WA-Sen: Murray Has Small Edge Over Rossi

PPP (pdf) (7/27-8/1, Washington voters, no trendlines):

Patty Murray (D-inc): 47

Dino Rossi (R): 33

Clint Didier (R): 10

Paul Akers (R): 4

Undecided: 6

Patty Murray (D-inc): 49

Dino Rossi (R): 46

Undecided: 5

Patty Murray (D-inc): 50

Clint Didier (R): 39

Undecided: 12

(MoE: ±2.8%)

PPP’s first look at the Washington Senate race confirms what we’ve known for months: this is going to be a close race, but Patty Murray has a perceptible advantage thanks to the lean of the state and decent approvals. Check out the undecideds: only 5% in a Murray/Dino Rossi head-to-head. Thanks to Rossi’s two gubernatorial runs, everyone in the state already has an opinion of both candidates, and he’s not going to fall below 46% (which is about where he wound up in 2008’s gubernatorial race). It’s the getting from that base camp to the summit of 50%+1 in this blue state that’s the tricky part for him (and for all Republicans, period).

Murray’s approvals are 46/45, surprisingly not-bad for an incumbent politician this year; Tom Jensen points out that leaves her fairly exalted company (only five Senators up for re-election this year have better ratings). Rossi’s favorables are 43/48, again, pointing to the problem of who he wins over to get over the top. (Bear in mind, too, that this sample went 51-41 for Obama over McCain in 2008; the actual Obama margin was 17 points, so this sample may be about as good as it gets for the GOP.)

PPP also wisely looked at Washington’s weirdo top-two primary, finding Murray easily winning there, but also finding Rossi set to cruise into the 2nd slot in the general. Faced with monumental name rec and financial deficits against Rossi, teabagger candidates Clint Didier and Paul Akers wound up more on the Chuck Purgason/Patrick Hughes side of the ledger rather than the Rand Paul/Sharron Angle end. Murray’s numbers are pretty flat from primary to general, meaning that Rossi pretty thoroughly consolidates the Didier and Akers votes behind him for the general, despite a general carping from the far right about the establishment having cleared Rossi’s path.

Also of note in this race: both Murray and Rossi are hitting the airwaves. In fact, this is Rossi’s first ad from his own campaign (although he’s been aided by GOP 3rd-party advertising). His spot is mostly a soft re-introduction ad, although he does tout the GOP’s newfound interest in fighting debt. Murray, by contrast, is going negative, pointing out the correlation between Rossi’s Wall Street fundraising and his being the first Senate candidate out there to run in favor of repeal of the recent financial reform package. Murray’s ad even invokes the Bush years for good measure, as part of what may be a new trend for Dem advertisements (although there’s some questions as to the usefulness of that argument).

9 thoughts on “WA-Sen: Murray Has Small Edge Over Rossi”

  1. But looks like a 52-48 sort of race that hardly budges. I don’t see how somebody with upside down favorables wins in a state that leans to the other party.

  2. 2 are positive ads one focused on Boeing jobs, another on aiding vets. Both of those ads have been running 2 weeks. The negative ad just started this week. I expect we’ll see her keep that kind of ration of 2 positive to 1 negative and run them at the same time.

  3. PPP continues to ask the best questions, but has some screwy samples.

    14% of Obama voters will not show in Washington, but 0% will not show in North Carolina??????????  Um, no.

    A more reasonable 5% Obama no show rate would put Murray up by 10+ points.  

    Likely Dem.

  4. Independent – 41%

    Democrat – 31%

    GOP – 28%

    Murray – 53/90/5 = 51%

    Rossi – 47/10/95 = 49%

    Since I suspect each candidate garners 90%+ of the party vote, this’ll come right down to Independents. In ’08, it was a 51/49 split between Gregorie/Rossi. If the same occurs here, the race is a legit tie. Alas, I think, despite the worse environment, Murray is still a decent bit more popular now than Gregorie was two years back.  

Comments are closed.