SSP Daily Digest: 6/24 (Afternoon Edition)

AZ-Sen (pdf): Magellan is out with a poll of the Republican Senate primary, and finds (everybody say it with me now… 3… 2… 1…) good news! for John McCain! McCain leads J.D. Hayworth 52-29. The sample was taken on Tuesday, post-reveal of Hayworth’s Matthew Lesko-style free-money shilling.

CO-Sen: Americans for Job Security, the mysterious conservative group who poured a lot of money into anti-Bill Halter ads in the Arkansas primary, have surfaced again, and this time they’re actually pro- somebody. They’re up with ads in Colorado pushing Weld Co. Ken Buck, who’s poised to knock off NRSC-touted Jane Norton in the GOP Senate primary.

FL-Sen: An important-sounding behind-the-scenes Democrat has gotten on board the Charlie Crist campaign. Jeff Lieser, who was the finance director for Alex Sink’s successful 2006 CFO campaign, is going to be heading up Crist’s “Democratic fundraising efforts.”

MO-Sen: Barack Obama will be doing a fundraiser with Robin Carnahan in Kansas City on July 8. Carnahan hid under a pile of coats when Obama was in Missouri last winter, so it’s good to see her changing her tune.

AL-Gov: Robert Bentley, the state legislator who surprised many by squeaking into the GOP gubernatorial runoff, is picking up a key Tim James backer. Ex-Rep. Sonny Callahan, who represented AL-01 for decades, switched his backing to Bentley yesterday.

AZ-Gov: The NRA really does seem to love its incumbents, as they’ve often been accused. The NRA weighed in to the GOP gubernatorial primary, endorsing appointed incumbent Jan Brewer. The only reason that’s a surprise is because her biggest rival is self-funding businessman Owen Buz Mills, who also happens to be on the NRA’s board of directors and who owns a shooting range.

IA-Gov: Terry Branstad went with a relative unknown for his running mate, state Sen. Kim Reynolds, rather than one of the parade of recent losers whose names had been floated (Jeff Lamberti, Jim Gibbons, Rod Roberts). Perhaps most significantly, he didn’t pick GOP primary runner-up and social conservative extraordinaire Bob Vander Plaats, so now all eyes are on BVP to see whether he follows through with vague threats to run an independent candidacy. (While socially conservative personally, Reynolds isn’t known for running with the social conservative crowd.)

MI-Gov: Virg Bernero is pretty universally considered the “labor” candidate in the Dem primary in the Michigan governor’s race, but rival Andy Dillon just got the backing of a big-time union: the statewide Teamsters. Bernero has the backing of the AFL-CIO (which, significantly for Michigan, includes the UAW); while they aren’t hitting the airwaves on Bernero’s behalf (at least not yet), they are gearing up for a large ground campaign.

OR-Gov, OR-Sen: It looks like the Oregon gubernatorial race is going to be a close one (like New Mexico, this is shaping up to be a situation where what seemed like an easy race is turning into a battle because the outgoing Dem incumbent’s unpopularity is rubbing off on the expected successor). Local pollsters Davis, Hibbitts, and Midghall, on behalf of the Portland Tribune, find the race a dead heat, at a 41-41 tie between John Kitzhaber and Chris Dudley (with 6 going to minor party candidates). Tim Hibbitts is the go-to pollster in Oregon; the upside, I suppose, is that it’s good for Dems to realize now they’re going to need to fight this one hard, rather than realizing it in October after months of complacency. While the Gov. numbers here are closely in line with Rasmussen, the Senate numbers certainly aren’t: they find Ron Wyden leading Jim Huffman by a much more comfortable margin of 50-32.

TX-Gov: Bill White got a big endorsement from Bill Clinton (although there’s no word yet if Clinton will stump in Texas on White’s behalf, which would be huge). Former Houston mayor White was also a Dept. of Energy official in the Clinton administration.

LA-02: You might recall some sketchily-sourced information from a few days ago that a couple Democrats were considering launching independent bids in the 2nd, where a high-profile spoiler may be the only hope for another term for GOP freshman Rep. Joe Cao. Well, it seems like there’s some truth to the story, inasmuch as the person most likely to be affected by that, state Rep. Cedric Richmond (the likeliest Dem nominee here), is calling attention to the situation now. He’s accusing Republicans of a “South Carolina-style political ploy by convincing black candidates to run as independents.”

MI-07: Although ex-Rep. Tim Walberg has the social conservative cred by the bushelful, he didn’t get an endorsement from Catholic Families for America. They instead backed his GOP primary rival, Brian Rooney. The Rooney backing makes sense, though, when you recall that Rooney is an attorney for the Thomas More Law Center, the Michigan-based nonprofit that’s a frequent filer of amicus briefs and bills itself as “Christianity’s answer to the ACLU.” The Center was founded by Domino’s Pizza baron Tom Monaghan, whose other attempts to mix ultra-conservative Catholicism and the law have included Ave Maria School of Law.

WATN?: I had absolutely no idea that retiring Rep. Henry Brown was actually interested in demoting himself instead of leaving the political game altogether, but it turns out that, rather than take up golf or shuffleboard like a normal 74-year-old, he decided to run for the Board of Supervisors in Berkeley County (in Charleston’s suburbs). Here’s where it gets really pathetic… he didn’t even win that race. He got 44% of the vote on Tuesday in the GOP runoff (although in his sort-of defense, he was running against an incumbent).

History: Here’s a very interesting article from Larry Sabato’s henchman Rhodes Cook, on why 2010 won’t be 1994. His gradation of “blue,” “purple,” and “red” districts is a little reductive, but it’s a nice look at how Democrats have somewhat less exposure in general this year. And if you’re looking for some amusing trivia, Univ. of Minnesota’s Smart Politics has a captivating look at which states have the most (South Carolina) and the fewest (Alaska by #, Idaho by %) governors who were born in-state.

65 thoughts on “SSP Daily Digest: 6/24 (Afternoon Edition)”

  1. I’ve gotten the impression that Andy Dillon is an anti-union DINO, but I haven’t heard the same rhetoric from my union friends.

    Anyone can shed some light on this?

  2. Cook makes the case why we’re not as bad off, but I did some math using some of the data he relied upon, and it ain’t a good outcome using my simple model.

    Cook’s column included a table that showed what percentage of “blue,” “purple,” and “red” Dem-held seats the Democrats lost in 1994.  The color-coding was based on which party’s presidential nominee won each district in 1988 and 1992; a split decision made the district “purple,” while, as you might guess, a Dukakis/Clinton district was blue and a Bush/Bush district was red.

    That same table included numbers on how many “blue” (Kerry/Obama), “purple” (split), and “red” (Bush/McCain) districts Democrats now hold.

    Well, I “finished the thought” if you will, and applied the 1994 percentages of seats lost in each of the three categories to our 2010 numbers for each category.

    And what I came up with was a gross loss of 45 seats, compared to 56 in 1994.  Keep in mind we picked up 4 GOP-held seats in 1994 for a net loss of 52.  If we pick up this fall the Cao and Djou seats, and the open seats in Delaware and IL-10, that’s 4 pickups and leaves us losing a net of 41 this November.  That gives Republicans the House.

    So yeah, we’re better off than in 1994, but Republicans can underperform 1994 by 13 seats and still take the chamber.

    I note that Sabato recently cited Alan Abramowitz’s model that now predicts the GOP to take exactly the 39 seats they need to take the House, and Sabato’s own model predicts a 32-seat shift.

    So we’re on balance right on the edge.

  3. I’m not surprised McCain is kicking arse once again and returning to safe polling territory. Unlike the GOP primaries in Kentucky and Nevada, there really is no strong populist support for the Tea Party candidate as there was for Rand Paul and Sharron Angle.

    Let’s face it, the Tea Party face there is a relative unknown who’s not really gaining traction. As for J.D. Hayworth, he’s nothing but a scumbag trying to hook himself on the Tea Party bandwagon, and judging from this poll it’s obviously not working.

    As for McCain, he’s changed his positions so many times it’s hard to figure out what he stands for anymore. I’m a small c conservative, but if I had a choice I’d probably vote for Glassman. As a municipal politician, at least he’s had to worry about finances and making sure Tuscon doesn’t spend too much money.

  4. Here’s what worries me. Voters are saying about Kitzhaber – We know you. We like you. We’re not voting for you.

    I’m going to be a bit Tekzilla here: a lot of people bring up Castle, Gerlach, and Kirk, but there was also Leach, Shays, and Morrella.

  5. What am I missing here? A Democratic politician endorsed another Democratic politician. And of course the endorser lost Texas twice. So how is this endorsement “big”?  

  6. Rooney threw his hat into the ring saying he had been ‘recruited’ to move into the 7th district to run . . .but nobody has been willing to own up to being the recruiter…. but with Tom Moonghan’s ultra orthodox version of Catholicism and now this endorsement, perhaps we have an idea now.

    The Rooney family has strong interests in Pennsylvania, New York and Florida-and appear to be trying to build a political dynasty as well: from Uncle Art, the Ambassador to Ireland, to brother Tom, the FL rep to brother Pat Jr who’s running for FL state office, this family intends to apparently replace the Kennedy dynasty that has pretty much died out.

    Rooney and his siblings own a chain of restaurants in Florida and a brewery. Dad owns a dog track and gambling interest in FL, his uncle runs horse racing and a casino in Yonkers, New York. Rooney hasnt been forthcoming about any of these connections . . .and someone is apparently buying a great deal of access to get all of these diverse groups to endorse him . .groups that have NO knowledge of the 7th district!

    The out-of-state money is very likely family money (the race tracks and casinos, the Steelers and the cousins who own the Giants). With this kind of family connections, are we really supposed to believe that Rooney is just pining to represent the many farmers and small businessmen in the 7th-which includes a great deal of rural southern Michigan? Or is it more a matter of finding a gullible district to help him get his foot in the door of national politics and give special interests access to Congress? Inquiring minds want to know . . .

  7. A few weeks ago, if I’d heard the name Kim Reynolds, I wouldn’t have recognized it as someone in the Iowa Senate Republican caucus (and I thought I knew of pretty much all the Iowa legislators).

    Today I ran into someone who spends a lot of time at the state capitol every year during the legislative session, and she also said she’d never heard of Kim Reynolds. We’re talking very low-profile back-bencher. She doesn’t have the stature to drive the agenda in a Branstad administration and won’t steal the spotlight during the campaign.

Comments are closed.