Google Ads


Site Stats

(MI, NC, IL) Redistricting Potpourri

by: borodino21

Mon Nov 29, 2010 at 4:43 AM EST


This diary presents potential redistricting maps for Michigan, North Carolina, and Illinois. It also carries the ulterior motive of the following bleg:

I've started working on two related projects for Michigan for Dave's App. I'm collating partisan data and renaming the voting districts by municipality name and precinct number. (Currently, Michigan's voting districts are named using a 14 digit code.) I could use the following three forms of help:

1. I need a precinct map for the city of Detroit. This is looking ahead a bit, because Detroit is the final portion of the state I intend to work on, but it would really help. My Google-fu has failed me thus far.

2. In order to enable collaboration (see third form below), I need to figure out how to get the lines in my copy of vt26_d00.csv sorted by county and voting district number. The vt26_d00_data.csv file is already sorted like this, but its counterpart is somewhat helter-skelter. The solution that occured to me was to try sorting it using OpenOffice Calc (my only spreadsheet program), but that immediately lost leading zeroes, which breaks the CSV file. Any ideas out there?

3. Actual collaboration in collating and renaming. I'm currently going through the counties alphabetically. After two-ish weeks of sporadic effort, I just finished the H's with Huron County. (On to Lansing's Ingham County next!) That's about 19% of the state population. Doing Flint's Genessee County took most of the day yesterday, and I'm fairly frightened of Kent/Macomb/Oakland/Washtenaw/Wayne. Even if you're just interested in helping with some of the smaller, easier counties, I'd be grateful. If you're willing and interested, send me an email at my user name at gmail.com so that I can send you information about the conventions I've been using. Also, post a comment letting me know you emailed me -- it's a secondary email that I don't otherwise check.

After the jump, you'll see the following forms of actual content to assuage my conscience from this bleg:

Michigan: what my partisan map progress looks like so far and a potential Republican gerrymander (an abgin-esque atrocity by Michigan standards)

North Carolina: a Republican map that packs five Democratic incumbents into two districts

Illinois: an oxymoronic "good government" map of Illinois -- I'm posting it mostly to show that two majority Hispanic districts in Chicago are easily created and to show off an particular idea for a reconfigured 17th district.

borodino21 :: (MI, NC, IL) Redistricting Potpourri
Michigan Partisan Progress So Far

Michigan Republican Gerrymander

Michigan redistricting law heavily discourages county and municipality splitting. This map probably looks tame by most states' standards, but it's basically an abgin-esque "finding the limits" map by ours.


The Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint CMSA

This map has its origins in a comment -- I don't recall which thread -- that posited an I-75 district linking together Kildee and Peters. This is my attempt to make that district and show its consequences.

I started by painting in all of Genessee County (I really don't think you can get away with having a district consisting of only portions of three different counties.) Then I painted in the bare minimum number of people to take in Saginaw City from Saginaw County -- no GOP plan is going to saddle one of their representatives with Saginaw. Finally, I snaked down through Oakland County, taking heavily Democratic Pontiac and Peter's home area of Bloomfield /Bloomfield Hills.  That, as it turns out, is a district. So I started working other districts around it.

End result: Peter's 9th district has been eliminated by trisection. Its eastern third is now in Miller's 10th, its central third is in Kildee's 5th, its western third is in McCotter's 11th.

I won't dissect the districts in detail, but suffice it to say that I think this is a fairly successful Detroit-area map for the GOP. McCotter gets majorly shored-up (although he might at primary risk from an Oakland-based politican), Miller probably washes out in trading the Thumb for eastern Oakland, and Peters gets the short end of the reapportionment stick.

Taking a look statewide...

... there are some interesting repercussions, mostly favorable to the Republicans. Starting with one of the pieces of bad news, however, with the 5th and 10th sucked down into the Detroit area, the 4th is forced to cover the Thumb. Dave Camp becomes an incumbent in-name only, with only his home county of Midland and the western portion of Saginaw County overlapping between his current district and this one. I would guess that this district is at least as Republican as his current one, but I'm not entirely sure.

With the 4th swinging east, the 1st gets to pick up the Republican-leaning Traverse City area, mildly shoring up Benishek. The 2nd and 3rd also get pulled north by the 4th's relocation. That, in turn, allows Upton to take in all of Republican Allegan County and Walberg to newly acquire heavily Republican Barry County -- a significant upgrade for him that I've been otherwise unable to find. I'm genuinely unsure about how the changes to Roger's 8th district pan out -- he loses Republican northern Oakland, and gains some swingy territory in central Michigan along with fairly Republican (I think) Ionia County.

Summary: This map definitly eliminates a Democratic incumbent. I think it also shores up four Republican incumbents while severely inconveniencing another, with the effects on yet another being unknown.

North Carolina Republican Gerrymander

This map has its origins in SaoMagnifico's recent Wyoming Rule diary on North Carolina. While composing a counter-suggestion to his proposed map, I discovered that there's a significant African American population in and around Fayetteville. I've seen some insisting that this population could be linked with Raleigh's to produce a new VRA-seat. My attempts at drawing that district while preserving the current 1st have failed, but it turned out to work well when linked with Charlotte's African-American population instead.

This is a 7-4-2 Republican/Democratic/swing map.

A quick run-through:

The 1st district (blue) stays more or less in place. VRA: 49% black, 44% white (is this kosher?). 2008: Obama 62%, McCain 37%.

The 2nd district (green) shifts substantially west. Still contains all of Ellmer's (and Etheridge's) Harnett County. 2008: McCain 56%, Obama 43%.

The 3rd district (purple) now hugs the coast all the way down to (and including) Wilmington. Incumbent Jones is (barely) drawn outside the lines, but I've been told he's outside the lines already. 2008: McCain 57%, Obama 42%.

The 4th district (red) packs Price and Miller into one uber-Democratic (majority-white) district. 2008: Obama 73%, McCain 26%.

The 5th district (yellow) continues to hug the northwest corner of the state. Foxx now lives in her district. 2008: McCain 60%, Obama 38%.

The 6th district (teal) shifts west. This is kind of like a bizzaro-12th, covering broadly similar territory between Charlotte and Greensboro, but with the intention of being a Republican district instead of an African-American gerrymander. Coble still lives here, I think. If not, he's close. 2008: McCain 56%, Obama 43%.

The 7th district (grey) is still in the southeast corner of the state, reaching north into the eastern parts of the old 2nd -- but it's been reconfigured to exclude incumbent McIntyre. 2008: McCain 56%, Obama 43%.

The 8th district (slate blue) is the center-piece of this plan. It strings together all three of Watt, Kissell, and McIntyre into a minority-majority district. VRA: 41% black, 35% white, 13% Hispanic. 2008: Obama 66%, McCain 33%.

The 9th district (cyan) now lies exclusively east of Charlotte. So far as I know, Myrick still lives in the district. 2008: McCain 55%, Obama 44%.

The 10th district (magenta) pulls in closer to Charlotte. 2008: McCain 59%, Obama 40%.

The 11th district (lime) stays in place. 2008: McCain 52%, Obama 46%.

The 12th district (cornflower) is a (majority white) Democratic new open seat in the Triad. Effectively, the Republicans get rid of both of McIntyre and Kissell and replace them with a Triad-area Democrat. 2008: Obama 60%, McCain 38%.

The 13th district (salmon) is a swing(!) district surrounding the Triangle. 2008: McCain 50%, Obama 49%.

If not screwing with Shuler is something you can't see the Republicans doing, here's an area map for the changes necessary:

(Please ignore the 5th changing colors.]

New stats
5th:  56 Mc / 42 Ob
10th: 57 Mc / 42 Ob
11th: 58 Mc / 42 Ob

Illinois Good-Government Redistricting

This map was drawn to avoid splitting counties and muncipalities -- an idea I support in the abstract if not necessarily in practice. I won't go into detail at all about it, because I don't feel like I understand Illinois well enough. But I wanted to draw attention to two features to see what people think who do understand Illinois politics. (The 11th and 16th -- both green -- can be hard to distinguish. DeKalb, LaSalle, and points east are in the 11th.)

Feature one: Here's the VRA statistics for most of the Cook County districts.

1st (blue) -- white 39%, black 53%
2nd (green) -- white 26%, black 58%, Hispanic 10%
3rd (purple) -- white 75%, Hispanic 16%
4th (red) -- white 25%, black 12%, Hispanic 59%
5th (yellow) -- white 32%, Hispanic 51%
7th (grey) -- white 29%, black 53%, Hispanic 16%
9th (cyan) -- white 66%, Asian 13%, Hispanic 12%

Actual census numbers may change this, of course, but 2 VRA Hispanic district seem possible with a miminum of fuss.

Feature two: Note district 17 [dark blue] in the whole-state map above. It links together the Quad Cities, Bloomington-Normal, and Champaign-Urbana. Is this a workable Democratic district?

If not -- I've gotten the impression that Bloomington-Normal is fairly Republican for a mid-sized city -- how about this, which substitutes in Decatur?

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Great work.
But regarding your Hispanic VRA districts in Chicago, don't they have to be a lot more than 50% Hispanic due to turnout rates? I thought that was why Gutierrez' current district is 70-something% Hispanic.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


Thanks
You could be right about turnout. I know that was the case when the courts reviewed the Delaymander in Texas. I was guessing that a northern city would have a higher ratio of Hispanic citizens to noncitizens compared to the borderland in Texas.

I just now glanced at the NYC-area districts represented by Hispanics for comparison. I saw two: Velazquez's 12th at 49% Hispanic and Serrano's at 63% Hispanic. I don't know how the creation of these interacted with VRA, though.

30, male, MI-11 (previously VA-08). Evangelical, postconservative, green.


[ Parent ]
National Origin Could Matter
A high percentage of the Hispanic population in the NE corridor between Boston and Philadelphia are Puerto Rican, who are by definition US citizens.

That's much less true in the MD-DC-VA area, where Central Americans seem to comprise the lion's share of the Hispanic community.  

36, M, Democrat, MD-03


[ Parent ]
Chicago
the northern half of Gutierrez' district (where he lives, I believe) is predominantly Puerto Rican, the southern half is mostly Mexican. So that could explain it.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
Very interesting maps
In NC that is some out of the box thinking. I suggested the other day that it would be easy to create a third AA majority seat for NC.  I thought keeping Watts & Butterfield's seats intact would be better.  This configuration works fairly nicely.  

Very interesting map for Michigan.  I am not sure about the double cross from MacComb into Oakland(Miller and Levin's district both cross)but this general outline would probably suit the GOP and all of its incumbents.  


Thanks
Re NC: I don't think a third AA district works. At least, I can't make it work in Dave's App.

Re MI: I didn't spell out all the reasons that I thought this map is abgin-esque by Michigan standards, but you noted one of them. Not only is there the "double-cross", there's also the fact that there isn't a single district that's solely within Oakland County.

30, male, MI-11 (previously VA-08). Evangelical, postconservative, green.


[ Parent ]
The third AA seat might not
technically be possible as you drew in either the Watts or the orange/durham/wake county seat.

In the case of Watts seat there will be about 5% lumbee indian presence in Robeson county plus a bit in the surrounding area.  They vote nearly as heavily democratic as the local AA population.

In the other district with the university votes in Orange and Durham counties  that seat would eventually elect an AA congressman.  Its 40% AA or so but including the bulk of the liberal votes in those two counties will make for a very liberal primary pool.

A map of this design would be the democrats nightmare in my opinion.  


[ Parent ]
It's probably not a big deal
but your new 4th district looks a lot like Jim Barcia's old district. Midland County is probably enough to hold it for Camp but if the stars aligned it could be dangerous for the GOP. I don't know if they'd take the risk.

32, M, MI-6, Iconoclastic Leftist

The 4th is one of the weak points of this map
from a purely political GOP perspective. Lapeer and Sanilac are both pretty Republican, Bay County and much of Saginaw County are pretty Democratic, and the most of other counties are weakly Republican. Combined with Camp's home base in Midland, I think it all adds up to a Republican district, but it's dicey.

The comparison with Barcia's district is apt. But note that upon Barcia's recent retirement from the state senate, his seat flipped to the Republicans.

30, male, MI-11 (previously VA-08). Evangelical, postconservative, green.


[ Parent ]
With the city removed, Saginaw County isn't really all that Democratic
State Senator Roger Kahn represents Saginaw County and Gratiot County (including the city of Saginaw), and he's not a very good politician. Apart from Saginaw itself, the county is largely rural.

Bay County is really the only Dem area in the new 4th, and even that is susceptible voting for the right Republican. I don't think Camp would have any trouble here. All in all, I like the map a lot. I don't think it would hold up, even given the new conservative Supreme Court majority, though. Too bad.


[ Parent ]
Liking the North Carolina map...
No surprise because your NC-13 and NC-03 look a lot like districts I drew. Thanks!

One comment I have for North Carolina is: NC-01 probably could use a larger share of African American voters. I might chop out Chowan, Perquimans, and Pasquotank counties, all of which have apparently slid to the white right over the past decade.

20, center-left independent, Auckland Central resident, MD-05 voter, OR-01 native


I'm sure I drew inspiration from your map
Re NC-01: If I drop those counties, where do you suggest I go to make up the population? I couldn't really find anything that worked.

For reference, my current version of NC-01 is about 5000 African-Americans short of being 50%+1 majority AA.

30, male, MI-11 (previously VA-08). Evangelical, postconservative, green.


