Public Policy Polling (9/11-12, likely voters, 8/7-8 in parentheses):
Chris Coons (D): 50 (44)
Christine O'Donnell (R): 34 (37)
Undecided: 16 (19)
Chris Coons (D): 35 (35)
Mike Castle (R): 45 (48)
Undecided: 20 (17)
(MoE: ±3.2%)
The loud rumbling sound you're hearing is the implosion of Republican chances in the Delaware Senate race, previously one of their gimmees that were the foundation for big overall Senate gains. As you can see, Democratic New Castle Co. Executive Chris Coons was well on track to lose to Mike Castle (although by a narrower margin than others polls have seen)... but the state's remaining Republican electorate saw fit to nominate Christine O'Donnell last night, giving Coons a pretty clear shot at the win.
How bad a fit for the Delaware general electorate is O'Donnell? Let's look at some of the underlying details: Castle's favorables are 44/40, while O'Donnell's are 29/50. 45% thought Mike Castle was "just right," while 31% said "too liberal" and 15% "too conservative." On other hand, Christine O'Donnell is 40% "too conservative," with only 35% "just right" and 9% "too liberal." By a 59-26 margin Castle was seen "fit to hold public office;" by a 49-31 margin O'Donnell is not. 18% say a Sarah Palin endorsement would make it more likely for them to vote for a candidate, while 52% say less likely. 15% say they're members of the Tea Party, 71% are not. All in all, a pretty serious indication that the Delaware Republican Party, shrunken by the defection of many moderates to the Dems as in many other northeastern states, has been distilled to irrational purism in its purest essence.
UPDATE: Swing State Project is moving this race to Lean Democratic (from Lean Republican). While this poll might be more suggestive of "Likely D," we don't want to underestimate the power of a particularly revved-up Republican base in an open-seat race, even in a blue state like Delaware. |