Google Ads


Site Stats

MA-Sen: Kirk Named Interim Senator

by: Crisitunity

Thu Sep 24, 2009 at 1:01 PM EDT


The interim Senator from Massachusetts will be Paul Kirk, Jr., the former head of the DNC and current chairman of the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation.

"He is a distinguished lawyer, volunteer, and citizen, and he shares the sense of service that so distinguished Senator Ted Kennedy," Patrick said at a press conference at the State House. "Paul will not seek the open seat in the special election coming up in January. But for the next few months, he will carry on the work and the focus of Senator Kennedy, mindful of his mission, and his values, and his love of Massachusetts."

Kirk's pick seemed pretty likely yesterday, after Kennedy's widow and sons came out publicly in favor of Kirk's appointment. Kirk was special assistant to Ted Kennedy from 1969 to 1977, so he is well connected with Kennedy's staff and can hit the ground running.

There's also some interesting subtext about Kirk vs. Michael Dukakis; apparently, there were actually people in the activist base who felt strongly enough about a Dukakis appointment that Patrick has pissed more Democrats off, something he can't afford if he wants to get re-elected. The Globe suggests that some insiders were afraid that Dukakis would be too likely to inject himself forcefully on the liberal side of the equation into the health care reform debate, while Kirk seems likelier to quietly vote for whatever emerges.

Patrick also signed the legislation today, which passed the state legislature yesterday, making the interim appointment legally operative. However, Republicans filed an injunction in state superior court today to stop the appointment from taking effect immediately, so there may be some courtroom wrangling before Kirk can be seated. (There was some concern yesterday that the legislature didn't have enough votes to include the "emergency" provision for the bill to take effect immediately, but apparently the Governor has the authority to implement it immediately through procedural means.)

RaceTracker: MA-Sen

Crisitunity :: MA-Sen: Kirk Named Interim Senator
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
back to 60?!1
I was hoping for Dukakis but meh. A five month appointment, as long as Kirk votes party-line, is fine.

[ Parent ]
Back to 60, But For How Long
Let us all pray for Senator Byrd's health and speedy recovery.

[ Parent ]
Byrd
Released from hospital today, just saw it on MSNBC

[ Parent ]
Amen
I'm hoping Byrd regains his strength and prove all the doubters that he's up for the fight for a few more years.

40, male, Democrat, NC-04

[ Parent ]
60
Too bad that isn't true... Byrd in the hospital for a few days and Bill Nelson and co still in power.  But hey, we get blamed for not passing anything due to the 60 seats so instead of getting actual good dems in 2010 we get blamed and lose possible good dems... I'd rather have 59 and hit the repubs over the head as the party of no.

I thought about doing a diary on this
But I'll mention it in abridged form here instead. The problem with the whole 60 thing is the myth that Dems, as a big tent, can ever be as lockstep as the Repubs. The only way you could really hope for any real unity would be to polarize senators by state. Say Obama's thirty best states - 10 Repubs representing within that block and Lieberman. In the other twenty, all won by McCain, there are 10 Dems. Swap those and you might have a chance, without it I'm surprised anybody realistically expects very much from the caucus in terms of complete solidarity.

[ Parent ]
Solidarity
I don't care about solidarity, I care about common sense.  It really isn't that far of a leap to say that paying a middle man to pay doctors is a waste of money.  Paying doctors to see you instead of paying them to cure you and never see you again is silly.  I expect that when we look at the debt we realize that Iraq and afghanistan are unsustainable regardless of the importance of one (both).  I tend to think repubs have a good reason to appose the dems, it will give them more seats.  Dems have no reason to avoid making these commmon sense solutions and then selling them to the public.

[ Parent ]
Preaching to the converted
But changes nothing I said.

[ Parent ]
You know how I know that it does matter
Just look at how hard the Republicans tried in MN and now MA to delay those seats from going to Democrats, it must matter or they would not be screeching so loud to prevent it!

[ Parent ]
I think it's any interesting question
whether anyone would have standing to get an injunction. In any case, the U.S. Senate gets the final word.

Sure it does
Your point is about Dems being a big tent prevents unilateralism.  I don't think so, at least not directly.  Most of our problem is with dems from small states.  They tend to rely on special interest money rather than wealthy donors and thus avoid coommen sense and rathher than what is best for the country.  So the fact that they come from small states may have an impact on this but the fact that they are douchebags probably has more to do with it.  Not all of them are like that mind you just a couple I have in mind.

Paging Kent Conrad


progressive, NY-8 (home), PA-7 (college)

[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox