Google Ads


Site Stats

LA-Sen: Cooksey Out, Melancon Unlikely to Run

by: James L.

Tue Mar 03, 2009 at 1:43 PM EST


David Vitter continues to dodge bullets:

Late last week, former Rep. John Cooksey (R-La.) was reportedly interested in taking on Vitter in the primary. But the former 5th district Congressman announced Monday that he is not running, in a statement that included some nuance.

"While I do not always agree with David Vitter's position on social issues, I believe David Vitter does a good job representing the people of Louisiana on fiscal matters," Cooksey said in a statement to the Concordia Sentinel. "If David Vitter emerges as the Republican nominee in the 2010 Senate race in Louisiana, I will vote for him."

I think we all know which "social issue" in particular Cooksey is referring to. In more good news for Vitter, Democratic Rep. Charlie Melancon says that he's probably not going to run:

Despite the urging of state and national Democrats, local Congressman Charlie Melancon says that, at least for now, he has decided against running for the U.S. Senate in 2010. [...]

"Never say never," Melancon told The Courier Thursday, "but I'm not contemplating a run at this time."

Democrats still have a number of other potential candidates on the table, including ex-Rep. Chris John and Shaw Group CEO Jim Bernhard. I remain convinced that Republicans have a more-than-good shot at retaining this seat, but we'll have some raw data to look at soon: Daily Kos will release primary and general election polling numbers from Louisiana later this week.

James L. :: LA-Sen: Cooksey Out, Melancon Unlikely to Run
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Kos
I love these Kos senate polls.  what a great service it provides to all us junkies.

It will be interesting to see what Vitter's approval ratings are.  The one poll I saw after the scandal showed he still had good approval numbers.  But, Cook and Rothenburg both seem to think he will be in for a tough contest and hinted at seeing some internal polling.

Too bad about Melancon.  On the bright side, at least we don't have to worry about losing his seat.


This is a relief
Melancon would ahve been an underdog against any Republican statewide in Louisiana and we would almost certainly lose his House seat without him.  He made the right move.  

This site is private property.
You are not welcome here. If you don't cease and desist, we will evaluate all of our options, including the possibility of seeking a restraining order.

Your account is now banned -- again.


[ Parent ]
LOLZ
I mean, this is no laughing matter, and I'm sorry to make light of it, but it is still amusing... you know, after being outrageous, pathetic, troublesome, boring, etc.

Is it Sean?  Or some miscreant I never had the bad luck to meet?

Sorry if I'm out of line.

28, gay guy, Democrat, CA-08


[ Parent ]
No, it's okay
Most people don't realize this, but I've had to spend a lot more time than I would have liked over the past few months weeding out trolls and banned users who keep on trying to come back and lounge around on SSP all day.

In this particular case, yes, it's Sean/BillNolan. He was first banned over a year ago for driving everyone insane by including pointing out that we were likely to lose a lot of downballot races if Hillary was nominated for President -- something he made note of in every single one of his comments. He's never made an attempt to change his behavior or apologize for it, so he is not welcome here.


[ Parent ]
Heh I was just thinking his post reminded me of BillNolan
Concern troll comments and all.

[ Parent ]
So BillNolan is now Saratoga Sue?
I'm sure there's a funny, somewhat crass, and potentially offensive joke in there somewhere!

[ Parent ]
RE: Bizarre jokes
Perhaps the real joke behind all of this is the actual person behind the curtain.

I would be curious to know what type of creature uses all of those labels to hide behind.

However, to get back on track, I noticed that Melancon's refusal was heavily qualified.

"Never say never, but I'm not contemplating a run at this time."

"At this time," as well as "never say never."

Is he waiting for something?  Holding out for some condition to be fulfilled?

He obviously is leaving the door wide open for a potential run, so I would say he actually is considering it.

Speaking of kicking people out, I don't see why the party still hang on to that non-singing Michael Jackson guy who ran against Don Cazayoux.

Any possibility of Don Cazayoux running again?  If he does, we should let Jackson know that any such 3rd party run again would cost him in the state legislature.

The same should apply for anyone who should try such a stunt in Melancon's district should he decide to run against Diaper Dave.

There is no reason we should not hold on to his seat should he run.

The party just needs to stand up for our candidates.


[ Parent ]
Did a search since I wasn't here
during the Sean/Bill Nolan era, but I found this funny, a direct connection between Sean and Bill Nolan.

http://www.swingstateproject.c...


[ Parent ]
Replying to the comment
I agree that we'd likely lose his House seat.

I'm not so sure that he'd be toast against Vitter, though.  He might actually be able to toast Vitter.  Possibly Daniels.  Dunno anything about the social-conservative nut (whatever his name was--was that Cooksey?).

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01


[ Parent ]

Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox