Google Ads


Site Stats

SSP Daily Digest: 11/10

by: Crisitunity

Wed Nov 10, 2010 at 2:52 PM EST


AK-Sen: The big news out of Alaska is that Joe Miller is now suing to disenfranchise bad spellers. It's probably his only path to victory, forcing the state to adhere to a strict absolutely-spelled-correctly standard for "Lisa Murkowski" instead of a looser standard of analyzing voter intent. Miller's lawyer is asking a federal judge for a hearing this afternoon, seeing as how the state is planning to begin the process of checking and counting the 92,000 write-in ballots cast. Miller did get a leg up from the absentee count (of 27,000 additional ballots) issued yesterday, though. Murkowski went into yesterday leading by 13,439 votes (a 7% spread) and came out leading by 11,333 (a 5% spread). That's not the end of the absentee and early-vote count, either; another 12,000 remain to be counted, on top of all the write-in analysis.

MA-Sen: I wonder just what the heck Marty Meehan is planning to do with his millions of dollars ($4.5 mil -- compare that with likely candidate Mike Capuano's $91K CoH!) in cash on hand, currently getting moldy in some bank vault. The ex-Rep. and current university president deferred on yet another Senate run, saying he won't challenge Scott Brown in 2012. At any rate, even with the most-loaded potential challenger out (short of Some Millionaire showing up and swamping the race with self-funding), the Beltway CW still is still treating Scott Brown as the most endangered GOPer for 2012, and that seems to have gotten amplified with the generally-strong top-to-bottom performance of Dems last week in the Bay State, suggesting that the Senate special election may have operated in its own little unusual vacuum.

ME-Sen: Turnabout's fair play, I guess. With the DC press trying to drum up some drama out of (possibly non-existent) GOP overtures to get Joe Manchin and Ben Nelson to switch parties, now there's word from, uh, somebody about Dem outreach to Olympia Snowe to get her to switch (and avoid a likely teabagging in a 2012 GOP primary).

MT-Sen: We mentioned businessman and losing 2008 Lt. Gov. candidate Steve Daines yesterday as a potential challenger to Jon Tester, and it looks like he's already moving full speed ahead. He'll be announcing his bid this Saturday.

NE-Sen: Right on cue, here's the first Republican-sponsored poll of the 2012 cycle showing Ben Nelson in deep shit. The poll, commissioned by the state Republican party from Voter/Consumer Research, finds Nelson trailing the one announced candidate, AG Jon Bruning, by a 50-35 margin. (He also trails Generic R 42-32, and Gov. Dave Heineman 59-31, although Heineman has already said he's not running.) Interestingly, he's still above water on his approvals, which are 50/41... but it's a red enough state that that may not be enough to save him.

NV-Sen: PPP is turning its attention to 2012 already, and its first poll is a juicy place to start: the GOP primary in Nevada. This is something of a surprise, at least upending the conventional wisdom: John Ensign has significant leads over both his highest-profile potential primary opponents. He beats Rep. Dean Heller 45-37, and Lt. Gov. Brian Krolicki 55-27. Those leads may not hold up across a campaign, though, as Ensign has much higher name rec than either opponent. He's at 64/23 (remember, this is only Republicans in the sample, who, if David Vitter is any indication, are firm believers in the principle of IOKIYAR), while Heller is at 56/8 and Krolicki is at 45/9.

RI-Sen: The names are also floating up for potential Republican challengers to Sheldon Whitehouse, with so-so approvals but not considered terribly vulnerable in his blue-state perch. State GOP chair Giovanni Cicione is publicly weighing a bid (although he's also saying that he's pushing outgoing Gov. Don Carcieri to make a bid, though he doesn't sound interested). Two other possibilities mentioned in the article include Warwick mayor Scott Avedisian and Cranston mayor Allen Fung.

WV-Sen: This whole thing is getting a little too meta for me: with the perception out there of having gotten publicly burned on their attempts to get Joe Manchin to switch parties, now NRSC spokespersons are trying to say that the whole rumors of the outreach (which may or may not have actually happened) originated with the Manchin camp, so that he can bolster his bipartisan credentials. I can't decide whether the two camps are truly playing 3-D chess with each other or it's just devolved into high school mean-girls behavior at this point.

CA-11, CA-20: Jerry McNerney keeps adding to his lead, making this one looking likely to get called soon. He's now up by 2,269 votes after a batch came in from blue Alameda County. We don't have any specific new numbers to report for you further south in the 20th, but the long-awaited dump of Fresno County ballots (where Jim Costa has led by a significant margin over Andy Vidak) is scheduled for later today, which is expected to push Costa into the lead (Vidak currently leads by only 145 right now, thanks to his home base of Kings County).

FL-22: Allen West's hiring of a controversial talk show host as his chief of staff (payback for her constant boosterism of his campaign) is not only great fodder for the sheer litany of terrible things she's said (click the link for more), but it also may run into ethical and even FCC problems if she keeps her other job as radio host. The counsel for the House Committee on Standards of Ethical Conduct said the situation is "potentially problematic" because of conflicts of interest, and a different expert says it may also pave the way for demands for equal time on the air for whoever West's 2012 opponent is.

PA-11: You may remember Corey O'Brien, the Lackawanna County Commissioner who lost the Dem primary in the 11th to Paul Kanjorski back in May. With the elderly Kanjorski not likely to try for a rematch, O'Brien looks to be in the driver's seat with regards to the Dem nomination for 2012 to go up against Lou Barletta in this D+4 district (though that's subject to the redistricting pen, of course). The buzz is he's a near-definite candidate, although he might face a primary bout with Scranton mayor (and, briefly, gubernatorial candidate) Chris Doherty.

DCCC: In case you didn't know, lawyers get really expensive really fast. One of Chris Van Hollen's last acts as DCCC head is to send out a fundraising blast to donors, trying to round up $100K to cover potential recount activity in (according to him) nine different races.

House: Nate Silver's new piece matches what I've seen a lot of in the comments (and my own perceptions, as well): the idea that 2012 should be a year of happy hunting for Dems in the House (although, especially with redistricting giving a boost to the GOP, a heavy lift to get back into the majority). The balance of mismatched seats has switched dramatically: now there are 12 Dems in seats that Obama lost (down from 50), and 55 GOPers in seats that Obama won (up from 28). Even if that's old news to you, the array of graphs is worth checking out.

IA-St. Sen.: It looks like things have been finalized in Iowa, and the state Senate is at least one closely-decided legislative chamber that we pulled out of the fire. Democrat Tod Bowman's 71-vote victory in SD-13 gives the Dems 26-24 control over the body. (One other outstanding race, where the GOPer is narrowly leading, could also break for the Dems.) That leaves the Oregon state Senate as the chamber that's still probably the biggest question mark.

Chicago mayor: We've been meaning for a while now to do a comprehensive who's-in-who's-out post about the mayoral race in Chicago, but here's a potentially big name that deserves immediate mention... if only because he's in the House, and if there's one thing SSP is all about at this point in the cycle, it's the Open Seat Watch. Rep. Danny Davis of IL-07 on Chicago's West Side (who'd previously flirted with and decided against a bid for Cook Co. Executive) is now expressing interest in the race, saying he's "ready to run." In a boost to his prospects, a coalition of black religious and community leaders that had previously supported ex-Sen. Carol Mosely Braun for the job has reversed course, and is now backing Davis.

Crisitunity :: SSP Daily Digest: 11/10
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

What about the NY St. Senate?
Do we have any hope?

if it's 32-30
the 32nd Republican is Grisanti, who is a registered Democrat.

[ Parent ]
But 30th Dem is Tim Kennedy
Who vote with the Republicans to give the GOP control of the Niagra County Legislature.

The 29th Dem is Carl Kruger who crossed the ailse and took a committee chairmanship the last time the GOP ran the place and the 28th is the Rev. Rubin Diaz who is the Rev Ruben Diaz so anything can happen.

Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


[ Parent ]
So, for the purposes of keeping 4 Dems happy
a lot of shuffling would need to go on with Cuomo that he'd probably hate to do. Stuff like Tim Kennedy having a good Senate Seat to run in (and a good Congressional seat if he is that inclined in 2012/beyond). Or Lots of goodies to the Espada/Monserrate sector of the caucus. Or giving Grisante some symbolic post to make him #31 without angering the other 3.

Then again, it all could change if a NYS Republican Senator accepts an appointment and resigns.


[ Parent ]
I don't remember that ever happening n/t


"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Danny Davis
He's a good Rep. but I hope he runs for Mayor because:
1. We need an credible alternative to Rahm.
2. He's getting old and I want a fresh face representing me in Congress.
3. Having a second black Mayor of Chicago would be good. A big fucking deal if you will.

19, gay male, IL-7, MN 4 (college), Dem

While we're on Chicago Mayor, this article is going to look very smart or very dumb in a few months
http://www.chicagobusiness.com...

   Call it the last twitches of a corpse - in this case, the final spasms of that group of aldermen, unions, 19th Warders and others who desperately want to find someone who can keep Rahm Emanuel from becoming the next mayor of Chicago.


21, male, CA-15 (home and voting there), LA-2 (college)



[ Parent ]
Miller's suit
Alaska law regarding write-ins was revised and tightened in 2000. Here are the relevant provisions:

(9) Write-in votes are not invalidated by writing in the name of a candidate whose name is printed on the ballot unless the election board determines, on the basis of other evidence, that the ballot was so marked for the purpose of identifying the ballot.

(10) In order to vote for a write-in candidate, the voter must write in the candidate's name in the space provided and fill in the oval opposite the candidate's name in accordance with (1) of this subsection.

(11) A vote for a write-in candidate, other than a write-in vote for governor and lieutenant governor, shall be counted if the oval is filled in for that candidate and if the name, as it appears on the write-in declaration of candidacy, of the candidate or the last name of the candidate is written in the space provided.(12) If the write-in vote is for governor and lieutenant governor, the vote shall be counted if the oval is filled in and the names, as they appear on the write-in declaration of candidacy, of the candidates for governor and lieutenant governor or the last names of the candidates for governor and lieutenant governor, or the name, as it appears on the write-in declaration of candidacy, of the candidate for governor or the last name of the candidate for governor is written in the space provided.

(b) The rules set out in this section are mandatory and there are no exceptions to them. A ballot may not be counted unless marked in compliance with these rules.


Hmm, a judge may likely be deciding who wins this election,
by deciding:
1) To enforce that wording strictly and allow zero misspellings.
Or
2) Accept minor misspellings.  From that article: Lt. Gov. Craig Campbell: "The courts have been very clear for the last 25 years that voter intent is important," "You do not want to disenfranchise voters over a technicality."

Miller now only needs 5% misspellings (down from 7%) to win. (And that margin might go even lower once all the absentees are processed)


[ Parent ]
Anecdotally, 10% of the write-ins are being challenged by Miller's lawyers, and
90% of those challenges are overruled and allowed by the Elections Director Fenumiai.
From this link: Write-in counting begins
... around 98 percent of the write-in ballots cast appear to be for Lisa Murkowski. Roughly 10 percent of those are being challenged by the Miller campaign on spelling grounds.
But Thoma said the Division of Elections is overruling 90 percent of those challenges. The Miller campaign than re-challenges. Those ballots will get another review during the expected recounts (with the courts having the final say.)


[ Parent ]
Yup
I believe you're right.

1. Campbell is ignoring one thing - the courts have never ruled on voter intent involving write-ins, all of the previous cases have involved issues like voters using an X over an oval instead of filling it in completely.

2. Alaska law was specifically narrowed  a few years ago to eliminate judgement calls by election officials.


[ Parent ]
PA-11
O'Brien isn't going to get anything close to a D+4 district after reapportionment.  I've been looking over the maps and I suspect the GOP is simply going to trade out Carbon and Monroe Counties (now part of the 11th) with the current tenth district.  PA-10 is already R+8, and Carbon and Monroe are swingy, so Marino would still be relatively secure.

In exchange for Carbon and Monroe, the 11th district can then easily be expanded westward to include the "lower leg" portion of the current 10th - very conservative areas of Lycoming, Montour, Union, Snyder and Northumberland Counties.  That would make both districts have a light but definite Republican lean.


couldn't they also
drop Scranton into PA-10 without much of an effect on PA-10, while securing PA-11 more for Barletta?

Anybody want to comment on St. Sen. John Blake (D-Archbald) or any of the other candidates in the primary field for that seat (Wansacz, Chris Doherty, Chuck Volpe). Ok, first term state Senators who won their first primary with 22% are not ideal candidates for the US Congress, but he wouldn't have to risk his seat to run.

You know some legislator somewhere is gonna fall into our laps as a Congressional candidate once his district gets screwed with in redistricting by Republicans.


[ Parent ]
FL-22
Could West be anymore of a trainwreck?  Why would he hire this woman?  I am working on the theory that the reason so many of these type people got in vs. the senate Teabaggers is the lack of scrutiny on US House nominees.

I believe (hope?) that we probably would have eeked out a few more close wins if there was more scrutiny of some of these nominees.  Or, am I being too hopeful?

Is it really that voters do not care enough?

41 African-American Female DC
Taxation but no representation...


i dont think you are being too hopeful at all


[ Parent ]
Neither do I. nm
nm

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
My Brother's Congressman
Hopefully only for one term.  

36, M, Democrat, MD-03

[ Parent ]
A few things:
1. Wouldn't it be a little amusing if Scott Brown taking the seat that was occupied by Teddy Kennedy for so long forced the Republicans to drop a lot of money into Massachusetts only to lose the seat, possibly by double digits? This would be money, after all, that would be otherwise spent in Virginia, Montana, and Missouri, to name three states.

2. If it's early enough to be releasing polls and announcing candidacies for 2012, it's early enough for the DSCC to give Nelson a deadline to decide if he is running. It looks like he is, but nothing would damage the party more in that state than to give a Democrat that would already have something of an uphill climb less time to make his case. If he is going to run, he needs to figure out something to change his momentum. (I don't know exactly what that could be, but he would know better than me.) If he's not going to run, the Democrats need to come up with a list of plausible candidates and map out paths to victory for each one.

3. Why would Snowe switch parties now? And more to the point, do Democrats want her? She seems like a reasonable enough Republican, but she's still a Republican. If she is given the boot by her state party, that instantly becomes, at worst, a fifty-fifty shot for the Democrats.

Sorry to sound like a conspiracy theorist here, but are Democrats planting stories like this? I could imagine a theme developing where the idea that she is open to the idea and such an idea eventually making it unlikely she wins a primary. There's a history of supposed overtures, after all.


"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?


I think we will see a
party switch from someone. I am not sure who but someone in the senate will flip.

I also think we will see a flip in the house from a Conservative, maybe Boren or Ross. It is just a gut feeling.  

TX-13,22,Dem


[ Parent ]
Party Switches...
I seriously doubt it. If they flip then they have no intention of running for re-election again ala Jeffords. If you switch parties you are DOA in the respective primary election. Nelson is DOA as a Republican based on his "liberal" voting record. I don't know about Snowe in a Democratic primary but she won't switch as her ties are deep to the Party. The House members you mentioned know the Parker Griffith story. Switch and you will be tea bagged no matter your voting record. Your political future would be done if you were to switch in this day and age of highly polarized primaries.  

28, Male, Democrat VA-08  

[ Parent ]
Could Snowe survive as an "I"
With Maine's past track record of electing Independents Governor, could Snowe switch to an Independent affiliation and get by caucusing with either side? Or at this point, is it just stick it out as an R or retire?  

Democrat: TN-8

[ Parent ]
Also, when would Snowe need to decide on going Indy?
Does she have to decide in advance of the Repub primary to file to run as an Indy?
Or can she wait and see if by some longshot she wins the R primary? And then go Indy if (or when) she loses?

Or after posing the primary, she also could try a write-in campaign, like Murkowski seems about to pull off.


[ Parent ]
I disagree that its immediate DOA...
Plus Snowe isn't DOA in a Republican primary either.  Christine O'Donnell didn't win by a ton.  Someone said this before but I think LePage could help her if he vocally supported her.  Tea Partiers didn't win every primary.  It's situational.  

I think Minnick might have had a shot in a Republican primary.  In fact, I wonder if he accepted the Tea Party endorsement as a Democrat instead of rejecting it, maybe it might have made a difference.  If they really, honestly worked to get him re-elected, (especially with Labrador as the Republican candidate) things could have been different.


[ Parent ]
Snowe is a much more high-profile
'RINO' than Castle ever was. If I recall correctly, PPP actually polled her against some to me completely unknown local Republican- some 2006 gubernatorial loser, Chandler Woodcock. She actually TRAILED Woodcock, someone with little name recognition, I guess, and that's 2 years out.  

18- Hamburg, Germany (non-US-citizen)

[ Parent ]
I think . .
that Boren and Ross could probably survive a switch -- especially Ross.  The GOP does not have much of a bench in SW Arkansas so I think Ross could survive a GOP primary.  And I doubt that Ross would lose to another Dem in the general. Nor is Obama going to provide any coattails, given the fact that he is likely to lose Arkansas by double digits in 2012.  

Frankly, Boren is a Republican in all but name.  And, given his family background, he may (like Chafee) decide to remain a Democrat so long as he has a seat in Congress.

Which, by the way, may not be long, as the GOP controls redistricting in Oklahoma.  


[ Parent ]
OK is not projected to lose a seat, are they?
That's really the only way they can get rid of him.  He already represents a conservative district.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
Ross
voted for the stimulus and took money from Bill Clinton. He's got plenty of D voting baggage that could haunt him in a GOP primary, I don't think he'll ever switch or wants to. I do not like him, but he's not as conservative as Bright or Boren. I could see Boren switching purely because I think he fits better with the GOP. Do not get me wrong I hope he doesn't but for goodness sake the guy has a pic of Bush on his desk, WTF. I assume it would go against his dad's wishes and that weighs on him. He would make it through a GOP primary, they love him.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
It's been pretty consistant
in studies over the years that when a Senator or Congressman switch parties, they become more like their new party.  They do not simply keep their old behaviors.

The same is true for long term voters who switch parties.  They become more like the partisans of the new party.  


[ Parent ]
Yeah, Specter
for example, pretty much became a good Dem vote after his switch.
Of course since he was instantly into a primary contest, he had to be on his very best voting behavior.

(I seem to recall a study Nate Silver did on party switching pols)


[ Parent ]
I could see that, but
is there not anyone in the state that is more liberal than Snowe who would last more than one or at most two terms?

"I have never deliberately given anybody hell. I just tell the truth on the opposition-and they think it's hell."--President Harry Truman. President Obama, are you listening?

[ Parent ]
Former RNC Vice-Chair, Ambassador considering run for MO-Sen
http://kmox.cbslocal.com/2010/...
Former Ambassador to Luxembourg and former RNC Vice-chair Ann Wagner is considering a run against McCaskill, but would probably not run if Talent or Kinder did. She could raise a ton of money.  

The list of Republican women to win statewide in Missouri
Margaret Kelly (appointed auditor, re-elected 3 times, lost for Lt. Gov, lost for Gov)
Sarah Steelman (elected Treasurer, lost Gov primary)

that is all.

I could see an unnecessarily bloody primary for Wagner or Talent. The people who could hold off on Roy Blunt (who had an obviously rocksolid conservative record) may not hold back on Talent (who has a long DC record and a 1-2 statewide record) or Wagner (who has no real conservative credentials aside from being a chairperson).

Of course, raising tons of money is not a requirement considering the current campaign finance deform can elevate candidates easily by having someone else spend money for them.


[ Parent ]
Not
a strong candidate. C list at best. You guys could do better.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Have you seen
The other choices? I mean really, Jim Talent and Sam Graves?  

[ Parent ]
Kind of.
Still I think you can find someone better. What about the Congressman that ran for Governor in 08? The ex Treasurer, the LG, Emerson or some leader in the state senate or house? Emerson or the LG would pose the strongest challenges.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
I would pick Graves or Emerson
Graves is the more conservative of the two and has over-performed in what was once a swing district, winning by a huge margin in 2008 when many expected a close race.

Emerson is more moderate and might have a tough time in a primary, but she represents the rural part of the state that McCaskill did well in last time. If she gets the nomination, she should play well with moderate female voters, a key demographic for this race.

20, CD MA-03/NH-01/MA-08


[ Parent ]
Emerson is my pick
She'd have a tough time against Steelman or Graves in a primary though. Graves is way to focused on social issues for my taste. Emerson is more toned down and a strong fundraiser and campaigner. Kinder would be best, but he's running for Gov.  

[ Parent ]
Emerson is married to a Dem mover&shaker
plus she's a woman who isn't sufficiently nutty, she'd be toasted in a statewide primary

[ Parent ]
WTF? Emerson sucks as a politician
Who the heck says Emerson is a good fundraiser OR a good campaigner? I'm sorry, but this meme has to stop. Because. She. Is. Awful. She got outraised by a nobody (Tommy Sowers) in several quarters, and barely outraised him overall, and if she wasn't in such a red district she would've gotten her ass handed to her. As it was, she got the lowest percentage she's ever gotten since her original election, despite it being a wave year that saw massive Republican victories. All because she had an actual opponent instead of the cakewalk she normally has.

Not only would she get nuked in the primary (easily) she sucks as a campaigner. Plus, she'd leave her seat open and put Sowers in a decent position for a pick-up. She's safe where she is, but the minute she actually has a race, she will become the cycle's biggest FAILorina.  

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


[ Parent ]
then again
Sowers was raising tons of money to not break 30% while Dems lost 2 or 3 state house seats in that district. Gotta have mixed feelings there. Sowers' fundraising people should get future work out of this campaign. But it's hard to spin a 2-1 loss into a positive.

[ Parent ]
People touted Sowers as something for months
Emerson held him to less than 29% of the vote. He barely did better than Robyn Hamlin, the GOP sacrificial lamb with no money in MO-01, Lacy Clay's VRA district that is much more Democratic than MO-08 is Republican. I agree that Emerson is has gone largely untested over her career, and her fundraising is not great, but Sowers was a legit opponent and she creamed him.

I do worry about Emerson's ability to survive a bloody primary and hold up under the spotlight of the general. But if she disproves the persistent rumors of a glass jaw, she'll be a tough draw for McCaskill.

20, CD MA-03/NH-01/MA-08


[ Parent ]
Her
fundraising really sucks and Sowers is debatable as a serious opponent. She would be a strong candidate, I'm not saying she wouldn't but you have to consider she is coming from a very safe R district. You always have to be careful with candidates who have not had to work for it in awhile, candidates can get rusty.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Sowers was a strong fundraiser
Does not mean she was a weak fundraiser. I don't think that anyone would argue that b/c Allen West outraised Ron Klein that Klein was a weak fundraiser. Sowers won 29%, even though he was a very highly touted candidate. He would not be favored to pick it up.  

[ Parent ]
Partyy switchinh
When are we going to realize that there's a reason why Blue Dogs and people in deep red territory stay Dems?  Because they are Dems, if they wanted to switch they could have done it years ago.  Parker Griffith was a bit of an unknown entity was he not?  It wasn't like Mike Ross who's been a loyal Democrat for years and comes from the Land of Clinton.

People just get mad at Ross because he believes in for profit health services.  Now some say that if you believe in for profit health services that you're not a true Dem and there we will have to agree to disagree.  

Please donate to amcharities.org to help build more after school centers in the Miami area.  

23, Democrat, IA-2


Plenty of Dems that switched parties after '94 had held elected office for years before switching to the Republicans
That is, both on a state or federal level. Remember Ralph Hall?

I'm not interested in debating who is most likely to party switch, but I don't buy the defense that Dems (or Republicans) will remain with their current affiliation just because that's what they've always done.  

Independent Socialist & Chair of SSP Cranky Indianian Hoosier Caucus, IN-09


[ Parent ]
Ralph Hall
Good point, Ralph Hall maybe would still be a Dem if redistricting didn't make him nervous.  He still fights like mad for NASA funding and for different projects.  

Please donate to amcharities.org to help build more after school centers in the Miami area.  

23, Democrat, IA-2


[ Parent ]
Hall's stated reason
for switching parties was that Republicans were blocking money for his district solely because he was a Democrat.

26, white male, TX-24, liberal-leaning independent

[ Parent ]
Boren and Ross . . .
could probably justify a jump on similar grounds.  And Boren could also argue the redistricting point.  

[ Parent ]
Um, no.
   People got mad at Ross because he made a public spectacle of trying to kill the health reform bill. Nothing Obama ever proposed put private health care in jeopardy.

 

24, Male, GA-05


[ Parent ]
Umm..I never said that it did
Obama never did threaten private insurance, but I'm very glad Mike Ross did make a spectacle out of it because the bill does eliminate plans if they don't have a certain number of people enrolled in the plans.  

Please donate to amcharities.org to help build more after school centers in the Miami area.  

23, Democrat, IA-2


[ Parent ]
In a number of cases
it's because the Democratic primary is easy for a conservative with the proper credentials and establishment ties to win.

Republican primaries are much more of a crap shoot in recent years.  Literally.


[ Parent ]
not literally
They didn't decide the primary with dice.  Pet peeve #5.

[ Parent ]
The last election of 2010
December 29th, 2010. Honolulu City Council, District 1 Special Election, conducted via all-mail. Incumbent Council Member Todd Apo resigned to take a job with Walt Disney Resorts.

The only candidate in the articles is Bob McDermott (who was a State Rep, and who lost to the late Patsy Mink in 2002, and lost a special election big in 2003). Filing opened today, and ends on Friday the 19th.

Honolulu's City Council is nonpartisan. But if anybody has a stack of 1959-1990 Hawaii election results that they want to scan and send, well... I would gladly accept that so that the results can be filtered through the internet, because Hawaii election results are more interesting than you'd think.


Erickson claims Thune isn't running in 2012
ttp://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/11/10/john-thune-is-not-running-for-president-orrin-hatch-is-retiring/

If he's right, that's one fewer sane candidate standing in the way of Palin's path to victory ****crosses fingers****

Some Dude, 19, Democrat, NH-02 (residence), MA-08 (college)


Sorry about the link
http://www.redstate.com/erick/...

Some Dude, 19, Democrat, NH-02 (residence), MA-08 (college)

[ Parent ]
I'm in MA-08 as a student too!
Do you go to Harvard or MIT?

[ Parent ]
According
to the link Orrin Hatch is retiring?! Not that any Dem including one by the last name of Matherson would of won but it would of been fun to see fireworks go off during the convention.

19, Male, Independent, CA-12

[ Parent ]
lol
Boston University

Some Dude, 19, Democrat, NH-02 (residence), MA-08 (college)

[ Parent ]
Go BU!
That's where I just graduated from.  I used to force my friends to come over for "Election Day Parties," whether they had any interest in politics or not.

Male, 23, NJ-12

[ Parent ]
he's editorializing
Not even saying there are rumors that Thune won't run or that Hatch is retiring, he's saying that they are coming out as pro-earmark therefore they MUST have given up on the GOP base and therefore are crazy if they think they can win.

[ Parent ]
Erick Erickson has one source
In the US Senate, and its Jim DeMint, who has a credibility problem IMO.  

[ Parent ]
CA-20
New numbers from Fresno County. Costa increased his lead in Fresno county by 1345 votes, that should put him up 1200 overall.

"Where free Unions and collective bargaining is forbidden, freedom is lost." - Ronald Reagan

Heath Shuler Running for House Minority Leader
Can only help him in his district
He has no chance to win but come 2012 it will be tough to tie him to Pelosi.

"Where free Unions and collective bargaining is forbidden, freedom is lost." - Ronald Reagan

[ Parent ]
Definitely a WTF Moment
The sort of Democrats who might be interesting in backing a guy like him over Nancy Pelosi just got wiped out.  

36, M, Democrat, MD-03

[ Parent ]
I hope he wins (but he won't)
Pelosi running again is beyond stupid for the Democrats. Did a 60+ seat shellacking teach them nothing?

"Where free Unions and collective bargaining is forbidden, freedom is lost." - Ronald Reagan

[ Parent ]
I
wish there was a better alternative than Shuler. I mean you have people from more liberal districts, that are liberals themselves, wanting a new Speaker but Shuler is just too conservative. The fact he is so far to the right prevents him from posing a serious challenge. I think Larson could win.    

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Not my ideal candidte either
A vote for Shuler is purely a protest vote. It's to bad someone in between Shuler and Pelosi on the political spectrum is not making a run.

"Where free Unions and collective bargaining is forbidden, freedom is lost." - Ronald Reagan

[ Parent ]
I'm
more concerned with a fresh face, preferably as liberal but I could live with a centrist (Hoyer,Chandler). Larson is plenty liberal but less controversial and would be a serious candidate. I just want someone else. As Chris Mathews put it if this was a sports team she'd be out, doesn't matter if it's her fault or not.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
A centrist would guarantee us being in the minority....
...for a long time.  You don't regain the majority by cutting deals with the opposition and being republican lite.  The DLC philosophy never won us any seats.  The 90's should have taught us that lesson well.

[ Parent ]
Read
my comment again. I'm not advocating for a centrist, I say I want a liberal. I just want a fresh face. Pelosi has led us for eight years. She's done great but it's time for someone new. I know the GOP will try to do the same to a new leader but Pelosi is an easier target, SF latte drinking liberal and what not. We just got crushed, we need to regroup and a new leader is needed. Just my view.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
What about DWS?
She isn't as polarizing as Pelosi and is from a safe district. Plus, she has a bad relationship with Pelosi, supposedly.  

[ Parent ]
My ideal Minority Leader would be Xavier Becerra
He's smart, charismatic, progressive, and definitely a fresh face. Can you imagine him going opposite Boehner? Plus, he's a Pelosi protege, so he'd know what he's doing. And the fact that he's a Hispanic and would be one of the leaders of the Democratic Party could only help. Although he'd never challenge Pelosi, and I doubt he would have taken on Hoyer for the job either had Nancy retired. I guess I'll just have to wait it out

Some Dude, 19, Democrat, NH-02 (residence), MA-08 (college)

[ Parent ]
Pelosi didn't cause us to lose 60 seats
Nor would our choice of House Leader make any difference in our chances come 2012. Elections aren't decided by Party Leaders (unless there is obvious corruption, and that isn't the case with Pelosi).

Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01, Chairman of the Atheist Caucus, and Majority Leader of the "Going to Hell" caucus!


[ Parent ]
She didnt??
Did you miss the whole Fire Pelosi bus tour and all the media coverage in so many 'blue dog' districts? Theres no question the teabagger types ralleycried to defeat Pelosi. Like them or not, how many long term incumbent blue dog types lost where this was the Rs mantra?

60 seats her fault - no, easily a dozen or so and a case could be made that if two months ago she would have said she was stepping aside as leader in the next Congress, how many seats could have been saved? In many races it would have removed the best argument the R candidates had to send them to DC.

Like him or not, Newt knew when his time had passed.


[ Parent ]
Exactly zero
The people who really give a damn about Nancy Pelosi are already rabid partisans, period. Democrats lost in those districts because many of those districts are heavily Republican already and the economy sucks.

Your logic absolutely sucks, it reeks of cum hoc ergo propter hoc (or correlation does not imply causation), Pelosi was unpopular in those districts because she was the Democratic leader, and changing leaders midstream would simply mean that they replaced the Socialist Pelosi with the Socialist Hoyer (and then there would be people talking about how Steny Hoyer was completely at fault).

And Newt Gingrich stepped aside because of a personal scandal, not because "his time had passed", to say otherwise is to rewrite history.

Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01, Chairman of the Atheist Caucus, and Majority Leader of the "Going to Hell" caucus!


[ Parent ]
DGM is 100% correct, and people here have surprisingly poor memories......
The GOP lost the House in 2006 and lost another 20 seats in 2008, and what leadership changes did they make?  Hastert had retired before his party lost the House, but Boehner and Cantor were kept in place after 2006 and 2008.

Correlation does not equal causation.  That the GOP ran against Pelosi and simultaneously took the House doesn't mean their rants against Pelosi "worked," or even had any effect at all.

Wave elections are caused by big issues.  The 2006 wave was about Iraq, the 2008 wave about the economy and Bush fatigue, and the 2010 wave about the economy, and maybe for seniors also health care.

The only political personalities to ever drive voting behavior are the candidates themselves and the President.  And Obama isn't that unpopular, he's more popular in blue and purple states than Clinton was in 1994.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
correction...
>>Hastert had retired before his party lost the House<<

He only stepped aside after the 2006 Election, and didn't retire for another year.  I only note this because if he had retired prior to the Election, some other Republican would have been Speaker, and that was not the case.


[ Parent ]
Oops, that's right, thanks for the correction. My memory failed me on that one. (nm)
nm

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10

[ Parent ]
That's just looking at it with blinders on
Pelosi has been utterly hopeless at one of the biggest aspects of her job: leadership in terms of policy and public opinion.

One House dem called her "toxic" today, and she is, not because the wingnuts demonized her, but because she did NOTHING to un-demonize herself or present herself positively.

From a modern electoral politics perspective, she is a terrible politician, and a majority leader needs to not just rally the party but persuade the public.  Pelosi is falt out bad at that.  Time for someone else.


[ Parent ]
Congressional leaders don't influence public perceptions
They are, by definition, extremely polarizing figures. Success in congressional leadership is determined by what those leaders pass in congress, and frankly Nancy Pelosi is the most successful House Speaker in recent history, she has nothing to be ashamed of and people need to get a clue about the real function of congressional leadership.

Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01, Chairman of the Atheist Caucus, and Majority Leader of the "Going to Hell" caucus!


[ Parent ]
You're missing the point

Pelosi got attacked as the paradigm of a liberal.  The conservative, Not Pelosi, party in the Democratic two-party coalition lost the election.  And lost big.

The swing voters don't know and don't (and won't) care who Pelosi is.  The problem thus lies not with a Pelosi Effect in swing districts but pretty Republican ones.  Where her name stands to unify enough Republican voters against the incumbent Democrat that he loses.

The bottom line is that the last 5-10 conservative House Democrats representing majority Republican districts want Pelosi out because they believe that improves their chances of prevailing in the 2012 elections.  

There's a serious cost/benefit question of whether sacking Pelosi will actually save any of them.  My sense is that the GOP considers most of them ripe and relatively easy to defeat either way.  As it is, the GOP's realistic target list in House seats is pretty short- they won practically all the swing seats a week ago.  There's post redistricting mopping up, but that's not a big challenge.  That leaves wiping out the last Blue Dogs and a relative lot of resources per Blue Dog to do it.

There's also a more fundamental question to Democrats of whether these particular 5-10 House Reps are worth a lot of effort or sacrifice to save.  Personally, I think they're goners and that makes the question easy to answer.  Others may be more cautious.


[ Parent ]
Apparently you haven't been reading about all the Dems wanting to get pelosi to stand down
Party leaders are supposed to lead.  Pelosi has shown zero ability to promote an agenda and win over hearts and minds.

Saying swing voters don't know who Pelosi is, is exactly why she must be replaced.


[ Parent ]
You're grasping at straws now,
imo.

Pelosi has led in the House.  Who got 300+ bills passed through the House, most of which the Senate couldn't get onto the floor?

We have a Democratic President.  The top Democrat in the House matters as national leader of the Party when his/her Party does not have the Presidency and competes for the top spot in the Party with the top leader in the Senate.

Pelosi is at best #3 leader in the Party in the public eye.  We also have the special circumstance that Ted Kennedy was always on par with or higher than whoever was Democratic Senate Majority Leader or Minority Leader.  In effect she was #4 while Ted was alive.

No #3 or #4 Party leader ever gets a crowd of average people together, let alone enthused.

Face it, she doesn't actually matter.  She and Obama matter in serving as cover excuses for conservatives who want to vote Republican but are ashamed of what they're voting for.

We saw the same phenomenon of supposed wrongs by Kerry as the reason conservative-leaning swing voters voted for Bush in 2004.  Exit interviews shows that the voters didn't actually believe any of the claims they gave for why they didn't want to vote for Kerry and knew they were unwarranted or wrong.  The conclusion the interviewers drew was that they were deeply ashamed of voting for Bush and therefore had to concoct themselves a rationalization that they were voting against something bad associated with Kerry.


[ Parent ]
Face it, she matters
If she didn't matter you wouldn't have posted about it.

[ Parent ]
Well there are like another 28 blue dogs, right?
They might back him.

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01

[ Parent ]
SF Mayor
State senator Leland Yee throws his hat into the ring.

http://blogs.sacbee.com/capito...

19, Male, Independent, CA-12


AK-Sen
http://community.adn.com/adn/n...

he first batch of numbers is out and they show 89 percent of the write-ins counted so far were perfect for Lisa Murkowski.

Out of 7,638 write-ins counted just 67 wrote in someone other than Murkowski.

The Division of Elections says 6,804 votes were unchallenged for Murkowski. Another 678 of the ballots were challenged but the challenge was overruled by the Division.

There were only 89 successful challenges of Murkowski votes. That represents just 1.17 percent of the ballots counted.

There was one write in vote for Joe Miller.

By my math a 89% of the write ins would be enough to give Murkowski a small lead regardless if the misspelled Murkowski ballots are counted or not.

"Where free Unions and collective bargaining is forbidden, freedom is lost." - Ronald Reagan


[ Parent ]
Meant as a post not a reply
sorry

"Where free Unions and collective bargaining is forbidden, freedom is lost." - Ronald Reagan

[ Parent ]
How small
is your "small lead"?

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01

[ Parent ]
So far..
...there are 92,528 write in votes. 89% of that is 82,350. Miller currently has 81,195 votes so if the 89% holds her lead would be about 1155 votes.

http://www.elections.alaska.go...

"Where free Unions and collective bargaining is forbidden, freedom is lost." - Ronald Reagan


[ Parent ]
Except
Still 26,000 questioned and absentees to count on Friday. Miller gained 2,200 votes out of 30,000 counted yesterday.

[ Parent ]
would be awkward if
the Mayor winds up being Chiu..

although there is a difference. Yee was born in China, but was raised in San Francisco and is 20 years older. Chiu was born in America and raised in Boston.

So, I could see the pride in Chiu being dampened by people who few him as being less San Francisco than Yee.

But then again, being an appointed incumbent, or just making it there due to being the Board President isn't really a position of strength for Chiu unless he partners up with enough established figures to get the votes needed to win an election.

Oakland will still have their Chinese-American mayor first no matter what.


[ Parent ]
Ugh, Screw this guy
I have to register in SF, and then reregister in Orange County just to try to keep this ass out of office.

20, Male, Democrat, CA-44 (home) CA-12 (college)

[ Parent ]
I dont get
whats with the hate for Lee? If anything i'm proud of him for standing up to the massive budget cuts.

16, Male, Democrat, CA-42/sometimes CA-32.

[ Parent ]
*yee
n/t

16, Male, Democrat, CA-42/sometimes CA-32.

[ Parent ]
Plus...
there was that whole nasty issue where Yee was getting death threats because of nutjob Sarah Palin sycophants.

I dunno... if you piss off Palin enough to cause her fans to make death threats, you're probably doing something right.  :-)


[ Parent ]
If he wants to do some political posturing thats fine
He can do what he wants, but not voting for a budget, and encouraging a stalemate and delaying the process really gets me mad.  Not only do we need to appease the stupid republicans because of the stupid 2/3rds majority required to pass a budget, now we have to rope in people say there are too many cuts?

YEAH, THE CUTS SUCK.  I'm taking the brunt of it, being a student, but an even more delayed budget DOESN'T help.

In addition to this, he apparently doesn't believe in the first amendment.  This is the hands of the supreme court because of Yee

http://www.joystiq.com/2010/11...

Sure, it's just "videogames", but this could have a resounding effect on all forms of media, and it's ridiculous that this is even an issue.

I refuse to vote for this man.

20, Male, Democrat, CA-44 (home) CA-12 (college)


[ Parent ]
Are
you the one going to SF state? If so, enjoy that 15% tuition hike next year. I guess the one thing good about being at community college for me is we aren't being priced out of a decent education yet....

19, Male, Independent, CA-12

[ Parent ]
Of all the signs that Scott Brown is vulnerable, the midterm results have got to be one of the least relevant
Off-party Senators get re-elected all the time (often by comfortable margins) in spite of their party's failures in preceding elections. I guess with Scott Brown, he's not as established as many of them were and limited data like that can be useful. Still, I would put vastly more weighting on his approvals and head-to-head numbers.  

This time, when we run against Scott Brown
We need to not only get our act together, but run a totally disciplined, flawless (and consistently active) campaign.

If "simply being a Democrat" didn't beat him in the special, then he's going to be far tougher than that in 2012.  I know that many people say he's vulnerable, but I just don't think he is all that vulnerable, not just yet, and I'd really like to see people not take his seat for granted anymore.

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01


[ Parent ]
Martha Coakley ran an incompetent campaign (putting it mildly)
And special elections are even more different from presidential year elections than midterm elections are from PEs.

This reminds me so much of the stuff about Charles Djou, Massachusetts is a reflexively Democratic state, Brown is the one who needs to run the flawless campaign here, a Democrat does need to actually campaign and not screw up really badly, but a special election victory does not make Scott Brown immune to Massachusett's natural tilt.

Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01, Chairman of the Atheist Caucus, and Majority Leader of the "Going to Hell" caucus!


[ Parent ]
I can't speak for all of the Mass Dems on this site...
But watching Brown this Summer and during the Fall campaign, I was impressed.  His candidates got smoked, but there's something very likable about him.  I scoffed at it before I moved here (the stupid truck, famous daughter, etc...), but his style of campaigning and his personality during interviews really does connect with people.  He's disarming and I can't quite put my finger on it.  After seeing him in action, it really made me change my assessment that Coakley merely "lost" the campaign and Brown backed into a win.  He's like Bill Clinton with his retail politics skills.  The race is a tossup in 2012 no doubt, but before I moved here I would have said Lean D for sure.

[ Parent ]
Hopefully
there won't be a negative, expensive, divisive Dem. primary campaign. Which leaves our nominee broke and with a divided and upset base.
And meanwhile with Brown just sitting back during that period working on keeping up his approvals and being moderate.
I can see Brown pulling off his re-election.

[ Parent ]
CA-11: looking failry good for McNerney
There are 30,000 uncounted San Joaquin county ballots uncounted.  

http://www.recordnet.com/apps/...

Assuming they break the same way the counted ballots have, Harmer picks up about 1500 votes, leaving him about 700 votes down.  I doubt the Contra Costa part of the district could help much (Harmer won it by 1%).  Of course, if the uncounted ballots are better than the rest of the county there could be trouble.  

21, male, CA-15 (home and voting there), LA-2 (college)



KY-Gov: PPP has inititial look at numbers for 2011 Governor's race.
Beshear's job approval is doing well at 48/34.
He leads David Williams in a hypothetical matchup 44-35.
He leads Phil Moffett in a hypothetical matchup 45-26.
http://www.publicpolicypolling...

Also, good news.  The Dems in the KY state House only lost 7 seats, bringing them down to a 58-42 majority.  That means they old 2/3rds of the trifecta.  Redistricting is due to be completed there before the 2011 elections, so that means they are able to draw an incumbent protection map for Chandler.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


Better
than I expected. It will be close. I can't believe they chose Williams over Farmer. I suppose Farmer thinks he's too moderate to make it out of a GOP primary. Did they include statewide numbers for SoS, AG, Auditor?

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Doesn't look like it
I'm getting very nervous about Conway's prospects for reelection.  

Independent Socialist & Chair of SSP Cranky Indianian Hoosier Caucus, IN-09

[ Parent ]
Atty. Gen. Conway curb-stomped his political career
That "Aqua Buddha" stunt just crossed the line, and it's hard to see how his reputation recovers. He might just have to do his time as a private citizen and try to make a comeback if there's a vacancy in KY-03 or KY-06 at some point.

20, center-left independent, Auckland Central resident, MD-05 voter, OR-01 native

[ Parent ]
He doesn't
live near KY-6. He will probably get a second term as AG. He has a great record to run on. It could go the other way but I think he can get past the aqua buddha ad. If he wins this year then I think that puts the AB ad behind him as Grayson may try and make that a part of the campaign. He is a great candidate to succeed Yarmuth but Yarmuth has the job until he doesn't want it and that could be twenty years or it could be four or six IDK. I don't know what's next for Conway after his second term as AG.    

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
I worry.
Grayson is the type of country club Republican that does well in Kentucky. And Conway probably earned a lot of enemies during his Senate run. Still he has a great record to run on. He is perhaps the best AG in the state's history. He's done a lot. The Republicans could not find anything in his AG record to attack him on, their only charge was repeatedly proved wrong and the most conservative outlets in the state would not even air them. He's truly a good AG who has done well. I think if Beshear wins, he does as well. Expect huge turnout in Louisville. I mean you got the Mayor for life running for LG, that will drive out turnout. I think we can still win it. Do you know about who's running for SoS on our side? The R's got that rich dude who had planned on running for Senate this year, not a bad recruit I suppose. I heard a rumor, just a rumor, that the state's auditor is thinking of going for it, don't know if there is any truth to that. If she did she would be an easy win and would put her in prime territory to take on McConnell.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Bill Johnson
He already declared his candidacy for SoS, Grayson's open seat.  

[ Parent ]
I know
That is who I was talking about.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
I don't know anything about what the statewide slate is going to look like beyond Beshear-Abramson
Maybe Dr. Dan will try running for something, heh.  

Independent Socialist & Chair of SSP Cranky Indianian Hoosier Caucus, IN-09

[ Parent ]
Do you think
Greyson will run? Is he the strongest the KY GOP could put up against him?

[ Parent ]
Grayson
will definitely run. No doubt about it.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Oh
and yeah he's the best you could possibly get.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
You don't think Bunning
will try and revive his career by becoming Governor. Then trying to primary McConnell in 2014

TX-13,22,Dem

[ Parent ]
God,
please read this comment. Thank you. No but seriously no, he's 80 and done with politics whether he wants to be or not. I honestly think he would have made KY Senate very close, a 2-3 point margin with the wave the only reason for the closeness. He is hated outside of the hard right wing circles. I could almost see him running against the turtle out of spite but I do not think he would get far and I doubt he would do it. He could try and find someone else to do it though.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Costa takes the lead in CA-20
As I noted on DailyKos...
here:

Politico story

There's also this radio site that has the story, with the additional info that Costa says he wouldn't support Pelosi as Dem leader for the next term.

Meh.  We got his votes on health care, financial reform, and the stimulus.  He's hardly one of the thorns in the Democratic side, plus his district is made up of more conservative Democrats who are rather socially conservative.  CA-20 is a Democratic district where a whopping 72.2% (.pdf) voted FOR Prop. 8.

(In other words, if you think someone should primary him from the left in 2012, running on a platform of supporting gay marriage, you're going to be in for a rude awakening when the district roundly rejects that liberal.)

I had to include that because of the invariable messages from those who think a 100% progressive could actually win in a district where almost 3/4 of the voting population think gay people are no better than second class citizens.


[ Parent ]
Is anyone starting to feel
like George W Bush is a moderate Republican in comparison to what the Republican party has become since he left office?  These are sad times.

He is...
if you compare him to the current crop.  But that is no ringing endorsement for him because Nixon looks okay in comparison as well.  

Sad times indeed...

41 African-American Female DC
Taxation but no representation...


[ Parent ]
Nixon supported guaranteed health care
for every American. If he came back to life and ran on his record as President, he would be drummed out of the Republican Party today.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Heck
Ronald Reagan is not conservative enough for many Republicans today.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Yes, and that's scary! n/t


"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
4 more Cali counties have been counted, not included yet:
1. Another 7000-8000 votes counted in Orange County. And for the second day in a row, Harris overperformed. She actually won the count yesterday, and while she did not repeat that today she only lost 3600-3100. That's much much less than Orange County's vote up to now.

2. Also, San Francisco counted about 2,200 votes, and Harris seems to have picked-up another 1400 - about what she needs.

3. Small update from Santa Clara, with Harris picking up about 700 votes from a new batch of 2500.

4. San Diego, however: Cooley netted about 2,400 out of just 11,500 ballots. That's big, more than he needs to.

Twitter.com/Taniel


Thanks for the update. Do we know what's still out?


21, male, CA-15 (home and voting there), LA-2 (college)



[ Parent ]
A lot...
About 200,000 from LA (Harris will have to do much better in the 140,000 counted yesterday); 74,000 from San Diego; a fair amount from Alameda and Orange... Hard to tell since unprocessed ballot #s aren't up to date.

Twitter.com/Taniel

The playing field has tilted in Harris' favor.
According to the latest Uncounted Ballot Report (which is not perfect), there are about 600,000 ballots to be counted in counties where Harris is ahead and about 475,000 ballots where Cooley is winning.

Using the same assumption from Jeffmd's table, i.e., that the remaining ballots in a county will come in with the same percentages as the ballots that have already been counted, Harris would gain approximately 29,000 votes, which would put her ahead by 17,000 votes.  Since there is reason to believe the late ballots will be even more pro-Harris, this is probably a conservative estimate of the final winning margin.


[ Parent ]
NV-Sen: Clark County Precinct Results
They're finally here!

And for the record, my precinct has a history of being one of the most conservative in Henderson... And Harry Reid won it with 52.67% of the votes! (Angle got 44.61%.) :-)

And btw, also for the record, Dina Titus won my precinct by 7 votes.

Yes, Virginia, there ARE progressives in Nevada!
24, gay male, Democrat, NV-03 (or 04?)


Do you know when they will be posted for the entire state?
Or are they and I'm missing something?

28, Liberal Democrat, CA-26

[ Parent ]
Official state results will be posted...
Next month.

But for precinct results, you'll have to go to the county sites. Clark County has it all up now, as does Washoe.

http://www.co.washoe.nv.us/vot...

http://www.accessclarkcounty.c...

I'm wondering now how Sharrrrrrrrrrrron did in her own Assembly District. ;-)

Yes, Virginia, there ARE progressives in Nevada!
24, gay male, Democrat, NV-03 (or 04?)


[ Parent ]
Just got polled by PPP
regarding experiences with Ranked Choice Voting in the Oakland mayoral election.  I had a feeling it was PPP based on the demo questions they asked and then they said who the pollster was at the end.  Hopefully, this is a public poll that they post on their web site.  

IN-Sen 2012: Rumors of a primary

A few political reporters around the Hoosier state have, over the last few days, discussed vague rumors that Republican state Treasurer Richard Mourdock is preparing for a Senate bid, not to succeed Richard Lugar in the event of his retirement, but instead as a direct challenge to him. Mourdock, a former coal and oil industry geologist, was reelected by a wide margin last week, and is closely affiliated with the so-called tea party movement. He's arguably best known for his involvement in a bizarre lawsuit which attempted to halt the sale of Chrysler assets to Fiat during the auto bailouts, a lawsuit that Mourdock himself estimated might've cost up to two million dollars in legal fees.

Mourdock is hard to take seriously, but he's no Joe Miller or Christine O'Donnell. I could see him managing to beat Lugar, and unless he's absolutely destroyed in the process (or something weird happens, like Lugar running as a Dem or some other unrealistic thing) he could quite possibly cruise through the general election. 



Independent Socialist & Chair of SSP Cranky Indianian Hoosier Caucus, IN-09

If Lugar retires
Who do ya'll expect to run for the Reps, with Pence looking like he is going for Gov? Could Skillman run, since Pence would beat her in the gov primary?  

[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox