-Gov- This will be a tough race.

NY-15- You couldn't have dropped out this year?

LA-St. Leg- I'd hate to be a southern dem. Dang, how many switches have we had in the last month?

Philly mayor- PLEASE let this be true. I love Specter, though he is probably too old.

WATN? Artur Davis you are an ass and no one likes you. Go to K Street you jackass. Good for MMM I suppose.

Census- Can't wait!


Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  


@NJ-Sen
Guadango is not the best.  Little is known about her and she's pretty invisible.  Kean would probably be better although he's probably better suited to be Governor like his father.  I think the GOP should run Leonard Lance.  He's sane, he's experienced, he has a clean record, and his district may be combined with Holt's.

@IN-Sen
Why not Gregg?  Is he worn out?

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
IN-Gov, not Sen


Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Lance
I know him professionally and I don't know if he could run statewide.  He's very bland, and won't and/or can't take the gloves off.  He's the "type" of Republican who can win in NJ on the moderation scale, but he doesn't make people want to vote for him, which a Republican needs in NJ.  He is a GREAT guy and policy wonk, but a tough sell statewide.  

Smith would be super interesting.  He's a hero in his district for the work he's done to get the young boy back from South America, his other trip to former Yugoslavia (?) to rescue a family, and his human rights record is amazing.  It makes it easier to stomach his stauch pro-life stance when you see that it's not a political position at all, but a conviction about life.  He still leads the Congress in stopping human trafficking.  


[ Parent ]
Chris Smith would be good too.
I don't know that much about him, though, but thanks for offering that information about him.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Chris Smith
In 1978 Smith was a 25-year-old anti-abortion activist running as a some dude challenger to Rep. Frank Thompson (D). In 1980, he ran again. Shortly before the election, Thompson was indicted in the Abscam scandal. Between the indictment and the Reagan landslide, Smith was elected. Now, Smith, 57, is starting his 16th term in Congress, and will be the Chair of the Veterans Committee in January.

Aside from being a whackjob on abortion issues, Smith is actually pretty moderate for a Rethug.


[ Parent ]
Yes, by today's standards.
And if he runs, that district could be a Dem pick-up.  Also, there's the chairmanship.  Lance, on the other hand, is a newbie in the US Congress and doesn't have such seniority.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
1982 was a better story than 1980
The district was made even more D in '82, and Smith was supposed to be as dead as Cao.  He was running against Senate President Joe Merlino.  Apparently after a debate, Smith went to shake hands with him, and he said "Look me up when I get to Washington, kid, I might have a job for you."  Though it seems like a ridiculous thing to say, Merlino never denied saying it.  It didn't help him, and somehow Smith squeezed out a second term.  It's never been close since then.

Last bit of great related NJ trivia:  When Harrison Williams was indicted, convicted, and ready to face expulsion from the Senate, the Dems were BEGGING him to resign before Gov. Byrne left office in January 1982.  Republican Gov. Tom Kean was coming in, and if he was expelled after then, Kean would appoint a Republican.  So intense was the lobbying that Byrne brought a signed letter appointing a Dem Senator the day of the Kean's swearing in, hoping Williams would relent and resign even at the last minute.  Williams still refused, arguing that he was entrapped and he would be cleared.  Weeks later, he found out he was going to be expelled the next day from the Senate and resigned.  Kean appointed Republican Nick Brady (who would later be TreasSec under Reagan), who agreed to not run in the R Primary (which was going to be between Millicent Fenwick and Jeff Bell).  Fenwick won the R Primary, and narrowly lost to Lautenberg in '82, after he made an issue of her advanced age (!).   For over two decades, Byrne refused to ever say whose name was on the letter.  Finally, a couple of years ago, he confessed that it was Merlino.  We were a Harrison Williams resignation away from probably never knowing Frank Lautenberg.  


[ Parent ]
I just
read Chris Smith's wikipedia article and apparently when Smith was trying to exchange friendly pleasantries with Merlino, Merlino told him rudely to, "Beat it, kid." I could understand why Smith won that year, I doubt most people would vote for someone who acted like their opponent had no right to be on the same stage as him.  

19, Male, Independent, CA-12

[ Parent ]
Especially since the "kid" in question...
Was a United States congressman.

How much of an idiot was Merlino?

20, center-left independent, Auckland Central resident, MD-05 voter, OR-01 native


[ Parent ]
I've
just never liked him much. I'd vote for him but if he was the nominee we'd pretty much be writing it off. Your probably right about the LG.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
NJ-Sen
Guadagno is relatively anonymous, but she would raise big money and is a tireless campaigner. She also has a more moderate reputation, and would start with a big base in Monmouth.  

[ Parent ]
She seems to have a relatively moderate profile
Most notably she's pro-choice. Those things would make her a good general election candidate in New Jersey, but could she get through a primary? Would the Christie connections be enough?

22, Democrat, AZ-01
Peace. Love. Gabby.


[ Parent ]
I think so
Plus, Monmouth is a big county for a Republican primary, and she has that locked down. Who would beat her? Kean Jr is probably to the left of her. Mike Docherty maybe, but I don't see him becoming a factor, and he has not been mentioned since summer for this race.  

[ Parent ]
What of Lance?
I know he's old school and stuff, but he has the best credentials for the job.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Doherty just won a safe senate seat
I don't really see him jumping into another tough primary without having the benefit of a solid shot at victory.

19, Male, libertarian Republican, TX-14 and MN-04

[ Parent ]
Not an issue in NJ
since State Senator elections are in odd and not even years. So he would get to keep St Senate seat if he ran.  

Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


[ Parent ]
CA-Gov
Abel Maldonado couldn't fundraise if his life dependenced on it. Which was one of the main reasons why Newsom crushed him. He'd never get through the primary anyway. And Poizner's tacked so far to the right (while still going down to a 40 point loss) he's made himself unelectable. Guess the California GOP should dig up another millionaire not by the name of Whitman or Fiorina.  

19, Male, Independent, CA-12

[ Parent ]
Abel Maldonado
is probably a good future candidate.  However, undoubtedly the primary crowd will peel him like an orange for voting for the temporary sales tax increase.  The GOP primay crowd would rather have California die rather than raise taxes and/or decrease services.  Note: Taxes in California are pretty low, much lower than here in NJ.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Maldonado
is probably off to advocating for more non partisan stuff. He's in New York right now with LIEberman, Crist, Castle, Bloomberg, Villaraigosa (mayor of LA) talking about how politics should become less partisan.

http://blogs.sacbee.com/capito...

19, Male, Independent, CA-12


[ Parent ]
Still, he could be
the CA GOP's best ticket to win statewide office next time.  Steve Cooley also, but he's probably embarassed for losing a race he was projected to win and declaring victory way too soon.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Thinking about Cooley's loss still brings a smile to my face even now.
"My staff is telling me it's too soon but I'm going to go ahead and declare victory. stupid victory sign" Nice job there, homophobic dickbag.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
Taxes in California are not "pretty low"!
Jezus, they are higher than the national average.  The amount of money taken in is obscene.

[ Parent ]
They're low for a state with so much services.


Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
No they are not
Not in any sense at all.  How the heck can you come to that?  They are even higher if you don't look at them percentagewise as incomes and property values are higher.

California taxes are "odd" not "high", as homeowners living next to each other in identical homes could be paying wildly different taxes on their homes.


[ Parent ]
CA taxes
I recall reading that California taxes are relatively unchanged from 10 years ago.

The main difference is the exponential growth in state prisons, with the enormous costs associated with that growth.

The California state prison system is THE growth industry in California par excellence.

Joe Cooper


[ Parent ]
When Poiz(o)ner [lol] ran for Insurance Commissioner....
What did he position himself as to win that in a great Dem year?

Oh, and sorry for making fun of his name.  When my mom and I (my mom lives in CA) talked about the primary race there, we'd humourously nickname them "Poizoner and Whitless" to lighten the mood of the conversation.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
He
ran against Bustamante, nuff said.

19, Male, Independent, CA-12

[ Parent ]
Oh yes, the Dems' suckiest candidate.
Seriously, was there nobody else?  Anywho, how did Poizner position himself in that race?

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
While Cruz was a fail overall as a candidate
He had the best lines ever w/r/t Ahrnold and "tolerance" back in '03

BUSTAMANTE: And the last thing is that equal opportunity doesn't come from tolerance. I'm going to tolerate somebody? No, it comes from acceptance.

snip

BUSTAMANTE: And we need to make sure that everybody is accepted and that we embrace our diversity. We don't attack immigrants. We don't attack Native Americans. We don't attack people. What we do is that we accept people and try to have everybody have an equal opportunity.


[ Parent ]
Good points he makes.
"Tolerance" has negative connotations, "acceptance" is a much more friendly term.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
He ran against Cruz Bustamante
nt

[ Parent ]
CA Dems' one weakness.
The one Dem who can run statewide in 200-freakin'-six and lose by a 12% spread.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Yeah
It's hard to see a Cali repub winning statewide in the near future.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Not completely true because of top two primaries
An excellent Republican (like Cooley, or Campbell, or...) could win if there are four or five strong Dems running and one single-issue fanatic was able to be the top of the five Dems running.  That's not a likely scenario though.

Put another way, Cruz Bustamante and Phil Angelides and Steve Westly would still lose to a Cooley or Campbell.

Poizner has no chance whatsoever of being elected anything statewide, so I hope he runs for something.


[ Parent ]
Do you see Campbell running again?
He hasn't had the best electoral luck lately, but I don't see very many other Republicans having a shot statewide in California anymore.

19, Male, libertarian Republican, TX-14 and MN-04

[ Parent ]
I think he will almost feel morally obligated to
now that there is the top 2 system he has been advocating for 20 years.

[ Parent ]
Maldonado's career is over statewide
No point even mentioning him really.  He certainly could be elected again in a state house or Congressional seat from his area.

[ Parent ]
Why is that?
He could run for his old seat or for State Senate and do fine.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
That's what I just said


[ Parent ]
Oops, misread that.


Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
NY-Sen
Isn't Dan Senor thinking about it again this time around?

20, Ind, Fl-13 & Fl-6 (college)

[ Parent ]
This is random...
but how do you pronounce "Senor?"  Is it Seh-nor or See-nor, or something else all together?  Thanks...just curious!

Male, 23, NJ-12

[ Parent ]
Sea-nor
And, yes, he's definitely considering a run.

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

[ Parent ]
Thanks!
Much appreciated.

Male, 23, NJ-12

[ Parent ]
Glad joining was such a red letter day for you!
Did something significant happen that day to cause you to want to join or do you just have a very good memory?  (I think I joined summer of 2009 but not sure when).


21, male, CA-15 (home and voting there), LA-2 (college)



[ Parent ]
I
was looking back at one of my diaries yesterday on my user page and noticed I had signed up a year ago. It's been a great year. You joined on July, 29 2009 at 11:40 PM.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Ah. Not sure what inspired me to join then instead of some other point
I'm tempted to look over some old comments for old times sake except it'll take a while to find them and I remember some of them were really bad.  Although I predicted Joe Sestak would win the Democratic primary all the way back in August 2009.

21, male, CA-15 (home and voting there), LA-2 (college)



[ Parent ]
I've been here 3 years!
Feels like such a long time ago! Hillary and Rudy were considered the runaway favorites for the following year.

My blog
Twitter
Scribd
28, New Democrat, Female, TX-03 (hometown CA-26)


[ Parent ]
3 years 11 months
this wednesday.

Top ten signs you're an SSPer #1: your favorite song is "Panic At Tedisco" and no one understands what you mean.

[ Parent ]
Almost two years now
 Before swing state, I lurked on real clear but someone there linked something to swing state so I discovered it. A month later, I got an account and two months later, I started posting on here.  

for more election analysis, visit  http://frogandturtle.blogspot....




17, CA-06,  


[ Parent ]
only a year?
I feel like I've been chatting with you here for at least two!

[ Parent ]
Why do you think
holding Michigan's Senate seat will be so tough?

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

[ Parent ]
Sen. Stabenow has all the charisma of a wet log
I think her politics are fine, but she's a stock Democrat, the definition of "back-bencher". Sens. Kohl, Bingaman, Bill Nelson, and Cardin, who are also up in 2012, aren't much different.

20, center-left independent, Auckland Central resident, MD-05 voter, OR-01 native

[ Parent ]
She's getting a chairmanship this Congress.
That may change her role for the better.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
King
Will he ever get over his obsession with Caroline? She is so late 2008.

God
Caroline had the worst roll out for a person wanting to be appointed to a senate seat I've ever seen. I know she didn't give a damn about politics until Obama but you would think from a family like the Kennedy's her political skills would be way above the average person.

19, Male, Independent, CA-12

[ Parent ]
FWIW, I actually preferred Gillibrand over Kennedy
I just wish Paterson had appointed a placeholder through 2010, allowing for a Democratic primary. I thought fmr. Rep. Liz Holtzman would've been terrific to put in there for two years.

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

[ Parent ]
Caretakers...
Not if Geraldine Ferraro has anything to say about it. :) Just kidding. Didn't they both run for the Senate seat in the mid-80s or something? I know Ferraro tried to again in 1998, but lost to Schumer in the primary.

What is Holtzman up to these days? Is she too old to make a run for elected office?  

26, Liberal Democrat, gay male, CA-38


[ Parent ]
Ferraro and Holtzman ran for Senate in '80.
All I know about her recent moves was trying for Attorney General this year, but announced in May that she would not run. She's 69, so a return to elected office is unlikely but not out of the question. Terry Branstad, though a few years younger, came back to win elected office. (Not that I approve of him, but...) Jerry Brown came back to the governorship also, though before that he had been elected to Oakland Mayor and Attorney General.

My blog
Twitter
Scribd
28, New Democrat, Female, TX-03 (hometown CA-26)


[ Parent ]
No
Holtzman ran in 80, losing thanks to a third party incumbent Senator draining liberal votes. Ferraro was VP nominee in 84 and ran for Senate in 92 and 98, never winning the nomination but costing us the GE in 92.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
I stand corrected.


My blog
Twitter
Scribd
28, New Democrat, Female, TX-03 (hometown CA-26)


[ Parent ]
Right, and interesting sidenote
In 1992, Holtzman and Ferraro ran against each other for the Senate. It was the "year of the woman" (i.e. post Anita Hill), and it was assumed the New York Dems would nominate one of them. Holtzman launched some harsh attacks against Ferraro, Ferraro followed suit, and they both ended up losing to Robert Abrams, who somehow proceeded to lose to Alfonse D'amato.  

[ Parent ]
You were partially correct but
   had the year wrong. They both ran in '92, along with Al Sharpton and a guy named Abrams (can't remember his first name) who got the nomination but lost to Al T'Omato.

52, male, disgruntled Democrat, CA-28

[ Parent ]
NJ-Sen:
Are you kidding me?  Anna Little, a nut, winning against Menendez in a presidential year?  She'd be a sacrificial lamb at best if she ran.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


PA-Sen
Schwiecker was very popular in 2002 and IIRC there were polls that had him even or beating Rendell because of the successful mine rescue in the Summer.  If anyone remembers, I don't know.

Is he
Still well known and popular? More importantly, has he lived in PA since he left office?  

[ Parent ]
my guess is
No, no, and I don't know why he wouldn't be.  I don't think he'd win, but it was kind of like one of those "exact right time and place" for him in 2002, but he had already said he wasn't running and Fisher was the nominee.  But he was on TV a lot statewide during the mine rescue, and got very positive marks.

[ Parent ]
probably not, probably not, and yes.
He's led the Greater Phila Chamber of Commerce for the last few years.

[ Parent ]
Don't Count Out Age Yet
My home city's mayor is 89; she's been mayor before I was born. Compared to her, Arlen's a young go getter.

Arlen Specter loves public service a lot.
As soon as he lost the primary, he began to ask about a possible cabinet position.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
what city is that?
And how old are you?  Or you can just say how long she's been in office.

[ Parent ]
I'm almost 30
As for the city, it's called Mississauga (see link)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...


[ Parent ]
Wow, mayor of a city of 750,000?
I expected "small city" when you said your mayor was 89 years old--never did I expect her to be running a city bigger than Boston! Go, Granny, Go--cool stuff indeed.

20, CD MA-03/NH-01/MA-08

[ Parent ]
Come Up Sometime
Nobody really comes here except to meet Hazel. We should put up a slogan, "Meet the world's oldest mayor/See the 1000 year old woman." The latter one unfortunately seems straight out of a P.T. Barnum event.

[ Parent ]
Sharron Angle creates "The Island of Misfit Toys."
http://politicalticker.blogs.c...

Clearly, her ego has not subsided and she wants to continue to be a thorn in the NV GOP's side.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


Lieberman voted for the tax cuts right?
I can't find a list, but I'm assuming he did.  He missed what could have been a brilliant political ploy.  

there have been some arguments that Lieberman's only chance is to run as a democrat and hope the voter's reliance on party ID will pull him through.

However, what does Lieberman offer that any other standard dem could offer without his rather douchey past?  nothing.  UNLESS he had voted against the tax cuts.

he's appealing to almost no one with his vote for the tax cuts, republicans won't support him unless they nominate an angle like candidate.  many dems hate the idea and moderates MIGHT warm to him a BIT.

But, if he voted against the tax cuts, a bill the liberal base, who votes in the primary, hates.  the vote could be seen to them as a "Grand romantic gesture," kind of like where buster accidentally bids on Lucille two at the auction on Arrested Development.  

It WON'T repair the relationship between Lieberman and the dem primary electorate, but it would certainly help.  Instead, I guess he'll either run as an indie, or retire.  

Top ten signs you're an SSPer #1: your favorite song is "Panic At Tedisco" and no one understands what you mean.


Are you kidding me?
That would be very transparent because he already declared that he wants all the taxes extended even before the election.He even voted against the tax cut vote for under 250,000 stating he wants all taxes exempted. At this point he is wed to this tax cut deal

[ Parent ]
he could have come up with some excuse
any excuse not to show it was not a flip flop.  besides mccain, basically the inverse (or parallel) liberman flipped on a whole bunch of issues and voters didn't seem to care (grant hayworth was weak, but still)

Top ten signs you're an SSPer #1: your favorite song is "Panic At Tedisco" and no one understands what you mean.

[ Parent ]
Nah, Lieberman is a man of principles
And those principles include flipping the bird to the netroots who defeated him in the primaries whenever possible.  

[ Parent ]
so was mccain
until he wasn't.  people do crazy things when they want to win.

Top ten signs you're an SSPer #1: your favorite song is "Panic At Tedisco" and no one understands what you mean.

[ Parent ]
Nah, Lieberman is a man of principles
And those principles include flipping the bird to the netroots who defeated him in the primaries whenever possible.  

[ Parent ]
Is it a coincidence that they are BFF's!?
I think not.

19, Self Appointed Chair of the SSP Gay Caucus (I claimed it first :p), male, Dem, IN-09 (College IN-09) (Raised IL-03, IL-09)

[ Parent ]
Watch how Chris Murphy votes on this in the House
If he votes "no," I suspect that may entice Lieberman to run in the Democratic primary, setting up a showdown between two candidates who voted differently on the tax cuts issue. Should he vote in favor of it, that's just another issue off the table for Lieberman to run on vs. a Democrat.

For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

[ Parent ]
I don't know
if I buy that argument, but I respect the fact that you brought "Arrested Development" into it. Any time that show is mentioned, you gain a few points, because it proves how awesome you are.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

[ Parent ]
Roll Call vote up.
http://senate.gov/legislative/...

Merkley said he would have voted against cloture had he been there.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


schumer was a yes
and kagan was a no.  that's certainly odd.

Top ten signs you're an SSPer #1: your favorite song is "Panic At Tedisco" and no one understands what you mean.

[ Parent ]
Your state is the only one where
both Senators voted against it.  I'm also kinda surprised about Landrieu, considering she helped carry water for Sanders last Friday.  I guess Clinton made a bunch of phone calls.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
there's little obama could have offered leahy
to vote for the bill and bernie certainly wasn't going to vote for the bill (understatement of the century).  I hope salmon tries to run against bernie and bernie smacks him down

Top ten signs you're an SSPer #1: your favorite song is "Panic At Tedisco" and no one understands what you mean.

[ Parent ]
I'm a bit surprised Boxer was a yea.


My blog
Twitter
Scribd
28, New Democrat, Female, TX-03 (hometown CA-26)


[ Parent ]
I'm not
she's one of the Senators who wanted to postpone a vote until after the election


[ Parent ]
CT-Sen: McMahon to meet with Cornyn
Chicago-Mayor: New poll has Emanuel at 43, Moseley-Braun second, then Davis, Chicago, Del Valle, Meeks
*make that CHICO after Davis


For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

[ Parent ]
Michael Steele
He wants to be reelected as RNC chairman. What could that mean for 2012 elections?

http://www.politico.com/news/s...


It means Republicans
better hope he isn't reelected.

19, Self Appointed Chair of the SSP Gay Caucus (I claimed it first :p), male, Dem, IN-09 (College IN-09) (Raised IL-03, IL-09)

[ Parent ]
Will there be cat fud?
He knows where the metaphorical bodies are buried, so he might be able to bully over some votes that way.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
TWO MORE YEARS, TWO MORE YEARS!
TWO MORE YEARS, TWO MORE YEARS, TWO MORE YEARS, TWO MORE YEARS!!!

Top ten signs you're an SSPer #1: your favorite song is "Panic At Tedisco" and no one understands what you mean.

[ Parent ]
Just like Miller
He doesn't know when to quit, and he intends on playing the race card if this quote is any indication: "This (race) will show if we are truly the party of Lincoln."
http://twitter.com/FixAaron/st...

[ Parent ]
Never
mind the fact the GOP elected two African Americans to the house and an Indian American to the SC Governorship this year.

19, Male, Independent, CA-12

[ Parent ]
Does this put the RNC delegate
in an awkward position.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
*delegates


Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Aren't the party heads
a lot less relevant in the age of groups like American Crossroads and Crossroads GPS?  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

[ Parent ]
Those new groups cannot
contact any campaigns or campaign committees for any reason.  The RNC can, which is why it's still more critical.  Rove's groups are just throwing money at key races and hoping it sticks.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
But even
with those limitations, which are probably a lot easier to get around than some think, isn't the fact that Rove's groups and others like it can raise a lot of money and influence the races something significant? Like you said, there are technically legal limits to what involvement there might be, but the ability to raise and spend money on that scale can get you a lot of influence.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

[ Parent ]
That's why we need to get groups on our side.
What the ex-head of Media Matters is doing is a start.  But we need a few more to compete.  Furthermore, throwing money at key races DOES help a lot, but that's really all they can do.  They can't collaborate with the candidates or even speak with them.  They can't ship out staffers to go work with them or give them advice on strategy.

Even though Rove's group helped turn under-the-radar races, it did not turn NV, CA, or CO, with the first and last being nail-biters.  The lesson here is that no race should be under-the-radar for the party.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
I mean
Throwing money and developing an independent strategy (that may or may not be redundant) is all they can do.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
I can see how
having the ability to have face-to-face contact would be great, but at the same time, candidates can now have an outside group running ads and being responsible for part of the tone of the campaign, using money that is raised in unclear ways, with no one person representing it. And in one way or another, all of the moves these outside groups are making will be known by anyone who wants to know, so the official campaign and affiliates in the parties can react to them.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

[ Parent ]
I've just installed a coffee brewer with timer.
I can set it to begin at a certain time to help me wake up mornings this week so I can study for finals (which start on Thursday for me).

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


Stay Classy, Gil Cedillo
http://latimesblogs.latimes.co...

I'm glad this dude isn't in Congress. He's the worst of the old vanguard establishment. He swapped his Senate seat to run for the Assembly, while the Assemblyman (Kevin DeLeon) swapped his seat to run for Cedillo's seat. Yup, all in a good day's work i guess..

16, Male, Democrat, CA-42/sometimes CA-32.


Oh Gil....
I am so glad that Judy Chu demolished him in the special primary for CA-32 last year....

The good news is that Gil Cedillo is termed out next election. He has served the maximum two terms allowed in the Senate and is serving out the maximum third (albeit non-consecutive) term in the Assembly. But something tells me that he's just classy enough to launch a quixotic primary challenge against a sitting rep...

26, Liberal Democrat, gay male, CA-38


[ Parent ]
Ron Paul says there's "at least" a 50/50 chance he runs in 2012
I thought he was going to push
Gary Johnson to run in his stead.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
That is pushing.


20, center-left independent, Auckland Central resident, MD-05 voter, OR-01 native

[ Parent ]
I agree
I think he's sending messages to Johnson through the press.  

NY-01/NY-19

[ Parent ]
Well that locks up 2% of the voters


[ Parent ]
OH-Prez: Obama at 42% approval, but leading all four stooges
so basically
meh versus blech.

Top ten signs you're an SSPer #1: your favorite song is "Panic At Tedisco" and no one understands what you mean.

[ Parent ]
You asked for it!

On a serious note, that's not bad.  It's a good bench.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
I don't mean to sound
like the guy who is always optimistic, but while that's not a good result, it's not a horrible one. He's got a bad approval rating in the state but he's still leading Gingrich, Romney, Palin, and Huckabee? Palin doesn't surprise me, but Romney can't pull out a lead in the state where the Democrats except for Strickland did terribly six weeks ago? That's pathetic for him.

I wonder if they polled people like Thune or Daniels against Obama. If they did, and Obama still leads them, he's probably a helluva lot stronger for 2012 than a lot of people think.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?


[ Parent ]
i remember this time in 06 guiliani and mccain were leading
both obama and clinton by large margins, but that was an open seat rather than against an incumbent president.

Top ten signs you're an SSPer #1: your favorite song is "Panic At Tedisco" and no one understands what you mean.

[ Parent ]
It doesn't mean
that much two years out, but this is probably a pretty low point for Obama, and yet he's not polling at 31 percent. His national approval, at least from more reputable ones like Gallup, is remarkably stable. While not particularly great, he's usually under 50 percent by just a few points, which isn't awful. He's leading or down by just a few in key swing states, now even in one where his approval is bad. Maybe the Republicans will nominate someone who will, if they have a legitimate opening, be smart enough to project an image of competence and maturity while repeating the phrase "jobs, jobs, jobs," but my guess is that they will be caught between a rock and a hard place, because nobody is particularly inspiring in a presidential way. Nor does anyone seem able to pull together support so that it goes beyond being a mile wide but an inch deep.

Anyway, voters seem to like Obama, even if they aren't thrilled with the job he's doing. He has, to be simple, an in with the voters, but he doesn't seem willing to use it. I won't go into specifics so I can satisfy the rule of not talking about policy, but suffice it to say that more stimulus is needed. I imagine that if Obama proposed a fairly easy-to-understand package of infrastructure investment and things like that, perhaps financed by a financial transaction tax or maybe even a Wall Street bonus tax, and then promised to consistently keep the public up to date on its progress, he'd get a lot of public support to for it. It might be voted down in the House, or perhaps it'd definitely be voted down, but if he kept up the pressure, it wouldn't hurt him. If nothing else, a clear contrast with the Republicans would be drawn, and if he's on the side of fighting to create jobs and tars the Republicans as the ones who are blocking it, I don't see how he loses.

In the end, I don't give that much of a crap about the tax cut extension. It can be dealt with fairly easily as long as we get the bigger issue of health care costs under control. As annoying as it might be for any number of reasons, it's far more frustrating to me because it looks like it might not be enough to make a big enough dent in unemployment at the right time. And I'm even more frustrated about why he's not pitching ideas to the public, like I indicated he could above. He might lose, but he won't know until he tries.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?


[ Parent ]
It doesn't mean
that much two years out, but this is probably a pretty low point for Obama, and yet he's not polling at 31 percent. His national approval, at least from more reputable ones like Gallup, is remarkably stable. While not particularly great, he's usually under 50 percent by just a few points, which isn't awful. He's leading or down by just a few in key swing states, now even in one where his approval is bad. Maybe the Republicans will nominate someone who will, if they have a legitimate opening, be smart enough to project an image of competence and maturity while repeating the phrase "jobs, jobs, jobs," but my guess is that they will be caught between a rock and a hard place, because nobody is particularly inspiring in a presidential way. Nor does anyone seem able to pull together support so that it goes beyond being a mile wide but an inch deep.


"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

[ Parent ]
Hard to poll Thune or Daniels...
They are pretty unknown to most of the populace at this point.

[ Parent ]
Maybe, but
I'd be curious to see how much support they get by running as the default choice for someone who just doesn't want to vote for Obama, at least at this point. You could, of course, say the same about Pawlenty or any other name I am forgetting.



"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?


[ Parent ]
It would be interesting to get any name that isn't well known
Generic R isn't fair, but little known guy would be a good comparison to the Knockwurst Four.

Even a name like Mccain or Mcconnell would help gauge how lame the four actually are (or if some of them outperform Mccain).


[ Parent ]
I agree with Jensen's commentary
Almost word for word. What next, he leads in FL? Sheesh. Taking nothing for granted but slight concern after last month has disipated somewhat lately. Especially with this tax deal. I see Obama has rebounded in Gallup since he took the initial hit and their polling, like ABC/WP, also shows people are supportive of the compromise.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/145...


[ Parent ]
I wouldn't be
ready to throw in the towel even if we were down by ten, but perhaps this indicates that he's in a much better position than we realize. Not a good one, of course, but far from the awful one some in the media seem to believe he's in.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

[ Parent ]
I don't have many non-negative things
to say about Republicans these days, but I will say I respect them for not just giving up on any race. They might not always strike gold, or even bronze, when they find a candidate to run, but they don't let the odds count them out of the race before it begins. They probably aren't going to win the Senate seats in Maryland or Hawaii, but they sure as shit will try. It'd be nice if Democrats went into the races in Texas, Tennessee, Wyoming, and other states with the same attitude. If we end up losing, nobody will be surprised, but making it competitive can only help us. And if we win, we once again expand the map beyond the usual states. Hopefully, Patty Murray is going into this with an aggressive mindset.  

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

Question for Minnesotans
can someone tell me more about the position of Minnesota's solicitor general? Is it elected? Appointed? Partisan? Nonpartisan? Is current incumbent Alan Gilbert outgoing? Is there some way we can get rid of him?

As for why I ask... http://advocate.com/News/Daily...

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


SG
What a douche.

Minnesota's SG is appointed by the incumbent AG - in this instance recently reelected Democrat Lori Swanson - to act in their stead and defend that state's laws. I have no idea though if the position is partisan, or if the appointment is subject to executive/legislative approval. Swanson herself used to be the SG before running for AG in 2006.  

26, Liberal Democrat, gay male, CA-38


[ Parent ]
You mean...he was appointed by a Democrat?!
geez. so if he really wanted to, could he refuse to defend laws, a la Jerry Brown/Kamala Harris and Prop 8? or can he use the old Eric Holder "I have to defend it, it's my job" excuse?

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
GA - Another State Legislator Switches
State Rep. Bubber Epps switched yesterday.

It's been rumored since Friday, but I guess yesterday it became official.

http://blogs.ajc.com/georgia_e...

I can think of maybe three across both chambers that could switch.

I've seen some try to spin these defections as good. That's hilarious. This is not good for the party in Georgia.


Only
The only one that truly makes no sense is McKillip in Athens.

There is at least an ideological argument for everyone else. McKillip on the other hand is a liberal representing a very liberal district.

Commissioner Bell's switch is probably the most damaging though. I've said on here a few times before that the local level is an area that the GOP has yet to really do well in throughout the state. There are too many ancestrally Democratic areas still out there. Bell is from a GOP stronghold, but, the idea of a county commissioner switching could open up the floodgates.


[ Parent ]
Undoubtedly, McKillip
was baited to come over with offerings of more influence and pork for his district.  But Dems in that area won't take it sitting down.  On a open thread last week, a few from Athens said they already had their eye on two individuals.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Actually
From what I understand, McKillip approached the GOP, not vice versa.

I'm not sure how he'll fit in with the Republican Caucus.

The GOP approaching McKillip with any offer just does not make sense. Sure, they want that super-majority, but there are still a few members out there they can approach.


[ Parent ]
Alright, let me shift my argument.
McKillip wants that juice because being in the minority there is to be totally locked out.  That was one of the reasons why Ralph Hall switched.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Bubber Epps?
Really? Ah man, it's been too long since I saw a candidate with a fun name.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
Unique
His name is actually James A. Epps, but his nickname is "Bubber".

Normally you hear the name "Bubba" but he's the only "Bubber" that I've heard of.  


[ Parent ]
Makes me think of "Bubba"
in a Rhode Island accent.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
CT-Sen: Reid wants Lieberman to run
Not much meat there
Kinda irrelavant anyway since most backed him 2006.

[ Parent ]
MA-Sen: Capuano eviscerates Scott Brown in the Herald
http://bostonherald.com/news/c...

Looks like the opening salvos for a Senate run

Some Dude, 19, Democrat, NH-02 (residence), MA-08 (college)


This probably also means that he'll vote
against the tax compromise. It's interesting that, in 2010, candidates like Melancon and Artur Davis were allowed by Pelosi and Obama to vote against the health care bill from the right so they could run for higher office. Now they might allow candidates like Capuano and Chris Murphy to vote against the tax compromise from the left so that they can run for higher office. I wonder if this will also apply to competitive House races like it did for HCR. It's also interesting to note that Gillibrand, Sherrod Brown, Bingaman, Sanders, and Feingold (who may run for Kohl's seat) are all up for reelection in 2012 and voted against it.

Some Dude, 19, Democrat, NH-02 (residence), MA-08 (college)

[ Parent ]
I think this vote
will be like TARP to the dems.  both were spearheaded by the parties leader Bush/Obama respectively, both went contrary to the parties ideology and both had a fair number of livid detractors.  

Top ten signs you're an SSPer #1: your favorite song is "Panic At Tedisco" and no one understands what you mean.

[ Parent ]
If it works as well
Then great.

[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox