Google Ads


Site Stats

2010 - NOT the year of the woman

by: markhanna

Wed Nov 24, 2010 at 1:56 PM EST


So the starting point for this diary was another diary, which I can't seem to find, but which I remember from the heady days of early 2009, when Dems seemed poised to pull a 1934 (at least in the Senate) and gain seats for the third cycle in a row. This diarist made the point that with such candidates as Katherine Sebelius in Kansas, Janet Napolitano in Arizona, Robin Carnahan in Missouri, Jennifer Brunner in Ohio and Christy Vilsack in Iowa, 2010 was poised to be a true year of the woman in politics, and particularly Democratic woman.

Yeah, well, that didn't happen.

So how'd women do in 2010. Well, Democratic women did terribly in general, but for women overall, there was the (kinda) good, the bad, and the ugly. Let's review.  

markhanna :: 2010 - NOT the year of the woman
The (kinda) good - the Governors

The Governors races were a mixed bag for women, which qualifies as good. The three losses were all due to retirements (Jodi Rell, Jennifer Granholm and Linda Lingle) and were balanced by three wins - Mary Fallin in Oklahoma, Susana Martinez in New Mexico and Nikki Haley in South Carolina. The later two are women of color, and regardless of your view of politics it's kind of cool to see a woman of Indian descent governing the state where the civil war started. Of course, all these were Republicans. There were some big losses for women as well, notably Meg Whitman in California, Karen Handel in Georgia and (from my perspective, the most heartbreaking), Alex Sink in Florida. Still, women held their own, and given there wasn't a huge amount of potential for women beyond the California, Georgia and Florida's races, I'm going to label the governor's results good.

The Bad - the Senate

Women held their own in the Senate - there will still be 17 Senators in the next session of Congress, with Kelly Ayotte replacing Blanche Lincoln. But given the potential: Robin Carnahan in Missouri, Elaine Marshall in North Carolina, Jennifer Brunner in Ohio, Roxanne Conlin in Iowa, Sharon Angle in Nevada, Christine O'Donnell in Delaware, Jane Norton in Colorado as well as earlier in the cycle, Martha Coakley in Massachusetts, not to mention the candidates who didn't run, holding their own was certainly not a good result. Women can take comfort from some of major retentions: Barbara Boxer, Patty Murray, Kirsten Gillibrand and probably the biggest win other than Ayotte, Lisa Murkowski (possibly the most gratifying win considering what a major ass**** Joe Miller turned out to be). But overall, the results were bad, considering the optimism that people had two years ago for this cycle.

The Ugly - The House

Here's all you need to know: according to the Center for American Women in Politics, the number of women in the House will drop for the first time since 1979. That's right: while nine Republican women won (and no incumbent Republican women lost House races), 10 Democratic women lost. The number of women in the House goes from 73 to 72. In addition to that, Nancy Pelosi, the highest ranking woman in the U.S. government, will lose her position come January.

http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/pr...

So, yeech, right? Beyond the ugly numbers, there were a couple of interesting victories. Vicky Hartzler took out the reigning chairman of the Armed Services Committee, Ike Skelton, scoring one of the bigger upsets of the cycle (and I'm a progressive, but does anyone think this would have gotten more publicity if the parties were reversed?). Jaime Herrera was the first Republican woman of Latino heritage elected outside of Florida. Renee Ellmers took out a seven term Dem Rep in North Carolina. And Colleen Hanabusa not only became the only Democratice women to oust a Republican incumbent, but made Hawaii the first state with more than one seat to have an all woman House delegation.

But still, yeech.

The future - 2012

For the governors races in 2012, things don't look great. Bev Purdue in North Carolina is one of the more unpopular incumbents, and Christine Gregorie is in a little better shape but has not announced whether she will run for a third term in Washington.

The good news about the Senate is that only two female incumbents, Claire McCaskill in Missouri and Kay Bailey Hutchinson in Texas look to be in any sort of trouble, and the latter will likely retire. Feel free to speculate who might be some potential female challengers for the Senate.

We can only hope the House elections go better in 2012. Certainly quality candidates like Ann Kuster in New Hampshire are likely to run again and hopefully win. It feels like it can't get worse than this year.  

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

I would add
I would add Debbie Stabenow and Olympia Snowe to the list of 2012 women in trouble.

Yep, good additions both.


[ Parent ]
Definitely
Though I'd still put Debbie Stabenow as much stronger than Olympia Snowe (as Olympia may either retire or be primaried).

1 Other women whose seat may potentially flip: Dianne Feinstein (retirement). We'll see though.


[ Parent ]
Dianne Feinstein?
Didn't she already announce that she's running for reelection?  

26, Liberal Democrat, gay male, CA-38

[ Parent ]
she may have, but it is possible to change one's mind
    DiFi is nearly 80 and while that is not ancient by Senate standards, she might decide to retire or might have to because of health issues. Not that she now has any I am aware of; I saw her a few days before the election at a Boxer event and she seemed like herself, though very old. I think the last time I saw her live was in 1994.

52, male, disgruntled Democrat, CA-28

[ Parent ]
California
Has such a big bench of possible Democratic candidates, and such a weak bench of Republicans that it seems like an open seat would be Connecticut 2010 redux; a Democratic gimme that Republicans will dump money into for no good apparent reason. I'd think a Feinstein retirement would help; get a more liberal Democrat in and hope Republicans take the bait. What Republican in California would possibly be able to make it a race (and nobody say Tom Campbell).

MI-06 (home), MI-02 (college)

20, Democrat, Male, MI-06 (Home), MI-02 (College)


[ Parent ]
And moreover
Most of the potential successors to DiFi are women. Sure you've got your Antonio Villaraigosa and Gavin Newsom, but you've also got Debra Bowen and your pick of the litter from Reps. Jackie Speier/Loretta Sanchez/Karen Bass/Susan Davis/Judy Chu.

22, Democrat, AZ-01
Peace. Love. Gabby.


[ Parent ]
For Stabenow...
the bench of possible female Republican challengers (Candice Miller, Ruth Johnson, Terri Lynn Land) is relatively large actually, but unfortunately none of them are probably going to make the race. It's probably good that Miller wouldn't run, since she's, at the moment, the only female period in the Michigan House delegation and would probably be replaced by a more conservative male Republican.

MI-06 (home), MI-02 (college)

20, Democrat, Male, MI-06 (Home), MI-02 (College)


[ Parent ]
On Stabenow
While I agree Olympia Snowe should be added to the vulnerable list, I have a hard time deciding how vulnerable I really think Stabenow is. I think 2010 was a high water mark for Republicans in Michigan, and Stabenow will be running in a presidential year, when I'm sure Michigan will go Dem.

I think McCaskill is in much more trouble.  


[ Parent ]
I completely agree with you...
For reasons I've outlined elsewhere, but I still think its a rather sad that in 2000 Michigan had two female Representatives, and lost two and gained one in 2000, one of them by blatantly targeting her (Lynn Rivers), even if Stabenow did win here race. It's interesting that the new Democratic state senate leader (Gretchen Whitmer) in Michigan is female, and that the second in charge in the House for Dems is also female (Kate Segal). Both would probably make strong challengers to Mike Rogers and Tim Walberg respectively in 2012 also.

MI-06 (home), MI-02 (college)

20, Democrat, Male, MI-06 (Home), MI-02 (College)


[ Parent ]
MI-8 Whitmer as a strong challenger not enough
It is worth noting that the elder Byrum lost to Rogers by only 121 votes -- far less than the swing after "final" results announced her winning.  Botched election procedures in Lansing and East Lansing alone could have accounted for more than that.

After redistricting, two years later, she was still in the state senate, but instead of seeking a rematch, she dropped down to the house (and became leader).  Two years after that, she still didn't seek a rematch -- she faded out of direct electoral politics almost completely.  (She has since taken an electoral education seat, and her daughter currently holds the house seat.)  If "strong candidate" were sufficient, I think she would have run again at least once ... so I suspect that Mike Rogers is safe unless Republicans intentionally weaken him to shore up another district.

Also note that Whitmer's own ambitious announcement (from which she backed away) was for a statewide race, not for Congress.


[ Parent ]
Great diary
Thanks for contributing to the site. This is the sort of thing we'd love to see more of, just in general.

Thanks David!
Means a lot.  

[ Parent ]
Jane Norton, not Gail
Gale Norton was former Secretary of the Interior.

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


It's pretty hard to avoid the obvious inference--
Republicans tend to be not only more racist, but also more sexist than do Democrats.

68, Dem-leaning indie, MI-8


Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox