Google Ads


Site Stats

SSP Daily Digest: 9/21 (Morning Edition)

by: DavidNYC

Tue Sep 21, 2010 at 8:17 AM EDT


  • AK-Sen: Word is out about two forthcoming ad buys in Alaska: Lisa Murkowski is going up on radio and TV (NWOTSOTB), while Scott McAdams just threw down what Smart Media Group is calling "a partial buy of $48K in broadcast."
  • Meanwhile, I don't really give a fuck what John Kyl thinks, but it's nice to see that he's sweating the possibility that a Murkowski write-in campaign makes it less likely the GOP will hold on to the seat. (As an aside, don't you wish Dems had handled Lieberman like this? Indeed, Republicans are supposedly weighing whether to strip Murkowski of her committee assignments.) But maybe Kyl is just being the idiot he always is, because a Republican source tells The Hill that internal polling "indicates Murkowski's write-in bid takes an equal amount of support from Democrat Scott McAdams as it does Miller." For once in my life, I hope Kyl is right!

  • MO-Sen: Global Strategy Group for the Missouri Democratic Party (9-14/18, likely voters, no trendlines, includes leaners):
  • Robin Carnahan (D): 39
    Roy Blunt (R): 43
    Jerry Beck (C): 3
    Jonathan Dine (L): 3
    (MoE: ±4%)

  • AK-Gov: NEA-Alaska, the biggest union in the state, just endorsed Dem Ethan Berkowitz for governor. And Bill Walker, the Republican primary loser who is still considering a write-in bid, is holding out the possibility of a Berko endorsement as well.
  • FL-22: The ghost of Casey Stengel is smacking his forehead and asking, once more, "Can't anybody here play this game?" The Florida Democratic Party sent out a mailer hitting Allen West over his tax liens... but the managed to include his full Social Security number. Oy.
  • IN-09: Reid Wilson claims there's a dispute between the IE arm of the DCCC and main HQ... but there isn't a single quote in the piece, not even an anonymous one. Though the IE wing has cancelled ad buys on behalf of Baron Hill in mid-October, supposedly the "coordinated" arm "believes Hill is still deserving of spending." I have no reason to doubt Reid, but if his source at main D-Trip wanted to get this message out there, this is a damn oblique way to do it - but maybe he or she was scared of accusations of "coordination via the media." Anyhow, it all just shows how dumb these rules against coordination are.
  • KY-06: The Mellman Group for Ben Chandler (9/13-14, likely voters):

    Ben Chandler (D-inc): 53
    Andy Barr (R): 33
    (MoE: ±4.9%)

    This is the first poll that Chandler has released, though his campaign teased earlier in the summer that their internal from June gave Chandler a "strong double-digit lead".

  • MI-03: This open-seat race hasn't gotten a lot of attention, but Dem Patrick Miles just rolled out an impressive list of Republican endorsements, including a couple of former county GOP chairs... and two daughters of retiring Rep. Vern Ehlers! Based on the comments in the article, I get the distinct feeling that Republican Justin Amash must be a seriously unlikable dude for this many of his fellow party members to want to diss him so thoroughly. By the way, Amash's fundraising has been unimpressive (just $380K), and he has less than half the cash of Miles ($227K to $112K).
  • NE-02: Biden Alert! The VPOTUS is coming to Omaha on Sept. 30th to headline a fundraiser for Dem Tom White. I'm gonna guess that Republican Rep. Lee Terry might have a harder time than most in tying White to the Obama administration, though, given that Terry put out flyers in the 2008 cycle touting his support from mythical "Obama-Terry voters."
  • NY-18: Wow, the NY GOP sure is good at producing pariah leper candidates these days, huh? Republican Jim Russell, running against Nita Lowey, penned an essay for the racist Occidental Quarterly in support of ethnic and religious segregation a few years ago - but that description is way too anodyne to do his piece justice. For instance, he approvingly quotes T.S. Eliot, who said, among other things: "What is still more important is unity of religious background; and reasons of race and culture combine to make any large number of free-thinking Jews undesirable." Click through to Maggie Haberman's piece for a much larger selection of choice quotes. Also note that the Westchester County GOP endorsed Russell in July, after another candidate dropped out.
  • TX-23: What a fucking idiot: Republican Quico Canseco blanketed San Antonio with door-hangers that claimed Rep. Ciro Rodriguez voted in favor of TARP. But, uh, he didn't. In fact, he voted against the bailout twice. Seriously, how fucking hard is it to Google this shit?
  • WA-03: Greenberg Quinlan Rosner for Denny Heck (9/7-9, likely voters, no trendlines):

    Denny Heck (D): 44
    Jaime Herrera (R): 47
    (MoE: ±4.4%)

    We say "no trendlines" because we don't know the precise top lines from GQR's previously poll for Heck (conducted in June), though we do know from Roll Call's write up that Heck trailed Herrera by 7 points in that one.

    SSP TV:

    • FL-Gov: Alex Sink's latest ad uses the words of local newspaper editorials against scumbag Republican Rick Scott's campaign platform, while also touting her economic ideas. And, hey, some WOTSOTB: She's spending $800K on the ad.
    • AZ-05: One Harry Mitchell spot touts his fight against Congressional pay raises; another touts his support from three apparently reg'lar Republicans (but oddly leaves off the "I approve" message - is this not a broadcast ad?)
    • AZ-08: Gabby Giffords hangs Jesse Kelly on the "flat tax" with his own words in support of a 23% national sales tax. I personally love going after Republicans on this issue because the dumb fucks who support this have to sputter that no, but, really, actually, what we mean is... ah, who gives a fuck what they mean.
    • KS-03: An anodyne spot from Republican Kevin Yoder (people shouting "We're Yoder Voters!"); and another pretty blah ad about small businesses (featuring a black-and-white photo of Pelosi without even mentioning her by name - odd)
    • KY-03: John Yarmuth updates an effective ad from his 2008 campaign, featuring a disabled Navy veteran narrating about Yarmuth's support for vets (ad is "expected to run for a week on all the networks in Louisville")
    • MD-01: Frank Kratovil also has a good ad hitting Andy Harris on the national 23% sales tax (see AZ-08 above)
    • NY-20: A pretty clever ad from Scott Murphy, responding to attacks on his vote in favor of healthcare reform by pointing out some of the most popular parts of the bill, like closing the Medicare "donut hole"
  • DavidNYC :: SSP Daily Digest: 9/21 (Morning Edition)
    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
    Print Friendly View Send As Email

    Unforunately
    Scotty backs up PPP and nameless Republican internal pollster in showing that Murkowski's bid hurts McAdams.

    http://www.rasmussenreports.co...

    34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


    McAdams wouldn't have a chance one on one
    against Miller.  Murkowski at least creates the possibility of shaking things up and moving voters around.

    [ Parent ]
    Not true, the crosstabs show Murkowski pulls in more Republicans than Democrats, and...
    ...independents are split evenly among the 3.

    Meanwhile, the turnout model shows 44R-41I-15D, which I doubt we'll see.  Voter registration in the state is 15% D, 26% R, and the rest either "undeclared," "no party," or registered with 3rd parties.  In reality both major party bases are bigger than their registration numbers, but this Rasmussen poll reflects that only for Republicans, not for Democrats.

    Another interesting thing that makes this poll questionable is in comparison with Rasmussen's previous poll, McAdams has gone from positive 43-36 to negative 36-46 in favorability.  He hasn't done anything to cause that, and nothing otherwise has happened in the race to make people sour on him or his party any more than a month ago.

    Meanwhile, Miller's favorability, too, has tanked, from positive 50-44 to negative 45-51.  But that makes sense since he's had bad publicity.

    Ultimately Murkowski's support in this poll is overstated because she's not going to get the same support as a write-in on election day that she'd get with her name printed on the ballot.  A drop-off is certain.

    And even further, if she spends money, it's probably to attack Miller, which only helps McAdams.  Really, in a 3-way the trailers have to attack the leader first, so Miller will get hit from both.

    Campaigns and candidates matter, this thing is really fluid.

    43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


    [ Parent ]
    Ummm
    McAdams was down single digits (I believe 9) on Miller in Scotty's last poll.  He's down 17 now.  I didn't really get down in the weeds of the crosstabs, but my expert analysis is that Murkowski's entry into the race is not good for McAdams because it has nearly doubled Miller's lead on him.  While I appreciate your effort at nuance, the top lines speak awfully loudly here.

    34, WM, Democrat, FL-11

    [ Parent ]
    Upon further examination of crosstabs, you're right, not good for McAdams......
    Comparing the 2 polls, McAdams bleeds a lot of indies to Murkowski, while Miller had only roughly one-third of them to begin with and bleeds hardly any.  McAdams also bleeds slightly more Dems to Murkowski than Miller bleeds GOPers to Murkowski, although that's largely a wash.  McAdams losing indies to Murkowski is the big hit.

    All that said, campaigns still matter.  If Murkowski and McAdams go hard after Miller and he takes on water, all bets are off.  I am not writing on McAdams' chances here, a 3-way like this is very volatile.

    43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


    [ Parent ]
    Murkowski overstated
    Rasmussen did not include Murkowski in their horserace question, only Miller, McAdams, or someone else. If they responded "someone else," they were given a choice of Murkowski. So that may overstate her support somewhat, but not as much as the PPP poll with her name on the ballot did.

    20, CD MA-03/NH-01/MA-08

    [ Parent ]
    Good catch, that's not in the crosstabs or toplines, just the narrative, and...
    ...I virtually never read polling memos, just data.

    Still, Rasmussen isn't disclosing what's really important if they really asked the horse race in 2 stages, which is how the numbers came out when it was a 2-way with "someone else" as a generic choice.

    43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


    [ Parent ]
    The only good thing for Dems in Murkowski running ...
    .. is the blood in the water created between the TEA party and the GOP establishment nationally.

    Ideally, Murk would bloody up Miller and then drop out, but that is not likely.  


    [ Parent ]
    TARP
    Considering most people believe TARP was the product of the Obama administration, when it was enacted in 2008, during Bush's reign, it's not surprising that Republicans are willing to take advantage of this, take things one step farther, and lie about their opponents' vote on it.

    Paul Krugman has said that most people confuse...
    ...the bank bailout with the stimulus...  

    [ Parent ]
    Close in time
    Krugman is probably correct.  There was a lot going on in a short period of time and the last-in-time event is the most despised of the events.  

    Additionally, the Republicans can get away with it since they nearly universally voted against the stimulus.  

    23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7


    [ Parent ]
    When that Murkowski ad
    first rolled out, they spelled her name Murkwski.  Not a great start to a write in bid.

    KS-03
    Any word on whether Yoder used actual Kansas voters? Knowing him, they were probably all Nebraskans.  

    (didn't get the reference? Click here. Or here.)

    Also, he looks like he's about 23 in that spot, not exactly someone aging Johnson Countians will want to represent them. I'm really starting to think Stephene Moore might just bake up a big ole ass-kicking pie on Election Day.

    Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


    I really, really, really
    want to see a poll out of KS-3.  Conventional wisdom has been that this seat is gone, especially with the R's killing it atop the ticket, but from what I've observed it seems that Moore is positioning herself well.  Yoder on the other hand seems rather abrasive and untested.  

    Still, the intra-family move reeks of nepotism, so maybe KS-3 voters will be turned off to Moore because of that.

    23, Male, Democrat, OH-13


    [ Parent ]
    Yea
    I just don't get it - I mean, if you want more family time or something, how do you get that if your wife is running for the seat?  OTOH, I can't stand people who use Rent-A-Kids, even if they are relatives.  What people like him and Quayle Jr. are thinking - like you are not going to get found out with that in this day and age?  Go rescue a cute doggie from the pound next time you want a warm and fuzzy image for an ad if you don't have kids.

    43 - Male - GOP/Libertarian - FL 22

    [ Parent ]
    Born & raised in KS-03, all my family's there, so trust when I say
    Conventional wisdom is wrong if it says this seat is gone. It's competitive as heck, but it ain't gone. Obama won this district narrowly, and Moore has steadily improved his vote share to 55%-ish even in competitive races. Republicans have seen several percentage points lopped off their registration advantage in fast-growing Johnson County in just the last few years, and Democrats have gone from having one JoCo state rep in 2004 to 6 of them in just two cycles. And Stephene Moore is indeed positioning herself well--basically saying she'd vote for the stuff her husband did (which was mostly quite popular), except for the bailout, which is unpopular. I actually wrote a SSP diary about why Stephene Moore might be better candidate than Dennis this cycle.

    I was really worried about the nepotism charge, too...at first. Here's the thing: Stephene Moore only ran because no one else had the chutzpah to do it and because Dennis felt like he was going to hand his seat to Republicans after working so hard to keep it all those years.  

    After all, he announced his retirement early to give Dems plenty of time to find a candidate... and Republicans plenty of time to start a clusterfuck. But KCK Mayors Marinovich (fmr) and Reardon (current) passed, our local legislative bench is weak, we couldn't get any of the local moderate Republican state senators or mayors to switch sides, and it was getting down to the wire and yet no one stepped up.

    Stephene Moore saved Democrats' collective ass and locals know it--and heck, they chose her as their candidate. She won her primary by 60 points or so. And I think most independents and moderates are happy to have a real race and a real choice (it would've been a Yoder cakewalk otherwise).

    Besides, is it really nepotism if voters get to decide? I mean, Stephene Moore won't represent KS-03 for even a day if voters don't want her to. Finally, I think the number of voters who are turned off by the "nepotism" angle 1) probably wouldn't have voted for Moore anyway and 2) are likely to be offset by the voters who are in the habit of voting for Moore for Congress and don't notice that his first name has magically changed to "Stephene".

    We definitely need to see a poll, though I'd guess there's probably still a high number of undecideds...

    Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


    [ Parent ]
    Wow
    That was a much longer comment than I thought it would be. Oh, SSP, you really get my writing juices flowing.  :)

    Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.

    [ Parent ]
    NY 29 Siena poll
    Reed by 14.  Not as bad as I thought it would be.  Still, this seat is gone.  # 3 on my list.

    http://www.theithacajournal.co...


    Well it IS about where I would have guessed......
    I wouldn't have guessed exact numbers, but 14 points sounds about right.  Zeller can't win without an unexpected scandal hitting Reed.  This seat is gone, but of course we already knew that.

    43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10

    [ Parent ]
    (almost) Generic R v. Generic D
    from the link

    The two candidates also remain largely unknown, especially Zeller. Eighty-two percent said they did not know or had no opinion of him. His favorable-unfavorable rating was a miniscule 9 percent to 9 percent.

    Fifty-seven percent said they didn't know Reed or didn't have an opinion of him. His favorable-unfavorable rating was split almost evenly, 21 percent to 22 percent.

    Sounds like it may be a battle of the small town newspaper ads...


    [ Parent ]
    Not exactly
    District residents would prefer that the GOP control the House 53/38.

    [ Parent ]
    That's why I said "Generic R v Generic D"
    In that case, any ole' D loses in NY-29.

    If Zoeller could make his name known, he could at least cut into that advantage, potentially setting himself up for '12. But it looks like he won't even get close enough there.

    My reference to "small town newspaper ads" was a suggestion that neither candidate will do a thing between now and Nov to move the needle.


    [ Parent ]
    NY Sen
    Ras has DioGuardi only down 10.  I just don't see him winning, even in a year like this, but had there been a stronger candidate - especially a self-funder, I think that this race could have flipped.  I wonder if Kara made enough money working for American Idol to help her dad out and get him elected?
    All the same, I give him like a 1 in 50 chance of catching fire - stranger things have happened.

    43 - Male - GOP/Libertarian - FL 22

    No Way!
    The NYS GOP blew this one big time. DioGuardi is basically a perenial candidate at this point. He pops up every few years to run for something and lose. Its a testament to how bad a state the NY GOP is in that he was able to win the Senate nomination.

    I would have said Joe DioGuardi was the NY GOP's worst recruitment fail of the cycle but then I read about the freak'n Nazi they got running against Nita Lowry!

    Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
    http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


    [ Parent ]
    I think DioGuardi could prove competitive
    Much like Carly Fiorina, though, he faces the uphill climb of running as a pro-lifer in a state where being pro-choice basically seems like a pre-requisite. I think he'll run a competent campaign, and his closing TV ad during the primary was good, but he just doesn't have the finances. The last I checked, he had only about $800K COH.

    For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

    [ Parent ]
    Finances
    This really boils down to money.  If he had the cash, he could be very competitive partially because Gilibrand has never been the strongest candidate.  New York seems to want to go Republican, but the Republican Party is hell bent on doing anything to prevent it.

    23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7

    [ Parent ]
    No, it's not all about the money
    As I said, he is simply way too socially conservative to win statewide in New York. Period. He has a history of aggressive anti-abortion politics in a pro-choice state. And New York doesn't "seem to want to go Republican." Where are you getting that from?

    "I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
    --  Will Rogers  


    [ Parent ]
    It's all about the money
    NY is a very expensive state to run in. Unlike Fiorina DioGuardi can not self finance and has nowhere near rhe kind of rolodex Fionrina has to call to raise cash.

    Bottom line is DioGaurdi will have no resources to compete. To win in NY as a GOP candidate you need millions of dollars to run an effective race. DioGuardi will be running statewide in NY with less cash than some congressional candidates have.

    Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
    http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


    [ Parent ]
    Btw, my current projection looks like...
    Democrat - 46%
    GOP - 29%
    Independent - 25%

    DioGuardi - 10/93/46 = 44%
    Gillibrand - 90/7/54 = 56%

    I have Cuomo up 64/36 and Schumer up 68/32.

    For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast


    [ Parent ]
    If DioGuardi gets 44% of the vote the GOP should kick themselves
    The last time a GOP candidate got 44% of the vote was Al D'Amato vs Schumer in 1998. Even Rick Lazio only got 43% vs Hilary.

    If DioGuardi get that high a percentage it shows the GOP gave away a senate seat to the Dems.

    Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
    http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


    [ Parent ]
    Yes
    I think they did.  Had they found a self-funder without a big political record, I think they might have been able to do it.  Just seems like that sort of year, but the NY GOP just can't seem to shoot straight.  Someone needs to take over the state party apparatus and rebuild.

    43 - Male - GOP/Libertarian - FL 22

    [ Parent ]
    The guy who was supose to take over and do that was Cox
    But he sold the NY GOP out to try and help is son in NY-1.

    I talked to a friend of mine who is a bit of a minor player in the NYS GOP.

    What he told me was Cox cut a deal with the Suffolk County GOP to back Levy for Gov in exchange for the County GOP backing Chris Cox in NY-1.

    When Lazio wouldnt go along with that and insisted on running Cox tried to move Lazio to the Senate race.

    Cox went out of his way to make sure not to recruit a big named candidate for the Senate race vs Gillibrand so Lazio had a fall back race to run in.

    DioGuardi's original plan was to run for Senate vs. Schumer. He only moved over the the Special Election race because he saw an opening there.

    Basically the guy who was suppose to fix the NYS GOP screwed them over royally in a failed attempted to help get his son elected to congress.  

    Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
    http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


    [ Parent ]
    Sheesh
    Well, they need to get rid of him, then.  Tricky Dick must be spinning in his grave that his son-in-law is so incompetent at politics.

    43 - Male - GOP/Libertarian - FL 22

    [ Parent ]
    The Lazio thing is intriguing
    I suspect he'd perform at least 3-5 points better than DioGuardi.

    For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

    [ Parent ]
    And still lose n/t


    "I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
    --  Will Rogers  


    [ Parent ]
    Bloomberg might have won
    I'm quite unconvinced any other candidate would have beaten Gillibrand. She's a great fundraiser and her history in her Congressional district shows that she's a tenacious campaigner.

    "I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
    --  Will Rogers  


    [ Parent ]
    DioGuardi
    is way too much of a social conservative to win statewide in New York. I wouldn't give him more than a 1 in 200 chance of winning, and only in case Cuomo was found guilty of gross corruption or a crime of moral turpitude or/and made a series of exceedingly idiotic statements.

    "I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
    --  Will Rogers  


    [ Parent ]
    Well
    He's not running against Cuomo.

    43 - Male - GOP/Libertarian - FL 22

    [ Parent ]
    Yeah, I'm sure Schneiderman and DiNapoli are hoping the Cuomo coattails are enough
    I suspect that's not necessarily the case, though. Cuomo and Schumer are poised to win 2-to-1, but we've got an AG race that's a legit toss-up and a Comptroller showdown that's probably only Lean D. I think Gillibrand's still in Safe D territory, that is unless another poll can back up DioGuardi being competitive (a 10 pt lead would make this Likely D, in my book).

    For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

    [ Parent ]
    On the Coattails front....
    I wonder if the new voting format will make it harder for candidates to have coattails.

    Under the old machanical voting booth machine system it was easy to go straight down 1 row and pull all the levers.

    Drop offs in vote totals tended to occur the farther from the top a race was located on the ballot.

    During the primary I noticed that under the new fill in the ovals system it will be impossible to just go straight down a line clicking the levers.

    Voters will have to look at each race to make sure the right ovals are being filled in making it harder to just party line vote.

    I wonder if this could have some effect on down ballot NYS races. It would be an interesting subject to look into.

    Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
    http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


    [ Parent ]
    Right. But same deal with Gillibrand
    He has NO chance.

    "I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
    --  Will Rogers  


    [ Parent ]
    What Heck
    If his own internal shows him down, that's not good. But the linked Roll Call article gives Heck the best possible spin:

    While Heck's poll finds Herrera at 47 percent and Heck at 44 percent, it's an improvement from recent public surveys and past polling conducted for Heck's campaign.


    That's right.
    I believe the SurveyUSA polls here this time.

    28, Liberal Democrat, CA-26

    [ Parent ]
    Heck's big advantage
    is that he has like an 8:1 financial edge on Herrera and can start positively identifying himself to voters now while trying to drag her down as too conservative.  

    [ Parent ]
    He's been trying
    Plenty of Heck ads on Portland TV. Zero Herrera ads. The poll numbers suggest to me that the needle ain't moving.

    [ Parent ]
    No, the polling
    shows that the needle IS moving, but Herrera still leads.  Survey USA and Heck's internals track identical four-point shifts towards Heck.

    34, WM, Democrat, FL-11

    [ Parent ]
    While I hope you're right
    (you make a good point w/r/t 2 different polls)

    4 points sounds like statistical noise to me.


    [ Parent ]
    If Heck is on the air and attacking hard, there's still plenty of time......
    I have no idea where Herrera stands on the hot-button issues that are good for us this cycle, but if there's something to attack and Heck is attacking, and Heck really has that big a cash advantage, then this is winnable.  I'm counting it as a loss for now, but anywhere we have such a big money advantage has potential for a Democratic comeback.

    43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10

    [ Parent ]
    Question still remains
    why would any candidate release an internal poll showing him behind? I thought that was the Raul Labrador method.

    Nevertheless, the article associated with the released internal is quite positive for Heck.


    [ Parent ]
    To show they're still breathing


    [ Parent ]
    Coons ahead by 15
    54-39 in Scotty's Pulse poll for Faux.

    http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo...


    And
    Castle would have been ahead by 15 over Coons.

    [ Parent ]
    Thank our lucky stars


    [ Parent ]
    OR-05: Kurt Schrader ad following the Hooley model
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

    NWOTSOTB, but it's running constantly here in Portland.

    The focus is on what he's done to help the vet, and that approach worked well IMO for Darlene Hooley in '06 (Schrader's predecessor in this district)


    Corbett up 15 over Onoarto
    http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x128...

    Guess that poll showing the Republican +1 was an outlier

    28, Liberal Democrat, CA-26


    [ Parent ]
    Oops...
    didn't mean that to be a reply to OR-05.

    28, Liberal Democrat, CA-26

    [ Parent ]
    DGA
    Does anyone know where the DGA is spending money this cycle?  Presumably not on this race, I would assume.  FL and CA would seem the best targets.

    43 - Male - GOP/Libertarian - FL 22

    [ Parent ]
    They put a million into GA-Gov recently


    Independent Socialist & Chair of SSP Cranky Indianian Hoosier Caucus, IN-09

    [ Parent ]
    RGA/DGA spending in PA
    I have not heard much other than the RGA dumping $500,000 awhile back.

    23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7

    [ Parent ]
    WV-Sen: PPP poll will find Raese up 46-43
    Waiting for link to confirm.

    For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

    Manchin only at 43%?
    Fails the smell test.

    [ Parent ]
    Big victory for my back of the envelope math yesterday
    guessing at what the result of the poll would be:

    http://www.swingstateproject.c...

    I think we should all focus on that as something positive that we can take from this.

    34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


    [ Parent ]
    I think the rest of the numbers fit, though
    Manchin's approval is still in the neighborhood of 60, and there is overwhelming positive sentiment for Robert Byrd. 51% of respondents identify as Democrats and the age breakdown is a little old but OK. There is also overwhelming disapproval for President Obama and Congressional Democrats. All of this "feels" like West Virginia, and while I'm shocked at the topline, I'm willing to give PPP the benefit of the doubt.

    20, CD MA-03/NH-01/MA-08

    [ Parent ]
    Age groups
    I am curious if a younger sample in a place like West Virginia would actually be more Republican.

    23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7

    [ Parent ]
    Possible
    I think it's possible.  Look at it this way - you like the job he's doing as Gov, but if he goes to DC, he becomes a hostage of the 'Obama/Pelosi agenda' and has to vote for their policy.  But if you like him as Gov, you can keep him and sent a GOP guy to the Senate - win/win!  I'll bet that's how a lot of people in WV are seeing it, anyway.  I still have the Dems picked to win this seat, but they will have to spend some $ against a self-funder and apparently this is NOT a cheap state to advertise in as it's covered by a lot of different (and expensive) media markets.

    43 - Male - GOP/Libertarian - FL 22

    [ Parent ]
    Link
    http://tinyurl.com/22wbtzx

    Obama approval at 30%?  Only 51% among Democrats?  As I said, doesn't pass the smell test.


    [ Parent ]
    In addition

    John McCain won the state by 13 points in 2008, but West Virginians who plan to vote this year report
    casting ballots for McCain by 23 points over President Obama-a 10-point enthusiasm gap compared to the electorate two years ago. If the same internals were still true and
    this race had been run in 2008, Manchin would be ahead roughly 50-44.




    [ Parent ]
    Not unreasonable
    Remember West Virginia has a roughly 2 to 1 Democratic registration advantage and Obama still lost there by 13%.

    23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7

    [ Parent ]
    I Don't Buy Obama at 30%
    I'd buy a number in the high 30s, but not 30. And yes, I know all about it being an old white state, though only state fully in Appalachia. But 30 doesn't makes sense given other numbers.

    That said, I can buy Raese polling well for now. He has been advertising a lot (beyond his in-state media empire), and I haven't heard of there being any Manchin campaign to speak of that's activated yet.


    [ Parent ]
    Campaign
    So is Manchin going to Coakley this race?  Letting Raese have free reign is not good.

    23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7

    [ Parent ]
    I Agree
    But at this point it doesn't surprise me since Manchin is extremely risk-averse, doesn't like to show his hand, and is used to winning elections without having to try too hard. Has he ever had a tough race? I'm not aware of it if he has.  

    [ Parent ]
    Neither did Coakley
    I hate this comparison seeing he strikes me as a very in touch politician, but not campaigning hard a month out before an election in a tough year seems pushing it.

    23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7

    [ Parent ]
    Well If There's Any Hope In This Poll
    It's that the cross-tabs look odd. President Obama is least popular with younger West Virginians? And more popular with men than women? Hopefully that's a sign something's a bit off here - and in ways that undercount traditional Democratic strengths.

    [ Parent ]
    Younger population is less Democratic than their parents
    It is common to see the under 50 voters being more Republican in Appalachia.

    23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7

    [ Parent ]
    That Still Doesn't Mean
    The president's popularity with 20-somethings is in the 20s. That's a bizarre finding.

    [ Parent ]
    Thats in line with Rasmussen
    WV is a very Conservative state. Their Dems are probably to the right of Reps in the NE.  

    [ Parent ]
    Interesting
    because the Dems they send to congress are reliable votes on everything. (Rockefeller was one of the top public option advocates during the HCR debate.) Except for Cap and Trade and anything that threatens the coal industry. Then again if Mike Oliverio wins in November expect his voting record to be to the right of Rahall and Rockefeller's.

    19, Male, Independent, CA-12

    [ Parent ]
    They are... so far
    But that may just be a function of a lag. You saw this, actually, in several Southern states in the '70s, '80s, and early '90s, where the national party had grown more liberal, but states continued sending Democrats to Congress for ancestral/cultural reasons. Often you'd have surprisingly reliable or mainstream Democrats in office from Southern states because they were sure that they were never really at risk of losing reelection. Once the states started becoming competitive, though, it became impossible to send more liberal Democrats to Congress from those states.

    A major example is Arkansas. Arkansas' previous two Democratic senators, Dale Bumpers and David Pryor, were much more liberal, party-line voters, than either Mark Pryor or Blanche Lincoln.

    So I suspect that post-Byrd and post-Rockefeller, any Democrats that hold the WV Senate seats will be substantially more conservative than either Byrd or Rockefeller.

    (Although, I've been surprised at how non-Blue-Dog-y Carte Goodwin has been. I mean has he bucked leadership on ANY big votes? Surprising because the speculation was he'd want to eventually run for higher office himself, so you'd think he'd burnish his record for that.)


    [ Parent ]
    I buy this
    I think it's pretty easy to read what's going on in WV. They love the job he's doing as governor. They hate the job Dems in Congress are doing. They want him to stay Gov and not be a Senator and empower the "Reid/Pelosi/Obama" Agenda. I don't think it has anything to do w/ Obama's race and I think that's unfair. I have some family in West Virginia and I know more racist people in Boston than in West Va. I think the race card is a cop out. If Raese pumps in enough money I think he definitely can take this.  

    [ Parent ]
    More FOX/Pulse polling...
    http://www.foxnews.com/politic...

    Angle - 46, Reid - 45
    Brown - 45, Whitman - 45
    Boxer - 47, Fiorina - 46
    Corbett - 49, Onorato - 39
    Toomey - 48, Sestak - 40
    Kasich - 47, Strickland - 41
    Portman - 49, Fisher - 36

    For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast


    Not terrible, considering the source
    Add few points for Scotty/Faux bias, and you have Reid slightly ahead, Brown and Boxer ahead, and Sestak and Strickland within striking distance.

    [ Parent ]
    DOA with those Obama approval numbers
    Obama having 37 and 38 percent approval ratings in Pennsylvania and Ohio respectively is not going to help to say the least.  Does anyone have any idea what Bush was polling in terms of approval rating in PA or Ohio in late September early October 2006?

    23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7

    [ Parent ]
    PA approval
    It would be, based on this poll.  But, based on other polls and the state's leanings, his approval is probably 6-8 points higher.  

    [ Parent ]
    Still a double digit fall off from 2008
    Low 40s is still bad.  I will be curious to see what Quinnipiac releases the Toomey/Sestak numbers tomorrow.

    FYI... the Obama approval numbers mirror the Franklin&Marshall and PPP numbers from August also.  Obama has consistently been under or around 40 percent for months in Pennsylvania and aren't going anywhere.

    23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7


    [ Parent ]
    Fox dumps a zillion polls
    http://www.foxnews.com/politic...

    Delaware
    Coons 48 O'Donnell 33

    Nevada
    Angle 46 Reid 45

    California
    Brown 45 Whitman 45
    Boxer 47 Fiorina 46

    Pennsylvania
    Corbett 49 Onorato 39
    Toomey 48 Sestak 40
    Obama 37% Approval

    Ohio
    Portman 49 Fisher 36
    Kasich by 6

    23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7


    Not bad for Republicans, outside of the DE fail
    Fiorina is at least still in the game, which I doubted was the case for a bit after the PPP poll from yesterday. Angle is still right there with Reid, and PA is the same. Kasich only up by 6 in Fox polling is a little red flag, though. The biggest surprise for me is Whitman/Brown--it looks like this has moved back to tossup after feeling like Lean R for a couple of weeks.


    20, CD MA-03/NH-01/MA-08

    [ Parent ]
    I now think Jerry Brown likely will win in spite of himself, because...
    ...for all that has happened to hurt Democrats, and as bad a campaign as Brown has run, and as much money as Whitman has spent, Whitman is still locked in a tight battle and can't pull away.  It did look like she was pulling away for awhile, and I was convinced the Clinton gaffe was the beginning of a final implosion for Jerry.  And yet it spins around just as fast, and the race is again a jump ball.

    If Whitman couldn't build a clear lead by now, I don't think she can build one later.  We all assume Jerry is going to finally spend real money the rest of the way, and that will get him over the top along with Bill Clinton actually campaigning for him.

    This is going to help Boxer, too, since she no longer will have to worry that Jerry is weighing down the whole ticket.

    43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


    [ Parent ]
    It's 54-39 in Delaware


    [ Parent ]
    Ralston calls BS again...
    He tweeted the internals, including the sample having the even number of GOPers and Dems... And 30% Indies??!! Plus, this is the Razzy outfit that apparently one can pay $600 for them to "poll".

    I think I'll wait for a more credible Nevada poll, and in the mean time wait for the rest of PPP's new California poll.

    Yes, Virginia, there ARE progressives in Nevada!
    24, gay male, Democrat, NV-03 (or 04?)


    [ Parent ]
    I don't think their model is too far off
    My own projection has this at 35D-33R-32I. Oh, and I also have Angle up 1.

    For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

    [ Parent ]
    Model
    Your model is very plausible for Nevada.

    23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7

    [ Parent ]
    PPP says Raese leads Manchin in WV...
    Well, shit...(if true).

    http://www.publicpolicypolling...

    It's like anything remotely close to Obama and Democrats is poison even for a poor state like WV. Un-freaking believable....

    Indepedent/Lean D. Dude.
    All 5s (now TX-5; frmly VA-5 and CA-5)  


    I imagine Charlie Cook will rate this as toss-up soon


    [ Parent ]
    Pollster.com already lists it as a tossup
    I've expected for some time that it would become one, although I still expect that Manchin will probably win.

    It's a big reason why I was thrilled O'Donnell won in DE.  


    [ Parent ]
    WV has always been poor, that never changes, so they vote culture nowadays......
    Awful hard to make money living in the mountains.  Awful hard to develop the economy in such a place.

    So those folks finally are aligning their conservative political impulses with the appropriate political party.

    That said, I bet Manchin pulls this out......but not by much.  He's going to have to go hard negative on Raese.

    43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


    [ Parent ]
    A lot has to do with pigmentation
    If Hillary Clinton were president, and pursued the same policies, I think you'd see different approval ratings.

    [ Parent ]
    I think
    I think that's a little unfair to the residents of WV.  

    43 - Male - GOP/Libertarian - FL 22

    [ Parent ]
    Sometimes the truth is


    [ Parent ]
    A little unfair
    I lived in an area similar to West Virginia right across the border in PA-12. While a few are racist for sure, I doubt that is the primary cause of this.  I think there are other things going on here including West Virginia being such an old state and flight from the Democrats over environmental policy.  Seeing how dependent West Virginia is on extractive industries, it should not be shocking that any perceived harm to these industries would drive voters to vote one way or another.

    23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7

    [ Parent ]
    PA-12?
    Then why does you sig line say PA-7?

    [ Parent ]
    He says he "lived," past tense, in PA-12. He's PA-07 now. (nm)
    nm

    43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10

    [ Parent ]
    Lived
    I lived in PA-12 while in high school.

    23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7

    [ Parent ]
    I just checked turnout, and didn't realize until now WV turnout dropped by 40K voters from...
    ...2004 to 2008.

    That really is telltale.

    The state's population has been flat but did increase absolutely by about 11K from 2004 to 2008, so voters really did just take a pass on the last election.

    43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


    [ Parent ]
    As Did
    Of course, the Obama campaign. They didn't campaign in WV, and the lack of that activity could have depressed turnout somewhat.

    [ Parent ]
    which should give pause
    To anyone giving a "they're racist" argument as if the people of WV were that against a black person becoming president, turn-out should have been higher to combat his possible presidency.  Or, if the drop in turn-out came almost solely from the party of the black person.  I'm on my blackberry so I can't quickly look up the numbers but Obama did almost as well as Kerry here (same percentage points I want to say even) so it isn't the later either.

    (Although I am a very big proponent of the belief that racial politics is deeply in play in this country currently.)


    [ Parent ]
    The rounded-off percentages were the same in 2004 and 2008, they were...
    ...56-43.  Obama and McCain both had fewer votes than, finished fractions of percentage points below, Kerry and Bush, respectively.  Third-party and independent candidates sopped up those fractions in 2008 when they didn't get as much in 2004.

    I don't think you can point to Obama not campaigning there as a factor, because Kerry didn't campaign there, either.  Organic voter interest just declined.

    43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


    [ Parent ]
    I'd buy that if it wasn't for 2 things......
    First, Obama lost WV 56-43, virtually the same as Kerry.

    Second, no, Hillary's job approvals wouldn't be any better, we'd still be in the same recession, with perhaps slightly different legislative accomplishments and failures/non-starters, but we'd be in the same place overall.

    I do think Obama being black is an issue, but the people for whom it's an issue are the same people who vote against Kerry or dislike Hillary or other national Democrats for other strongly-held cultural reasons.

    43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


    [ Parent ]
    1996
    Bill carried the state comfortably despite 1994, and all the Clinton hatred from the right.

    [ Parent ]
    That
    That really didn't have anything to do with Clinton's skin colour as much as he knew how to win those sorts of states.  A skill totally lacking in Gore and Kerry.  Obama did better in the south than those two; I still think it's unfair to say WV is a racist state just because you don't like their choice in senate candidates.

    43 - Male - GOP/Libertarian - FL 22

    [ Parent ]
    That wasn't b/c he was white, it was b/c the state wasn't YET ready to let go of its Democratic roots......
    The state's voters have been Democrats for many generations, and it was a big thing for a lot of them to vote Republican.  They resisted out of loyalty to tradition.  But that eventually was going to fall down, and finally did.  These people are just plain conservative and always were.  They voted Democratic for a long time and rationalized it by way of needing the economic help.  And they do need it.  But it ultimately doesn't change the state, which probably can never be changed because it's entirely in the damn mountains.  And the people finally figured that out and decided they might as well vote on other things that they also care about, namely cultural issues.

    43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10

    [ Parent ]
    I think increasing affluence is also part of it
    Yes, WV is still a poor state, but part of what has happened the past few decades in much of the South and Appalachia is that as they've becoming more integrated with the rest of the country, the economic well-being of their population rises. The population may still be poor relative to the rest of the country, but once the majority of people there are at least earning a middle-class income and living in suburban communities, their voting habits change. For one thing, cost-of-living is low, so they feel better about their position than they otherwise would. And once their basic needs are met, they no longer feel they rely on government, so their resentments at those that do build and their cultural biases take over.  

    [ Parent ]
    Guns & Coal
    I think that's what it comes down to. It's not about the state being conservative as such. It's not about missing some supposed Clinton charms. It's not about race (well, not much). I think once the meme got entrenched that the Democrats were going to take away their rifles and that the Democrats were enemies of the coal industry, the Democratic base in the state (which is rural, hunts, is still deeply invested in a state story tied to those things, and which gets lots of money from people tied to coal) fundamentally shifted in a way that moved the state at least 10% away from where it was in the early 90s.

    [ Parent ]
    I wouldn't freak out too much...
    ... until this gets corroborated by other polls. I mean, even Rasmussen had Manchin ahead by 8 just a couple of days ago.

    But that said, I do think this will be a close race. The national climate isn't good for Democrats, and Manchin may not be immune.  


    [ Parent ]
    Ben Nelson v. Chuck Hagel 1996 redux?
    Different year and circumstances but could it happen?

    Weird that Hagel became better while Nelson got worse. I do agree that any Democrat running for federla office needs to be pummeling the be-Jesus out of any opponent, otherwise one risks sneak upsets.

    Indepedent/Lean D. Dude.
    All 5s (now TX-5; frmly VA-5 and CA-5)  


    [ Parent ]
    There's a lot of precedent for popular governors losing Senate bids
    Mike Sullivan vs. Craig Thomas in Wyoming ('94) was one. Kerry vs. Weld ('96) was another, although that wasn't an open-seat contest.

    I've been worried about this seat for awhile, and I felt it was dumb for Manchin not to have simply let the SoS' original ruling stay and wait to run in 2012. (The political climate that year may well be better, and even if it isn't, Manchin would still have to run in 2012 anyway if he won the seat this year.)  


    [ Parent ]
    This is the one I was worried about..
    after the DE primary.  I don't doubt the numbers at all.  

    [ Parent ]
    TN-8: New Herron ad
    Herron has remixed his last attack by incorporating new issues about Fincher ducking debates and refusing interviews, while adding a positive intro. This ad continues with the theme of "Stephen Fincher: Breaking the Law, Unworthy of our Trust".



    Democrat: TN-8


    Mason-Dixon Idaho GOV, ID-1, ID-2 Poll Results
    GUV

    Otter (R) - 45%
    Allred (D) - 29%

    ID-1

    Minnick (D) 46%
    Labrador (R) - 36%

    ID-2

    Luna (R) - 47%
    Olson (D) - 30%^

    http://www.magicvalley.com/new...


    Not ID 02
    Mike Simpson is the GOP Rep for ID-02 and he will cruise. Those numbers are for some other statewide race.  

    [ Parent ]
    Superintendent of Public Instruction [nt]
     

    23, male, Democrat, IA-02 (previously CA-26, PA-06, CA-06)

    [ Parent ]
    Labrador Lives . . .
    If accurate, this poll suggests the GOP nominee (however flawed) is closing.  Expect the GOP and their allies to start dumping money into this race.  

    [ Parent ]
    I don't think so.
    Labrador is not highly regarded by the National GOP and his internals can't show him leading. That's a problem.

    28, Liberal Democrat, CA-26

    [ Parent ]
    CA-GOV - PPP says Brown up by 5.
    http://www.publicpolicypolling...

    34, WM, Democrat, FL-11

    Same as yesterday, I'd like to see another pollster confirm this
    'Cuz the voter model is downright ludicrous.

    For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

    [ Parent ]
    MI-GOV - Rasmussen has Snyder up 51-38.
    Kindest poll I've seen to Bernero.

    34, WM, Democrat, FL-11

    internals look reasonable
    They have Obama at 49% which sounds about right given that his approval in most states is running 5-10 points behind his 08 vote.

    41, Ind, CA-05

    [ Parent ]
    PPP/KOS confirming Wisconsin numbers from yesterday
    Johnson is up 52-41 over Feingold, Scott Walker leads Tom Barrett 50-41 in the race for WI Governor.

    I'm not thrilled with their voter model
    Only this time, I think PPP is UNDER-sampling the Democrats. They're playing with 36R-33I-31D, whereas I'd peg it at 36R-35D-29I. Apply their cross-tabs to my model and you've probably got about a 5-point Johnson lead. My own projection only has Johnson up 2.

    For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

    [ Parent ]
    PA-Gov financial reports
    Someone earlier asked if the DGA is spending any money in Pennsylvania.  I don't have an answer to that, but here are the financial reports as of September 13:

    Corbett COH - $7.7 million
    http://blogs.mcall.com/capitol...

    Onorato COH - $3.3 million
    http://blogs.mcall.com/capitol...

    23, male, center-right cynical Republican, PA-7


    LA-02 - The future is not Cao.
    Rather, the future is Cedric Richmond, who according to this leaked Dem internal leads the aforementioned Representative Cao 45-35, confirming the conventional wisdom that this district is too tough to hold.

    http://hotlineoncall.nationalj...

    34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


    I thought it would be larger
    And since it's an internal poll, it's more likely a five point race.

    [ Parent ]
    Leading only by 10 in a D internal in a D+25 district?
    Even in '10, that suggests that Cao is a lot stronger than a lot of people expected.

    I'm not saying that Cao has much of a chance (absent a Richmond scandal), but right now, it's reasonable to think this is currently just "Lean D"


    [ Parent ]
    Lean D is fine with me.
    What a bunch of droopie dogs we are.  Cao was up something like 24 in his internal released a few months ago.  Richmond's apparently up to 10 or something in that neighborhood now.  I'd call that progress!

    Buck up, you bunch of hangdogs.  Take your good news where you can find it.  

    34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


    [ Parent ]
    Depends who the undecideds are
    If the undecideds are mostly not black, good news for Cao, if mostly black, Cao is done.

    38, male, conservative Republican, TX-3 currently (IL-13)

    [ Parent ]
    Doesn't Richmond have a bunch of scandals surronding him already?
    I remember reading something about a bar fight, a shady charity and something about a murder. Dont remember all the details about it.

    Could this be why its closer than it should be?

    But it is New Orleans so maybe voters are a little more forgiving of their politicians ethical lapses.


    Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
    http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


    [ Parent ]
    Here they all are. Have fun.
    Pretty tame stuff for the Big Easy.

    http://www.nrcc.org/default.as...

    34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


    [ Parent ]
    Damn!
    That certainly makes me feel better. If a Dem internal shows a 10 pt race, this is probably about a 5 point race, before Cao has even hit the airwaves with his financial advantage.  

    [ Parent ]
    NV-Sen: New Ad From Reid and Patriot Majority
    Reid ad:

    Patriot Majority:


    Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
    So little time, so much to know!


    Is attacking Angle for wanting to privatize the VA effective?


    Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
    So little time, so much to know!


    [ Parent ]
    Kratovil dubbing the "fair tax" as the "unfair tax" is pretty good.
    I also like how this commercial points out the economic infeasability of such a tax.

    Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
    So little time, so much to know!


    WI-08: Julie Lassa up with negative ad.


    Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
    So little time, so much to know!


    I mean WI-07


    Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
    So little time, so much to know!


    [ Parent ]
    I mean WI-07


    Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
    So little time, so much to know!


    [ Parent ]
    Pryor and Lincoln have joined the GOP filibuster of DADT
    I wonder if Halter would consider giving Pryor a primary challenge?

    For daily political commentary, visit me at http://polibeast.blogspot.com/ and http://twitter.com/polibeast

    I Am Going to Delight
    In seeing Lincoln lose by a bigger margin than Rick Santorum.

    [ Parent ]
    This isn't
    really SSP material, but I'll add Blanche Lincoln probably won't vote for a DADT repeal because she's afraid Boozman will choke her with it in Arkansas. Not that Boozman has no shortage of things to attack Lincoln with. And Pryor was probably just providing cover for Lincoln like he did when he voted against the Reconciliation HCR bill.

    19, Male, Independent, CA-12

    [ Parent ]
    MI-03
    Prefers to think of itself as supporting moderate Republicans.  When he retired, Ehlers said he didn't plan to endorse, because either of Hardiman or Heacock would make a fine Congressman.  When asked specifically about Amash, he repeated that either of Hardiman or Heacock would be a good choice.  (He eventually endorsed one of them, but Amash won the primary anyhow.)

    This race is still at least Likely R, and probably safe -- but it has a chance of becoming Tea Party Fail.  And even if Amash wins, he has a chance of getting booted out in two years, whereas the others would have been safe.


    CA-Sen: Scotty finds Boxer up 4
    CQ's new ratings are gloomy with some exceptions
    http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmsp...

    Tossup to Lean R:
    CO-04 (Markey)
    FL-24 (Kosmas)
    IL-11 (Halvorson)
    IN-08 (Ellsworth, Open)
    MD-01 (Kratovil)
    NH-02 (Hodes, Open)
    OH-01 (Driehaus)
    OH-15 (Kilroy)
    TN-08 (Tanner, Open)
    TX-17 (Chet Edwards)

    Leans D to Tossup:
    AZ-01 (Kirkpatrick)
    AZ-05 (Mitchell)
    GA-08 (Marshall)
    NY-19 (Hall)
    PA-10 (Carney)
    WI-08 (Kagen)

    Leans R to Tossup (?!!):
    CA-03 (Lungren) (?!)

    16, Male, Democrat, CA-42/sometimes CA-32.


    I NEED to see polling out of CA-03.
    It's getting me excited.

    I think all of the other ones we knew about (From some kind of internal), with the possible exception of GA-08. The Marshall internal showed him up by a good bit. Maybe CQ is weighting Republicans internals more.

    28, Liberal Democrat, CA-26


    [ Parent ]
    Or maybe
    They've seen some unreleased Dem internals...

    [ Parent ]
    what does NWOTSOTB mean?
    It's been driving me crazy for months.  (Not without other tall short old time beers?)  (No wild onions think someone outside thinks big?)    I'm lost.  Help me out here.  

    thanks,

    Michael  


    It stands for
    No Word On The Size Of The Buy.

    23, male, Democrat, IA-02 (previously CA-26, PA-06, CA-06)

    [ Parent ]

    Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

    Primary Sponsor

    You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

    Menu

    Make a New Account

    Username:

    Password:



    Forget your username or password?


    About the Site

    SSP Resources

    Blogroll

    Powered by: SoapBlox