Google Ads


Site Stats

Washington Redistricting 10 CDs

by: edward

Tue Oct 12, 2010 at 6:39 PM EDT


With the news that Washington state may receive a 10th Congressional District, I set out to develop a map that is favorable to Democrats and should lead to a 7-3 delegation split in bad years, and up to an 8-1 split in good years.

Washington has a bipartisan redistricting commission, so massive gerrymanders are off the table. When Washington received a 9th CD, the commission attempted to make the 9th competitive - I expect the same to happen with a 10th CD.

Anyway, this map creates a super-strong Republican seat east of the Cascades, and generally puts each major city in the Western portion of the state in its own district and connects that city with more rural portions of Western and Central Washington. (BTW, partisan data would be helpful here).

Photobucket
edward :: Washington Redistricting 10 CDs
WA 1 (Inslee [open]-D) [Blue]

WA 1 still extends across Puget Sound to Kitsap County, but loses Bambridge Island and some Seattle precincts and extends to the eastern most portions of Snohomish County. The Kitsap portion of the District, as well as the western Snohomish portion should keep this District a safe Democratic one.

Photobucket

WA 2 (Larson D) [Green]

WA 2 retains much of its current form - Northwestern Washington. Like it does now, the district extends into Everett. If Larson holds on this year, the District should remain a Democratic hold.

WA 3 (open D) [purple]

WA 3 runs along the Columbia River and the Pacific Ocean. Inland it includes solidly Lewis County. In many years, this would be a Democratic seat, but control depends on who wins Clark County (and the City of Vancouver).

The coastal counties are more Democratic, and Skamania and Klicikat Counties did vote for Obama in 2008. In 2010 and 2012 this might be a tough hold, but as Vancouver becomes more solidly Democratic, so should the entire CD.

Photobucket

WA 4 (Hastings - R) [Red]

This district encompasses most of Eastern Washington - or at least Yakama and most of the low population counties east of the Cascades. Currently, both WA 4 and WA 5 are about 40-45% Democratic - this district would probably push that number to about 35%.

Tri-Cities

WA 5 (McMorris-Rogers - R) [Yellow]

While it may not be possible to create a safe Democratic district in Eastern Washington, connecting the Tri-Cities to Spokane may do the trick (to at least elect a Democrat - or make it a swing district). Whitman County voted for Obama and Spokane has two Democratic Senators in Olympia.

Spokane

WA 6 (Dicks-D) [Teal]

WA 6 connects Olypmia to Kitsap County and extends to the Pacific Ocean. All of these counties are fairly reliable Democratic counties. Fairly in the sense that King, Snohomish, and sometimes Pierce Counties lead the way on Democratic issues in the state.

WA 7 (McDermott - D) [Grey]

Seattle.

Puget Sound

WA 8 (Reichert - R) [Lavender]

WA 8 is strongly contested in 2010 by Suzan DelBene. Likely, the 2010 election will depend on how well she does in Pierce County.

To solidify the district, I chose to add several Democratic areas to the district - Renton and Kirkland. To add population to the district, I added the central Washington counties of Chelan and Kittitas. This is an area where I would like more partisan details, but both counties have voted for Democratic presidential candidates in the past.

Photobucket

WA 9 (Smith - D) [Bright Blue]

WA 9 was originally designed as a swing district twenty years ago - but has only been held by a Republican for only 2 years (1995-1997). For this map, it should stay a Democratic seat.

The district goes from the Seattle border to Puyallup and from Puget Sound to east King County.

WA 10 (open) [Magenta]

This new district is a Pierce County district. It includes Tacoma and Gig Harbor - and then races out to eastern Pierce county. This district should be competitive - or leaning Democratic in the worst years.

**Sorry for the quick write-up (I published the Diary before I was ready). Each district is + or - 744 from the ideal population size.
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

I believe the Washington secretary of state
has results by city/precinct, but not sure.

28, Liberal Democrat, CA-26

It does have city results for most counties.
For some reason, city results aren't included for some of the largest counties, like King, Pierce, or Snohomish (maybe these counties report the returns on their own?). I do believe their precinct results are complete for the entire state, though. And their breakdown by congressional/legislative district is superb.

Radical or something, WA-07

[ Parent ]
A few thoughts
I haven't the patience to actually draw a map like this, and it's really interesting to see what changes could be made.
I'm not sure you should put the Tri-Cities in the Eastern Washington swing district, though. This is basically the most Republican urban area in the state. McCain won Kennewick 16605-9644, Richland 14175-9216, and Pasco 7419-5822. I'm not sure where else you could extend the district instead, but I think these cities would neutralize the Democratic advantage in Spokane (where Obama got about 60%) and Pullman (home of Washington State University). Bridging the cultural divide across the Cascades might cause problems for the Eastern Washingtonians in the 8th, although Kittitas and Chelan counties have some Democratic areas. But overall, this is an pretty interesting and well-done map, and the work is appreciated.

Radical or something, WA-07

Thanks for the constructive comments
I was not certain about the partisan make up of the Tri-Cities - I assumed that as an urban area, it would be more Democratic than in actuality (40%). The neighboring counties (to this map) are worse (Benton - 36%, Franklin - 37%, Adams 31% and even Pend Orelle County is at 39% Obama). This may not make it a true swing district, but it should be more hospitable than what exists today.

As for the 8th, with 10 CDs (and according to Dave's numbers), at least one CD will have to extend into Central Washington. The other way I can think about drawing a map is to make the Columbia River district take Yakama (leaving the Pacific Ocean, allowing for an Olympia/Coastal District). For Democrats, I think this would ensure a safe R seat along the Oregon border (for the nearish future) and not really make any of the other seats safer for Democrats.  


[ Parent ]
Suggestion
This would be easier to follow if you would add the color to the description, e.g., WA-2 (Green).

Nice map
I'm working on Version 2.0 of Daves Redistricting (Release date expected soon after election). Since I live in WA, I've played around recently with WA 10 districts (to test evrything) and came up with something a little similar. I, too, think having WA-08 jump across the mountains via the main passes makes the most sense. It seems much of the growth in the state has been in Clark County (near Portland, OR) but it's also been scattered thru Snohomish County, Pierce County and King County. It will definitely be interesting in we indeed get a new district.

Regarding partisan data for the state, it does appear to be available, but doesn't match up well to 2000 vote districts, which are the shapes available. If someone is willing to do the work to match it up, I will add it to the app's data. (See recent diary of mine for details.)

Anyway, nice work.


Can't wait
I am excited about version 2.0. I hope that there is an easier way to find those "hidden districts" that are hard to color over.

As for the map, I wanted to keep WA 8 west of the Cascades, but the only way I could see that happening is for the Vancouver (Clark County) district to connect to Yakama. To me, that violates more communities of interest (and creates a safe Republican seat) than connecting Bellevue and east King county across the passes.


[ Parent ]
Crossing the Sound
This looks credible to me as a non-Washingtonian but would a commission (as opposed to the Dem-controlled legislature) really cross the Sound the way your 1st (and to a lesser extent 8th) do?

32, M, MI-6, Iconoclastic Leftist

Crossing the Sound
The 1st currently crosses the Sound - from Edmonds to Kingston - there is a ferry crossing there. This map  reduces the percentage of the 1st that actually crosses the Sound.

The detailed photo is misleading - Grey is the 7th CD (but I messed up the label). The piece of the 7th that appears to cross the Sound actually does not - Vashon Island is part of King County (as is Seattle) and currently is in the 7th. This map does not change the arrangement.  


[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox