Google Ads


Site Stats

IA-Sen: Could Grassley face a primary challenge from the right?

by: desmoinesdem

Sun Apr 12, 2009 at 7:21 PM EDT


Angry social conservatives are speculating that Senator Chuck Grassley could face a primary challenge in 2010. The religious right has been dissatisfied with Grassley for a long time (see here and here).

After the Iowa Supreme Court struck down the state's Defense of Marriage Act, Grassley issued a statement saying he supported "traditional marriage" and had backed federal legislation and a federal constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage. But when hundreds of marriage equality opponents rallied at the state capitol last Thursday, and Republicans tried to bring a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage to the Iowa House floor, Grassley refused to say whether he supported their efforts to change Iowa's constitution:

"You better ask me in a month, after I've had a chance to think," Grassley, the state's senior Republican official, said after a health care forum in Mason City.

Wingnut Bill Salier, who almost won the Republican primary for U.S. Senate in 2002, says conservatives are becoming "more and more incensed [the] more they start to pay attention to how far [Grassley] has drifted."

Iowa GOP chairman Matt Strawn denies that party activists are unhappy with Grassley. I hope Salier is right and Grassley gets a primary challenge, for reasons I'll explain after the jump.  

desmoinesdem :: IA-Sen: Could Grassley face a primary challenge from the right?
Before anyone gets too excited, I want to make clear that I don't consider Grassley vulnerable. His approval rating is around 71 percent (if you believe Survey USA) or 66 percent (if you believe Selzer and Associates). Either way, he is outside the danger zone for an incumbent.

That doesn't mean Democrats should leave Grassley unchallenged. Having a credible candidate at the top of the ballot in 2010 will increase the number of straight-ticket Democratic voters. So far Bob Krause is planning to jump in this race. More power to him or any other Democrat who is willing to make the case against Grassley. We should be realistic, though, and understand that unless something extraordinary happens, we are not going to defeat this five-term incumbent.

So why am I hoping a right-winger will take on Grassley in the Republican primary? Here's what I think would happen.

1. A conservative taking potshots at Grassley would intensify the struggle between GOP moderates and "goofballs" just when Iowa Republicans are trying to present a united front against Democratic governance. GOP chairman Strawn claimed this weekend that Democratic tax reform proposals had unified his party, but if Grassley faces a challenger, expect social issues to dominate next spring's media coverage of Republicans.

2. Although some delusional folks seem to think Grassley could lose a low-turnout primary, Grassley would crush any challenger from the right. That has the potential to demoralize religious GOP activists and their cheerleaders, such as the popular talk radio personality Steve Deace. (Deace already has plenty of grievances against Grassley.)

3. Every prominent Iowa Republican will have to take a position on the Senate primary, if there is one. I assume almost everyone will back Grassley, which would offend part of the GOP base. But if, say, Strawn or Congressman Steve King surprised me by staying neutral in the primary, that would demonstrate how much power extremists have within the Republican Party. Most people intuitively understand that you don't try to replace a U.S. senator from your own party who has a lot of seniority.

A Senate primary could become a distracting sideshow for Republican gubernatorial candidates. It's not clear yet how many Republicans will run against Governor Chet Culver, but almost all of the likely candidates would endorse Grassley over a right-winger. I would expect even Bob Vander Plaats to support Grassley, although he could surprise me. Vander Plaats believes Iowa Republican have been losing elections because they've become too moderate.

Watching the Republican establishment line up behind Grassley will remind social conservative activists that the party likes to use their support but doesn't take their concerns seriously. These people will hold their noses and vote Republican next November, but they may not donate their time and money when Strawn and the gubernatorial nominee need their help to improve the GOP's early voting operation.

My hunch is that no challenger to Grassley will emerge, because even the angriest conservatives must understand that they have little to gain from this course. Then again, we're talking about people who believe the little-known, inexperienced Salier would have done better against Tom Harkin in 2002 than four-term Congressman Greg Ganske. Maybe some Republican is just crazy enough to run against Grassley next year.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

I Don't Know....
Grassley's the most popular Republican in Iowa I reckon. Removing him from the equation would put this state in toss up category. Are Iowa Republicans that stupid?

Never underestimate Republicans' stupidity
They almost nominated Steve Laffey in Rhode Island, even though he would have been crushed in the general.

My blog
Twitter
Scribd
28, New Democrat, Female, TX-03 (hometown CA-26)


[ Parent ]
Grassley's the most popular politician in IA
from either party, and has been for many years.

The people who think he has become too "liberal" are deranged--this is still a senator with a single-digit lifetime Progressive Punch rating.


[ Parent ]
What exactly accounts for his popularity?
All I've seen of him are his gaffe prone moments.  Admittedly, he seems more like a policy wonk than most Republicans though.

http://www.bluearkansasblog.com

[ Parent ]
Grassley works for Iowa
In fact, Grassley sometimes seems to care nothing for the rest of the country.  He single-handedly forced the revision of the Medicare reimbursement formula to drastically reduce funding for urban and teaching hospitals but increase funding for rural hospitals.  Good for Iowa, lousy for NY, CA, and even Anchorage (where it is hard to find a primary care doctor who takes new Medicare patients).

Chicago area motorists have long paid a ten to twenty cent a gallon "ethanol premium" on gasoline courtesy of the clout of Iowa.  That's not all Grassley but he's part of it.

From the standpoint of Iowa someone that secures high farm subsidies, hospital subsidies, etc geared to help local needs is going to be popular.

The plus is that Obama and others can always buy Grassley's vote by paying a large enough amount in Iowa geared breaks and subsidies.  

Even an out of stater could see that Grassley works the elderly hard and delivers.  Works farmers hard and somewhat delivers.  Read the Des Moines Register regularly heading into the prolonged caucus campaigns and Grassley looks a lot better than he does to shall we say less informed out of staters.  He's in some ways similar to Ted Stevens with little or no personal gain.  That is a pretty powerful position.  Even now, he is able to work with Max Baucus to have much more influence than a ranking member should have.


[ Parent ]
those are all part of the story
Especially your last point about how Baucus makes life for Grassley less unpleasant than being in the minority normally would be.

[ Parent ]
his constituent service is outstanding
and always has been. Even the most liberal Democrat will tell you that Grassley has better constituent service than Harkin. Think how many Iowans have some friend or relative who got help from Grassley's office during the past 30 years.

[ Parent ]
I know from personal experience...
That getting very important help (i.e. constituent service) from a representative means alot to you prsonally. My mom got alot of help from DeLay, with regards to MS medication, and while i think DeLay is corrupt and not my ideological cup of tea (also with the way he 'hammered' his caucus members) I am very thankful for his help. Sure it was his staff who did the work but he had to sign off on it. He did alot for my mom and that means alot personally. Although id never vote for him if he ran again...as i try to look out for the nation rather than my own personal interests.

[ Parent ]
Oh please tell me that Iowa Republicans are that stupid
Now all we need is the Club for (Democratic) Growth to align themselves with someone backed by the Religious Right and we'll be set.

Seriously, do these guys think that Iowa is Nebraska or something?

Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01, Chairman of the Atheist Caucus, and Majority Leader of the "Going to Hell" caucus!


western iowa is


Call no man happy until he is dead-Aeschylus

[ Parent ]
Don't have to tell me twice
My mom's family lives in Nebraska pretty close to the Iowa border (maybe an hours drive away) and while the people I usually see there are pretty friendly, they are quite conservative.

Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01, Chairman of the Atheist Caucus, and Majority Leader of the "Going to Hell" caucus!


[ Parent ]
Republican caucus
The Iowa Republican caucus went to Mike Huckabee who had little funding but was strongly wired into a network of many Iowa churches.

Didn't Pat Robertson nearly win against Dole one year?  

At least 25% and probably at least a third of Iowa Republicans are pretty hard core church driven voters.  That would be a good base for a Steve King type to attempt to take on Grassley.  Add in Club For Growth Funding and the results are somewhat similar to Chuck Hagel in Nebraska in 2008.  Hagel was only moderate by GOP extremist standards with an 8% Progressive PUnch rating but he was not stupid.  He got driven out of ther primary.

That would be King's district and not Latham's or the other three but it is a heck of a start.


[ Parent ]
Hagel simply retired from the Senate
I never heard anything of any sort of primary challenge to Hagel occur (Hagel's pretty popular in Nebraska anyways, I doubt there'd be anyone who could've taken him on anyways).

Politics and Other Random Topics

24, Male, Democrat, NM-01, Chairman of the Atheist Caucus, and Majority Leader of the "Going to Hell" caucus!


[ Parent ]
Yes there was
I think his name was Brunning.  Attorney General of Nebraska or something like that.  He was in the race to primary Hagel till Hagel retired and the more known and liked Johanns jumped in.  I believe Brunning was polling in a dead heat with Hagel even very early in the race.  

Hagel was definately not popular among republicans near the end of his time in the Senate.


[ Parent ]
Iraq
Hagel was a high profile dissenter on Iraq.  He was the mirror image of Lieberman and that's why so many hard core Republicans didn't like him.

[ Parent ]
Hagel
Hagel was also quite a maverick on civil liberties issues, but it wasnt given nearly the amount of attention as his Iraq stance. Also, on foreign policy in general, hes not a Neo Con at all. Its not just Iraq.

[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox