Google Ads


Site Stats

NM-01, NM-02, NM-03: Teague Trails Pearce By 2

by: Crisitunity

Thu Feb 25, 2010 at 1:24 PM EST


Public Policy Polling (2/18-20, registered voters):

Martin Heinrich (D-inc): 45
Jon Barela (R): 36
Undecided: 19

Harry Teague (D-inc): 41
Steve Pearce (R): 43
Undecided: 16

Ben Lujan (D-inc): 40
Adam Kokesh (R): 32
Undecided: 28

Ben Lujan (D-inc): 42
Tom Mullins (R): 36
Undecided: 22
(MoE: ±4.9%)

PPP's NM-Gov sample comes with an added bonus: results for each of the Land of Enchantment's three House races. The big ticket item here is NM-02, where Rep. Harry Teague is considered one of the most vulnerable Democratic incumbents going into November. That's not so much because of the district's lean (it's R+6 and has a Hispanic plurality -- Walt Minnick and Bobby Bright would kill for R+6) but because Teague is facing off against ex-Rep. Steve Pearce, who held the district for a number of years until his ill-fated 2008 Senate run, and is still well-thought-of here (as seen by his 43/31 favorables). While I'd certainly prefer to see Teague leading, all things considered, the 43-41 lead for Pearce feels not-that-bad. Like Tom Perriello in VA-05, Teague seems to have been already written off as a casualty by mainstream media pundits, not only having won a superficially-fluky victory in a reddish district but also having voted for cap-and-trade instead of cowering with the Blue Dogs. And yet (just like Perriello) PPP finds him in a dead heat.

The race in the 1st -- between freshman Rep. Martin Heinrich and Jon Barela, the former head of Albuquerque's Hispanic Chamber of Commerce -- is one that, even before this poll, I'd have classified as "Likely D," given the district's lean (D+5) and Heinrich's convincing 2008 victory. The Republicans will have to make a serious dent in the currently "Likely D" seats in order to retake the majority, but it's looking like NM-01 isn't on track to be one of those seats where they do.

In fact, the Republicans actually come a little closer in the 3rd, which is the state's traditionally most Democratic-friendly district at D+7 (although this was briefly held by a Republican in the 1990s after a surprisingly strong Green Party performance in a special election). Part of the problem may lie with its Rep, Ben Lujan (the only one of the three to sport negative approvals, at 31/40 -- Teague, by comparison, is at 41/36), but I suspect the 3rd is also a very difficult district to poll. It's a rural, impoverished district where a sizable number of the Democratic base voters may not speak English or have landlines, which may give more weight to the district's Republicans clustered around Farmington.

RaceTracker Wiki: NM-01 | NM-02 | NM-03

Crisitunity :: NM-01, NM-02, NM-03: Teague Trails Pearce By 2
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Why would Lujan
Have such poor favorables? Anyway, Teague is still in play which is encouraging.

Aside from
winning 41.5% in the primary and 57% in the general election?

Although thanks to Carol Miller, it was a 57%-30.2% victory with Miller winning 12.8%.

I'm guessing, from Obama's statewide, that he won a pretty high percentage in NM3. So there are Democrats in that district who won't support Lujan.


[ Parent ]
D+7 seat
Party line vote. What is there not to like? Seriously, I can't understand some people.

[ Parent ]
I'm not sure I buy PPP's sample of NM-03
NM-03 is easily the most liberal district in New Mexico (thanks to Santa Fe and Taos) there samples in ideology and Obama approval ratings border on being ridiculous.

Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01, Chairman of the Atheist Caucus, and Majority Leader of the "Going to Hell" caucus!


[ Parent ]
That was my first thought
Doesn't really make much sense.

[ Parent ]
NM-01 and NM-02 strike me as being about right though
Particularly Heinrich, who has been very good about making sure his constituency knows him (he's been everywhere urging people to get their flu shots, especially for H1N1).

Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01, Chairman of the Atheist Caucus, and Majority Leader of the "Going to Hell" caucus!


[ Parent ]
Well yes
Which was what made the Third stand out so much.

[ Parent ]
CD size
Yeah but the NM-01 is tiny so it's easy to get to know your voters easily. The 2nd and 3rd are so much bigger that it will take some time to get the same recognition numbers.

[ Parent ]
I've come up with my donation list for this year
Chet Edwards
Patrick Murphy
Tom Periello
Harry Teague

Every day goes by keeps suggesting I've picked 4 guys who are all going to win and do it closely, while voting for some real good legislation (or in Chet's case willing to support it if need be).

I'm liking Teague's odds of winning, despite being down 2.

26, Male, Democrat, TX-26


Teague doesn't need our money.
He's the 10th richest member of both houses of Congress clocking in at a net worth of more then $40 million. http://www.rollcall.com/featur...

Honestly that fact makes me feel even better about holding on to NM-2.


[ Parent ]
Baloney
Good people should get our support.  People are throwing thousands of dollars to people who make silly primary challenges every day, why can't we throw a few dollars to Harry Teague to keep Pearce out of Congress.  Pearce is a dangerous loud mouth who more people need to focus on.  

Please donate to amcharities.org to help build more after school centers in the Miami area.  

23, Democrat, IA-2


[ Parent ]
You
can support candidates without throwing money at them. Make some calls and things of that nature. Honestly I will give to people who actually need my money. Considering Teague's personal wealth, money will be the least of his problems.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Personal wealth
If Teague wants to write himself a check that's fine, but I also think it shows some weak support to just keep writing yourself checks without asking for donors like Linda McMahon did.  Besides it's Teague's money and he pays his taxes and makes charitable/campaign donations.  We as people who are Democrats ought to pick up for the slack for him if we really want him in Congress.  

Please donate to amcharities.org to help build more after school centers in the Miami area.  

23, Democrat, IA-2


[ Parent ]
What makes that even better is...
It's against a 3-term congressman who is probably already maxed out on how well known he is. It's also true that this is probably at the worst the cycle is going to be for the Democrats.

The only thing that worries me is that Pearce has outraised Teague the last two quarters, but with the DCCC cash advantage, it's only a minor worry.

Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01, Chairman of the Atheist Caucus, and Majority Leader of the "Going to Hell" caucus!


[ Parent ]
Yep
Although I'd typically be worried about a poll showing an incumbent trailing, Pearce isn't your run-of-the-mill challenger in that he already represented the district for six years and should be well-known to the voters by now -- this isn't a case of an incumbent trailing Some Dude.  Pearce's numbers probably have about as much of a chance of going up as Teague's do.

"The only thing that worries me is that Pearce has outraised Teague the last two quarters, but with the DCCC cash advantage, it's only a minor worry."

And, as pointed out above, Teague's ability to self-finance if needed mitigates this somewhat.

26, white male, TX-24, liberal-leaning independent


[ Parent ]
I'm encouraged
Maybe its just me being overly optimistic, but I feel that the Democrats have finally rebounded a little in recent days.  


40, male, Democrat, NC-04

Top 5 marquee race
How many of these R+6 type seats do we hold?  How many can we expect to hold in the longrun when we run good candidate against their top candidate?

As this race goes, so goes the nation (the R+0 to R+7 part anyway).


Touch unfair
Considering Pearce is coming back so soon. I could easily see Pearce winning yet holding many other vulnerable seats of a similar PVI.

[ Parent ]
A lot of people probably think Pearce is just running for reelection
So the under 50% rule likely wouldnt apply here.  

the consistency of the numbers is predictable
these folks (with the exception of pearce) have all only been in office for a year.  they simply aren't that well-known.  if tom udall was running for reelection, he'd probably be in the 60s.


Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox