Google Ads


Site Stats

IA-Gov: Another potential GOP candidate takes a pass (updated)

by: desmoinesdem

Mon May 18, 2009 at 8:25 PM EDT


UPDATE: On May 21 Republican attorney and former State Senator Chuck Larson of Cedar Rapids said he's not running for governor either.

Iowa Governor Chet Culver's approval numbers have declined since the start of the year, but Republicans aren't exactly beating down the doors to run against him. Earlier this month former Republican Governor Terry Branstad and Vermeer Corporation chief executive Mary Andringa both quashed speculation that they might challenge Culver next year.

Today State Auditor David Vaudt announced that he won't run for governor either. It's bad news for Republicans who were hoping to recruit a candidate known for expertise on fiscal matters.

More details and analysis are after the jump.

desmoinesdem :: IA-Gov: Another potential GOP candidate takes a pass (updated)
At a press conference, Vaudt cited Iowa's budget problems as his reason for not running:

"I know that if I were to run for governor, there would be some that would try to discredit important financial information that I'm providing to Iowans. They would do that by simply questioning the motives, since I would be running for governor."

The last thing he wants to do, Vaudt said, is diminish his ability to keep Iowans informed about what's happening with state finances.

Other factors might also have influenced Vaudt's decision. He's virtually guaranteed re-election if he stays in his current position, whereas he might have trouble in a Republican gubernatorial primary. Or, perhaps he doesn't think Culver is particularly vulnerable. Even though Culver is below 50 percent in some polls, he still has time to bounce back. It's worth remembering that Iowans haven't turned an incumbent governor out of office since 1962.

I doubt Vaudt would have won the Republican nomination for reasons I described here, but he would have been a stronger general-election candidate than Bob Vander Plaats, the only Republican who seems certain to run. Vander Plaats is a Sioux City businessman who was Jim Nussle's running mate in the 2006 gubernatorial election. Since then, Vander Plaats has served as Iowa chair for Mike Huckabee's presidential campaign and has argued that Republicans are losing elections in Iowa because they're not conservative enough.

Vaudt's decision is a blow to Republicans who are hoping the 2010 race will revolve around economic and fiscal issues. It also removes from the mix one of the most seasoned office-holders from a party that's had a bad run in Iowa for the last decade.

Hill Research sent me partial results from the poll they took in March about the Iowa governor's race. They redacted some of the most interesting findings, such as how appealing respondents found various types of candidates (including an "auditor who has kept track of how state money is spent"). Still, I found this result intriguing:

   Do you want an experienced and effective elected official, or an outsider with a fresh perspective and new ideas?

   Strongly want an experienced elected official: 34%
   Want an experienced elected official: 19%
   Fresh perspective: 14%
   Strongly want a fresh perspective: 27%

Vaudt is by far the most experienced statewide official who was considering running for governor. (Former Governor Terry Branstad has no desire to get back in the game.)

Secretary of Agriculture Bill Northey, the only other Republican currently holding a statewide elected position, is leaning toward running for re-election rather than governor. It makes sense. He would be heavily favored against Francis Thicke, the most likely Democratic candidate for secretary of agriculture. In contrast, I believe Northey would be a long-shot for the Republican gubernatorial nomination, having gone on record supporting a gas tax increase. Besides, the same-sex marriage controversy will probably give an edge to religious conservatives in next year's primary. Even if Northey won the GOP nomination, I think that with no base of support in eastern Iowa population centers, he would be an underdog against Culver in the general.

One or two Iowa House Republicans seem likely to challenge Culver. Former Iowa House Speaker Chris Rants has been thinking about running for governor for a long time. Earlier this month he sent an e-mail to potential supporters saying that since the 2009 legislative session ended,

I've put 2,300 miles on my car driving around the state talking to donors and activists about running for Governor.

I'm not making any official announcements or anything like that just yet. I'm taking stock first to see if I can find the support, and if I do, then I'll let the press know. I have my eyes wide open. Its at least an $8M - $10M endeavor - or $110,000 a week as I like to say... I want to put some money in the bank, and be sure of financial backing before I take a stab at that.

So far it's been encouraging. I have a series of fundraisers set up, and people who have agreed to help organize and set things up for me. I'll be on the road this coming week again - back to the east coast of the state.

If he runs, Rants will compete with Vander Plaats for the conservative vote. Rants tried several times last month to bring legislation banning same-sex marriage to a vote on the Iowa House floor.

State Representative Rod Roberts told the Daily Times-Herald of Carroll he is "very seriously considering" a gubernatorial bid. He's an ordained pastor, but some fellow Republicans claim he can communicate a broader message than abortion and gay marriage. Whether a state legislator from western Iowa can raise enough money and gain enough name recognition to seriously challenge Culver is another question.

Craig Robinson of the Iowa Republican blog thinks there is room for another Republican candidate besides Rants and Vander Plaats, but

A candidate from the business community or a candidate that hadn't previously weighed in on the marriage debate may find the primary more difficult to navigate than it would have been if the [Iowa Supreme] Court's decision had been different. This may be the reason why, out of nowhere, we have seen some long-time GOP powerbrokers like Dave Roederer and Doug Gross warning Iowa Republicans that the focus cannot be on the issue of gay marriage if we want to win elections. [...]

Gross has not been shy about his belief that the fiscal issues create an agenda which will unite the Republican Party. Many, if not most, Republicans probably agree with that. The only problem is that the issue of gay marriage has been thrust to the forefront in Iowa by the Court's decision. Ignoring the issue or trying to diminish its importance is simply not an option.

With only 397 days until the primary, it is likely that the gubernatorial primary will be between Vander Plaats, Rants, and maybe one other candidate. While it is true that there is plenty of time for candidates to emerge, the clock is ticking. It takes time to organize people and raise the huge amounts of money needed to run statewide campaigns.

Robinson asserts that Roederer and Gross "are probably having difficulty recruiting a candidate of their liking." Vermeer Corporation chief executive Mary Andringa has already said she's not running for governor next year.

In theory, today's announcement from Vaudt could leave an opening for a Republican moderate hoping conservatives will split the primary vote. On the other hand, there aren't many moderates left in Republican political ranks, and Culver doesn't look endangered enough to make this race attractive for someone from the business community, in my opinion.

Pleas share any relevant thoughts in this thread.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

I've seen Vaudt speak in the past.
He doesn't really convey the qualities expected from a candidate for governor.  Culver would have him beat hands down on the stump.

http://www.bluearkansasblog.com

probably so
I think Culver would be favored against any GOP opponent, but Vaudt would have given him more of a race than, say, Vander Plaats. Vaudt was warning about possible budget problems two or three years ago, so he would have had a credible message on the fiscal issues.

Vander Plaats and Chris Rants don't worry me at all.


[ Parent ]
There's also the issue
of gay marriage in Iowa.  The problem is, while many business Republicans are wise to try and make fiscal issues and the economy the central issue for Iowa in 2010, the Republican primary electorate in the state is heavily dominated by Evangelical Christians who want to make same-sex marriage the main issue in Iowa (Vander Plaats has already jumped on the wagon by proclaiming that Culver should issue an executive order stopping all gay marriages until an amendment is passed...in 2011, hardly a constitutional move). As such, many Iowa Republicans who would be interested (like Vaught) are getting chased out, as it would force them to take an uncomfortably hard-line stance on an issue that they feel is more of a distraction and is less effective at taking Culver down.  Plus, they don't want to be turned into a crusading marriage warrior or have their campaign hijacked by a culture wars debate, which is exactly what the hardliners in the Iowa GOP want to have happen.  Hence, you have Vander Plaats running, and only Steve King and Chris Rants are considered real possibilities - all diehard social conservatives.  That may play well in the primary and in Wester Iowa, but it won't get them traction when most folks will be worrying about their paychecks.

[ Parent ]
I hope Steve King is the nominee.
If he in all his craziness and bigotry got his clock cleaned in a general election, I could go to my grave a happy man the next day.

http://www.bluearkansasblog.com

[ Parent ]
Rather Amazing How Weak the GOP Is....
Culver is setting himself up to be quite vulnerable, having accomplished little and angering alot of core constituencies, particularly labor.  Yet the Republicans seem to have nobody strong enough to put forward a compelling challenge against him.

no kidding
Considering that Republicans held the governorship for 30 years in Iowa before Vilsack won the first time, it's striking that their bench is so weak.

Culver is not beloved among Democrats and has a dysfunctional relationship with the Democratic-controlled legislature (not entirely his fault), so many Democrats I talk to are under the impression that he's in big trouble. My response is always, "You can't beat something with nothing, and nothing is what the Rs are offering now."


[ Parent ]
God I hope no GOP operatives read this
But what about Fmr. State Sen. Lamberti?  Would he make a viable candidate statewide?

30, male, Democratic, CO-01

[ Parent ]
he's been talked about
and I think some people in the business community would like to see him run. He hasn't formed an exploratory committee or done much traveling around the state.

Lamberti didn't do too well against the underwhelming Leonard Boswell (IA-03) in 2006. Granted, that was a Democratic year, but I am not too worried that he would sweep the state with his charisma. Money would be less of an issue for him, but would he want to pour much of his personal fortune into an uphill race against Culver?

I think he'll stay out unless Culver's numbers continue to drop during the summer and fall.


[ Parent ]
Culver should be safe
The GOP will nominate some right-wing social wingnut who will only offer red meat arguments and not present a credible alternative on econ issues.

[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox