Google Ads


Site Stats

Redistricting 2011: Penn. & Utah

by: Nathaniel90

Tue Mar 24, 2009 at 3:36 PM EDT


Episode 6 in my redistricting series. By this point I'm tired of having these maps and data lying around burning a hole in my Microsoft Word documents, especially in light of the new Census county estimates for 2008. So I'm knocking out all the already-completed states for your and my nerdy enjoyment. Today, some keystones with your Jell-O?

Previously covered:
Diary 1: Massachusetts and Texas
Diary 2: Michigan and Nevada
Diary 3: Iowa and Ohio
Diary 4: Georgia and New Jersey
Diary 5: Florida and Louisiana

Those strangest of bedfellows, Rust Belt Pennsylvania and booming Utah! (spelled with an exclamation point as on state license plates) just below the fold...

Nathaniel90 :: Redistricting 2011: Penn. & Utah
Pennsylvania

Needless to say, this is truly a state of contrasts, from the upwardly mobile, newly liberal-leaning Philadelphia suburbs to the numerically shrinking, increasingly Republican towns of western Pennsylvania. In the vast "T" between Pittsburgh and Philly lies some of the most conservative and rural territory in the entire old North, along with a Democratic island in the Penn State campus and its environs.

What will redistricting see in Pennsylvania? Hard to say. The least likely option is a Democratic gerrymander, thanks to a healthy 30-20 GOP majority in the State Senate. Republicans have an outside shot at a redux gerrymander thanks to the open governor's mansion and narrow 104-99 Dem edge in the House. My money is on a continued power split, since it is tough (though quite far from unheard of) for a party to pick up both the governor's mansion and a legislative chamber in one cycle in a competitive state. I drew my hypothetical Pennsylvania map (again, using 2007 stats) with according assumptions.

Split partisan power in redistricting usually means all-around incumbent protection, which particularly helps the Democrats and their weaker seats (the 10th, 3rd, 12th, 11th, et al.), but also the Republicans in at least two cases (the 15th and 6th). There is, of course, a wrinkle: Pennsylvania will be losing at least one seat in reapportionment; possibly two, but one seems more likely unless North-to-South migration really picks up in the next year. With much of the state's worst population loss occurring in the west, and with Western Pennsylvania Democrats a bit overrepresented at the congressional level (at least considering trends in the region), it seemed likely that a relatively new Democrat would be eliminated, or at least put in a tough spot against an incumbent Republican. John Murtha's seniority means his is likely not to be the unlucky musical chair, unless he's finally ready to retire in 2012 at age 80. That's a possibility, but I drew the map to combine Republican Tim Murphy and Democrat Jason Altmire in a competitive (but doubtlessly McCain-supporting) western district. Meanwhile, Murtha and Erie's Kathy Dahlkemper are both strengthened. Of course, this assumes that Murtha, Dahlkemper, Altmire, and Murphy are all reelected in 2010, and all four have at one time or another been targeted recently.

One oddity in the west as a result of the eliminated district? Bill Shuster's 9th moved all the way into former Murtha country, though it kept Shuster's home in-district. (Yeah, doesn't make much sense, but with the 12th trending GOP, and Murtha getting quite up there in years, you can bet Democrats will try to salvage all their strength in the Pittsburgh area). In the east, I did my best to shore up Chris Carney, whose district is darned difficult to gerrymander for a Dem, as well as 2008 underperformer Paul Kanjorski and Charlie Dent, whose 15th District tilts Democratic in its current form. I also attempted to make the Philadelphia-area districts more compact and logical, which may have been a case of my quixotic reformer instincts overreaching.

Now, every map has at least one Achilles heel, and mine is Tim Holden's 17th District. I simply could not figure out how to make it Dem-leaning without some seriously ugly and disruptive lines. In fact, it got more Republican in this map...not my intention, I assure you. Also, Shuster's district moving west meant that Platts and Pitts would see some major turf changes.

This isn't my best map (I'm much happier with Texas and Ohio), but perhaps it isn't the travesty Louisiana and Massachusetts were. I aimed to lessen Pennsylvania's "emaciated serpent" factor while protecting potentially vulnerable newbies. Without a doubt, a state legislator with real redistricting software (rather than a calculator, Census estimates on Excel, and Paint) could draw something more effective and precise. But you can judge for yourself:

Photobucket

District 1 - Bob Brady (D-Philadelphia) -- still ethnically mixed and heavily Democratic, the home of Rocky Balboa. (Cue Bill Conti and his horn section.)

District 2 - Chaka Fattah (D-Philadelphia) -- the only VRA district in the state, still majority-black.

District 3 - Kathy Dahlkemper (D-Erie) -- barely voted for McCain as-is, so I aimed to maximize the influence of Dem-friendly Erie County and competitive Mercer County. I also divided Butler County to further minimize GOP strength. This district would have voted for Obama by an inch, no more than 51-48 or 52-47, but I think that's the best I could do.

District 4 - Jason Altmire (D-McCandless) vs. Tim Murphy (R-Upper St. Clair) -- both incumbents live in suburban Allegheny County, so the district includes a healthy 25% of that county along with the remaining 65% of Butler and all of Beaver and Lawrence. It's nice and compact, and pretty competitive -- my guesstimate is the numbers will actually be more Democratic than the McCain 55-44 stat seen in both Congresscritters' current districts, which could bode well for Altmire.

District 5 - Glenn Thompson (R-Howard) -- super-Republican "T" district, including one Obama base: Centre County and its many Penn State students. Why are these public university towns (State College, PA; Gainesville, FL; Athens, GA) always situated in a sea of red?

District 6 - Jim Gerlach (R-Chester Springs) -- I simplified the lines to include 69% of Berks and 85% of Chester Counties, two of the more swingy counties in the Philly suburbs (compared to Delaware and Montgomery, each 60-39 for Obama). Gerlach would have a slightly more favorable seat here, but there is a huge caveat: he is exploring a 2010 run for Governor, which could be bad for our chances of holding the governor's mansion but is probably good for our chances of picking up PA-06.

District 7 - Joe Sestak (D-Edgmont) -- all of Delaware and 18% of Montgomery = a strong (and compact) Dem seat.

District 8 - Patrick Murphy (D-Bristol) -- all of Bucks plus remainders of Berks and Montgomery; the vote here should be similar to my proposed 6th (about 54-45 for Obama), and if I'd wanted to gerrymander a bit, I could have made it more solid.

District 9 - Bill Shuster (R-Hollidaysburg) -- now essentially a Western PA district! Not my slickest map-making, but I was worried about holding the 12th in future election cycles.

District 10 - Chris Carney (D-Dimock) -- this was fairly well-done, OTOH, though I couldn't be too aggressive for fear of weakening Kanjorski; I included 96% of Luzerne County and 28% of Lackawanna, while cutting out GOP-leaning (but Dem-trending) Pike; a 54-45 McCain district would hopefully be a lot closer to even now.

District 11 - Paul Kanjorski (D-Nanticoke) -- I don't know if Nanticoke would be in the 10th under these lines, so ignore them because the 4% of Luzerne left in the 11th would ideally include Kanjorski's house. Other than Pike, every county in this district voted for Obama, and the expansion into Northampton County is intended to replace lost turf in Luzerne County. The district might technically be a hair less Obama-supporting than before, but there is a serious silver lining here for the incumbent: Lou Barletta's Hazleton is no longer included.

District 12 - John Murtha (D-Johnstown) -- this being the only district in America to switch from Kerry '04 to McCain '08 set off an alarm in my head; coupled with frequent controversy about Murtha himself, it was enough to prompt my version's radical changes to the old lines. While the 65% of Westmoreland County doesn't help, I've included all of Murtha's native Cambria County along with competitive Indiana County and (this is key) 18% of Allegheny.

District 13 - Allyson Schwartz (D-Jenkintown) -- 80% of Montgomery and the remaining 5% of Philadelphia for a compact, logical, and safe Dem seat.

District 14 - Mike Doyle (D-Forest Hills) -- entirely within Allegheny County.

District 15 - Charlie Dent (R-Allentown) -- yes, it's heavy in Democratic Lehigh County, but retains just 18% each of Dem-leaning Northampton and Berks, now including all of heavily GOP Lebanon and even 20% of GOP-friendly Lancaster. This might still have voted for Obama, but by a heck of a lot less than 56-43.

District 16 - Joe Pitts (R-Kennett Square) -- stretches along the south from Adams to Chester Counties, but ruled by Lancaster County, of which it comprises 80%.

District 17 - Tim Holden (D-Saint Clair) -- this is my biggest disappointment. It was drawn in 2002 for George Gekas to defeat Holden, and somehow I managed to make it more Republican than before, when it should have been easy to push into the Dem column through mild adjustments. Holden can win this district as I've drawn it, but when he retires, all bets would be off. There must be a way to grab some Philly suburbs for the 17th without drawing the lines too revoltingly.

District 18 - Todd Platts (R-York) -- okay, so it's a lot less compact and a lot more Shuster-ish. But it's still dominated by his York County base and still safely Republican (more so, actually).

Mapping the Keystone State, and still failing in some of my goals, was migraine-inducing, so you can imagine how relieving it is to be switching gears here for a state with just four districts, a state like...

Utah

This was a cinch to draw, since the legislature already green-lighted (green-lit?) a plan called Plan L back in late 2006 when Utah pols hoped for lame-duck congressional approval of the D.C. House Voting Rights Act. Now, whether that bill will eventually become law is still up in the air given tensions over the poison pill gun issue, but regardless of the immediate outcome, Utah will get a fourth district in reapportionment, and the state is overdue for an urban Salt Lake seat in the next decade. The current map includes three districts that combine cities/suburbs along the populous Wasatch Front with isolated small towns and desolate rural areas. That was done to hurt Jim Matheson; but GOP lawmakers, who can genuinely approve any map they want to in this heavily Republican state, appear likely to give Matheson the most Democratic district possible in order to ensure hard-right GOP hegemony in the other three districts.

Why would they do this? Well, Salt Lake County is trending Democratic, even voting for Obama in 2008 after going to Bush by 20 points in 2004. A new urban district is likely to be concentrated around Salt Lake City, and should the popular Matheson run in a rural district, there would actually be a good chance of two Democrats in a four-member Utah delegation! Thus, the best solution for Republicans is to put Matheson in the urban seat and carve themselves deep red rural turf.

My 2nd District, designed for Matheson, concentrates just about all the Democratic areas in Utah other than Moab, and creates a new 4th along the western portion of the state that would favor a Republican from Salt Lake, or (if the Salt Lake vote was split) someone from the fast-growing St. George area who commanded rural support. (Trivia for those who haven't been: most of the state is indeed known for its high elevations, dramatic snow-capped mountains, and pristine skiing, but St. George actually has palm trees and relatively hot, humid summer temperatures ideal for growing cotton! Weird, I know.)

Here's the Utah map, probably one of the least controversial I've drawn (and again, though I'm using 2007 estimates and not 2000 Census data, the legislature's prior work served as a clear blueprint for my plan):

Photobucket

District 1 - Rob Bishop (R-Brigham City) -- the northwest corner of the state, dominated by Davis and Weber Counties along the Front.

District 2 - Jim Matheson (D-Salt Lake City) -- considering it would comprise 60% of Salt Lake, 6% of Davis, and all of Summit, this district might have literally voted for Obama...yes, it's now possible to draw a genuine Democratic seat in Utah! And while the legislature may not draw Matheson something quite as favorable, they are sure to stick him in a safe urban district to avoid introducing a new Democrat into the delegation.

District 3 - Jason Chaffetz (R-Alpine) -- the largest area in the state, but Utah County (Provo-Orem) reigns supreme.

New District 4 - Safe Republican, contains 40% of Salt Lake and all of Washington -- odds would favor a second Salt Lake County Congressman here (a Republican to complement Matheson), but if rural areas stick together, there is room for someone from outside the Wasatch Front.

Comment away!

Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Re: pennsylvania
I think it's pretty clear that your 9th, 12th, and 17th are just wrong. There's no way they'll end up like that. As you draw it, the 9th would probably elect a Democrat. Indeed, it's a near-reconstruction of the old 20th, that Al Gore won.

As to the 17th, giving Perry county to Holden is just insane. He's never won the part of the county that he currently represents, even though he now wins by good margins.

I would also say that the 3rd does not do much of anything to protect Dahlkemper.  


BTW, the 1st is also traditionally considered
to be a VRA district. I think it was drawn to be 50% black in 2002.

[ Parent ]
Wiki says PA-01 is 46% black
while PA-02 is 61% black. The Census may reveal that Brady's seat is majority-black by then, but it will be right on the threshold. Fattah's is the only VRA-protected district for now.

20 years old, male, GA-12 (home), GA-10 (school); previously lived in CA-29, CA-28, CA-23, IL-06, IL-14, GA-01.

[ Parent ]
Add the hispanics to the AAs
If they're even 4%, it's minority-majority.  

[ Parent ]
in this case the Hispanics
don't count, SCOTUS just overruled "Coalition districts" are protected under the VRA

Call no man happy until he is dead-Aeschylus

[ Parent ]
Sorry, that's not right
Read the decision: they distinguish between coalition district and crossover districts. Coalition districts are still protected.  

[ Parent ]
My 12th isn't *too* awful, I don't think
I was trying to concentrate Democratic votes, and with Western PA trending GOP, Allegheny County was the best source.

But yeah, I think I made it pretty clear I'm not at all satisfied with the 9th and 17th. Had I used 2008 numbers which are now available, and been using a "big picture" approach to Eastern PA re: Holden, I'd do things quite differently. I might have helped Holden a little more and Schwartz/Sestak a little less. But I was doing each district on a micro basis, and that made for some unsatisfactory leftovers. Pennsylvania was one of the first states I drew, and I got a bit better with time (Michigan, Ohio, Florida, and Texas were all after PA).

20 years old, male, GA-12 (home), GA-10 (school); previously lived in CA-29, CA-28, CA-23, IL-06, IL-14, GA-01.


[ Parent ]
The 12th is probably fine
The 9th and 17th are very far from reality.

[ Parent ]
Disagree on the 9th
Nathaniel's version of the 9th contains Blair County, which is pretty strongly Republican and wasn't in Frank Mascara's district. John McCain clearly won it, but it's my feel for the 9th is that it's torn between old-school Republicans in Blair/Somerset Counties and conservative Democrats who crossed over in Washington/Fayette/Greene, with emphasis on the former.

I do have a hard time seeing them tearing apart the Lehigh Valley into two districts though - Lehigh and Northampton Counties have been together for a long time, and maintain almost enough population for one district.


[ Parent ]
The 9th, as drawn on this map, looks like
a district that would have been won by Michael Dukakis. It's like West Virginia.  

[ Parent ]
obviously splitting the Lehigh Valley
was part of my solution for simultaneously protecting both Kanjorski and Dent - Kanjorski's by cutting out Barletta country, Dent's by extending it further west.

My 9th would definitely have voted for McCain, but andgarden is right that its nature is a lot different from the current 9th, much more Frank Mascara conservative Dem-ish (Shuster could be reelected, but would have a very different constituency). I'm really not content with it (or the 17th) at all.

20 years old, male, GA-12 (home), GA-10 (school); previously lived in CA-29, CA-28, CA-23, IL-06, IL-14, GA-01.


[ Parent ]
Good work on Utah
Most Republicans out there seem pretty with it and probably see the writing on the wall. They might try to draw the SLC seat in such a way that they still have a decent chance of winning it when Matheson retires, but they're going to have to shove a lot of Dems in there.

22, Democrat, AZ-01
Peace. Love. Gabby.


Thanks
Yes, I was especially generous to Matheson in including Summit County (as I believe the GOP-approved Plan L did), and if they want to keep it a competitive seat, they can stick Summit County with Chaffetz where it won't have a voice, and instead put the 2nd entirely within Salt Lake. That way, they at least have a fighting chance when Matheson retires.

But overall, I'm happy with my Utah map (also one of the first I did, as it was easy to use "Plan L" as a roadmap and just update with 2007 numbers).  

20 years old, male, GA-12 (home), GA-10 (school); previously lived in CA-29, CA-28, CA-23, IL-06, IL-14, GA-01.


[ Parent ]
Plan L
I dont think the next map will look like Plan L. Back in 2006 when they drew this map it was after the elections and they were hoping congress would pass the DC voting act in the lame duck session but it never came up. So under time pressure they compromised and came up with this map. Most republicans in the Utah legislature didnt like this map because they wanted all 4 seats to be a mix of urban and rural. But this time the republicans will have time to draw any map they want considering they control the Utah legislature by big margins.

[ Parent ]
I believe there are several Metheson family members in politics
They have to know that even when Jim retires another Matheson could run in his place.

The concern I have it that if the new 2nd district is TOO Dem friendly a liberal like Mayor of SLC challenges Matheson in the primary.


[ Parent ]
That's why
another variation might exclude Summit County, making the district Dem-leaning but not as liberal (though SLC Dem primary voters would be pretty liberal to begin with). As long as there's an urban SLC district, its Dem primary will be dominated by social/environmental progressives, and the general election will be tossup-to-lean-Dem depending how the lines are drawn. The 2nd District I drew would actually have voted for Obama, but a less favorable version might have been McCain by a few points (still solid turf for Matheson, but not a Democratic slam-dunk when he retires). Given trends in the area, though, I think Republicans will be happy to give Matheson a solid seat and "ghettoize" the Democrats, at least to a degree.

20 years old, male, GA-12 (home), GA-10 (school); previously lived in CA-29, CA-28, CA-23, IL-06, IL-14, GA-01.

[ Parent ]
I think they could be nastier to Matheson
Republicans want three safe seats held by nutters in Utah, but they don't need R+20 districts to do that. Michele Bachmann manages with R+5. If the Republicans can weaken the other three to put Matheson in an impossible district without making him run in a different district, they'll do it.

How about dividing up the Democratic parts of SLC 40-30-30 and giving Matheson the 40 plus a whole swathe of rural west Utah he hasn't represented before? Chaffetz's district can curl round Matheson's bit of SLC then aim for Washington county, and a third district can go for eastern Utah. Bishop could stay where you've put him.

Granted, Chaffetz would have a fair amount of new turf and Matheson might just run in the new district, but I think there's more room for skulduggery.

Alternatively, what are the chances of Utah Republicans creating a largely rural/non-SLC-metro-based district as a community of interest? It could take up virtually all of southern Utah. It'd have to get pretty near to SLC, I imagine, or take in the north-west. Then Bishop could have a district based on north SLC and the area around the Lake, Chaffetz could have the conservative suburbs and Matheson could have the more liberal areas and Summit County.

As to Pennsylvania, I really don't believe the map will look like that. If a seat is going to be sacrificed in Western PA, I imagine Democrats will want in return to have the Pittsburgh-based district carved up. Doyle could have more or less his old district back, whilst eastern Pittsburgh and environs could be used to shore up either Murphy or Altmire. That would also have the advantage of keeping the ninth in a sensible location. Otherwise Shuster would probably be tempted to primary Platts.


They *could* be a bit nastier to Matheson
But an urban SLC district really is the logical next step...they've been planning on that since 2001 at least. They could make one that voted for McCain, but not by much or it won't be a genuine urban SLC district. Matheson is going to get friendlier turf, in all likelihood, even if his new seat isn't quite as generous as what I drew.

(And remember, my lines are based off of a plan passed by Republicans in the legislature.)

20 years old, male, GA-12 (home), GA-10 (school); previously lived in CA-29, CA-28, CA-23, IL-06, IL-14, GA-01.


[ Parent ]
Consider the context of the plan
They wanted the bill that would get them the extra seat to get through a Democratic Congress.

[ Parent ]
Next time?
Jim Matheson was born in March 1960.  He'll be around for the next ten years but possibly not the next 20.  The smartest thing may be to draw him a more Dem-friendly district this time and possibly be more aggressive in 2022.

Many of the Utah GOP may be most interested in seeing that none of the three Republicans are evn remotely moderate.

Time will tell.


[ Parent ]
The Wasatch Front
(i.e. everything from Provo up to Ogden) has about three-quarters of the state's population, so an all-rural seat would have to be literally everything outside of the SLC and Provo metro areas.

26, white male, TX-24, liberal-leaning independent

[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox