Google Ads


Site Stats

AK-Sen: Libertarians Tell Murkowski to Twist

by: James L.

Mon Aug 30, 2010 at 1:25 PM EDT


Politico:

The Alaska Libertarian Party will not swap its chosen nominee for Sen. Lisa Murkowski if she loses the GOP nomination.

"We have decided that we will not offer the nomination to Lisa Murkowski for the Senate seat, even if came to that, because of fundamental differences," said Alaska Libertarian Party Chairman Scott Kohlhaas.

The prospect of getting a sitting United States Senator to change colors must have been a hard thing to turn down for a party that doesn't even have any elected state legislators, but at the end of the day, it seems that the Libertarians had too many issues with Murkowski's voting record. At the end of the day, though, this is good news for Democrats: polling has shown that Democrat Scott McAdams has the best shot against Miller in a two-way race. Of course, now the possibility exists that Murkowski could run as a write-in, should she lose the GOP nomination to Miller.

In other Alaska news, the latest updated tally of uncounted votes is now north of 25,000: 15,720 absentees, 663 early votes, and 9,117 questioned ballots. The Alaska DoE says that about 7,000 votes will be counted tomorrow, which should give us a good indication of just where this race will end up.

Meanwhile, Joe Miller sounds like a 2004-era tinfoil hatter, as his attorney is sounding the alarm over Murkowski supporters potentially tampering with the state's "vulnerable" Diebold voting technology with their iPhones. God, this cat fud looks so tasty that even I may need to take a bite!

James L. :: AK-Sen: Libertarians Tell Murkowski to Twist
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

The only alternative then is for her to be the Democratic candidate
Switch parties or run as a write-in.

I doubt Democrats would accept her.


That's a non-option.


[ Parent ]
While running as a libertarian was seen to hurt McAdams
Does anyone think a write in campaign would hurt McAdams?

I could see it going either way if that happened.  It could be that only dedicated Murkowski supporters (Republican affiliates?) would write her in, while indys and dems would see how right Miller is and vote for McAdams to try to stop that train wreck in its tracks.

20, Male, Democrat, CA-44 (home) CA-12 (college)


Is that even pollable?
I think pollsters in the case of a high-profile write-in campaign would likely not name Murkowski but have "write-in" as an option. But then there's the question of whether you can still poll Murkowski's favorables. It would be interesting.

Some Dude, 19, Democrat, NH-02 (residence), MA-08 (college)

[ Parent ]
Reminds me of a California House election in 1982
in which Ron Packard, after losing the primary by 62 votes, ran a poll that found that voters would vote for him if they knew they could write his name in. He then campaigned using pencils as a prop and beat the Republican and Democratic nominees.

My blog
Twitter
Scribd
28, New Democrat, Female, TX-03 (hometown CA-26)


[ Parent ]
Oh cripes.
Looks like Miller has both the crazy and the brains to support his crazy.  He's smart enough to cite a report about the Diebold machines.

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01

Latest
Lt Gov Campbell just said on local Anch radio that a Murk observer may have committed some "monkey business" while votes were being organized but no huge crimes. The State will post attys at the various counting locations but not Troopers.

Counting will start tomorrow at 9 ADT, 1 EDT at the 4 main election offices in Anch, Fbks, Wasilla and Juneau. Should have a pretty good idea in 2-3 hours.



Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox