Premium Sponsor


Featured Sponsor


Our Sponsors


Ad Networks

Advertise Liberally

Buy an ad on all of the top liberal blogs with just one click.

Site Stats

PA-11: Kanjorski on Brink of Defeat?

by: James L.

Mon Nov 03, 2008 at 2:17 PM EST


This does not look good.

SurveyUSA for Roll Call (10/30-11/2, likely voters):

Paul Kanjorski (D-inc): 45
Lou Barletta (R): 51
(MoE: ±4%)

The top of the ticket isn't a problem for Kanjorski here -- Obama is leading McCain by 53-43 in this CD (a better margin than Kerry's 6-point win here in 2004).

While 2006 was a bloodless year for Democrats, 2008 doesn't look quite as clean -- Mahoney is a certain goner, and the GOP could pick up another couple of seats if they're lucky, including this one. Kanjo has simply run a tired campaign that embodied politics as usual. He is poised to be the rare Dem victim of the "change" mantra tomorrow.

James L. :: PA-11: Kanjorski on Brink of Defeat?
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
What an embarassing showing
And to think of all the money we've wasted on this guy.  We can get it back though, no Republican except for Mike Castle can hold a D+5 seat in this climate.

in that neck of the woods
There's always another Casey ready to serve.

[ Parent ]
Exactly
Lou is gonna be a one-term wonder.  

[ Parent ]
if not he can be redistricted
with Dent, and Scranton and osme of the more Democratic areas in the northpart of the district could be put back into PA-10, while moving out the far-right ancestrally Republican central-PA counties that Republicans added in in 2002 to make it stronger for Sherwood, and which even voted for Sherwood after his scandal. That would make it a complete swing district again, and one much better suited for Carney to hold, he'd be a perfect fit for that district.  

Call no man happy until he is dead-Aeschylus

[ Parent ]
I think we lose three seats
The fact is that when a 20-year incumbent is in the high 30s/low 40s late in the game, he's toast.  

Goners

FL-16
PA-11
TX-22

And am a bit concerned about Murtha, but I can't believe his constituents would throw away his influence.


You know, I'm really impressed
at how well Obama is doing in this district.

McCain doesn't have a prayer in PA tomorrow.


Biden grew up in the population
center of Scranton.

Call no man happy until he is dead-Aeschylus

[ Parent ]
I am very well aware of that
How many votes do you suppose that drives here? I doubt many.  

[ Parent ]
i just know that many people would
vote for Obama here in Northern Louisiana if that's where Biden was from. It's local pride, and a feeling of kinship. All I know is Obama got slammed by Hillary like 3:1 here, was behind here early, and this area was used as a prime example of the areas he was struggling with, Catholic, blue collar, fairly rural, and now he's outperforming Kerry. A lot of it is Biden, part of it is the economic crisis.  

Call no man happy until he is dead-Aeschylus

[ Parent ]
I'm going to say something that's going to be unpopular here.
I think Kanjo deserves to lose.

Frankly, if the people in his district feel so strongly about illegal immigration that it will cost a popular decades long incumbent his seat, then said incumbent should have switched positions and supported the majority view in his district. Populism goes both ways -- even if it's not in the direction we'd like it to be.

 


I have been saying
as a New Yorker,that this is a very anti-illegal immigration district, even and especially among local Democrats. This district is populated by ex-New Yorkers who left the city because they wanted to "get away from them"

I have some friends and family in this district and while all of them are voting Obama, only a few will vote for Kanjorski. Barletta has done a great job erroneously tying economic problems in the district to illegal immigration and making people believe it.



Liberty Avenue Politics - a place for politics in Southern Queens


[ Parent ]
I agree
I still think we should've spent the money this seat but I'm fine with losing this one.  We can win it back.  Top House priority in 2010 in my opinion, and if we lose then, well, redistricting can be fun  :)

[ Parent ]
slightly disagree
I think Top House priority in 2010 is getting all our new freshmen re-elected. Spend big on that. Let the R's have this seat for one more cycle in 2010.
Then in 2012, redistrict Barletta out of the job.

[ Parent ]
g'bye Kanjorski

My sense is that there are two things to take away from this one.  One is that the old Labor type of Democrats are going away everywhere.  The other is that illegals and more generally Latino immigration has to be dealt with fairly soon.

For Mahoney, it's that the Gingrich Era rules about mistresses and payoffs and the like are being repealed by the electorate.

Lampson...that's about who runs Texas (read: still the oil patch mafia) and abortion in a fairly rural/agrarian state.


Crosstabs
http://www.surveyusa.com/clien...

28% of Dems crossing over to vote Barletta.  That's a killer.


We need to get rid of him quickly in 2010
run Pat Casey against him and he will win.  This is a Democratic district and there is no reason to have a Tom Tancredo representing a D+5 district.  


Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

Primary Sponsor

Talk to your supporters, not tech support. Campaign Engine is the powerful, affordable Progressive Campaign Software.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


About the Site

SSP Resources

SSP Race Ratings

Blogroll

Powered by: SoapBlox