[ Parent ]
In a word...
Southwest. Drawing it over to Fayetteville, to my surprise, is indeed entirely doable.

Here's what I came up with as a slight redraw:

Some districts changed quite a bit (NC-01, NC-07), and others barely changed at all (NC-04, NC-12). I decided to go with the scenario in which Republicans screw over Rep. Shuler in NC-11, because I do think they'll try.

NC-01 (blue)
41% white, 51% black
64% Obama, 36% McCain

NC-02 (green)

74% white, 15% black, 8% Latino
42% Obama, 57% McCain

NC-03 (purple)

74% white, 18% black
41% Obama, 58% McCain

NC-04 (red)

52% white, 30% black, 11% Latino
73% Obama, 26% McCain

NC-05 (yellow)

83% white, 9% black
41% Obama, 57% McCain

NC-06 (teal)

77% white, 13% black
43% Obama, 56% McCain

NC-07 (grey)

66% white, 23% black
48% Obama, 51% McCain

NC-08 (slate blue)

34% white, 41% black, 8% Native, 13% Latino
66% Obama, 33% McCain

NC-09 (cyan)

77% white, 12% black
44% Obama, 55% McCain

NC-10 (magenta)

80% white, 11% black
43% Obama, 56% McCain

NC-11 (lime)

88% white, 6% black
41% Obama, 58% McCain

NC-12 (cornflower)

54% white, 33% black, 10% Latino
60% Obama, 39% McCain

NC-13 (salmon)

72% white, 16% black
47% Obama, 52% McCain

I'm actually rather surprised at how swingy the redraw made NC-07, considering it absorbed most of conservative Wilmington and ditched the black-majority parts of Cumberland County, but NC-13 looks a bit better for the GOP and Republicans are insured against retrogression charges over NC-01. It's pretty much your map otherwise.

20, center-left independent, Auckland Central resident, MD-05 voter, OR-01 native


[ Parent ]
That is an amazing map
and if you drawing to maximize GOP votes you got 9 McCain seats?  Wow.

I don't have a crystal ball-snow globe yes but not a crystal ball.  I can see them following some variation of this. Your map has just opened my eyes to a line of action for the GOP.

I think using your basic outlines for much of the district I see a path for the GOP to get to ten mcCain seats with one being Shuler.

I would only do minor swapping of voter between Shuler and McHenry.  I think he might win the seat you drew in Western NC that has his home in Swain county.  People focus on Buscombe but its really Shuler's strength in his home area that make him tough.

Basically you just have figure out a way to ditch the seat based on Winston Salem/Greensboro-Allamance.

Not easy to do.  I can visualize it but number it out.


[ Parent ]
9-4, maybe...
The problem with some of those seats you're regarding as safe Republican is that they're pretty vulnerable to savvy Democrats catching a wave, and with North Carolina turning blue, the breakdown could shift toward parity very quickly. Because of the way North Carolina's population is distributed, and considering the fitfulness of its liberalization, that's probably a risk GOP mapmakers have to take.

I really don't see a way to rip up the Democratic open seat around Winston-Salem and Greensboro without throwing enough Democratic voters into the GOP-leaning districts surrounding it to put them at a high risk of turning blue. 9-4 looks like the best-case scenario from where I'm sitting.

20, center-left independent, Auckland Central resident, MD-05 voter, OR-01 native


[ Parent ]
You are probably right
one my rules of redistricting is "A man has got to know his limitations".

some call it dummymander or reverse starfish.  

can't do the impossible. it can backfire


[ Parent ]
The Republicans are really at a big risk of that this year
The urban-rural divide between the parties is huge right now, apparently getting larger, and cities are only getting bigger (disproportionately to the population).

One of the big challenges for the Republicans in the coming decade is going to be trying to keep a few of the cities and urban areas that are still fairly good for them (here I'm thinking of Fort Worth, Phoenix, San Diego, Orange County, Staten Island, and Hampton Roads) in their column despite the national trend toward a firmer dichotomy of big blue cities and spacious red counties. A lot of their maps will count on it.

20, center-left independent, Auckland Central resident, MD-05 voter, OR-01 native


[ Parent ]
Ironically in North Carolina
in 2008 we show urban based former Charlotte Mayor lose as the GOP candidate against a female with a small town background.  

Rural urban does matter.  For the most part urban centers are democratic and even the more heavily GOP ones (San Diego & Cincy) the real republican strength is more surburban then urban.

I think we will see the urban-suburban-rural interplay come into effect in several ways this redistricting cycle.

1. some instance in IL it might be tempting to see some expansion beyond Will county for democratic congressman on the Southside.  The 7 urban chicago based congressman appear to be 525K short of population.  There is even talk of an 8th seat but how far can these seats stretch west or north or south?  Rural folks took the seat loss in IL in 2000 and by most accounts they should get 7 seats.  If they are rounded down to 6 seats they will holler.  When I say holler democrats and republicans will holler.

2. You will continue to see many rural and suburban seat hookups.  Who are drawing lots of maps?  Who has strenth in rural and surburban areas.  just guess?

 


[ Parent ]
Great work
I keep coming back to a similar vote sink in the Research Triangle. But the different approach that I had was to create a second Democratic vote sink in the Fayetteville-Lumberton area that reached over to Charlotte but didn't interfere too much with NC-11. Then, by using NC-11 to sop up as many remaining blue precincts in the triad as possible (and trying to sink the rest into Coble's district), I managed to make NC-13 vote Republican by several points.

I like the idea of Chicago getting a second Hispanic-majority district too. I tried it once and was surprised by how easy it was, though I targeted Lipinski's seat for deletion, not Quigley's (dare to dream...). I have a feeling that this isn't going to happen until 2022, though.  

22, Democrat, AZ-01
Peace. Love. Gabby.


Thanks
Re NC: I think you mean NC-12 instead of NC-11? If so, I suppose that would work too. I've seen a number of people express doubt that you can pack McIntyre and Kissell together, and I don't really understand why. It seems pretty straightfoward.

Re Illinois: I didn't actually target any particular incumbent -- I didn't know where any of the Chicagoland incumbents live. So it's Quigley I've axed to make the second Hispanic district?

30, male, MI-11 (previously VA-08). Evangelical, postconservative, green.


[ Parent ]
I think that McIntyre and Kissell
can be packed together easily; you did it, I've done it. I'm not 100% on combining them with Watt and creating a new Dem district in the triad (where Brad Miller would probably move to anyway), but the numbers do add up as you've demonstrated. Mostly, I think giving the McIntyre-Kissell district the Fayetteville area as well is the most efficient way to pack Dems together (freeing up the Repub district who have it on your map to absorb other swing and Democratic areas, like Cary).

Quigley looks like the odd man out in your map; basically, his district and Lipinksi's have been combined, and it looks like the combined district has a lot more of Lipinski's working-class White neighborhoods than Quigley's more affluent northside neighborhoods. I don't know for sure though; I'm definitely not a Chicagoland expert. I'd love to hear a perspective from someone who knows the area.

22, Democrat, AZ-01
Peace. Love. Gabby.


[ Parent ]
Someone can correct me but
I think Quigley lives in Lincoln Park. Which appears to be in the 2nd now.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
Camp is the incoming Chairman of Ways & Means
The Rethugs would want to protect someone in that position.

Nice work.
If it were me, though, I would have broken this up into separate diaries for each state.

Thanks
I get what you're saying, but I really dislike diary flood. Knowing how much work can go into one of these, it's not a light decision for me to bump the bottom diary off the front page.

Also, only the NC map is actually a serious proposal. The other two are only exercises in demonstrating particular concepts that aren't applicable to the legal (MI) and political (IL) realities.

30, male, MI-11 (previously VA-08). Evangelical, postconservative, green.


[ Parent ]
Sent an email to your
Gmail account.

Re: IL
IL is supposed to lose a seat in redistricting, so I'm not sure how accurate your map will be.

Otherwise, you guarantee a Dem pickup of a net of two seats. Your IL-14 should be safe for Foster, and Democrats should win IL-8 (if a Bean-type moderate runs) and IL-17 (Johnson, Schilling, and Hare all end up in the same district; Schilling would teabag Johnson and lose to a Dem in the general). However, you drew Costello and Shimkus into IL-12; I have a feeling Shimkus would win that matchup.

Regarding the second VRA district, Guiterrez lives in IL-5 as currently drawn so I imagine he would run there and displace Quigley. I would rather the 2nd VRA district crowd out Lipinski as we're not likely to get a strong progressive from the new IL-4...but it may not be doable.


I can't believe I didn't know that Illinois is (probably) losing a seat
Thanks for your comments.

You're right about Costello and Shimkus in IL-12 -- I assumed that Shimkus would continue to run in one of the other two southern Illinois districts. It's not entirely uncommon for someone to run in a district they don't live in, especially after redistricting. If I understand correctly, two of North Carolina's thirteen representatives are in that position.

30, male, MI-11 (previously VA-08). Evangelical, postconservative, green.


[ Parent ]
I like your Illinois
It looks much better than the current IL

26, male, Dem, NJ-12


Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox