Google Ads


Site Stats

Michigan Elections Breakdown

by: MIJunkie

Fri Oct 29, 2010 at 3:32 PM EDT


I've not written any diaries of my own since joining the site earlier this year, but after reading hoosierdems's excellent analysis of Indiana earlier this week, I thought I'd give it a go. Here I'll analyze each of the races in Michigan this year, including a short prediction for the State House, State Senate, Supreme Court and ballot initiatives.

WARNING: This diary will be long, so if you're looking for brevity, it may not be for you. Also, standard disclaimer that I have dogs in a couple of these fights; friends are managing Rob Steele's campaign and volunteering for many other candidates, as well as working for the Michigan Republican Party. I will do my best not to let this color my analysis, however.

I'll begin with the biggest-ticket races, and by far the most boring of the cycle.

MI-Gov

Republican businessman Rick Snyder managed to survive a 5-way Republican primary to challenge populist Dem and Lansing Mayor Virg Bernero in the general election. Bernero upset the more establishment choice, House Speaker Andy Dillon in the Democratic primary himself. Since then, however, he has struggled to raise money (only $2 million raised for the cycle compared to Snyder's $11 million), and to move beyond his base of progressive Dems and union activists. In no survey has he trailed by less than 12 points, and he consistently loses all regions of the state to Snyder (including Lansing-based Mid-Michigan) except for the city of Detroit. In the crucial Wayne-Oakland-Macomb tri-county area, Snyder leads by about 10. Though likely the most boring, this race could have the most far-reaching effects downticket; if depressed Dems stay home rather than vote for a likely loser in Bernero, it could be a bad night for Dems all over in Michigan.

Final Prediction: 58-41 Snyder

MI-AG

Because Lieutenant Governor is elected on the gubernatorial ticket, the next race in Michigan is for Attorney General. Here establishment Republican former Congressman (and MI Ag Secretary, and judge, and everything else under the sun) Bill Schuette won the GOP nomination at the Republican convention, albeit by a smaller margin than many expected after a Tea Party revolt nearly pushed Senate Majority Leader Mike Bishop over the top. In a closely contested Democratic convention vote, Genesee County Prosecutor David Leyton edged trial lawyer and Wayne State Regent Richard Bernstein. Bernstein dropped out thereafter and decided not to contest the nomination (Democratic conventions aren't binding in MI).

This race has also been fairly boring: Democrats have attacked Schuette for allegedly being in the pocket of corporations and for being bad on the environment, while Republicans have attacked Leyton for allegedly being soft on crime. Pretty standard AG campaign. Leyton has suffered from some of the same money problems as other statewide Dems, and has been for the most part unable to respond effectively to TV ads by the Michigan Republican Party and others. Because of name recognition, money, a GOP year and Leyton's association with the city of Flint, Schuette will win this in a walk.

Final Prediction: 56-43 Schuette

MI-SoS

The race to replace outgoing GOP Secretary of State Terri Lynn Land initially seemed to be the most interesting of the top-tier races. A slew of generic Republicans lined up to face the hard-working Democratic nominee Jocelyn Benson. Benson, a Wayne State University law professor and Jennifer Brunner disciple, had been campaigning for nearly a year before the Dem convention, hitting just about every county and local Democratic party in Michigan. She faced only token opposition at the convention and cruised to the nomination.

The outlines of this race only began to emerge after Oakland County Clerk and 2006 LG nominee Ruth Johnson got into the Republican race late, making her the most visible and well-known candidate. She ultimately prevailed at the convention on the 2nd or 3rd ballot (depending on whom you ask).

Though Benson has run a spirited campaign, and comes off much better on TV (her debate with Johnson on Tim Skubick's On the Record was uncomfortable to watch), she hasn't been able to shake either the D next to her name or the attacks leveled on her by Republican groups. Though this race has the potential to close in the last week if Benson uses some of her 500k on TV time in Metro Detroit, she likely won't be able to overcome Johnson this year. Look for her to run for something in 2012 or 2014. For now, Johnson wins comfortably.

Final Prediction: 54-45 Johnson

MI-Supreme Court

The dynamics of the Supreme Court races got very interesting this year when Elizabeth Weaver, the Republican-appointed swing justice on the otherwise 3-3 Court(often siding with the Democrats) cut a deal with Gov. Jennifer Granholm to retire in exchange for Granholm to appoint a judge from Northern Michigan. Weaver had had a falling out with other Republicans on the Court, particularly Robert Young. In exchange for Weaver's retirement, Granholm appointed now-Justice Alton Davis, who will be running along with Oakland Circuit Court Judge Denise Langford-Morris as the Democratic candidates for the cycle's two seats. Republicans re-nominated Robert Young for the seat he currently holds, and put up Wayne County Circuit Court Judge Mary Beth Kelly for the seat currently held by Davis. All public polling has shown the two Republicans leading the races by 5-10 point margins, and the Republicans have had the benefit of strong TV advertising on their behalf. The two Democrats have had trouble raising money, for their part, and have only been able to afford sparse TV advertising. Give the advantage in this race to the Republicans.

Final Prediction: Robert Young retained, Mary Beth Kelly elected

This would result in a 4-3 Republican court, from a 4-3 Democratic SC now.

Congressional Races

MI-01

This race appears to have tightened somewhat in recent weeks, with Democratic State Rep. Gary McDowell within single digits of Republican nominee Dan Benishek, a heart surgeon. Benishek beat out Republican State Senator Jason Allen by a very small margin in the September primary.

There is also a conservative independent in the race,Glenn Wilson, who seems to be drawing more votes from Benishek than McDowell (a point echoed by his former campaign manager, who quit for this reason). Wilson has been unable to use much of the $2 million he had hoped to dump into the race for campaign finance reasons, but has perhaps been buoyed by Democratic psy-ops. In recent weeks, the State Democratic Central Committee has sent mailers to Republican-oriented voters with messages like "Glenn Wilson has a dangerous plan to shrink size and scope of government," obviously designed to move conservative support to Wilson.

Still, the most recent polls give Benishek a small lead, while McDowell has not led this year. Notably, surveys show Benishek winning by a nearly 10-point margin in the Lower Peninsula and carrying places like Alpena (where his signs are everywhere). This is important, because counterintuitively, most of the votes in this district are actually cast in the LP. If Benishek maintains this and continues to run close in the UP, where he has a solid base in the west (McDowell's is in the east), he'll win.

Final Prediction Benishek 46-44-9

MI-02

This is Michigan's most conservative district, at R+7. Though Democrats made gains here in 2008, this was largely a result of elevated African American and Hispanic turnout in Muskegon and elsewhere, coupled with McCain's abandonment of the state. Congressman Pete Hoekstra retired this year to run unsuccessfully for Governor, leading to a crowded Republican primary to replace him. In the end, State Rep. Bill Huizenga beat out Tea Party favorite Bill Cooper and others to emerge as the GOP candidate. He faces Democrat Fred Johnson in the general election. Though Johnson is a credible enough candidate, this race will not be competitive, especially with the Tea Party so active in Western and Northern Michigan this year.

Final Prediction: Huizenga 60-40

MI-03

Republican Congressman Vern Ehlers retired from Grand Rapids-based MI-03 this year, leaving the seat up for grabs. Republican State Rep. Justin Amash beat out Sen. Bill Hardiman and two other establishment candidates to win the GOP primary, while the Democrats nominated attorney Pat Miles. Though some have speculated that Amash is too far to the right of the district that elected moderate GOPer Ehlers, this race won't be competitive. Ehlers endorsed Amash shortly after the primary, and he has been aided by the Club for Growth and others in his bid. Public polling places Amash ahead by 9-10, his internals have him up 19. Splitting the difference, his lead is probably in the 12-14 range. Miles has been plagued by poor name recognition and mediocre fundraising, and will need to hope for astronomical African-American turnout in Grand Rapids to keep this close. Miles will likely show up in other races soon, however. I wouldn't be surprised to see him run for a State Senate seat in the area and win soon.

Final Prediction Amash 54-44

MI-04

This district winds its way from Traverse City in the north, down through Mount Pleasant to Owosso. It's GOP Rep. Dave Camp country, and will continue to be for the foreseeable future. His opponent is Some Dude Jerry Campbell.

Final Prediction Camp 63-35

MI-05

Democratic Rep. Dale Kildee's district takes in the plurality-black city of Saginaw and majority-black Flint. Though some Republicans in the state want to dream that this seat is "in play," Kildee is safe against Some Dude John Kupiec.

Final Prediction Kildee 59-39

MI-06

Though this district is actually pretty evenly split (R+0 PVI), with ubermajority-black Benton Harbor and heavily-Dem Kalamazoo, it's also quite rural. Moderate Republican Rep. Fred Upton has held the district for a long time, and survived a Tea Party primary challenge from former State Rep. Jack Hoogendyk this year. He'll cruise to re-election over 2008 retread Don Cooney.

Final Prediction Upton 54-43

MI-07

Oh, how I've come to hate this race. In 2008, Mark Schauer beat Tim Walberg by a slim margin to take this seat for Democrats. He went on to vote for the stimulus, cap and trade, and the health-care bill, which should have left him dead in the water in this moderately Republican district. But read on, me hearties.

The trouble began brewing in the Republican primary. A political newcomer, attorney and veteran Brian Rooney challenged Walberg for the right to take on Schauer. Rooney, while still a conservative, came off as much more moderate, likable, and truly sane than Walberg. Rooney raised money on par with Walberg and had a strong campaign team, but simply couldn't overcome the name recognition and Club for Growth advantages that Walberg had built in. He lost, and lost badly. Thus 2008 loser and general dickwad Tim Walberg will be the Republican nominee against Schauer again this year, making what should be a sure thing much closer.

Why, you ask? Because Walberg pissed off many Republicans in the district by primarying and beating former Republican Rep. Joe Schwarz. While ordinarily this would have been an upgrade (Schwarz was out in left field even on economic issues), the sleazy way Walberg beat him in the primary, combined with inflammatory and generally dumb statements in the general election (and in office) turned many against him. He barely beat organic farmer and liberal doormat Sharon Renier in 2006, then lost in '08. Now the GOP decides to run him again.

Meanwhile, Schauer has built a truly formidable campaign machine. He has 35 people working full-time on his re-election plus volunteers; Walberg has 2 and volunteers. Schauer has spent $2.2 million bucks in addition to money from the DCCC, SEIU, AFSCME, Sierra Club and LCV. Walberg has been forced to depend heavily on the NRCC and the Club for Growth because he's raised little (state Republicans shut their wallets after he won the primary). Democrats want Schauer in the leadership if he wins and gets a more favorable district, and he's running the campaign to do it. Public polls give Schauer a small but serviceable lead; Walberg's internals have him with a comical double-digit advantage. Walberg will also be hurt by the fake Tea Party candidate on the ballot, giving him a further obstacle to overcome (as if he couldn't create more himself). This one will come down to the wire on Nov. 2, but I'm not optimistic for my team.

Final Prediction: Schauer 49-47

MI-08

Republican Rep. Mike Rogers scared off Democrat Kande Ngalamulume, and was left without a serious opponent. Not sure if Democrat Lance Enderle managed to get on the ballot after all, but it won't matter.

Final Prediction: Rogers by a bunch

MI-09

Another race I'm pissed off about. None of the marquee Oakland County candidates decided to take on freshman Democrat Gary Peters (Sheriff Mike Bouchard was so certain of his gubernatorial chaces, and Majority Leader Mike Bishop just knew he'd be the next AG). Peters won this seat over corrupt old GOP bastard Joe Knollenberg in 2008 (even I didn't vote for Joe that year, I went Libertarian), and like Schauer, he also voted for just about all major Dem legislation in this swing district. In the end, Republicans nominated former State Rep. and veteran Rocky Raczkowski to challenge Peters. Though polling has shown varying leads for each candidate, the race will likely be very close. Peters has to hope for major turnout in plurality-black Pontiac, while Raczkowski needs the Tea Party voters that put him over the top in the primary to turn out in droves (and Snyder's coattails here won't hurt either). I think Peters pulls it out here, but only just; if Snyder depresses Dem turnout, he could be a casualty.

Final Prediction: Peters 49-48

MI-10

It's Candice Miller, yo. Northern Macomb is strongly GOP, while the Thumb can be swingy, but is culturally very conservative. Miller will romp over Demcratic fireman Henry Yanez.

Final Prediction Miller by a bunch

MI-11

Thad McCotter's an odd, odd dude. I've met him a few times, and the way he speaks (all the time) leaves you with the impression that he's just disgusted by everything. Still, this GOP rep isn't being seriously challenged this year after surviving in 2010. Luckily for him, State Sen. Glenn Anderson and State Rep. Marc Corriveau didn't decide to go for the promotion in this Western Wayne County district. He'll beat Democrat and teacher Natalie Mosher in a walk.

Final Prediction McCotter 58-40

MI-12

New Ways and Means Chairman Sander Levin currently holds this solidly Dem district. Anchored by majority-black Southfield, it also takes in the most Democratic parts of Macomb County, like Warren and Sterling Heights. Levin will have no trouble with Republican insurance agent Don Volaric.

Final Prediction: Levin 61-36

MI-13

This Detroit and Grosse Pointes district ousted Congresswoman Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick in the primary in favor of State Sen. Hansen Clarke. Clark will win the general, and will no doubt provide better representation for the city than another Kilpatrick. Clarke beats Grosse Pointe businessman John Hauler, no sweat.

Final Prediction: Clarke 75-25

MI-14

John Conyers' wife, a former Detroit City Councilwoman, is currently in jail on bribery charges. He also misses many, many important votes, and he has been chastised for using staffers to do menial chores for him. But this is Detroit; corruption is part of the game and people love Conyers for some reason. In a just world he'd lose, but in reality, Conyers stomps Republican businessman Don Ukrainec.

Final Prediction: Conyers by I can't count that high

MI-15

Democratic Congressman John Dingell is old. Like, really old. And a guy named John Dingell has held this seat since before your momma and your momma's momma were born (depending on your age, very possibly true). He's also facing a very strong challenge this year from Republican doctor Rob Steele (sounds like a Bond villain). Yet this district is anchored in the People's Republic of Ann Arbor and Downriver Detroit. Though Steele is running the campaign of his life, and comes off much better on television, in person and in debates, he won't be able to overcome the partisan lean of this district. Some polling to the contrary aside, Dingell wins by single digits.

Final Prediction: Dingell 53-46

So after this cycle, we end up with an 8-7 Republican congressional delegation, from an 8-7 Dem one now.

State Senate

I won't go through these races in detail, but the GOP currently holds a 21-17 advantage in the State Senate. Based on candidates, polling and the year, I think they expand this to about 24-13. The Dems lost probably their best pickup opportunity when State Rep. Robert Jones, the Dem candidate for a Kalamazoo-based Senate seat, died unexpectedly of cancer. His replacement will probably be unable to overcome the advantage this leaves his Republican opponent, Tonya Schuitmaker with.

State House

Republicans need 12 seats for a tie here, and 13 to take back the 110-member State House. I think there are two possible scenarios for the House: if turnout is about average and Dems come out in spite of the bloodbath at the top of the ticket, they'll maintain a 2 or 3 seat majority in the House. If turnout is lower or simply more skewed in favor of Republicans and against incumbents, Republicans take the House by a couple of seats. This one remains up in the air, though I think the massive spending by the RGA and the cash-rich Michigan Republican Party bodes well for Rs.

Ballot Initiatives

Proposal 1 (Constitutional Convention)

This is just about the only bipartisan initiative on the ballot ever. Both progressive and conservative, Chamber and unions alike oppose a new convention. They'll get their wish.

Final Prediction: NO 60-40

Proposal 2 (Ban felons from political office)

Public support for this proposal regularly polls in the 70s. It's a lock

Final Prediction: YES 80-20

These are, based on the polling, news and what inside information I'm able to get, the best projections I can make for now. What do you guys think?

MIJunkie :: Michigan Elections Breakdown
Poll
Will Schauer and Peters win re-election?
Both will win
Only Peters will survive
Only Schauer will survive
Neither one will make it out alive
Recounts all around!

Results

Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

I guess we can look forward to another GOP gerrymander
Along with GOP gerrymanders in most other states.  This will ensure Republican majorities in the House for the next decade.  

Gee, you're cheery...
If likely Gov. Snyder wants to win reelection, he'll work with the Democrats to probably keep the partisan breakdown of districts looking similar to the way it looks now. Michiganders are going to be pissed off if they elect Snyder by a wide margin, thinking he's a commonsense bipartisan moderate, and he starts signing off on a redistricting plan that dices the state up to give Republicans an absurd advantage.

20, center-left independent, Auckland Central resident, MD-05 voter, OR-01 native

[ Parent ]
not so sure
I don't think Snyder would pick a fight with his own party over redistricting, as the only practical consequence would be to help Democrats.

I think it's going to be moot anyway. Snyder doesn't appear to have coattails at the congressional level: if he did, Walberg would be ahead. I suspect that the same thing is going on with the state house races, and Dems will hold the house, leading to a new map that is at worst an incumbent-protection plan as opposed to a partisan gerrymander.  

41, Ind, CA-05


[ Parent ]
That's exactly what I think will happen.


20, center-left independent, Auckland Central resident, MD-05 voter, OR-01 native

[ Parent ]
I disagree

The democrats have a pretty chance of gerrymander California, and that mean they can send home a big majority of the 19 republicans (maybe all).

They are chance too of gerrymander New York and Illinois.


[ Parent ]
My thoughts
The governor's race has been pretty boring.  I thought it might have more fluidity.  One point about the money...Snyder didn't raise 11 million.  He gave more than half of the money to his own campaign.  Snyder still had a fund raising advantage though.  

Snyder: 55%
Bernero: 43%
Other: 2%

AG

It's too bad Leyton didn't have more money.  I think the ads against Schuette were pretty strong, particularly the one with the mother and her disabled son.  Unfortunately, I think it may have come too late.  Leyton hasn't built enough name recognition to win this race

Schuette: 54%
Leton: 46%

SoS

I think the Democrats will win SoS.  Benson is the stronger candidate and has excited the Democratic base, which Bernero failed to do.  Additionally, if voters truly want outsiders and people who aren't career politicians (which Snyder supporters say they do), then Benson is the clear choice.  Johnson is the definition of career politician.  Snyder is giving a false impression about Republican strengthen as well.  It's a Republican year but not as strongly Republican as some think it will be.

Benson: 52%
Johnson: 48%

Supreme Court

The Dems have been airing SC ads fairly regularly, particularly the negative Young ads.  The negative Young ads are far better than the "sleeping judge ads."  I think Young will lose but it will be Republican Mary Beth Kelly who benefits.  

Winners: Davis and Kelly

MI House and Senate

I'm don't know tons about individual races.  Republicans will hold the senate...possibly with a pick or two.  The Dems will hold the House.  The GOP will make gains, with the house maybe even coming to just one or two seats.

MI-1

This is the race I'm most uncertain about.  I haven't seen much polling except a recent poll that had the Republican leading by a small margin.  I think this race could be as close as the Republican primary.  I'm gonna go out on the limb and say the Dems keep it.

Benishek: 44%
McDowell: 46%
Wilson: 10%

MI-7

Schauer will win because the GOP picked a bad candidate.  

Schauer: 50%
Walberg: 48%  

MI-9

Peters will also win because the GOP failed to select a strong cnadidate.  I think Bouchard probably would've been a good possibility.  Bishop, no...not after the disaster he was in the legislature.  Peters has been spending a lot of money and I think it will pay off for him.

Peters: 52%
Raczkowski: 47%

MI-11

McCotter has been lucky that the Dems have ignore this district.  If Democrats had recruited a stronger candidate and put money into the race in 2008, McCotter would've lost.  This year, he'll win.  

McCotter: 56%
Mosher: 44%

MI-15

This is a Republican pipe dream.  Dingell will win by around 20%

Dingell: 59%
Steele: 41%


My Thoughts
First, a correction:

1. Republicans hold a 22-17 majority in the Senate after Congressman Schauer was elected out of the Senate.  The GOP picked the seat up in a special election.  The GOP has held the Senate since the 80's, and will only built their lead here.

Some thoughts:

- I think Schauer is going to win larger than most anyone expects him to.  Hopefully, it'll mean the permanent end of Walberg running for congressional office.  

- I think the SoS race will be much closer than predicted.  It's the only one I feel really unsure about.

- The current SoS has calculated that the turnout will most likely be AT LEAST 52%, which is just slightly more than the last gubernatorial election in 2006.  I don't think Dems will be able to change much of anything in any of the state-wide races, but I predict turnout among Dems will be higher than expected and that they'll split the ticket...just like they are already doing in the congressional elections (i.e. Schauer/Peters voters for Snyder).  I think this will help the Dems hold the state house.


Oh
And Lance Enderle is very much on the ballot as the Democratic nominee for the 8th District (my district, BTW).  He'll get stomped for the sole fact that he has absolutely zero name recognition, hasn't been in local politics, and with no money (personally, or his campaign).

How Dems haven't been able to find a Lansing-based Dem with money and name recognition (or which there are quite a few) to run competitively in this district against Mike (who has absolutely no interest in representing the Lansing half of his district) is beyond me.  It's only rated an R+2.


[ Parent ]
MI-8
R+2 is an underestimate; is it by any chance based on the Obama election, when Republicans were voting against McCain out of spite for publicly pulling out?

The previous incarnation was a swing district; it is almost certain that Byrum would have beaten him without the election problems in Lansing and East Lansing, and plausible that she did anyhow, except that for some reason she decided to skip the recount.  The redistricting ... is an example of how even complete R control of the next redistricting wouldn't cost Dems much.


[ Parent ]
How do you...
How do you figure that it's an underestimate?  Do you not know how these things are calculated?  They are consistently calculated.  If the rating for MI-08 is off, every rating for every district in the country is off.

[ Parent ]
How do you...
I'm honestly not sure which estimate you're using for the R+2.  I know that one main way to calculate is to take the vote share in the last Presidential election and subtract that national average vote share.  Obviously, this leads to distortions based on the actual candidates, particularly in their home states.  Michigan just happens to be a state where McCain ended up badly underperforming for reasons that barely applied to Congressional candidates in 2008, and wouldn't apply this year.  Obama/Walberg voters are probably a floor for the underestimate; that still wouldn't account for people who were mad enough to stay home, or were also rejecting Walberg specifically.

[ Parent ]
How do you...
I'm not sure which source you're using for the R+2.  The best known formula takes vote shares from the last Presidential election, and subtracts the national share from the share within the district.  I can't think of any national method which is obviously better, but it does have weaknesses -- in particular, it can be distorted when individual candidates have a particular appeal (or disgust) to specific districts.

The obvious case is home-state advantage, but it isn't the only one.  Hawaii is almost certainly heavily Democratic, but not quite as strongly as the Obama election showed.

McCain's public pullout offended a fair number of Republicans in Michigan.  At a minimum, the Obama/Walberg voters should be considered Republican in a normal year.  I believe there are also quite a few who either stayed home or voted for Schauer because they really didn't like Walberg -- but who would still vote for a moderate or even generic Republican.

(Apologies if the substance of this reply posted more than once; I can't tell whether it made it before.)


[ Parent ]
Michigan Election breakdown nitpicks
Snyder is way ahead, but will have particularly weak coattails; plenty of his votes are from people who wouldn't even consider a Republican legislator in this climate.

That won't stop him from supporting a heavily Republican gerrymander -- but it almost can't be nearly as biased as the status quo, even if Republicans retake the House and Court, so it won't be disastrous for Democrats.

Schuette being everything under the came after he left Congress, so he is hungry to keep moving back up to where he was.  Maybe too hungry, but he'll probably succeed in a year like this.

Republican court nominees Young and Kelly aren't generic; Young is the worst remaining judge in terms of civility or ignoring precedent or ... and Kelly apparently lost a previous judicial position (chief judge) over corruption.  The race is sufficiently low-profile that I wouldn't count either of them out, but it won't be the cakewalk an incumbent normally enjoys.

Enderle tried to get on as a write-in, and got only about 8% against the guy who had already withdrawn.  He is now on as a replacement, but if even primary voters didn't know about him, he won't do any better than the last few Rogers challengers.

The death of Robert Jones is particularly bad because absentee ballots (available to anyone over 65) had already been mailed, and some returned.  Votes for him will not transfer to the replacement Dem, and the Republican Secretary of State has barred clerks from even telling voters that he died and they would need to get a new ballot if they wanted to vote for his replacement.

The other estimates I've seen don't consider losing the Michigan House to be very likely -- but some of these were from people so optimistic that they considered retaking the Senate as plausible.


Out of curiosity...
...what is your political leaning?

[ Parent ]
Out of curiosity...
I'm a pragmatist with liberal leanings.  The first time I voted straight ticket, I was angry at the Republicans for nominating such bad candidates even at the local level, but ... that wasn't the last time they did so.  In fairness, when I lived in Lansing proper, there weren't as many partisan local elections, so the state conventions alone were able to -- and sometimes did -- choose candidates running for the wrong reasons.

To avoid a further derail into policy, please ask any followups by email.  At gmail, I'm JimJJewett.


[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox