Google Ads


Site Stats

Special Elections Tonight: MN & OR

by: DavidNYC

Tue Jan 26, 2010 at 10:19 PM EST


We have a couple of special elections tonight, which SSP community members have already created diaries for. In MN, MinnesotaMike is covering a state Senate special election, while Oregon has a couple of tax-related measures on the ballot, which tietack is on top of. Check those links out for full coverage.

UPDATE: We've lost in Minnesota, where Mike says of the results: "Disapointing, but a 6.5 point loss is as close as a Dem has come to winning this seat in decades."

On the plus side, the ballot measures in Oregon look like they are winning by pretty decent margins, with 79% of the vote tallied:

Measure 66
Yes: 55.3%
No: 44.7%

Measure 67
Yes: 54.6%
No: 45.4%

What do these measures do?

Measures 66 & 67 raise the $10 corporate minimum for the first time since 1931, and increase the marginal tax rate on the richest Oregonians (those who make more than $250,000 a year).

UPDATE: The Oregonian has called both measures - they both pass. More analysis here.

DavidNYC :: Special Elections Tonight: MN & OR
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Oregon looks to be a landslide for raising taxes
on the rich.

Wow.  


Not to be a party pooper
but this looks like it'll end somewhere around 53-47...not exactly a landslide, and it concerns me that 46%+ in a state where Obama got 57% of the vote thinks it's not a good idea to do something as obvious as raise taxes on the rich.  

[ Parent ]
When was the last time you saw
a win at the ballot box for higher taxes?

As an up or down vote, this is pretty stunning. And I don't care if it's by one vote.  


[ Parent ]
And look at where most of the outstanding votes are
The margin will widen.  

[ Parent ]
Have to agree with this
During a terrible, terrible recession no less.

[ Parent ]
Oregon was a close state in 2000 and 2004
D.C. Dems should take careful note of this.  

[ Parent ]
Agreed.
Don't take it for granted ala Massachusetts.

http://mypolitikal.com/

[ Parent ]
Current OR unemployment = 10.8%
a bit higher than the national rate of 9.7%. But Oregon in general, and Portland in particular is a magnet for younger mobile voters, a standard D demographic.

[ Parent ]
As I understand it
Oregon last approved a tax increase by ballot initiative in the 1930s when it passed the income tax into law, after rejecting it in the 20s.  Apparently, it's always been an anti-tax state, so this is actually showing a shift in the progressive direction.

http://www.bluearkansasblog.com

[ Parent ]
OR is a anti-sales tax state
Any state politico who suggests a sales tax is severely punished.

From a progressive POV, that's great, ensuring a (relatively) progressive tax system. However, it's a bit of a bear for the state budget, as revenues become almost completely income dependent. A sales tax would provide more stability w/r/t revenues.

Multnomah Co (most of the city of Portland) voted for on both like 71-28 - which is consistent. In the previous recession, Multnomah voters approved a temporary (3 yr) county income tax.


[ Parent ]
As a progressive/liberal/Democrat, etc.
It's really nice to win a policy initiative whenever we can. It's seems soooo seldom that we do.

NY-14, DC-AL (college) Distraught Mets fan

FYI, updated numbers and analysis in my diary

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox