Google Ads


Site Stats

SSP Daily Digest: 1/22

by: Crisitunity

Fri Jan 22, 2010 at 3:10 PM EST


KY-Sen: Rand Paul makes an interesting point: he'd like SoS (and GOP primary rival) Trey Grayson to recuse himself from his secretarial duties during the May election. In other words, he doesn't want Grayson to count the votes of the election that he's running in. (Unsurprisingly, Grayson's spokesperson says "no.")

MA-Sen: An AFL-CIO post-game poll finds that a majority of labor households in Massachusetts went for Scott Brown in the special election, by a narrow 49-46 margin. The one consolation Democrats might take from that failure is that a large majority of respondents said they were "choosing the best candidate" rather than "sending a message to Washington," which suggests that the success (or lack thereof) of the two campaigns at defining the individual candidates is the main story here.

NY-Sen-B: This seems to exist mostly at the level of idle speculation, but people in the know are wondering whether Harold Ford Jr.'s apparent entry into the Democratic primary may open the door for other primary candidates who considered the race and then thought better of it to get back in, out of hopes they might shoot the gap in the middle.

PA-Sen, PA-07: Pennsylvania's Democratic party chair, T.J. Rooney, is now publicly urging Rep. Joe Sestak to "pull a Gerlach" and bail out of his Senate primary bid while heading back to nail down his suburban swing seat instead. This isn't that remarkable, as Rooney has been outspoken all year in his desire to avoid paralyzing primaries - but you've gotta wonder if Sestak, who's stalled a bit in the polls lately, is considering it in the back of his mind.

WI-Sen: Rarely has so much ink been spilled writing about a four-word quotation ("I'm not saying no"), but with that utterance yesterday from ex-Gov. Tommy Thompson, thus begins a whole 'nother round of speculation as to whether the 68-year-old Thompson's unlikely bid to challenge Russ Feingold will ever materialize.

KS-Gov: State Sen. Tom Holland sounds willing to step up and take on the job that no one seems to want: running against Sen. Sam Brownback in the open gubernatorial race in Kansas. Holland represents one of the state's few purplish areas, with a district that includes part of college town Lawrence, but he clearly plays to win, as seen in the fact that he's beaten two different incumbent Republicans in his state legislative career.

AK-AL: Between being kind of old and on everybody's "most-likely-to-be-indicted" list, Alaska's Don Young is a tempting target, from both the left and right. He got another primary challenger yesterday: never-before-elected telecommunications executive Sheldon Fisher. Gadflyish businessman and blogger Andrew Halcro (who won 10% as an independent in the 2006 gubernatoril race) has already said he'll run against Young in the primary, too.

AR-01: As we reported yesterday, Rep. Marion Berry is sounding kind of unenthused about much of anything right now. Fleshing out that interview we mentioned, Berry said it's his "intention" to run again, but, as part of a longer excursis waxing philosophical about his own mortality, wouldn't make an absolute commitment to sticking around.

HI-01: A fourth entrant (and a third Democrat) seems likely to get into the special election to replace retiring Rep. Neil Abercrombie: state Sen. Will Espero is starting an exploratory committee. Because of the weird all-parties, winner-takes-all nature of the election, the fear is that a Democratic pileup could open the door to a victory by lone Republican Charles Djou - but a recent Mason-Dixon poll of the race finds Djou a distant third behind well-known Democratic opponents Ed Case and Colleen Hanabusa, and it's unclear whether Espero has the name rec to make much of a dent one way or the other on that.

MA-10: Republicans in the Bay State are taking a renewed interest in competing in House races there, usually something that gets completely neglected. In the wake of Scott Brown's victory, former state Treasurer Joseph Malone is now saying that he's planning to run against Rep. William Delahunt in the 10th, which is probably the least secure district for Democrats in the state; covering Cape Cod and much of the South Shore, it's at D+5, but the source of some of the darkest red on this week's map. Delahunt was unopposed in 2008. The GOP is also interested in fielding candidates in the 3rd and 5th against Jim McGovern and Niki Tsongas, two other blue-collar Catholic districts that gave big margins to Brown.

MS-01: Here's a surprise: after painstakingly clearing the GOP field for state Sen. Alan Nunnelee and getting him off to a good fundraising start, the NRCC is now meeting with Fox News talking head Angela McGlowan about a run against Rep. Travis Childers in the 1st. McGlowan hasn't been elected before, but she does have experience as a staff member to Sen. John Ensign.

NJ-03: In addition to being an NFL player, NJ-03 Republican candidate Jon Runyan is apparently also a gentleman farmer in his spare time. He owns a 20-acre spread in rural New Jersey, but pays only hundreds of dollars in property taxes each year on 15 of those acres thanks to using them as farmland - in order to raise four donkeys. (I'm sure the irony of raising donkeys is lost on no one, although the land probably isn't zoned to allow for elephants instead.)

NY-23: The Doug Hoffman camp is touting an internal poll showing him with a big lead over potential rivals for the GOP nomination this year, including the more establishment figure of Assemblyman Will Barclay. Hoffman, still benefiting from a lot of name rec after gaining national attention from the special election, leads Barclay 56-22 in a hypothetical 4-way contest also involving would-be-picks from last time Matt Doheny and Paul Maroun.

MA-St. Sen.: The good news is that Democrats may have a shot at picking up Scott Brown's Senate seat in a special election (date TBA). The seat covers parts of Middlesex, Bristol, and Norfolk counties in Boston's southwestern suburbs. 21-year state Rep. Lida Harkins says she'll run for the Democrats; physician Peter Smulowitz also intends to run. State Reps. Richard Ross and Elizabeth Poirier may run for the GOP. The bad news? They don't really need a pickup, as the Dems already have a 34-4 edge now (with one other vacancy in a safe Dem seat to be filled, thanks to the resignation of prison-bound Anthony Galluccio).

Supreme Court: As you probably know, the Supreme Court opened the door yesterday to a flood of special interest money into the election process with their decision in Citizens United. The case allows corporations, labor unions, and other similar entities to make unlimited independent expenditures on behalf of candidates, although they still can't make direct contributions to the candidates' warchests. Rich Hasen's Election Law Blog and How Appealing have roundups of links to many different discussions as to what all it means. (Everyone seems to agree it's a big deal, but just how big a deal seems up for debate.)

Census: Census Director Robert Groves is out with a timetable for all the movements that will occur over the next few months to get the Census up and running, seemingly to be executed with military precision. And if just can't get enough Census discussion, Groves even has his own blog now.

Crisitunity :: SSP Daily Digest: 1/22
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Marion Berry
Just wanted to make a quick comment on Berry.  A lot of people in the district expect him to retire soon (or drop dead, whichever comes first), though it looks like he's going to press on with this campaign here on the ground.  If he does retire, we have a deep bench here to pick from and not many Republicans that could be viable in this district (my district mind you).  Several names jump to mind, former state party chair Jason Willett, former state senator and Lt. Gov candidate Tim Wooldridge, and (the one that interests me the most), our state Treasurer Martha Shoffner.

http://www.bluearkansasblog.com

IDK
Just because you have a good Democratic bench means very little. In my county we only have one elected Republican yet we voted something like 56-39 McCain. I think we also voted Sodrel by a narrow margin. I have said it for years a Indiana democrat is a republican, and I feel the same is true in Berry's district. I think that if Berry retires it will be a very uphill battle to keep his seat. Plus you will probaly have Lincoln leading the ticket. I hope we can hold the district, I really do.  

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
We've got Beebe at the top of the ticket
And the SSP crew just reported on his approval ratings being 82-9 or something like that.  

[ Parent ]
Not to be confused with Marion Barry
of "The bitch set me up" fame.

[ Parent ]
I find it hard to believe...
...that any open seat in Arkansas in 2010, is anything but HIGHLY VULNERABLE to flipping.  

[ Parent ]
Regarding MS-01
McGlowan hasn't been elected before, but she does have experience as a staff member to Sen. John Ensign.

So, what kind of 'experience' are we talking about here?  


Another Question
I can't access my profile to change my signature. It keeps saying 'we're unable to locate that page.' Please advise.

[ Parent ]
I suspect
That the problem is due to the use of punctuation in your user name, and that's triggered some kind of glitch with the latest Soapblox upgradge. In the meantime, I've cleared your signature until this issue is resolved.

[ Parent ]
Thanks, that's what I was going for.


[ Parent ]
I see what you did there - nt


Independent Socialist & Chair of SSP Cranky Indianian Hoosier Caucus, IN-09

[ Parent ]
Sestak
Mission accomplished. Go home. I actually think he would be stronger than Specter in the general but I don't think he can win the primary. All he does by staying in is hurt Specter for November.

Im starting to agree with this, not entirely sold yet
These are much different times than way back when I was rooting for Sestak heavily.  We need to keep PA-7 and Specter needs the ability to start driving down Toomey's favorables.

Although I kind of have a feeling Specter is damaged goods now.  He's been pretty front and center in a lot of the political happenings (recently telling Bachmann to "act like a lady") and it seems like the ones who get themselves in the headlines are the ones voters are associating with sucking. Even Snowe's numbers started to plummet once her name got into the headlines concerning HCR, even though the press was actually pretty positive.

A big primary is only going to drag him down.  But I just really do not like Specter....


[ Parent ]
538 just moved PA up to #4
in his Senate ranking list to flip. Ugh.

Specter is unpopular. Sestak is still unknown statewide.
Let them primary and debate. That ought to help with Sestak's name recognition. But I agree it's becoming harder for Sestak since he has to fight the Dem establishment, too.


[ Parent ]
Running has moved Specter left
Closing off Sestak's reason d'atre for winning. And Dems need every House seat they can get.

[ Parent ]
Specter is the new Lieberman
Here's why I don't trust Specter: this would probably be his last race, even if he wins. He's been one of the most centrist Senators in a centrist chamber and really only switched to survive politically. Sound familiar?

If Specter wins yet another term, he's got six years as a Lieberman to cause trouble and can then just retire at age 86 (!) after that. Sestak's a 58-year-old 3-star Admiral, and he's kinda like the saner, more progressive Jim Webb.  

Now, I'm not saying that Specter is anywhere near as douchey as Lieberman. (is that even possible?) But even the possibility of him going there is more than I can stomach. Sestak seems like a good guy and he could beat Toomey just as easily, if not more easily, than Specter could.

In other words, we need Specter to pull a Dodd more than we need Sestak to pull a Gerlach.  

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


[ Parent ]
Not Sure
If it is indeed his intention to serve one last term, Specter will be able to vote freely and he could become more liberal.

Specter is a political animal, he knows how to "play the game". If he decides to serve just one more term, he'll finally be free to vote how he truly feels.

Think about it, he started out as a Democrat, switched to get elected locally, and stayed with the party during his Senatorial career until this past year when he came back to the Democratic Party.

I'm probably in the minority here, but I think Specter not having to worry about running for re-election again will make him more liberal.


[ Parent ]
Any comments on...
how the Supreme Court decision in Citizens United yesterday will impact any or all of these races?

I mean, if some corporation decides they're suddenly going to dump $10 million into a Senate race in support of the Republican, or $1 million into 10 House races, then all of our thinking and conventional wisdom would go flying out the window, wouldn't it?

If those guys start bringing over Madison Avenue guys who know how to market things... with enough money for TV ads, they could rehabilitate even the worst Republican's image, or smear the Democrat into oblivion.


Cuts both ways
Hollywood, Trial Lawyers, the Unions etc.

[ Parent ]
And the one plus on our side
is that these big corporations who may want to get heavily involved could only end up hurting their business' image.  Like if McDonald's only gets involved in GOP races, Im only going to eat at Burger King.

However, everyone already knows who Hollywood, Trial Lawyers, and the Unions support.  The organizations who will spend heavily for the Democrats are already heavily identified with the Democrats and ours really dont have a bottom line to worry about.  While corporations who will want to spend a lot more on the GOP are not identified as such and do have bottom lines to worry about.


[ Parent ]
All of which probably pale in comparison to big business, though.


Follow the elections in Georgia at the 2010 Georgia Race Tracker.

[ Parent ]
Look at California
corporations are allowed to not only spend freely advocating for or against candidates and ballot measures, but can give directly too.  We operate just fine out here.

[ Parent ]
The foreign money angle is also interesting
That too probably cuts both ways.

[ Parent ]
Disclosure Laws
Corporations and partnerships still have to disclose just like everyone else.  That will deter a lot of companies who may not want to alienate their consumers, and it may unintentionally backfire (if a Pharma company is airing attacks ads against an incumbent Democrat, that Dem can easily turn around and say, "look, I've been standing up to these guys").  I've said  this elsewhere, but this rule already exists in California for both candidates and ballot measures, and it certainly hasn't hurt us out here.

[ Parent ]
It hasn't hurt us here?!?
Um, I'm in California too, and if you haven't noticed, our state is on the brink of financial ruin, and the fixes we've tried have all been shot down in flames by the Republican minority, or by oil companies spending massive amounts of money to fool Californians into voting against their own interests.  And do you wanna make Enron into a national disaster?

If you want to use California for a model, we're royally fucked.


[ Parent ]
I'm not convinced it matters much
A lot of money - seemingly unlimited amounts - were already being spent through seeming loopholes in the tax code.

Perhaps I'm missing something, but I'd think this would just save a few fees w/r/t forming 503(c)4 organizations, or whatever is the current loophole for issue PACs.  


[ Parent ]
Thompson likely to run after all?
Senatus on Twitter just Retweeted that "WI-SEN: Better than 50/50 chance that ex-WI Gov Tommy Thompson runs for Senate, per source".  Hopefully PPP is right and his approvals are in the red.

21, male, CA-15 (home and voting there), LA-2 (college)



How long ago was that poll?
I swear, if this poisonous atmosphere caused by the ConDems ends up costing us Feingold...

Follow the elections in Georgia at the 2010 Georgia Race Tracker.

[ Parent ]
Maybe it stops him being so smug
And self-righteous. Listen, plenty of blame goes to all sectors of the party in my view.

[ Parent ]
We'll see how progressives in the House deal with the Senate bill
But so far, I only blame conservadems in the Senate making this take so damn long.

[ Parent ]
Smug and self rightous?
Where do you get that? Feingold may be a bit of a pain sometimes but I wouldn't call them smug.

[ Parent ]
Just my opinion
Have never liked him. Obviously I hope he wins but he isn't a team player and never will be.

[ Parent ]
Really?
I'm not going to lie to you Conspiracy you the first liberal on the blogs that have said he dislikes Feingold. He's a darling to every progressive i've talked to. He's not a team player, what incidents have occured to ake you think like this? I mean the guy's not the Senate version of Dennis Kucinich I can say this.

[ Parent ]
Feingold has a tendency to either
(a) Take potshots at the Senate leadership and/or President

or

(b) Be a purity vote against things.

I tend to agree with his reasons for both of those, and I do like the guy a lot, but he definitely has a tendency to be something of a loose cannon.  

Independent Socialist & Chair of SSP Cranky Indianian Hoosier Caucus, IN-09


[ Parent ]
I agree he takes potshots
At the leadership and the President and that does irk me like it does with both of you but still at end he is a reliable vote. He's not like Ben Nelson or Joe Lieberman that takes shots at him then strikes down the legislation. I get what your saying th man can be a bit a pain in the ass but he's not that bad, he is reliable and he's not that much of a purist. Kucinich now he's a purist. Feingold, sometimes but not as much as 'ol Dennis. I think we can agree on that maybe.

[ Parent ]
Oh, sure
I don't actually have a problem with him at all, personally. And he's no Kucinich. I was just saying I can also see where conspiracy is coming from on this one.

I actually like politicians who are a pain in the ass for their own party if their party and their principles collide. Even more so if I agree with those principles as well. Heh.  

Independent Socialist & Chair of SSP Cranky Indianian Hoosier Caucus, IN-09


[ Parent ]
Agreed
I see where both of you are coming from. Your right SOMETIMES, being a pain helps because it brings your views to attention. That's why I always respected Senators like him, Sanders, Boxer, Brown, Webb etc.

[ Parent ]
My dearly departed Nancy never forgave Feingold for
voting to confirm Ashcroft as AG. This was during the time when the Judiciary committee, like the Senate, was split 50-50.

I don't know if his vote could have actually prevented his confirmation from coming up for a full vote in the Senate,

but if it did, would the so-called PATRIOT act have been so extreme?


[ Parent ]
I was wondering when someone was going to bring that up
Your right, I will say this. The only true beef I ever had with Russ that he voted to confirm John Ashcroft for AG. That was a black eye for him.

[ Parent ]
The poll was done just before Thanksgiving
Things may have gotten worse since then but not THAT much worse.  According to Gallup Obama's approvals are in about the same place they were them.

21, male, CA-15 (home and voting there), LA-2 (college)



[ Parent ]
A Georgia Republican has a good idea for a change!
http://www.ajc.com/news/georgi...

If they put that to a referendum, I'm voting for it.

Follow the elections in Georgia at the 2010 Georgia Race Tracker.


That's a great idea!
It should be extended to appointive office, too. Here's the crux of the proposal:

Some legislators are pushing for a constitutional amendment to get tax cheats out of their ranks -- and out of Georgia politics in general.

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
Whoops, I pressed "Post" too soon
That sentence was meant to be block-quoted, and I was then going to say that this is exactly the kind of bipartisan populism the Democrats and Republicans should be pressing, on the national as well as state level. I think this is a great idea for a Constitutional amendment. We might consider other language, too, such as anyone who has in the last 5 years been a CEO or COO of a corporation that was found guilty of felonies is barred from elective or appointive office. How about it, folks?

"I'm not a member of any organized political party, I'm a Democrat!"
--  Will Rogers  


[ Parent ]
I agree
I've been going over a pair of companion amendments in my head.  One makes public financing the sole source of campaign money and requires excess funds be returned (no war chests).  The other completely bans gifts with any real value (e.g. not honorary degrees) and with exceptions for Christmas presents from family to elected officials and certain high-level appointed officials.  

Violations of either would come with a lifetime ban from holding ANY office at ANY level of government, elected or not and bans them from lobbying.  

Follow the elections in Georgia at the 2010 Georgia Race Tracker.


[ Parent ]
KS-Gov: Yeah Tom Holland
Democrats desperately need a candidate and an experienced State Senator who's known for beating Republicans and not going down without a fight...I'll take it!  Well done, Kansas Democrats!

Now just get Joe Reardon into KS-03 and find someone to take on the Great White Dope in KS-02 and we actually have a decently competitive slate this year. In KS, for Democrats, that is an accomplishment.

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


Moore
I wish we could talk Moore into running, however he probaly does not want to go out with a loss.

Proud member of the Indiana Democratic Party from IN-9.  

[ Parent ]
Now THAT would be a race
There's no way it would happen, I think Moore's happy to get out of politics. And I don't think he'd particularly care about losing. He's almost lost so many times in his early races that I'm sure he's made peace with it.

But I think the secret to Moore's success is that he's just so hard to attack or get mad about. He's got this image of a nice, responsible, plain-spoken, moderate adult who's just very quiet and does his job.

Feeling vulnerable, Brownback would probably go overboard with the attacks, they'd backfire because Kansans would not believe that Moore wants everyone to have gay socialist abortions. And voila, Gov. Moore....in my dreams.

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


[ Parent ]
That's how I feel as well
Dennis Moore has been representing KS-3 since 1998 and had yet to get truely entrenched. He's faced competitive races so many times that he's getting tired. He's probaly thinking to himself, i've been in office for 12 yesrs, represented my district well times to hang them up and truely enjoy my life. It sucks because he was a very good rep for his district and would be one of the Democrats I would hate to lose like him and Vic Snyder in the House and Byron Dorgan in the Senate but get expects these guy to stickaround until kingdom come.

[ Parent ]
Does anyone else think this is a good thing?:
"Republicans in the Bay State are taking a renewed interest in competing in House races there"

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01

MA-St. Sen.
I couldn't find a map of Brown's senate district so I drew it on VRA: http://img715.imageshack.us/im...

This is your typical blue-collar Brown-voting district. I'm not sure how strongly it went for Brown (can't find data for the split towns) but I know he got upwards of 60% there. However it also went for Obama, so with the right circumstances we could pick this up. (LOL.)

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


and just for the hell of it
the districts of the three state reps interested in the race: http://img714.imageshack.us/im...

Blue is Harkins (D), Green is Ross (R), Purple is Poirier (R).

21, dude, RI-01 (registered) IL-01 (college)
please help Japan. click "donate funds" in upper right and then "Japan Earthquake and Pacific Tsunami." http://www.redcross.org/


[ Parent ]
Angela McGlowan Vs. Travis Childers, MS-01
Ok, so I looked up Angela McGlowan and lo and behold, she's a hardcore teabagger. An African-American teabagger. Now how interesting would that be if she won the primary.... (and I would doubt it, but maybe...?)

A teabagging black female Republican against conservative Blue Dog Democrat Travis "the Mustache" Childers.

Oh, yeah--and she brings the crazy like Bachmann:

http://washingtonindependent.c...

Kansan by birth, Californian by choice, and Gay by the grace of God.


MS-01
If she wins the Primary, Childers wins easily in the General. I think he'll win anyway, but McGlowan is enough of a partisan hack that Childers can easily show the difference between a politician who cares about MS-01, and a politician that cares about the GOP.

However, there are three candidates in the race now, not two.

http://www.swingstateproject.c...

It's even mentioned here that Henry Ross is running.  


[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox