Google Ads


Site Stats

Redistricting Virginia (A comprehensive look with three scenarios)

by: Penndem

Sun Aug 30, 2009 at 3:11 PM EDT


Virginia offers one of the most intriguing opportunities for redistricting after the 2010 census. The current map is based off of a Republican gerrymander, initiated after Republicans took firm control of both the House or Delegates and State Senate ahead of the 2001 redistricting. Thus Democrats stand to gain even under a bi-partisan or non-partisan scheme. Currently a numberof schemes are possible depending on the outcome of the 2009 state elections. Below I outline the likelihood of each scenario and an example of a redistricting scheme that could result from such a scenario.
Penndem :: Redistricting Virginia (A comprehensive look with three scenarios)
NOTE: Current map can be accessed here: http://www.iqrealestate.com/Co...

Scenario 1. Bi-partisan or non-partisan redistricting

This is far and away the most likely outcome. Currently Democrats control the State Senate by a slim 21-19 margin. This control will prevent Republicans from enacting a gerrymandered scheme as long as Democrats do no suffer any mid-term retirements (an unlikely though not impossible sceneario as will be discussed in scenario 3). In addition, the political winds seem to be blowing against the Democrats in Virginia this year, so it seems almost equally unlikely that Democrats will gain control of both the governership and House of Delegates in 2009 and be able to enact a Democratic gerrymander. Therefore, the most likely outcome is that redistricting will occur either through a bi-partisan negotiating process, or a non-partisan panel (both have been discussed). Although there would be minor differences between the two outcomes, the sample map below is a good example of what either might look like since it both protects endangered incumbents and keeps similar "communities of interest" together. This sample map would likely maintain the current 6-5 Dem majority but could easliy support anything from a 7-4 Dem Majority to a 7-4 Rep majority in the long run

Bipartisan - state

CD #1 (Dark blue) - This largely resembles the current incarnation of the district. It should be marginally more Republican as it's lost majority-minority areas in Prince William County and Hampton Roads in exchange for more conservative areas of Fauquier County, Prince William, and the Northern Neck.

Photobucket

CD #2 (Green) - The GOP was too clever by half in it's 2001 redistricting scheme. Because of demographic and political changes both district 2 and district 4 became politically competitve and were won by Obama in the 2008 election. The 2nd seeks a compromise by making the 2nd more dem friendly for Glenn Nye in exchange for making the 4th a strong Republican district to protect Randy Forbes. Under this map, majority African American areas of Chesapeake previous in the 4th have been given to the 2nd in exchange for extremely conservative areas of coastal Virginia Beach. (Also note that Rep-leaning areas of Hampton have been ceeded to the 1st).

CD #3 (Purple)- Bobby Scott's district needed to expand as it primarily consists of urban African-American sections of Richmond and Hampton Roads that have not kept pace with the state's population growth over the last 10 years. As part of the compromise to strenghten the 2nd while weakening the 4th, the 3rd takes overwhelming African-American Petersburg from Forbes's district while leaving Nye with many majority African-American areas in Hampton Roads.

CD #4 (red)- See above for most changes. In addittion, Forbes's district gaines almost all of heavily Republican Chesterfield county.

CD #5 (yellow)- Tom Periello's district is currently quite precarious and will probably stay that way under any bi-partisan compromise. Unfortunately there's no way to make the district radically stronger without serious gerrymandering (which will not be possible under a bi-partisan compromise) due to the lack of other strong Democratic areas in the vicinity of Charlottesville. However, the district should become marginally more friendly as it has not kept up with the states population growth over the past 10 years and therefore gains the swingy locality of Lynchburg.

CD #6 (teal)- Becomes even more strongly Rep-leaning as Republicans compromise by giving the Dem-leaning city of Roanoke to the slow growing 9th in exchange for heavily Rep areas of the Shenandoah valley that have to be shed from the fast growing 10th.

CD #7 (gray)- No significant changes, the 7th remains a staunchly conservative district that provides a comfortable home to Eric Cantor.

CD #8 (light purple)- District has to expand as inner-Nova's growth has not been as dramatic as PW or Loudon counties. Takes in heavily dem areas of Fairfax county and remains the heavily Democratic home of Jim Moran.

CD #9 (light blue)- The most rural, and slow growing district of the state must expand and does so by taking in Dem leaning Roanoke in exchange for less populous areas around Covington and Martinsville. This district is marginally more Democratic and should continue to easily re-elect Rick Boucher. However, it will still be very difficult to fill the seat with a Democratic replacement upon his retirement

Photobucket

CD #10 (pink)- Outer Norther Virginia has both grown by leaps and bounds and become more Dem-friendly over the past few years. This bi-partisan compromise gives Wolf the most Rep-friendly district possible without sever gerrymandering (in exchange for Republican concessions on the 5th and the 9th). However, this new district will still be significantly more Dem-friendly than its current incarnation. While Wolf might continue to squeak by, the district will likely flip Democratic upon his retirement.

CD #11 (lime green)- Part of the compromise to protect Wolf is necessarrily to make the 11th even more strongly Dem leaning than it is currently. By picking up marority-minority areas of Eastern Prince William and losing Strong-Rep areas of Western Prince William the district move from having a strong Democratic lean to a heavily Democratic district that could not elect a Republican even under the most ideal circumstances.

The other two scenarios (a Republican or Democatic controlled gerrymander) are much less likely and as such will be discussed in less detail below.

Scenario 2 - A Democratic gerrymander

Given the high hill the Democrats would have to climb to reach a majority in the House of Delegates and the unfriendly political winds blowing against the Democrats this scenario is possibly the least likely of the three.  However, politics is, as always, unpredictable, and if the Democrats do recover steam in time for the 2009 elections they may be able to enact a gerrymander similar to the one envisioned below. This example map would likely create a 7-4 Dem Majority.

Photobucket

Notable differences from the bi-partisan scheme
1. In Northern Virginia:
   Frank Wolf's 10th takes heavily Democratic Arlington and Falls Church making his reelection next to impossible. Although the 11th is less Dem friendly it is still majority-minority. All three NOVA districts are strongly Democratic and should return Dem reps for the next 10 years

2. In Hampton Roads and Richmond:
   Glenn Nye's 2nd district takes on all the majority African-American areas of South Hampton Roads and becomes a majority minority district with whites and blacks exist in almost equal proportions. Not suprisingly it is very strong Dem district (Obama prob won by at least 20 points). Suprisingly Bobby Scott's district can maintain it's majority minority status (and keep Scott's base in Newport News) by taking Petersburg and African-American heavy areas of Henrico and Chesterfield counties. Randy Forbes 4th becomes a staunchly Republican as it's majority African American areas are raided to strengthen the 2nd.

3. In the Southside/SW Virginia
  Periello's 5th is strengthened (but not radically changed) by the inclusion of heavily African-American areas of Lynchburg, and Southeast Virginia, in addition to the swingly college towns of Harrisonburg and Staunton, in exchange for the overwhelmingly Republican areas of Appomattox, Franklin and Pittsylvania Counties. The 9th becomes more dem friendly, losing heavliy Republican rural SW VA counties in exchange for Dem-friendly Roanoke and swingy counties along the WV border.

Scenario #3 - Republican gerrymander
 Although Republicans seem somewhat likely to take the Governorship and extremely likely to retain control of the House of Delegates, there will not be an election in the Dem controlled state Senate before the next redistricting scheme is encacted. However the current Democratic majority is potentially precarious as it could be disrupted by the retirement of 82 year-old Chuck Colgan who represents a marginal seat in Northern Virginia that could flip Republican in a special election. In addition one member of the Democratic caucus (Ralph Northam of Norfolk) nearly left to join the Republicans earlier in the year. If a 20-20 tie occurs it will be broken by the Lietenant Governor who, given the current political enviornment, could very well be Republican candidate Bill Bolling. Although these are not good signs, Democrats can take solace in that a victory by Republican candidate Ken Cucinelli in the Auttourney General's race would trigger a special election to fill his Senate seat -- a seat won by Obama by a 12 point margin in 2008 that could very well flip Dem in the election and restore Democratic contol over the chamber. Nonetheless, if the worst does happen the Republicans would likely draft a map that looks something like this. This example map would likely create a 7-4 Republican Majority.

Photobucket

Notable differences with the Bi-partisan plan

1. In NOVA
  Democratic Strength in the region is concentrated in the 8th and 11th, and consigned the the heavily Republican 1st. The 10th is left with all the Republican areas and a larger share of the Shenadoah valley, making it a more hospitable district for Wolf and future Republican successors

2. In Richmond/Hampton Roads
 By Bobby Scott's taking over heavely African-American Petersburg, the 4th and afford to take strong AA areas from the 2nd in exchange for strongly Republican areas of Chesapeake and Suffolk. In addition the 1st cedes Poquoson (which McCain carried by 50 points in 2008) and similarly rock-ribbed Republican areas of York County to the 2nd. The new 2nd is not completely unwinnable for Nye, but will probably flip Republican as long as they can find a somewhat credible challenger.

3. In SW Virginia/Southside
  Periello's 5th is eviscerated as his base in Charlottesville is added to the rock ribbed Republican 6th. Without heavily Dem Charlottesville/Albemarle the 5th becomes a very difficult climb for any Democrat and unwinnable for a relatively liberal Democrat like Periello. Although the 6th gains this Dem bastion it too is unwinnable for any Dem candidate, with the loss of Democratic Roanoke, and the addition of heavily Republican areas of the Shenandoah Valley and Northern Virginia. Republicans make minimal changes to the 9th and remain confident that the district will flip back to them upon Boucher's retirement.

Suffice to say, a lot hangs on the results of the state elections in Virginia this Novemeber. Please let me know if you have any suggestions or observations.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Nice work
you can bet Republicans are dreaming up ways to destroy Periello's district.

26, male, Dem, NJ-12

I have a question
What are the demographic percentages of the districts in your various scenarios? IN particular, I'm interested in how Perriello's district varies.  

Let me know if you want any others...
The 5th in the Republican Gerrymander is 68% white and 26% black. While that would make it more African-American than the current incarnation of the district without Charlottesville it would have voted for McCain by at least a five point margin. Moreover, without historically high African-American turnout any Democrat would have a much steeper hill to climb.

[ Parent ]
If not for the VRA we could get 4 D districts in Richmond/Hampton Roads
1. all of Hampton, Newport News, tidewater region, north to Fredericksburg
2. Norfolk, Virginia Beach, Eastern shore
3. Richmond and suburbs
4. Portsmouth, Chesapeake, west to Emporia, north to Petersburg
Each one is about 30%-40% black, so it would have a good chance of electing a black Congressman. Black voters are a majority of the Dem primary and Dem voters are a majority in the general election. It's probably up to the Obama/Holder Justice Department to allow it.
I did a map here.

As long as the Bobby Scott district has to be 50% black, it seems like you can't get more than 2 out of 4 of the Richmond/Hamptons Roads districts to be Democratic, even in the Democratic gerrymander.

26, male, Dem, NJ-12


That is an interesting thought
It would be interesting if the VRA could be susupended. While it would be quite difficult to get any such plan pass either the courts or the Dem caucus in the state legislature, it would definitely increase Democratic representation in the state, and potentially be more geographically compact.  

[ Parent ]
Random Thoughts
The "non-partisan" approach looks pretty close to what we'd expect if the two parties are forced to focus on protecting the incumbents. The only thing I'd disagree with is that Fluvanna being removed from the 5th seems unlikely given its ties to the growing area around Charlottesville. If there are any more Democratic-leaning precincts in Orange and Louisiana we could see them put into the 5th, making the 7th even more Republican.

On the Republican gerrymandering, I don't know if what you outline in Western Virginia is the most likely outcome. Current 6th District Congressman Bob Goodlatte is from the Roanoke area but also very popular with the Shenandoah Valley areas in his northern end. I would not expect to see even a Republican gerrymandering remove all of the Roanoke area from the 6th unless Goodlatte was retiring.

Your 5th District in the Republican gerrymandering would probably have a high African-American population between Southside, Roanoke, and Lynchburg. I don't know if the Republicans would risk its first election being in 2012 with Obama on the ballot, even if his approval is dipping.

If you look back at 2000 you'll get an idea of the political dancing the Republicans had to go through. They could have gerrymandered more in Western Virginia but Goodlatte didn't want to give up more of his Roanoke home to other districts and Goode didn't want to see Franklin County and Martinsville, two areas represented by him since the 1970s, taken away from him.

Of course, Perriello (and Nye) have to win reelection first. Republican gerrymandering will depend on if they are defeated and the political base of the new Congressman.


Good points
I think you're probably right about Fluvanna county. It is more in Charlottesville than Richmonds orbit and would likely be included in the 5th. However, both from numerical figures and from the personal experience of travelling to Fluvanna county numerous times for work while I was a student in Charlottesville, I can say that it is a very small, very rural county that wouldn't affect the make up of the district too much. Unfortunately Louisa and Orange county are both pretty consistently rural and Republican and wouldn't offer any chances to add strength to the 5th.

Regarding the Republican gerrymander, I think you do have a point. In my map I think I was too aggressive about adding Republican areas to the 6th to make up for the addition to Charlottesville. In a Republican gerrymander they'd likely keep Roanoke in the 6th and give the 5th parts of Bedford and Campbell county in return. However, even under this map Republicans wouldn't be at much risk of a Democratic challenge even in a Presidential election year. Although the district would have a higher percentage of African-Americans (approx 26% in this model vs. approx 20% in the current) outside of Roanoke City and Lynchburg City Democrats receive extremely minimal support from white voters in this district. even in 2008 when African-American turnout was at historic highs McCain would have won this district by at least 5 points. While a strong Blue Dog type candidate might have a chance in the district, Periello would not be able to win in such a district, and any subsequent Democratic challengers would find it extremely difficult to unseat a competent Republican incumbent.


[ Parent ]
The 5th
My thought with Fluvanna, and with Louisa and Orange, was based on Perriello's strong performance in Fluvanna--he won the county while Obama lost it. With Obama in the mid-40s in Louisa and Orange adding them while taking away the more Republican areas closer to Roanoke, where Democratic performance is more like low 30s, would marginally improve the district.

[ Parent ]
Ken Cucinelli is running for AG not LG
Nice post! Just one correction...Ken Cucinelli is running for Attorney General, not Lieutenant Governor.  The current LG, Republican Bill Bowling is running for LG again and then he will run for Governor in 2013

Good catch!
Thanks for pointing that out. I was a little nervous when I was writing this. I've fixed it now.

[ Parent ]
And a correction to gutter2d's correction......
It's Bill Bolling, not Bowling.  Although I certainly hope Jody Wagner beats him this fall and leaves him with plenty of spare time to go bowling.

43, male, Indian-American, Democrat, VA-10

[ Parent ]
Very Interesting
One small correction...Perriello's district already has Martinsville.

I wonder if incumbent protection really is the goal, then they try and do a swap of protecting Perriello for Wolf. By that I mean, many think Boucher's safe regardless of who runs against him, and that district is the GOP's when he retires regardless of whether he has Roanoke or not. So could an incumbent protection plan give Perriello Roanoke and Lynchburg (while giving up Bedford and Campbell) and give Wolf similar protections to what you proscribed.


I think it would be possible
I would hope that Senate Democrats would have the ability to negotiate for a map like the one you mention. However, the one matter Republicans will likely not be willing to budge much on is the 5th, since its currently a district that should naturally elect a Republican and they'd be reticent to concede a district that would likely be theres under a completely neutral scenario. While I may be underestimating the negotiating skills of the Senate Dems I was assuming they'd likely end up making some concessions on the 5th in order to get Republican concessions to strengthen the 2nd and the 9th.  

[ Parent ]
Fair point
You're probably right about the Senate. I just think "strengthening" the 9th is futile. Boucher is an institution similar to Gene Taylor or Jim Matheson. When they disappear those seats are v. tough to defend. I don't think Roanoke boosts it enough. But I bet the Senate agrees w/ you more than me ;-)

[ Parent ]
The 9th can't be strengthened enough to become a Democratic district
But you could argue that since Roanoke is a liberal city it should be represented by a Democrat.

26, male, Dem, NJ-12

[ Parent ]
9th
I don't have any specific knowledge of the 9th district but judging from it's geographic location I would expect it's voters are similar to those found in West Virginia and Eastern Kentucky.  Strong democrat tradition and registration advantages, they just won't vote for black people running for office.  I remember reading an article in Virginia paper around a year ago where a reporter went to a church in that area and one lady told him that she was "praying to God to give her the strength to vote for a black".

Therefore I doubt that the 9th district will change much (except to add more voters to it) no matter who controls redistricting since there is really nothing wrong with the way it is now.  Republicans didn't touch it last time they controlled redistricting because Virgil Goode, Bob Goodlatte, and Rick Boucher all wanted to keep representing the same regions.  Even when Boucher retires it should be an relatively easy seat for a conservative to moderate democrat to win.


[ Parent ]
I don't agree
This is an R+11 district. While the concept of the "yellow dog" may hold in some local elections, the fact is that George Bush got 60% in 2004 and 55% in 2000.

Mark Warner did the worst in this district of any of the Democratically held districts. Six republicans represent the area in the House of Delegates.

Calling it "relatively easy" for a moderate dem (or even a conservative dem) to win isn't backed up by facts.  


[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox