Google Ads


Site Stats

CA-10: Garamendi Posts Lead in Internal Poll

by: Crisitunity

Tue May 05, 2009 at 6:16 PM EDT


JMM Research for John Garamendi (dates unknown, likely voters):

John Garamendi (D): 24
Warren Rupf (R): 17
Mark DeSaulnier (D): 13
Joan Buchanan (D): 10
(MoE: ±5%)

Lt. Gov. John Garamendi has been shopping around for the just-right elected office for a long time now, and with Rep. Ellen Tauscher leaving behind an open seat in the U.S. House to head to the State Dept., he might just be ready to settle down. Garamendi got into the race late (after finally pulling the plug on his faltering 2010 gubernatorial campaign), with state Senator Mark DeSaulnier already having gobbled up many key endorsements. Still, Garamendi is in a strong position in his own internal poll, beating his two Democratic opponents combined, DeSaulnier and Assemblywoman Joan Buchanan. (The only other poll of this race was a Buchanan internal from late March which, not surprisingly, gave her the lead.)

Garamendi's position is largely thanks to his high name recognition: 80% know him, with 35/12 favorables. DeSaulnier is known by 39%, with 16/13 favorables, and Buchanan is known by 45%, with 17/12 favorables. The Republican polled, Contra Costa County Sheriff Warren Rupf, is known by 20%, with 9/9 favorables.

Rupf has not announced for the race, and doesn't really seem likely to run; he is, however, probably the strongest GOPer in the district. (San Ramon mayor Abram Wilson and former Assemblyman Guy Houston are other Republicans who've been linked to this race.) They were polled en masse because in the primary special election, all candidates are listed together in one pool, and if no one candidate receives more than 50% (unlikely with three top-tier Dems in the race), then the top vote-getter from each party advances to the general.

UPDATE: More discussion in californianintexas's diary.

Crisitunity :: CA-10: Garamendi Posts Lead in Internal Poll
Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Just to clarify
It's likely that no one candidate will receive more than 50% of the vote in round 1.  

Garamendi: advantages and disadvantages
   John Garamendi is an experienced politician with proven vote-getting skills. He is also fairly progressive on some important issues without coming off as a wild-eyed lefty (example--he is a supporter of single-payer health insurance). If Garamendi is elected the vacancy in the LtGov position would be filled by appointment of the Governor, subject to approval of the Senate, I think. That seat would be up for election in 2010 (as are all the statewide offices) so we would have a temporary GOP officeholder (Bruce McPherson, maybe?).
  If DeSaulnier or Buchanan is elected then there would be a vacancy in the legislature which would have to be filled by special election. In the meantime, we would be short a Democrat in dealing with the ongoing meltdown of CA government. This is importand because of the cockamamie two-thirds requirement to pass anything with revenues in the legislature. Buchanan's election would have the additional problem of being a swing seat that we could possibly lose in a low-turnout special election. She is in her first term in the Assembly. I understand the appeal of a House seat with no term limits, but it is not her time for this one.
   If I lived in this district I would vote for John G. in the special election.

52, male, disgruntled Democrat, CA-28

Good reasoning
But I wish he would have shopped around a bit farther north.  Garamendi, not Angelides, seems like a very good get for CA-03.

30, male, Democratic, CO-01

[ Parent ]
I agree.
But for now I'll enthusiastically support Bill Durston in the 3rd, and I now am leaning to Garamendi in the 10th.

My blog
Twitter
Scribd
28, New Democrat, Female, TX-03 (hometown CA-26)


[ Parent ]
Except...
Durston's not running in CA-03.

And while Garamendi's a carpetbagger in CA-10, he's right at home in A-03. There are already plenty of local Dems in the CA-10 race who are plenty progressive. CA-03 needs a strong Dem to run against Lungen.


[ Parent ]
Too Soon to Tell
24% is pretty underwhelming for Garamendi, especially since his name ID was 80%. The numbers of DeSaulnier and Buchanan are to be expected, given that both only represent part of the district. I expect DeSaulnier's support to rise considerably when the campaign begins in ernest -- so far, he's the only candidate to receive ANY endorsements from elected officials in the district, and he's got strong labor ties and he's doing well in the money game. Garamendi, judging by his failed gubernatorial race, tends to be clunky on the stump and his numbers are unlikely to rise considerably.  

Garamendi isn't very good
but he should be able to beat a Republican.  There is some sense that he is aspiring within his means for once.

Still, it would be better to have someone who is actually interested in this particular job rather than a guy who is running for this only because he can't win something else.

(I don't know anything about the other people running.)


[ Parent ]
It occurs to me
that if Garamendi wins, Schwarzenegger will be able to appoint a replacement Lt. Governor. That's a little concerning to me.

The Lieutenant Governor
has next to no power in California, so it's not a terribly upsetting loss if only to get Garamendi to settle down into one elected office. California's statewide positions have been shuffling between the same 10 people for awhile now.

[ Parent ]
It would be bad
if Arnold appoints his choice for 2010 Gov.  Whitman as sitting Lt Gov puts her in a whole different light.  Same with Poizner, Campbell or McPherson.

[ Parent ]
Who are Campbell and McPherson?
Do you mean CA-48 John Campbell?  And Steve Poizner?

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01

[ Parent ]
Poizner and Campbell
He did mean Poizner.  However, the Campbell to which he refers is Fmr. Rep. Tom Campbell of Silicon Valley.  Campbell's an ultra-moderate/possibly even liberal Republican (pro-choice, pro-environment, pro-LGBT rights, pro-gun control, bad-but-not-horrible on labor issues) who would be wholly unelectable in a primary but reflected the strain of fiscal conservatism and social liberalism that used to characterize a lot of coastal California (minus the OC and military areas like the San Diego suburbs).

30, male, Democratic, CO-01

[ Parent ]
Both Campbell and McPherson
would have serious trouble in a primary, but would be top of the line candidates in the general.  They would still not beat a quality Democrat, but our candidates totally suck.

This is basically the nightmare scenario... Republican moderates are electable but seldom win primaries.  Here we would get an enthusiastic appointment of a strong moderate from Arnold.  Garamendi's job jumping could cost us the Governorship, and at the very least should cost us an extra ten million dollars to win it.


[ Parent ]
What with all this talk about CA-LtGov and TX-Gov having relatively little power...
do most voters even KNOW how much power their elected officials have?

I mean, I sure don't, and I'm an electoral geek.

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01


[ Parent ]
And McPherson
is Bruce McPherson, another moderate Republican state legislator who Arnold put into the Secretary of State position after Kevin Shelley resigned.

My blog
Twitter
Scribd
28, New Democrat, Female, TX-03 (hometown CA-26)


[ Parent ]
Flaws in the Garamendi Poll
There was a very good post on the Progressive Connection earlier today discussing some of the flaws in the Garamendi poll. Among them:

1) Overly optimistic turn-out projection and over-representation of Decline-to-State voters as opposed to Dems

2) An unusually high 5% margin-of-error

3) Biographical information about DeSaulnier and Buchanan that was misleading or flat-out false

4) Claims that Garamendi has been endorsed by Bill Clinton

Conclusion: Instead of making a splash, this poll makes Garamendi look desperate.

http://www.theprogressiveconne...



Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox