Google Ads


Site Stats

MO-Sen: Carnahan Smokes Blunt

by: James L.

Thu May 14, 2009 at 12:23 PM EDT


Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research (4/28-30, likely voters):

Robin Carnahan (D): 53
Roy Blunt (R): 44

Robin Carnahan (D): 54
Sarah Steelman (R): 42
(MoE: ±3.5%)

Democracy Corps has more:

After voters hear profiles of each candidate, Carnahan maintains a 7-point advantage over Steelman and a 9-point advantage over Blunt. After attacks on each candidate, Carnahan remains above 50 percent against both Republicans, and leads Blunt by 7 and Steelman by 6. At this early and uncertain stage, Carnahan starts off the contest with a strong personal and professional standing that puts her in a position to defeat either potential opponent. At the same time, it appears as if Steelman may be the tougher foe with a stronger profile than Blunt and the potential to run a fresh outsider candidacy that Blunt cannot offer.

Carnahan also enjoys a 46-22 favorability rating, and 87% name recognition among likely voters. Blunt, at 82% recognition, isn't exactly winning any popularity contests with his 33-27 favorability score. Steelman, an ex-state Treasurer, has more room for growth with just 22-13 rating but only 51% name recognition.

Perhaps most interesting is the fact that, despite narrowly supporting John McCain last year, Missouri voters would prefer a Senator who supports Barack Obama's agenda as opposed to yet another Republican drone seeking to provide false "balance" to DC:

President Obama provides a slight boost to Carnahan, even in a state he failed to carry, with a 56 percent job approval rating (compared to 58 percent nationally) and voters preferring, by a 49 to 40 percent margin, a senator who will mostly support Obama's agenda to get things done rather than one who will mostly oppose his agenda to provide balance.

While it's still very early in the game, this poll is further proof that Carnahan is one of the DSCC's strongest recruits this cycle.

(Hat-tips: conspiracy, Taegan, and Jeremiah)

James L. :: MO-Sen: Carnahan Smokes Blunt
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Ba-dum-tish
Creative choice for the subject line, there, James :p

man
I must be deep in finals mode right now, I didn't even catch that. Damn you James and your trickery!  

[ Parent ]
Credit where credit is due
Jeremiah is responsible for sharing that gut-busting title with us.

[ Parent ]
Taken another way it could be offensive
but I get what you're going for.

[ Parent ]
Well
The most obvious interpretation is the non-offensive one, I think. (You depraved sicko.)

:P


[ Parent ]
heh, well, I play for the other team.
I just tend to read closely. . .

[ Parent ]
I must not live in an obvious world
Aside from blowing what is the other interpretation?

[ Parent ]
Smoking a marijuana cigarette? (eom)


[ Parent ]
Some of the most creative titles come from here
continued props for "Panic! At Tedisco" ;)

and, if that title were to be taken literally, that'd give me a bigger reason to donate to Carnahan ;)


[ Parent ]
Heh
I don't take too much from this, frankly. RC is an excellent recruit, but for federal office, MO polls tend to swing around like crazy, and then support the Democrat or the Republican by a couple of points.

I think it's probably the hardest state to win in, because there are no guarantees.


Hulshof was thought a decent recruit
He lost by nearly twenty points. I suspect Blunt to go the same way, Steelman by a smaller margin but still comfortable.

[ Parent ]
Federal office is different


[ Parent ]
Sure
But not this time. Talent/McCaskill and Talent/Carnahan were always closer than this in the polls. Mind you, I suppose Kit Bond never had particularly big wins.

[ Parent ]
I can see it both ways
Carnahan is clearly going to be the favorite and this poll reflects that but it's still a long time til the actual election.  But these are quite solid numbers for us.

[ Parent ]
I see it both ways
It may currently lean Dem but that could change certainly.

[ Parent ]
Speaking of federal office
What do you think is next for Jay Nixon? He's run for the Senate a few times and never gotten closer than 43%, but if he wins two terms he's out in 2016. Perhaps a dark horse Presidential candidate?

[ Parent ]
I try not to jinx our Governors
It seems whenever Democrats have a Governor talked up as a Presidential candidate that person has a habit of seeing their approvals evaporate.

[ Parent ]
of course
Nixon's approvals may be in the tank, too, along with every other governor in the nation.

[ Parent ]
They are still very good
Governor Nixon's approval is 56/32 according to SUSA poll from a couple weeks ago.

http://www.surveyusa.com/clien...


[ Parent ]
those are very nice numbers
but what makes him so great that he should run for President?  Is he terms out and will have nowhere else to go?

[ Parent ]
Not until 2016
But I assume McCaskill and Carnahan might still be serving by then.  At the point, he might be kinda stuck.

30, male, Democratic, CO-01

[ Parent ]
And the thought is Jeb would have a problem with his surname!


[ Parent ]
VP Nixon
He might be a good Veep if say it is a close race and we need to get a particular state etc.

[ Parent ]
and eisenhower is our presidential candidate:)


[ Parent ]
Who knows
If might be IL Sen. Kennedy/MO Gov. Nixon as a ticket in 2016. Kennedy/Nixon...ahh the irony. Or maybe Nixon/MA Sen. McGovern.  

[ Parent ]
But I know...
Not going to happen ;)

[ Parent ]
Lets hope not
heh.

[ Parent ]
Maybe
He would only be 60. More likely though he would be the frontrunner for the senate seat in the unlikely event Carnahan fails to win next year.

[ Parent ]
A good question though
Is whether or not Democrats would be willing to vote for another President Nixon :P

Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01, Chairman of the Atheist Caucus, and Majority Leader of the "Going to Hell" caucus!


[ Parent ]
Nixon's waaay too "moderate"...
He'd never get through a Dem presidential primary. Maybe a VP...

[ Parent ]
Missouri is Strange
Dems hold most the statewide, The Republicans have the Lt. Governor and Sen. Bond (which will probably become Sen. Carnahan). So after 2010, the Republicans may be down to one statewide office.

Meanwhile, legislatively, there is a 5-4 Republican advantage in congress (MO-9 was closer than I thought it would have been last year) and Republicans have massive majorities in the State House and State Senate, majorities that increased in 2008.

Such a strange state . . .

26, Male, Democrat, TX-26


[ Parent ]
Whoops! Minor Correction
Dems were +3 in the State House in 2008
Republicans were +3 in the State Senate in 2008

So, not a full loss.

26, Male, Democrat, TX-26


[ Parent ]
From what I've read
The Missouri republican dominated state legislature is one of the most despicable state legislatures in the nation.  

Check out this story from last week.  The republican floor leader actually stripped funding for a cancer center to get back at a democrat.

http://www.columbiamissourian....

In a House Rules Committee hearing Monday, House Republican floor leader Steve Tilley amended the bill to strip Ellis Fischel [Cancer Center] of its funds. Tilley drafted the amendment after Democrats, including Rep. Stephen Webber, D-Columbia, walked out of the hearing after a spat over rules and procedures.

Republicans then voted 6-1 to wipe out Ellis Fischel's funds...



[ Parent ]
Sounds Like Texas when Craddick was in Charge


26, Male, Democrat, TX-26

[ Parent ]
MO Senate
Is Robin Carnahan moderate, liberal, or conservative?  Does anyone know?

Seems like a moderate liberal to me.
For example, she came out in favor of EFCA.  I'd guess that she'd be somewhat to the left of McCaskill, and near the middle of the Senate caucus.

[ Parent ]
Im really excited
to have two Democratic women Senators from MO.  That's pretty sweet.  Pairs it with Washington and California and then Maine has a Republican duo.  Such a strange state indeed as noted in the comments above.

[ Parent ]
Just cant see
How Blunt can win this thing. Im sure if it was in the early part of this decade he could. But times have changed. Steelman would seem like the better get for the Republicans. She may be more conservative and more of a 'firebrand' but she at least presents herself as an 'Washington outsider' and a 'reformer'.  Its races like this that will probably ensure the Dems of keeping their filibuster proof majority even if the GOP has a wave year.  


Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox