Google Ads


Site Stats

HI-01: DCCC Makes Pullout Official

by: Crisitunity

Mon May 10, 2010 at 12:32 PM EDT


The DCCC has been telegraphing this for most of a week (ever since Colleen Hanabusa's press conference to announce that she wasn't dropping out), but it's official today:

The DCCC is pulling out of the race to replace ex-Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-HI), effectively ceding the heavily Dem seat to the GOP as intra-party feuding splits the vote.

"The DCCC will not be investing additional resources in the HI-01 (Abercrombie-open) special election. Local Democrats were unable to work out their differences," DCCC communications director Jennifer Crider said in an emailed statement. "The DCCC will save the resources we would have invested in the Hawaii special election this month for the general election in November."

It had been at least a week since the Dems invested any money in this race, but they'd spent $314K on anti-Charles Djou advertising (as well as sending around a Barack Obama robocall advising a vote "for a Democrat"). With about one in five (60K out of 317K) of the election's mail-in ballots already returned (the deadline is May 22 for the all-mail election), the die is already looking pretty well cast, meaning the outcome could be set even with a last-minute NY-23 bombshell where one candidate bails out.

Crisitunity :: HI-01: DCCC Makes Pullout Official
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

$300k down the tubes for nothing
Good thing the DCCC has such a large advantage of the NRCC.  

It's all or nothing in Pennsylvania
If you'll win there, it'll be spun as a massive victory and the beginning of Dem comeback. With this big caveat hanging over it, the GOP could hardly use HI as a symbolic victory hearlding things to come.


Comeback?
They've won how many special house elections in a row, including NY-23.

[ Parent ]
You're both right
While Ds have won like the last 10 special elections in the House,

I think Ireland's assessment is correct w/r/t how a win (if we win) will be seen in the MSM.


[ Parent ]
Not in a row
The Dems have won a lot of house special elections but they lost the LA-04 Special election in Dec 08.  Granted they've still won more then they lost, but a loss here wouldn't be unprecedented.  

[ Parent ]
That was not a special election.
That was general election 2008.  Due to hurricanes, the first primary was not until October.  For races that needed primary runoffs, it was agreed that those runoffs would occur on election day in November.  For those races, the general was held in December.  We lost LA-02 and LA-04 on the same night under the same circumstances, but neither was a special election.

Dems have in fact won 10 in a row:

LA-06
MS-01
MD-04
OH-11
NY-20
IL-05
CA-32
CA-10
NY-23
FL-19

The last one the Republicans won was LA-01 in May 2008.  Prior to that, Dems had won 3 in a row:

IL-14
IN-07
CA-12

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


[ Parent ]
Call it what you like
but LA-02 & LA-04 were two Dec. elections of house races that the dems lost.  It would benefit the dems to call these special elections because then they could minimize any fallout from the HI elections.

[ Parent ]
Um
I call it a special election when it's a special election when someone resigns, dies, or becomes incapacitated midterm.  That was not the case in LA-02 or LA-04.  Fleming and Cao were elected in the general election - albeit postponed a month - and joined Congress with the rest of the freshman class in January 2009.  

It would not be smart for Dems to try to spin those as special elections because ... they weren't special elections.  Only the Republicans get to lie with impunity.

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


[ Parent ]
True but...
Mass Sen Special > all those house specials put together

So all this talk about special elections without factoring in the senate special is kind of a moo point*

*cow's opinion  


[ Parent ]
No actually
10/435 = 2.3%
1/100 = 1.0%

Scott Brown's victory did not derail HCR (and in fact may have helped it in a perverse way) and does not seem to have done anything positive or negative for the overall electoral environment, which was bad for Dems before and has basically remained the same.  So I don't really see how it was intangibly better than 10 House seats either.

And no, "all this talk" about 10 House specials in a row is not "moot" or "moo" for that matter.  The DCCC has been kicking the NRCC's ass in specials for three years now, including 6 this cycle and 2 in swing districts this cycle.  That has nothing to do with Scott Brown.  

34, WM, Democrat, FL-11


[ Parent ]
Critz will need all the help he can get
Burns has about 300k for the final stretch while Critz is sitting on 73k.  

Great News
to hear that inner party squabbling is not primarily restricted to the Republican Party.

Are you kidding?
Dems have been doing this since the teabaggers were in diapers (ok, exaggeration, but still--there's a reason HCR didn't get passed in 94 with Dem majorities and just barely passed this year).

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
This is bad

but I understand. You can not spend money when in your team they are people working wrong.

The result: A new advantage for Djou.



Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox