Google Ads


Site Stats

Obama Money May Flow to Democratic Committees

by: Crisitunity

Mon Oct 20, 2008 at 7:39 PM EDT


I hate to sound like I'm starting to do a victory dance about five yards shy of the end zone, but for practical purposes, the presidential race is all but over. (John King from CNN just reported that the McCain campaign has more or less ruled out the possibility of winning Colorado along with Iowa and New Mexico, which is tantamount to ruling out the possibility of winning the election. King reports Team McCain's considers its last hope to be a triple-bank-shot approach of holding all the other battleground states and somehow picking up Pennsylvania.)

That doesn't absolve anyone of doing the hard work of GOTVing, of course; it just should lead to some discussion of what we might do with the Obama campaign's gigantic financial bounty. Considering that I write for Swing State Project, you might assume (correctly) that I would call for some of that money to be released to be spent on downballot races. The Obama campaign has seemingly read my mind, as he seems serious about not just bringing with him the 60-seat Senate and progressive-heavy House that he'll need to enact his agenda, but even building at the state legislature level.

The Washington Post is reporting, in an aside in a piece of Obama's advertising plans, that some of the campaign's money may go to the DSCC and DCCC:

The campaign has raised so much money that it is considering passing some along to Democratic Party committees to try to help grow the party's majorities in Congress, according to a campaign source.

Marc Ambinder also reports that the DNC may be moving money to state legislative races (as much as $20 million), especially in key contests like the New York Senate, Ohio House, and Texas House. This is, to my mind, extremely important, as expanding state legislative majorities serves to build the Democratic bench and Democratic brand, and will help establish as much Democratic control as possible over the 2010 redistricting process... one more example of how both Obama and Dean are playing 3-D chess after decades of Democratic committees playing tic-tac-toe. (H/t Kos.)

Which brings me to one more item on my wish list: that Obama himself, in the last week of the campaign, hold some rallies in Mississippi and Georgia, even if it means passing up the chance to try to nail down, say, the EVs of Indiana or West Virginia. Part of that, of course, stems from the need to call attention to and bolster enthusiasm for the campaigns of Ronnie Musgrove and Jim Martin, either of whom could be that Senate Seat #60. But there's also the sheer symbolic power of it: the nation's first African-American president marching confidently into the reddest corners of the Deep South, and making his last stand there.

Crisitunity :: Obama Money May Flow to Democratic Committees
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I like that idea
After all, Bush's last rally was in Dallas four years ago...

I can't wait to hear the news... But until it's official, I won't get my hopes up.
Although Obama's campaign has been very transparent in cases like picking their VP.  So it sounds legit.  But yeah.  

great idea on the southern states tour
i doubt it will happen, but would it not be great

Completely agree with your last point
I would also like to see Obama travel to NE-02 for Jim Esch and Oregon for Jeff Merkeley.  The Republican opponents in both of those races are hitching themselves to the Obama bandwagon and it would be nice to see Obama publicly and unequivocally reject them.

When Obama was running for Senator in 2004, he spent his time and resources campaigning for other Democrats after it became clear he was going to rout his opponent.  If he feels confident of a victory, I have no doubt in my mind that he will do the same thing this time around either.


He should do this
It is very important that Democrats grow their majorities in both Houses.  

Will this become another 1980?
Us gaining 8-11 Senate seats and a ton of Houseseats due to presidential coattails and lethargic Republican turnout? This would especially help out in places like ID-01, NV-02, NV-03, CO-04, AZ-03, NM-02, or any other races in the rest that may benefit from Republicans not showing up to the polls after Virginia (and therefore the election) is already called for the Democrats.

Looks like it
In 1980 republicans gained 34 house seats and 12 senate seats.  Our gains in both chambers appear to be only slightly lower than that.

[ Parent ]
There was also this e-mail
That went out around the country from the Obama campaign.

MS and GA?
Maybe I'm being too pessimistic, but would Obama actively campaigning for Musgrove and/or Martin be beneficial?  I think he'd drive away as much white support as he'd attract black support.  I think the better strategy is for his campaign to GOTV in those states and just assume that his voters will also support the Democratic Senate candidates.  I think he'd be much more helpful in OR, NH,  and MN.


IA.
Stay away from those two, Barack. Especially Mississippi. In fact, I'd suggest he not even go there during his entire two-term Presidency

...unless he's wearing a bullet-proof jacket.


[ Parent ]
It's up to Martin and Musgrove
The local candidates and their staffs have to decide if it would be helpful to their campaigns for Obama to come to their states. They could fear blowback.

I've suggested before that Obama's pullout from Georgia may have come after Martin and the DSCC concluded that his chances were better if Obama let the white racist sleeping dogs lie, and so Obama agreed to make his most conspicuous efforts elsewhere, leaving the ATL airwaves even while keeping his ground game registration efforts going.

Certainly Obama's people would want to clear with the local candidates before coming in to their states, whether its GA, MS, or LA.

I'm not sure it would hurt at all at this point. Obama has passed the Commander in Chief test very well, he's more than survived the debates, he's looking VERY Presidential. So a visit in deep Dixie might be well received by the local candidates and their supporters. In fact, it may be high time for Obama to approach the Southern whites and ask for their votes.

But if not just anywhere, Obama should go to Arkansas and appear in Little Rock with Bill (now that's he's done Orlando with Hillary). Arkansas has no Senate or House seat being seriously contested. And with the polls in Missouri looking good, and in West Virginia, too, Arkansas should be ripe for a bid from Obama.

By all means, Obama should go to Texas, probably to Houston, where his visit would help Rick Noriega for Senate, and Nick Lampson in TX-22, Tom DeLay's old district, and the challengers against DeLay cronies in TX-20 and TX-07, as well as a clutch of State House and Senate races that will shape the course of the Lege for the next two years, and probably determine the redistricting of Texas' then-36 House seats after the Census.

Now that Obama seems to be ramping up to two campaign events a day, he could do H-town and one other in Texas, perhaps Dallas or San Antonio, or at LBJ's alma mater now called Texas State, in San Marcos, located about midway between Austin and San Marcos, for free media in two markets.

Obama could also go to New Mexico by way of  El Paso, Texas. The signals from El Paso's TV stations reach deep into southern New Mexico, and dominate that state's second largest city, Las Cruces. So it's a two-fer. And a campaign stop in El Paso would generate huge excitement among the Hispanic voters all along the Texas Border region. Noriega needs a huge turnout from his ethnic base to win his election.

Need more Obama in the South? There's always Tennessee, in another state where we don't have much to lose even if the racist vote were to start coming out of the woodwork like it did in Harold Ford's race -- "Call me, Harold." And it probably wouldn't hurt anything either if Al Gore introduced him to the crowd in Nashville.


[ Parent ]
I said this in another thread
With Obama transferring money to other entities, I think he should transfer like $20 million to Texas.  That is a place where we can make inroads with a Senate seat, 2 House seats, and the state house.  Plus county seats and judgeships all over.

This early spending now could make Texas ripe for the picking in 2012 for Obama.  Not that he'll need Texas, but what a slap in the face to the GOP.  We took your number one EV state.  The earlier we make Texas a swing state, the earlier we can enjoy a Democratic dominance at the presidential level.  Without a reliable Texas, the GOP are screwed.  That's a lot of money to spend in a state once thought reliable.  That's a lot of money for us to spend as well but we only have to spend enough to make them spend heavily.


[ Parent ]
He needs to stop in places like Idaho, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nebraska, Texas, Alaska
where he might not win the top of the ticket but might be of huge help downballot in important Senate and House races.

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01

I'm gonna go add Wyoming, just for good measure
though then again, as I stated in the other thread, I'm not sure whether Trauner wants him there.

party: Democratic, ideology: moderate, district: CT-01

[ Parent ]
i hate to be the one
But I really would prefer 'deep south' and 'last stand' not to be used in the same sentence. Those people scare me. They scare me a lot. lol


Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

You're not running for second place. Is your website? See why Campaign Engine is ranked #1 in software and support among Progressive-only Internet firms. http://www.mediamezcla.com/

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox