Poll Roundup: The Sketchy and the Snoozy

by: DavidNYC

Wed May 13, 2009 at 10:52 PM EDT

• IL-Sen: Some anonymous Republican outfit leaked a poll to Lynn Sweet, but only offered some transparently selective questions - two Mark Kirk head-to-heads that showed him tied with Alexi Giannoulias and Chris Kennedy, son of RFK. There's also a Dem primary poll which shows Jan Schakowsky leading the pack with all of 20%. Nothing (released?) on Lisa Madigan.

• NH-Sen: Why is it that universities in the Granite State keep polling Cloud Hampshire? Dartmouth is the latest offender, ginning up a 32R-28D sample (real numbers: 29D-29R). Still, Paul Hodes leads John Sununu 38-35, though he somehow has much lower numbers against Charlie Bass, 31-30. No way the Bassmaster inspires a seven-point dither.

• NY-Gov: Quinnipiac's latest poll is just fine, but there's really nothing new to see here: Paterson gets pounded by Cuomo and Rudy. Same old. There is one notable datapoint: Cuomo's lead against Giuliani has slipped from 53-36 to 47-41. The pollster offers no real explanation for this, and I'd personally like to see confirmation elsewhere.

• NYC-Mayor:  Marist's newest survey is almost identical to their last, with Bloombo leading Weiner 50-36 and Thompson 51-33. Weiner really needs to outright declare that he's not running for Thompson to have any shot, but just the other day he said the mayor's attacks on him have made him "more inclined to run." Guys, the election is just six months away. Quit wasting time.

• OK-Gov: Two polls for ya here. First, a company called SoonerPoll pushed out a GOP primary survey with a sample size of just 139. That's an MoE over eight. Try again, folks. FWIW, it had Mary Fallin leading JC Watts 45-28. Perhaps to counter this news, a Republican company called Wilson Research Strategies released a poll showing Watts up 39-36. This one at least had a respectable n of 500, though it seems no one (including Wilson) has explained who paid for this poll.

UPDATE: Chris Wilson of Wilson Research writes in:

To follow up on your post regarding who paid for our poll, I did.  We had another survey in the field and I paid to add the GOP primary questions on there simply for the purposes of interest.