Google Ads


Site Stats

IA-Sen: Conlin releases strong fundraising numbers (updated)

by: desmoinesdem

Thu Apr 15, 2010 at 12:04 PM EDT


Iowa Democrat Roxanne Conlin gave her U.S. Senate campaign $250,000 during the first quarter of 2010 and raised nearly $630,000 from other donors.
desmoinesdem :: IA-Sen: Conlin releases strong fundraising numbers (updated)
From this morning's press release:

Conlin Campaign Raises More than all of Grassley's Past Challengers Combined
Has $1 Million in the Bank
Banked $879,615 in First Quarter with NO PAC or WASHINGTON LOBBYIST MONEY

Des Moines - Roxanne Conlin's grassroots campaign for the US Senate has more than $1 million in the bank.  Iowans made up 81 percent of the campaign's contributors and she has not accepted one penny from Washington lobbyists or PACs.

"I'm humbled by the outpouring of support for our campaign," said Conlin. "Our grassroots effort has reached 93 counties and we will reach the remaining six this weekend.  Iowans keep telling me, Chuck Grassley is not the same man they sent to Washington decades ago.  We need a fighter who will stand up for Main Street and not bail out Wall Street."

FACTS:
No PAC or Washington lobbyist funds.
81 percent of donors are Iowans.
78 percent of contributions are $100 or less.

Breakdown:

Campaign to date raised:                                    $1,483,191
First Quarter 2010 raised:                                   $629,615
Candidate contribution:                                      $250,000
First Quarter PAC Money:                                  $0
First Quarter Federal Lobbyist Money:               $0
First Quarter 2010 total:                                      $879,615
Cash on hand:                                                      $1,000,455

Those are impressive numbers for a challenger, especially since Grassley is not considered one of the most vulnerable Senate incumbents. Grassley's last Democratic opponent, Art Small, only raised about $136,000 during the whole 2004 campaign, and about $70,000 of that total came from the candidate himself.

I haven't seen Grassley's latest fundraising numbers yet. He raised about $810,000 during the fourth quarter of last year and began 2010 with about $5 million on hand. While Grassley will surely have a big cash-on-hand edge over Conlin, she will have the resources to run a statewide campaign.

I haven't seen first-quarter numbers for the other Democratic candidates, Bob Krause and Tom Fiegen, but at year-end Fiegen had about $400 on hand, and Krause had about $3,500.

At Iowa Independent, Jason Hancock covered a recent dustup among the Democratic candidates over debates before the June 8 primary. I hope we will see some debates in addition to candidate forums. I plan to vote for Conlin, whose work I have long admired and who is best positioned to make the race competitive. Not only has she raised money, she will have a strong volunteer base. Just in my own precinct I know several Democrats who are not inclined to volunteer for Governor Chet Culver but will knock on doors or make phone calls for Conlin. By next Monday she will have held campaign events in all 99 Iowa counties.

I respect the Democrats who prefer Krause or Fiegen, and I understand why some people were annoyed by Iowa Democratic Party chair Michael Kiernan's apparent favoritism last year. Competitive primaries are often healthy for a party, and I particularly appreciate that Krause has kept his message focused on his good ideas and Grassley's flaws as a public servant. I hope the final eight weeks of the primary campaign will not become too divisive.

UPDATE: Grassley raised $613,577 in the first quarter and has about $5.3 million cash on hand. I am surprised that Conlin was able to out-raise the incumbent for the quarter even if you don't count her own large contribution to the campaign.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Nice


Follow the elections in Georgia at the 2010 Georgia Race Tracker.

2010 isn't going to be 1994
I guarantee it.  Dems will likely have a net loss, but we could gain some important seats in OH, FL, NH and MO.  Im gunna say the dem caucus looses a net of 3 or 4 senate seats.

20, Male, Democrat, CA-44 (home) CA-12 (college)

I think we will lose 5-6 Senate seats
If we get out of this year with a net loss of only 3 it will have been a great election for us. We really "should" be able to pick up NH and OH, but I am nervous about those.

[ Parent ]
Do mean MO and OH
Because from where I'm sitting, Missouri is still a better pick-up opportunity for us than New Hampshire (though I think that Hodes still has a decent chance of victory).

Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01, Chairman of the Atheist Caucus, and Majority Leader of the "Going to Hell" caucus!


[ Parent ]
I feel less confident about MO
I know Carnahan is a good candidate, I just feel that race is going to be a heart-breaker.  

[ Parent ]
Agreed.
ND is gone no two ways about it, and we probably lose DE, IL, CO and NV at the very least. I think we end up at around 52-54 seats when the dust settles.  

Still, that doesn't mean we won't be able to get as much or more done. Hoeven's a moderate who used to be a Democrat and answers to no one but his own constituents, and Crist may still win FL as an independent (and who the hell knows which side he'd caucus with if he did). Bayh and Lincoln will be gone no matter what, and Lieberman and the Nelson twins have to run for re-election next cycle, as does Olympia Snowe - who seems to have lost her halo in the whole HCR mess. Even if we have a net loss of seats, the balance of power in the Senate might be altered in a way that we can probably get more done with 52 Dems and a few more moderate R's than we could with 59 Dems and a handful of moderate DINO egomaniacs sandbagging the President's entire agenda. (Except for Ben Nelson, who will be worse than ever because he has to win in Nebraska.)  


[ Parent ]
Giannoulias is weak
in IL, because his banking stuff really smells. I don't see CO as a foregone conclusion, though.

I seriously doubt having FEWER seats in the Senate would enable the Democrats to get MORE done.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
It might
If we lose Bayh, Lincoln, and Reid, gain Hodes and Carnahan, and get a better majority leader, losing seats could actually improve our chances of getting things done.

The Crolian Progressive: as great an adventure as ever I heard of...

[ Parent ]
Jeez, I know the national tide is going in the wrong direction,
but it seems like national tide (and maybe Branstad's coattails) might be the only thing that saves Grassley this year. It'd be awesome if the Dems could knock off Grassley right here right now and I'll be cheering for Conlin the whole way, but I'm still more concerned with making sure his sleazy attempts to keep his seat in the family don't bear fruit in 2016. If Conlin doesn't get him this year, I hope the Dems have a strong challenger for that race when the time comes. You'd think a state that has become as Democratic as Iowa (and keeps re-electing Harkin) would be sending two Dems to the Senate, so Grassley really strikes me as something of an anomaly.  

in 2016
I expect Grassley to retire to clear the way for his grandson (currently a state representative who is under 30), and I think the Democratic nominee will be strong--perhaps Bruce Braley or Tom Vilsack.

[ Parent ]
I would have never guessed that Grassley would have to ride someone's coattails.
I gotta say, while I don't think she can win, these are impressive numbers. I bet she holds Grassley under 55 percent, anyway.  

[ Parent ]
that would be quite an achievement
Incidentally, about half his 1Q money came from PACs--she out-raised him while taking nothing from PACs.

[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox