| As Richard Nixon showed in the '66 election, one path to the R nomination is based on campaigning for others in their party.
But such an effort would help Palin only if perhaps a majority of targeted incumbents are defeated. By definition, Ds in districts that McCain won in '08 are in a more difficult position, but I think at least a few are entrenched.
Of these 20, 3 are retiring. (Vic Snyder AR-02, Brad Ellsworth IN-08, Bart Gordon TN-06). While we've got a shot of holding IN-08, it's possible Rs will carry all 3. So Palin would need 8 of the remaining 17 to say she "won a majority of targets" and declare victory.
Just comparing the remaining names to one set of projections, (Sabato, ref http://www.centerforpolitics.o... (* highlights members of the blue dog caucus)
Ann Kirkpatrick, AZ-1 - tossup
* Harry E. Mitchell, AZ-5 - lean D
* Gabrielle Giffords, AZ-8 - lean D
* John Salazar, CO-3 - lean D
* Betsy Markey, CO-4 - tossup
* Allen Boyd, FL-2 - likely D
Suzanne M. Kosmas, FL-24 - tossup
* Baron P. Hill, IN-9 - tossup
* Earl Pomeroy, ND-AL - tossup
* Charlie Wilson, OH-6 - not on board (assume solid D)
John Boccieri, OH-16 - lean D
* Kathy Dahlkemper, PA-3 - lean D
* Christopher Carney, PA-10 - lean D
John M. Spratt, Jr., SC-5 - lean D
Tom Perriello, VA-5 - tossup
Alan B. Mollohan, WV-1 - likely D
Nick J. Rahall, WV-3 - not on board (assume solid D)
Of course, Sabato's predictions are an arbitrary measure. I disagree with some of Sabato's predictions. But assuming Palin has to win 8 of the remaining 17, she'd have to help Rs carry all 6 of the tossups, plus 2 of the 7 "lean Ds".
Again, while over half of these targeted Ds are "blue dogs," they all voted for HCR. |