Google Ads


Site Stats

SSP Daily Digest: 7/7 (Afternoon Edition)

by: Crisitunity

Wed Jul 07, 2010 at 4:33 PM EDT


CO-Sen: Both Democratic candidates are hitting the TV airwaves, with Michael Bennet trying once again to introduce himself to his constituents with a feel-good bio spot, and Andrew Romanoff's first ad playing up the anti-corruption, anti-Washington angle he's been working. Over on the Republican side, where Ken Buck seems to be putting some distance between himself and Jane Norton, Buck got some useful backing from the Dick Army: he snagged a FreedomWorks endorsement. Norton's 2005 support for TABOR-limiting Referendum C seems to have been a dealbreaker for the teabaggers.

KY-Sen: PPP, fresh off its Rand Paul/Jack Conway poll yesterday, also has some approval numbers out for Mitch McConnell. It's more evidence that the most dangerous job in America is party leader in the Senate. McConnell's numbers are dwindling, and his backing of Trey Grayson over Paul in the GOP primary seems to have accelerated that: he's down to 34/48, after having had favorables in the 40s in their previous polls, with almost all of his decline coming from Republicans. 49% of all respondents would like to see him lose his leadership role, with only 38% saying continue.

NH-Sen: Big money for Kelly Ayotte this quarter: she raised $720K last quarter, her biggest quarter so far. No word on her CoH.

NV-Sen: With their empty coffers suddenly replenished, the Karl Rove-led 527 American Crossroads decided to keep their anti-Harry Reid attack ad on the air in Nevada for the fourth straight week. They've spent nearly half a million airing the same ad.

NY-Sen-B: Although the terrible disarray in the state GOP can't be helping matters, New York's unique ballot access laws just seem to encourage self-destructive behavior by the local Republicans. With Republican/Conservative/Independence Party splits threatening to result in multiple viable right-of-center candidates in races ranging from NY-01 to NY-23, now cat fud is about to start flying in the Senate race. David Malpass, seeming a long shot in the Republican field, has said that he's going to seek the ballot line on the as-yet-to-be-named teabagger's ballot line that gubernatorial candidate Carl Paladino is trying to create, most likely to be called the Taxpayer's line. Malpass, as you'll recall, is lagging in GOP primary polls against Joe DioGuardi, who already has the Conservative line but is trying to petition onto the GOP ballot, and Bruce Blakeman, who's assured a spot on the GOP ballot. This may even spill over into the who-cares other Senate race, where Gary Berntsen wants in on the Taxpayer's line (and where rival Jay Townsend already has the Conservative line).

WA-Sen: The Washington Farm Bureau, which endorsed Dino Rossi in his two failed gubernatorial bids, has decided not to endorse anybody in the Senate race. Goldy wonders whether this is a matter of lots of Clint Didier supporters at the Farm Bureau... Didier, after all, is a farmer... or if the Farm Bureau secretly likes Patty Murray's skill at appropriations.

WV-Sen: Gov. Joe Manchin held a press conference today to announce his plans on the vacant Senate seat, and it seems like the institutional pressure on him to fill the seat soon (preferably with himself) seems to be working. Manchin stopped short of calling on the state legislature to have a special session to move up the election to Nov. 2010, but he did tell his AG to start laying the legal groundwork for such a move. Manchin again said that he wouldn't appoint himself to the seat on a temporary basis, but confirmed that he would be "highly" interested in running for the seat whenever the special election occurs. (He didn't give any inkling on who he might appoint.) At any rate, it seems like Manchin feels confident that, despite the national downdraft for Dems this year, his own personal popularity, combined with the shortened election schedule working to his advantage, would facilitate his election in November; if he didn't, he wouldn't be going along so readily with the moved-up election.

CO-Gov: Democratic nominee John Hickenlooper had better hope the contributions keep coming in: he's sitting on only $66K CoH right now (although he raised $500K in June alone), but he just reserved $1.2 million in ad time. The plan is to lock the ad space in now, when it's still cheap to reserve far in advance. On the Republican side of the aisle, insurgent candidate Dan Maes is in some trouble: he's being hit with the largest fine ever handed down to a Colorado candidate for campaign finance donations. It was for a series of small-ball failures rather than one huge blunder, ranging from improper reimbursements to himself for mileage, to failure to list occupations for many donors.

OK-Gov: As I remarked yesterday, it's a remarkable transformation for Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, who in a few months went from DOA in her own primary, to competing with Sarah Palin in terms of traversing the country handing out GOP primary endorsements like so much poisoned candy. (What's something Arizona-specific that we can call her clutch of endorsees? Mama Rattlesnakes?) Brewer waded into another gubernatorial race, giving her backing to Rep. Mary Fallin in Oklahoma.

PA-Gov: Democratic nominee Dan Onorato seems to be kicking his fundraising operations into higher gear after having won the primary; he pulled in $1 million in contributions in the last month. He's sitting on $2.5 million CoH.

TX-Gov: The plot (to get the Green Party on the ballot in Texas) keeps thickening. New e-mails have surfaced among Green leaders revealing the name of Anthony Holm, a GOP consultant linked to big-time GOP donor Bob Perry (the man behind the Swift Boat Vets), saying that he wanted to pay for 40% of the costs of petitions to get the Greens on the ballot. Holm denies any involvement.

MN-06: It looks like the 6th, held by lightning rod Michele Bachmann, is going to be the nation's most expensive House race this year. Democratic challenger Tarryl Clark posted big numbers this morning, raising $910K this quarter, claiming $2 million raised so far this cycle. (No mention of her CoH.) Then later this morning, Bachmann topped that, raising $1.7 million last quarter, giving her $4.1 million CoH, which would be plenty even for a Senate race.

TN-06: State Sen. Diane Black has a GOP primary lead in an internal poll taken for her by OnMessage. She's at 41, leading former Rutherford County GOP chair Lou Ann Zelenik at 22 and state Sen. Jim Tracy at 20. Black (or whoever else wins) should have an easy time picking up this R+13 Dem-held open seat, vacated by retiring Rep. Bart Gordon.

TN-08: Here's one more GOP primary internal poll out of Tennessee, from the Stephen Fincher camp. His poll, conducted by the Tarrance Group, gives Fincher the lead at 32, followed by Ron Kirkland at 23 and George Flinn at 21. Attacks on Fincher by the other two seem to have taken their toll, as Fincher's previous internal poll from early April gave him a 40-17-7 lead. As with the poll in the 6th, there's no word on general election matchups.

WI-07: Republican Sean Duffy, bolstered by David Obey's retirement (and a Sarah Palin endorsement), had a big quarter, raising $470K. He's at $670K CoH.

Legislatures: If you read one thing today, this should be it: Stateline.org's Louis Jacobson handicaps all the state legislative chambers that promise to be competitive this year. As you might expect, the news isn't very good for Democrats, considering not just the nature of the year but how many chambers they currently hold. He projects one currently Democratic-controlled chamber as Lean R (the Indiana House), and has 11 nominally Dem-held chambers as Tossups (both Alabama chambers, Iowa House, Montana House, both New Hampshire chambers, New York Senate, Ohio House, Pennsylvania House, and both Wisconsin chambers). The only nominally GOP-held chamber that's a Tossup is the Alaska Senate, which is in fact controlled by a coalition of sane Republicans and Democrats.

NRCC: The NRCC seems to like slapping lots of different names on different groups so that they look busy, and now they've even come up with a program for primary victors who are running in safe Republican seats: "Vanguard!" There's no word on what exactly they plan to do for these shoo-ins, or if it's just an impressive-sounding title so that the likes of Jeff Duncan and Todd Rokita don't feel left out.

Fundraising: The Fix has a couple other fundraising tidbits that we haven't seen before: Craig Miller in FL-24 raised $270K for 2Q with $332K CoH. And Charlie Bass in NH-02 raised $170K and has $360K CoH.

Crisitunity :: SSP Daily Digest: 7/7 (Afternoon Edition)
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Any reason Manchin wouldn't want the special this year?
As we've seen with governors from Spitzer to Sanford, you can go from incredibly popular to laughingstock overnight. Not suggesting that Manchin has any skeletons in his closet, but I wouldn't take the chance of waiting 2 years and assuming his popularity as governor will still be so high.

Also, WV is one of the few states in the union where the GOP would benefit from having this race in a presidential year as opposed to a midterm year. Obama is pretty toxic there (although Manchin had no trouble winning in '08.)

20, CD MA-03/NH-01/MA-08


From an electoral perspective no
but Manchin might just love being Governor, and might not want to leave until he has to.  And why wouldn't he, I mean he has everything at his fingertips right now, and no strong opposition from any corner.  

As a senator, he would not only have to take tough votes, but would have to fight 98 others who really could care less about his state.  (I suspect the deep-held opinion of West Virginia among most senators isn't that different than among most bloggers.)


[ Parent ]
But It Might Be a Good Time to Leave
He can leave Charleston before he has to make tough choices (has Manchin made any in 6 years?): one never knows how having to deal with a state budget is going to go in this economic environment, and supposedly redistricting the state legislature promises to present problems for some leading Democrats in those bodies.  

[ Parent ]
Bleh
you on a crusade now?

[ Parent ]
Should I be?
Some of the comments that I have found on the blogosphere like the ones below disgust me:

I really do not care for blue collar idiots on either side including Joe the Plumber whose not actually a Plumber.  Why don't they just all go back to whatever the great unwashed do?

The most liberal places and the most conservative places often suffer from the same problems.  Both are societal hellholes where irresponsibility is rampant and everyone is blaming everyone else for their problems.  In addition, they are generally the most intolerant places around.  

Except for the gun violence, there is not much difference between the state of the society in West Philadelphia or the backwoods of southwestern Pennsylvania.  They both suffer from a lack of moderation and personal and collective responsibility.  

I get the sense that comments like this come from people who have never actually interacted with blue collar or Appalachian people.  The Democratic Party used to stand up and help these people, see LBJ and the Kennedys.  Now much of the party simply looks down on them.


[ Parent ]
This isn't a good subject for SSP.
Drop it.

[ Parent ]
Suggestion
I suspect user RuralDem has a similar perspective, but AFAIK, he stays within the norms expected by the people who run this site.

(FWIW, I'm --not-- trying to group rural and working class voters in the same bloc.)


[ Parent ]
?
I'm not really sure why my name is being mentioned. Am I missing something?

[ Parent ]
I mean it as a compliment
as you're someone with a different POV than most, who does well here.  

[ Parent ]
LOL
Thanks, I appreciate that :)

[ Parent ]
Manchin is a man of ambition.
He didn't become head of the Democratic Governor's Association for nothing.  He was quite careful not to take sides in the Obama/Hillary race in part because he did want to be considered for VP by both.  And he enjoys a good relationship with the Obama administration.

Also why I am not that worried about him as a US Senator.  Sure he'll stand up for big coal.  But he's not someone who will want to stand apart from the party.  He wants to be one of it's leaders.  He'll be closer to a Rockefeller than a Nelson.  And if he decides to run for President perhaps even take a sharp leftward turn.

However I do hope they get all this resolved quickly.  Since the best way for Manchin to overplay his hand and steal defeat from the jaws of victory is to be too much of a drama queen.

NY-13, Democrat. Blog @ http://infinitefunction.wordpr...


[ Parent ]
Run for President?
He'll be 69 in 2016, and he'll come from an awfully small and rather unusual base to mount such a campaign. But I think your broader point is on target. I think he'll be to the Right of Jay Rockefeller, but he won't be Ben Nelson.

[ Parent ]
No shot in hell of ever winning a Dem nomination
Way too many liberals for him to ever win.

[ Parent ]
Specifically,
he'll never be able to take a coherent position on coal and climate change that will allow him to get through the Dem presidential primary calendar.  

28, gay guy, Democrat, CA-08

[ Parent ]
Abortion would be the main stumbling block.
To that it has stopped other Democrats from shifting their position.  If I recall in 1988 Michael Dukakis was one of the few Democrats running who hasn't previously pro-life.  But abortion remains the pre-eminent litmus test.  Gay rights is gaining ground but a candidate can still get by being just pro-civil unions.

On climate change there actually is some wiggle room.  He'd have to acknowledge climate change but wouldn't necessarily have to accept prescriptions that are not considered anti-industry such as cap and trade.  (Ironic since at one point it was the favored solution by many conservatives).  For example research in and tax credits for carbon capture on fossil fuel power plants.  And other mythical "clean coal" technologies.

Now I didn't mean to say he WOULD run for President.  Just that if he did (and he is ambitious enough to consider it even in his 60s) he might move more to the left han expected.  See John Edwards who moved far enough that he hurt his own chances of being re-elected and ending up retiring from the Senate after one term to join Vito Fosella on the cast of Big Love.

NY-13, Democrat. Blog @ http://infinitefunction.wordpr...


[ Parent ]
TN-8: Kirkland has evident momentum on the ground
Around Jackson and its rural hinterlands the is strong evidence of Dr. Ron Kirkland gaining traction. I've seen lots of ground staff knocking neighborhoods and his campaign office seems pretty busy on the occasions pass it. Kirkland signage is picking up as well, and unlike Fincher the majority of it is not next to farm fields or littering the ROW. That being said Fincher has a strong base of support with the farmers and segments of the small business community, but I see no evidence at this point of his campaign having any sort of ground operations to make voter contacts outside of the TV/radio/mail. I also see trace support for Flinn, and this poll by Fincher would indicate he could be the dark-horse/spoiler, something I have suspected due to his positive jobs-focused campaign.

I think the Kirkland ads hammering "Democrat Stephen Fincher" also is playing a role in narrowing the margin, that really seems to be resonating. I'm almost think Fincher may be easier for Herron to beat before its all over, but Kirkland and Flinn are much more tolerable, if the 8th had to elect a Republican.

Democrat: TN-8


I'm really hoping Fincher
squeaks by. Mainly because he has gone so negative against Kirkland I feel like it would create a beautiful GOP divide in populous Jackson county which any successful GOP candidate would have to win. Herron can win the Tennessee Valley counties, pull off a narrow victory in Jackson, win the Shelby county portion of the district, and then split the more conservative rural west Tennessee counties which have trended Republican, (and which he represents in the Senate and which are also Fincher's base as well), then he'll win.  

[ Parent ]
Louisiana Filing: Day 1
I can't explain why I've become so obsessed with Louisiana, but here's the first day's filing results:

Senate: David Vitter (R), Cary Deaton (D), Charlie Melancon (D), Anthony Gentile (L), Bob Lang (I), Mike Spears (I)
LA-01: Steve Scalise (R)
LA-02: Joe Cao (R), Juan LaFonta (D), Cedric Richmond (D), Anthony Marquize (I)
LA-03: Ravi Sangisetty (D), Hunt Downer (R), Jeff Landry (R)
LA-04: John Fleming (R), Steven Jude Gavi (D), David Melville (D)
LA-05: Rodney Alexander (R), Tom Gibbs (I)
LA-06: Bill Cassidy (R)
LA-07: Charles Boustany (R)
Lt. Governor: Jay Dardenne (R), Kevin Davis (R), Roger Villere (R)

So, the Democrats now have 4 seats to find a candidate for, and 2 days in which to accomplish that feat. Unfortunately, I haven't heard of any candidates in the remaining districts.


Are we back to a jungle primary or did the LA law not take effect until after this cycle?


28, Unenrolled, MA-08

[ Parent ]
Minnick banks $410k in 2Q for a total of $1.9m raised so far
http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/ey...

I will be interested to see how Raul Labrador does.


I'm
thinking Labrador is hoping the environment is just godawful enough for Democrats he can ride the wave to victory in November. Just like Helen Chenoweth in 1994 who was so nutty she didn't wear a seat belt that would of saved her life.

19, Male, Independent, CA-12

[ Parent ]
Difference is she defeated a much better Democrat


[ Parent ]
Can you define "Much better Democrat"?
Was LaRocco more liberal, or a more skilled politician?

(Long term, I think Minnick has excellent potential -- if he survives this election.)


[ Parent ]
More liberal
he voted for Clinton's 1993 budget.  

19, Male, Independent, CA-12

[ Parent ]
More liberal
I don't see too much potential. Minnick is what? 65 or 66? What long term potential is there? And local Idaho Dems don't like him much because he's not doing anything to rebuild or promote the local party or its infrastructure; heck in 2008 he refused to coordinate his GOTV efforts with them, and nowadays he avoids the Democratic party with a ten foot pole, even on a local level. He's not strengthening the party.

[ Parent ]
So more liberal in Idaho
means easier to beat? So Minnick has a better chance to survive v. LaRocco?

I did not know about the feelings of some towards Minnick w/r/t infrastructure. The DK diary cited by user LookingOver doesn't seem to indicate such problems with Minnick.

I guess I'm thinking "long term" in American terms (2-6 years), where Minnick could run statewide.


[ Parent ]
That's a big haul for a state
like Idaho. Seems like he is well ahead of his pace from last time around.  

[ Parent ]
I put ID-01 at Lean Dem.
Here's a good analysis of politics in Idaho from a native: http://www.dailykos.com/story/...

Not bad for his first diary.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


[ Parent ]
ID-01: An Analysis of the Race from CQ Politics:
http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmsp...

They also moved the race from Toss-Up to Lean Dem.

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


Looks like I beat them to the punch
I moved this race to Lean D last month.  

Speaking of the devil, it's almost time for the July ratings update, shoot.

23, Male, Democrat, OH-13


[ Parent ]
MN-6
Here are two reasons the why the fundraising disparity may level off from now on.  Bachmann's total includes her extremely high profile dinner/fundraiser with Sarah Palin.  And, Tarryl Clark no longer has major DFL competition as Maureen Reed dropped only a few weeks ago.  As my roomy said, I've never heard of Clark and I know my stuff, she'll probably be able to pick it up even more.

And these monster numbers from Clark probably will start getting people like Pelosi to host dinners out here as this is one of the few pick-up opportunities, even it's still quite a tough district to win.

It's on!  


Clark needs to consolidate the anti-Bachmann vote......
Unless the anti-Democratic wave gives Bachmann a comfortable victory in the 50s this time, which is very plausible, there normally is an anti-Bachmann majority in MN-06 that gives too many votes to the Independent Party nominee for the Democrat to eek out a plurality.

Clark needs to consolidate that anti-Bachmann vote as completely as possible to have a shot.

I don't question that Bachmann is sooooo openly crazy that she will never be truly safe.  But in this environment, I'd put her reelection in "likely" territory.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10


[ Parent ]
Don't get your hopes up on this one Andrew
Work hard to stop Tom Emmer instead. He's very beatable, and (if you ask me) far more dangerous.  

[ Parent ]
I really dont think Emmer has a shot in hell
He'll either lose by 1% or 15%, either way, he's going to lose.  He recently said that tipped hospitality service workers should have a lower minimum wage, which is something many states up and down the political spectrum have.  Here in MN, we have it protected by law that even tipped hospitality workers must be paid full minimum wage, not some bs, oh you get tips so we can pay you $2.13 an hour.

He is absolutely getting SLAMMED for this.  Margaret Anderson-Kelliher has used it to her advantage by saying we need to raise the minimum wage instead by $1.50 (which puts us at the federal level, whoopdy-doo!.....)  He looks like a heartless asshole for even suggesting such a thing in economic times like this and every media outlet is like, wtf?  He even claimed some of these servers at a restaurant he visited are making $100k a year!  How ridiculous!

We voted 56-44 to raise our sales tax for conservation, parks, and the arts in 2008 when the economy was nearing free-fall and MSNBC ran an article yesterday about how every candidate in the MN-Gov race recognizes we need to raise taxes, except for Emmer.  He is a total extremist, and not to sound really campaigny and corny, but he is the nominee during a time that Minnesotans realize our state's reputation is also in free-fall along with the economy.  We've only had GOPers and Ventura as Gov, and it's time to get DFLers back in office and get us back to the Minnesota Miracle.   And Minnesotans pay attention to politics, we arent nearly as short-memoried as Americans in general.  (Read: Bush ruined economy, not Obama, and we know whose been in charge lately at the local level.)

Emmer is a clone of Bachmann in ideology (his state house seat is her political base actually, and my good ole hometown area) and I dont see a path for him to get elected.  He will not be able to win the suburbs like Pawlenty has been able to, and that's makes him DOA, unless it's Dayton.  I actually think MAK would wrap up the race nicely because of the suburbs if she's the nominee.  She'd probably kill it with women voters and if you can at least break even with the suburbs, you won the state.  (Suburbs, in my terminology, are the 2nd ring of suburbs that are usually 15-25 minutes down a freeway from a downtown area and upper class in nature.)

Not to say I wont be working for the top of the ticket, because Im gay and want to see gay marriage pass because we got a DFL gov over Bachmann losing.  (If our 2/3 and near 2/3 majority in both chambers doesnt crumble because of the crap cycle, enough gay marriage votes can probably be mustered.)  Ill be working it all over.  :)


[ Parent ]
Yesterday, user General Hospital said:
that he read on the Hot Air blog that Lautenberg died.  This, of course, was false.  This may be to blame for that hoax: http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/07...

Ad hoc, ad loc and quid pro quo!
So little time, so much to know!


Manchin
Will do whatever is best for him. If he wants the seat he will have to run in 2012 whatever. It just depends how he feels about running that race as an incumbent or in a open seat.

WI and NV senate
  I was just in WI for a funeral for a week and it was a shock to me to find out how many people didn't have any idea as to who Russ Feingold is running against.  Only a few political junkies had a clue.  This is not scientific of course but it did raise my eyebrows.  There seemed to be some feeling that Russ is not in any real danger.
 It amazes me that the Republicans would show such crass stupidity in spending any money on Sharron Angle.  Even if she wins she will damage them by being a concervative disgrace in the Senate.  In the house another loon would be overlooked, there are some outstanding mental cases already, what is one more??  But the Senate, ah, that is a horse of another color.  She would make conservative arguments just so many sound bites for the critical press.  In other words a buffoon like her would tarnish the conservative brand.  Other republicans would hide in the cloakroom for fear of getting a picture taken standing next to her.  Sure, thay would get her vote but at what cost??

Rollo "Rob" Weems


Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox