Premium Sponsor


Featured Sponsor


Our Sponsors


Ad Networks

Advertise Liberally

Buy an ad on all of the top liberal blogs with just one click.

Site Stats

SSP Daily Digest: 10/15

by: Crisitunity

Thu Oct 15, 2009 at 4:39 PM EDT


CA-Sen: What's with the California politicians who are too busy to vote? Carly Fiorina has previously conceded that she didn't vote in all elections, but today her camp is admitting that she didn't vote at all in the period between 1989 and 1999.

CT-Sen: After a mediocre fundraising quarter (of course, between prostate cancer and pinch-hitting at the helm of the HELP committee, he may have had better things to do), Chris Dodd is getting some high-level help. Barack Obama will appear on Dodd's behalf at a fundraiser in Connecticut next week.

FL-Sen: Two very different pictures of where Charlie Crist's approval stands, from different pollster. Insider Advantage finds his approval at a puzzlingly low 48/41,and 55/38 among Republicans. (They didn't poll the primary or general.) On the other hand, a poll by Republican pollster Cherry Communications on behalf of the Florida Chamber of Commerce finds 62/28. Meanwhile, Charlie Crist's losing streak among the party base continued, as Marco Rubio racked up a big win with the Palm Beach GOP, winning their straw poll 90-17. (While most of the straw polls have happened in rural, teabaggy places, this is moderate, country club terrain, where Crist should play better.) Interestingly, ex-NH Senator Bob Smith, whose existence most people, me included, had forgotten about, pulled in 11 votes.

NV-Sen: Facing bad poll numbers but armed with gigantic piles of cash, Harry Reid has already started advertising for his re-election. Despite his decades in office, he's running a TV spot basically intended to introduce himself to Nevada, seeing as how many of the state's residents have moved in since the last time he was elected in 2004.

NY-Sen-B: Kirsten Gillibrand reported another large cash haul this quarter, bringing in $1.6 mil and sitting on $4.1 mil CoH. Nevertheless, she still needs to work on introducing herself to her constituents (granted, there's a lot of them); a Newsday/Siena poll of Long Islanders find that she has a favorable of 23/27, with 50 saying they don't know.

OH-Sen: Ex-Rep. Rob Portman doubled up on Lt. Gov. Lee Fisher in the money chase in Ohio, raising $1.3 million to $620K for Fisher. Portman will still need to get past wealthy auto dealer Tom Ganley in the primary, though, who's pledging to spend up to $7 million of his own money on the race, which could drain Portman nicely before he faces off against a Democrat. No word yet from Fisher's Dem opponent, SoS Jennifer Brunner, although the fact that she just replaced her campaign finance team can't be an encouraging sign.

PA-Sen: This would be a big 'get' for Joe Sestak if he were running in Connecticut: Ned Lamont, whose successful primary defeat of Joe Lieberman in 2006 established some precedent for Sestak, gave Sestak his endorsement.

CT-Gov: Jodi Rell is not looking much like a candidate for re-election, if her fundraising is any indication; she raised just $14K over the last quarter. The Dems in the race (who are running with or without a Rell retirement), Stamford mayor Dan Malloy and SoS Susan Bysiewicz, have each raised over $100K.

FL-Gov: The poll paid for by the Florida Chamber of Commerce, mentioned above, also took a look at the Florida governor's race. They see GOP AG Bill McCollum beating Dem state CFO Alex Sink, 42-35.

NJ-Gov: Rasmussen polls the New Jersey gubernatorial race again, and there's a pretty important distinction between their results with and without leaners pushed. Their topline numbers are 45 for Chris Christie, 41 for Jon Corzine, and 9 for Chris Daggett, a bit more Christie-favorable than what else we've seen this week. However, in Rasmussen's words, "when voters are asked their initial choice," it's a 38-38 tie between Christie and Corzine, with 16 for Daggett. This should superficially cheer Democrats, but it also points to some hope for Christie, in that it shows just how soft a lot of Daggett's support is. (Rasmussen also finds that 57% of Daggett's supporters say they could change their minds before Election Day.)

WY-Gov: Gov. Dave Freudenthal is at least offering some sort of timeline on deciding whether to seek a third term, but we'll need to wait a long time. He says he'll let us know after the end of the next legislative session, in March; the end of the filing period is May 28. He also didn't offer much insight into when he'd set about challenging the state's term limits law in court (a challenge he'd be expected to win, but one that could be time-consuming) if he did decide to run.

FL-10: The retirement speculation surrounding 79-year-old Rep. Bill Young isn't going to go away with his fundraising haul this quarter: only $4,500, with $419K on hand. He's also giving away money (to the tune of $10,000) to the NRCC, despite facing a strong challenge next year. Unfortunately, his Dem challenger, state Sen. Charlie Justice, had a second straight lackluster quarter of his own, bringing in $77K for $101K CoH.

FL-19: A roundup from the newly-merged CQ/Roll Call looks at the quickly developing field in the dark-blue 19th, for a special election to replace the soon-to-resign Robert Wexler. The big question is whether Wexler throws his support behind state Sen. Peter Deutch; Deutch won Wexler's old state Senate seat (which covers more than half the 19th) in 2006 partly due to Wexler's endorsement. West Palm Beach mayor Lois Frankel is another possibility; so too are Broward County mayor Stacy Ritter and state Sen. Jeremy Ring, although their Broward County bases don't overlap as well with the 19th. Broward County Commissioner Ben Graber (who finished 3rd in the 1996 primary that Wexler won) is already in the race.

LA-02: Um, what? GOP Rep. Joe Cao will be appearing with Barack Obama in New Orleans at several events today. While it's apparently customary for presidents to invite local lawmakers to appearances in their districts, it's also customary for members of the opposition party to decline. Cao, however, probably sees hitching his wagon to Obama as at least a faint hope of staving off defeat in this strongly Democratic district. Cao's fundraising numbers for last quarter were pretty good, with $394K raised, but his burn rate was terrible, churning through nearly all of it ($382K) with high costs for direct mail fundraising.

NY-01: We could have a real races on our hands in the 1st, where Democratic Rep. Tim Bishop's Republican challenger Randy Altschuler reported $659K in the third quarter. Of course, $450K of that was from his own pocket, and a grand total of one donor was actually from within the 1st, with the bulk of the rest of the money coming from Manhattan.

Census: David Vitter, who, with Robert Bennett, is leading the Republican charge to get the Census to ask respondents about their citizenship status, has decided to modify his amendment to this year's appropriations package after one of the academics who he was relying on said that such a measure would scare off respondents from participating in the census at all. Not that it would matter, since it's not likely to get an up-or-down vote, and Commerce Sec. Gary Locke already made clear that it's way too late to make changes to the 2010 forms, which have already been printed and shipped.

Polling: PPP's Tom Jensen notes, that generally, Republicans aren't picking up any new voters; the main problem with the upcoming New Jersey and Virginia elections is that Democrats have disproportionately lost interest. If the 2008 voter universes still applied in NJ and VA, Democrats would be winning both races handily.

Crisitunity :: SSP Daily Digest: 10/15
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Hiram Monserrate is not a felon
He managed to come unscathed even without an Oscar. Just a misdemeanor

But he could still go to jail....
The misdemeanor charge carries a penalty of up to a year in jail! So he could be sitting in Rikers while the State Senate is trying to vote on a budget. This would leave the Dems 1 vote short of the 32 they would need to pass anything.

What a mess.

Fight global warming & help disaster relief efforts by raising money for Music for Relief when you search the web! Click here for more info:
http://searchmfr.swagbucks.com...


[ Parent ]
Observation about Cao from today's townhall meeting
I was at President Obama's townhall at the University of New Orleans.  At it's start he introduced local politicans.  Bobby Jindal was loudly booed and Ray Nagin got a mostly negative response.  Cao's was pretty nice: I was afraid he'd get the same treatement as Jindal (I don't like either but it's pretty obnoxious to boo them).  Granted, people weren't jumping out of their seats for Cao (or either of the Landrieus and Melancon) but the response in this overwellmingly Democratic crowd was pretty good for a Republican.  

NJ gov
http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes....

This is the first time I saw Daggett's picture. And I thought that there must be a famine in NJ.


Christie has been stealing his food


[ Parent ]
That's because
Christie "throws his weight around."



[ Parent ]
...uh, he is standing next to CHRISTIE
Daggett looks quite H/W proportionate to me.

[ Parent ]
My brainteaser is working


[ Parent ]
What does Gillibrand do other than raise money?
I am not a New Yorker so I may just be ill informed but Sen Gillibrand hasn't been the rising star some claimed she would be. When she takes a position on an issue you can pretty much guarantee it's a liberal/left position. And there's nothing wrong with being liberal but it just seems like for her its not so much based on principle like many of the other liberal senators but expediency. I also don't understand why if she's so great at raising money she doesn't spend at least some of it improving her poll numbers among democrats. Just my 2 cents.  

I wonder why she isnt spending it either
if a GOPer gets in the race and its someone like Pataki who could be up on the air within weeks of announcing, attack ads against her flip flopping record and such could KILL her ability to get good favorables.  She needs to introduce herself to the voters before her Republican opponent does!  Hell, she should be introducing herself regardless.  Start getting those approvals up now so Republicans wont be so tempted to run against her.

[ Parent ]
I said that months ago
Only reason to hold off would be to hoarde in case somebody like Pataki runs but I agree with your rebuttal if that is indeed the reasoning behind it.

[ Parent ]
Was Pataki really that popular?


[ Parent ]
Not at the end
I have no doubt she would still win but another pain in the ass to defend.

[ Parent ]
Beyond people at swingstateproject.com...
I sincerely don't know a single New Yorker who loves Kirsten Gillibrand. I knew quite a few who were excited by the possibility of Carolyn Maloney challenging her, but otherwise, I don't sense a whole lot of enthusiasm for or against her. Granted, lukewarm-ness is usually enough for a Dem to win in New York, but probably not against George Pataki, who's still a pretty well-liked name Upstate and in the NYC suburbs. She wouldn't beat Rudy either. Of course, she'd beat Edward Cox by 30%.

[ Parent ]
I'm not buying it
Not in a senate race. It would be competitive for sure but New York is not sending a Republican to Washington no matter what people think of her right now.

[ Parent ]
She's not popular in NYC
The perception I get from my New York friends is that those in the NYC area were pissed that she got picked while upstaters seemed to like her better.  A lot of that has to do with geography - City residents feel that since they are the largest constituency in the state they ought to have someone who understands their issues and is more in line with them ideologically, while folks from the Hudson Valley area feel that they always get overlooked in favor of city politics.  I can't really blame either group for feeling that way.  The other sentiment I picked up amongst NYCers is that if she tacked so far left after becoming Senator, why didn't Paterson just pick a "real" progressive like Jerry Nadler or Steve Israel in the first place?  The other issue that seems to be plaguing Gillibrand is that she is still known as Paterson's appointment, and he has been a deadweight on her approval ratings.

I don't really think Pataki would be a threat - it would just cost a lot of money to beat him.  His favorables have increased since his governorship has looked better in light of the Spitzer/Paterson shitfest that has dominated Albany politics since (hell, any ex-Gov would look better up against those clowns) but he's still only within the margin of error despite the statewide name ID and not having his record re-scrutinized.  Plus, the NYC suburbs - particularly Westchester County - have been bluing so much over the last decade that I really do think any half-decent Democrat will win in the end.  Even Giuliani would suffer from that fate, which is why he's only willing to run if it's against Paterson.


[ Parent ]
It's very odd
She has net positive approvals upstate, but negatives downstate. I don't think I've ever seen that for a Democrat before.

But the advantage you get from being on the Democratic line downstate means that she's effectively probably unbeatable in a general election. It's hard to imagine the kind of Republican candidate who could beat her. Indeed, all of her actions thus far have indicated that she know her biggest threat is on the left in a primary.  


[ Parent ]
But
City residents feel that since they are the largest constituency in the state they ought to have someone who understands their issues and is more in line with them ideologically,

We have Chuck Schumer.  


[ Parent ]
Well for one thing
she has been passionately pulling to repeal DADT, she pushed Carl Levin to hold hearings on it.

Gillibrand's biggest problem is she hasn't gotten any $$$ for New York yet, but she doesn't really have to as Schumer gets everything we need...but that's what's keeping Gillibrand from really making a statement.


[ Parent ]
She's up for election in 2010 and 2012
She's going to need a whole lot of money. Besides she's probably waiting for Pataki to make his move.

[ Parent ]
SUSA takes another look at NJ
here:

Q: If the election for governor were today, would you vote for... (candidate names rotated) Republican Chris Christie? Democrat Jon Corzine? Or Independent Chris Daggett?
A: Christie (R) 40% Corzine (D) 39% Daggett (I) 18% Other 1% Undecided 3%

Huge numbers for Daggett. Christie is down 3, and Corzine is down 1. Corzine's performance among blacks drops a bit, which is actually not terrible news--at the end of the day he will clean up with them.

Also, SUSA finds big movement in Central NJ.  


NYT NJ poll has Corzine ahead
40 to 37 (PDF).  

[ Parent ]
Is this really the 1st NYT poll of the '09 NJ Gov race?
Only one line is shown for relevant questions in the poll.

And did they really poll over 6 days?! (Oct 9-14) Isn't that one reason why we all criticized the IBD/TIPP polls during '08?


[ Parent ]
Yup, their first poll
The length of the poll is a little long, but it doesn't look like the race changed much over that period.

What's most interesting to me is that this is apparently the first poll of the race that included cell phone only calls.  


[ Parent ]
Same number of days
As Quinnipiac. I don't remember much criticism of TIPP for that reason. They just had screwy internals. Now the Battleground poll splitting days and tacking numbers together is another thing entirely...

[ Parent ]
GA-Gov: Oxendine's ethics troubles continue.
http://blogs.ajc.com/political...

Follow the elections in Georgia at the 2010 Georgia Race Tracker.

CA-SEN
Carly Fiorina's daughter, Laura, passed away on Monday at the age 35. http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo...

Very sorry to hear this.
My condolences.

Bill Posey is not half-alligator...and is outclassed by Davy Crockett anyway: http://www.washingtonmonthly.c...

[ Parent ]
That's really tragic
n/t

[ Parent ]
My condolences.


Check out the 2010 California races (http://2010californiaracetracker.wetpaint.com) and help us take back Red California! (http://www.takebackredcalifornia.org)

[ Parent ]
NV-Sen, smart move by Reid's campaign
to re-introduce himself, especially since he has the cash to use.
NV is the fastest growing state in the nation, with a projected population growth of an insane 35% since the last census. So that's lots of new voters since his 2004 election.

Too bad he isn't using the money to introduce someone else....


[ Parent ]
Cristiunity you misread Rasmussen on NJ-Gov......
You fell for Rasmussen's lie about the race.

The "topline number" you cite is what they show in the graphic alongside their narrative on the poll, but the 45-41-9 is not an honest straight-up topline.

What you missed is the that question on "initial preference" is the real topline, and that comes out 38-38-16.

Rasmussen then produces a GOP-friendly result by pushing only soft Daggett voters, without pushing soft Corzine or soft Christie voters.  Rasmussen's narrative says 57% of Daggett voters could change their minds, but the narrative then admits 27% of Corzine voters and 20% of Christie voters say the same...but soft Corzine and soft Christie voters aren't pushed in the follow-up!

Now, it's reasonable to think Daggett's support could fall off.  But the honest polling practice is to just note that a majority of Daggett's support is soft while Corzine's and Christie's support is more solid, and leave it at that.

But Rasmussen has spent the year cooking GOP-friendly numbers rather than producing honest polls, and so they manipulated their questioning to get a skewed result that isn't in line with polling reality.  And, needless to say, it's not an apples-to-apples comparison with all the other polls, none of which publishs a "result" after pushing Daggett voters to the major party nominees.

The relevant apples-to-apples result to take away from Rasmussen is 38-38-16, which is in line almost exactly with everyone else right now.

My wife caught me intellectually masturbating looking at dirty polls on Swing State Project.


Hrm, perhaps...
...but I wonder if Daggett's support really does collapse come election day, that the "topline number" is the most accurate projector of what could come of such a scenario.

Again folks, I'm sure I sound like a broken record, and perhaps I'm overexaggerating the impact of this, but Daggett's name will not necessarily be listed as the top alternative to Corzine or Christie on the actual ballot. The law on the books (which Daggett unsuccessfully attempted to challenge) makes it so that the third-party candidates are listed in an entirely random order on each respective county ballot. Corzine and Christie receive the first two slots on every single county ballot. One county's ballot may look like, from left to right...

Jon Corzine - Democratic
Chris Christie - Republican
David R. Meiswinkle - Middle Class Empowerment
Joshua Leinsdorf - Fair Election Party
Jason Cullen - People Not Politics
Greg Pason - Socialist Party USA
Chris Daggett - Independent
Kenneth Kaplan - NJ Libertarian Party
Gary Steele - Leader, Independence, Vision

Daggett winds up completely lost in the shuffle. Contrast this to the '08 Minnesota Senate race, where Dean Barkley received the top slot on EVERY SINGLE county ballot.


[ Parent ]
Ballot placement is badly overhyped & not really relevant......
Ballot placement doesn't matter for any candidate who has enough name recognition to be polling consistently in the double digits in the first place.  Once you rise to that level of support, the voters who are considering you, whether they ultimately pick you or not, will find you on the ballot.  NO ONE is going to say, "I don't see Daggett here so screw it I'll just vote for Christie."  Voters will find Daggett.  Finding a candidate on a ballot is not hard, and yet some political analysts act like it's akin to finding a needle in a haystack.

If you're one of those other guys on the ballot, then ballot placement can be very slightly more relevant...but even then only very slightly.

If Daggett drops off, it will be because his soft support collapsed before people walked into the voting booth.  Anyone intending to vote for Daggett as they arrive there will find him, as will most of those very few people who make their actual decision only in the voting booth.

My wife caught me intellectually masturbating looking at dirty polls on Swing State Project.


[ Parent ]
I'd tried to emphasize that
at least somewhat in my post, by specifically flagging the line "when voters are asked their initial choice," which certainly set my antennae twitching as soon as I saw that, as that would strike me as being the most important number for polling purposes. But thanks for calling that to everyone's attention more explicitly, especially the point about the Corzine and Christie leaners. 38-38 feels right, as it's consistent with the 1-point game everyone else is seeing.

[ Parent ]
As soon as I saw it on the site
I thought it was odd. Now, he has reported leaners in the past but not usually this close to election day. More a reallocation of undecideds than a poll.

[ Parent ]
It's a reallocation specifically to make Christie look stronger......
Scott Rasmussen is, in fact, a conservative Republican and also a fundamentalist Christian, but he tried to keep his election polls pretty accurate while his boy Dubya was in power.

But ever since Obama won the election, Rasmussen has been manufacturing ways to make Obama and Democrats look weaker and Republicans stronger than is the reality.  His "Presidential approval index" is one such tool, where the intensity gap ("strongly approve" minus "strongly disapprove") on job approval necessarily was smaller than the overall job approval gap.  Rasmussen also created a fictitious category of people he calls "the political class," identified based on answers to three ambiguous and loaded questions, and he uses that fictitious group as a foil in his polling narratives.  Rasmussen also has been playing with his "likely voter" model to produce a more conservative and Republican electorate.  And of course he always has used question wording and ordering as a way to manufacture skewed survey responses.

This stunt regarding NJ-Gov is just his latest gimmick.  And it's a more transparently stupid one than others, since it's easy enough to quickly pick apart what he did.

My wife caught me intellectually masturbating looking at dirty polls on Swing State Project.


[ Parent ]
It certainly supports
My belief that his numbers lean on average three points Republican.

[ Parent ]
AZ-Sen: Rodney Glassman forms exploratory committee
His new website is here.

This is an excellent get for the Democratic Party in AZ.  Glassman is an Andrew Rice-style candidate: a young up-and-coming local officeholder who will raise a lot of money and use the race to raise his statewide profile, while forcing McCain to actually campaign in the state.  This is basically the best we can get for this race, given that no Democratic politician in the state is capable of beating McCain -- Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords loses 57-30 in the latest PPP poll, and the wildly popular AG Terry Goddard is definitely running for Governor instead.

The PPP poll linked above gives McCain a 55-25 edge over Glassman to start.  Glassman apparently had the same reaction I had to that poll, which is that it gives him lots of room to grow and a real chance to break 40% or even 45%.  To put this in perspective, McCain's last opponent, perennial candidate Stu Starky, got only 20.6% of the vote.

Glassman's trying an odd strategy for his exploratory phase: accepting only $20 donations.  Apparently that worked for him when he ran for City Council, allowing him to demonstrate broad support throughout the city.  However, I hope he gives up the idea after his exploratory phase, or even earlier, because in a federal race it's pretty stupid.


IA SEN
Grassley Would Beat Vilsack
A new DailyKos/Research 2000 poll in Iowa tests a rumored match up between Christie Vilsack (D) and Sen. Charles Grassley (R) and finds the senator leading by 11 points, 51% to 40%.

In the much-anticipated gubernatorial race, former Gov. Terry Branstad (R) holds a relatively small lead over Gov. Chet Culver (D), 48% to 43%.  


11 points?! That's striking distance. I like it.


[ Parent ]
I think it's a realistic gap, too, based on...
...Grassley's falling job approval rating, which is not far above 50 these days--still good, but the lowest he's ever had in a career where he's largely avoided visibility in the sharpest partisan fights of the past quarter-century.  It's very obvious Grassley's two-faced role in the health care reform effort has turned off virtually all the partisan Dems and many Dem leaners.

So 51-40 sounds about right, given Christie Vilsack's name recognition.

If she runs, I guess we'll find out how good a campaigner she is.  I buy wholesale Chuck Todd's adage that "candidates and campaigns matter," and it will take a good candidate running good campaign hitting on all cylinders to really keep Grassley on defense in this.

My wife caught me intellectually masturbating looking at dirty polls on Swing State Project.


[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

Talk to your supporters, not tech support. Campaign Engine is the powerful, affordable Progressive Campaign Software.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

SSP Race Ratings

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox