Premium Sponsor


Featured Sponsor


Our Sponsors


Ad Networks

Advertise Liberally

Buy an ad on all of the top liberal blogs with just one click.

Site Stats

SSP's Competitive House Race Ratings (6/8/08)

by: James L.

Sun Jun 08, 2008 at 10:05 PM EDT


Likely D Lean D Tossup Lean R Likely R
CT-02 (Courtney)
CT-05 (Murphy)
GA-12 (Barrow)
IL-08 (Bean)
IN-02 (Donnelly)
IN-08 (Ellsworth)
KS-03 (Moore)
MN-01 (Walz)
NH-02 (Hodes)
NY-19 (Hall)
NY-24 (Arcuri)
OH-18 (Space)
PA-08 (Murphy)
PA-11 (Kanjorski)
TX-23 (Rodriguez)
AZ-05 (Mitchell)
AZ-08 (Giffords)
CA-11 (McNerney)
FL-16 (Mahoney)
GA-08 (Marshall)
IL-11 (Open)
IL-14 (Foster)
IN-09 (Hill)
KS-02 (Boyda)
KY-03 (Yarmuth)
LA-06 (Cazayoux)
MS-01 (Childers)
NH-01 (Shea-Porter)
NY-20 (Gillibrand)
NY-25 (Open)
OR-05 (Open)
PA-04 (Altmire)
PA-10 (Carney)
WI-08 (Kagen)
AK-AL (Young)
AL-05 (Open)
AZ-01 (Open)
MN-03 (Open)
NJ-03 (Open)
NJ-07 (Open)
NM-01 (Open)
NY-13 (Open)
NY-26 (Open)
OH-15 (Open)
OH-16 (Open)
TX-22 (Lampson)
VA-11 (Open)
CO-04 (Musgrave)
CT-04 (Shays)
IL-10 (Kirk)
LA-04 (Open)
MI-07 (Walberg)
MI-09 (Knollenberg)
MO-06 (Graves)
NC-08 (Hayes)
NV-03 (Porter)
NY-29 (Kuhl)
OH-01 (Chabot)
OH-02 (Schmidt)
WA-08 (Reichert)
AL-02 (Open)
AZ-03 (Shadegg)
CA-04 (Open)
CA-26 (Dreier)
CA-46 (Rohrabacher)
FL-08 (Keller)
FL-13 (Buchanan)
FL-15 (Open)
FL-18 (Ros-Lehtinen)
FL-21 (L. Diaz-Balart)
FL-24 (Feeney)
FL-25 (M. Diaz-Balart)
ID-01 (Sali)
IL-06 (Roskam)
IL-18 (Open)
KY-02 (Open)
MD-01 (Open)
MN-06 (Bachmann)
MO-09 (Open)
NE-02 (Terry)
NJ-05 (Garrett)
NM-02 (Open)
NV-02 (Heller)
OH-07 (Open)
PA-06 (Gerlach)
TX-10 (McCaul)
VA-02 (Drake)
VA-10 (Wolf)
WV-02 (Capito)
WY-AL (Open)
15 D
17 D, 2 R
2 D, 11 R
13 R
29 R

Races to Watch:

AL-03 (Rogers) IN-04 (Buyer) PA-15 (Dent)
CA-45 (Bono Mack) KS-04 (Tiahrt) PA-18 (Murphy)
CA-50 (Bilbray) MN-02 (Kline) SC-01 (Brown)
FL-09 (Bilirakis) NC-10 (McHenry) SC-02 (Wilson)
IA-04 (Latham) OH-14 (LaTourette) TN-04 (Davis)
IL-13 (Biggert) PA-03 (English) TX-07 (Culberson)
IN-03 (Souder) PA-05 (Open) VA-05 (Goode)

Today's Ratings Changes:

  • CA-04 (Open): Leans Republican to Likely Republican

    Democrat Charlie Brown probably got the less formidable opponent when Conservative Icon Tom McClintock beat former Rep. Doug Ose in the GOP primary here. But despite McClintock's baggage from several failed statewide bids and his carpetbagging ways, Brown will have a hell of a time getting the 50% he needs in this R+11 seat. While he does indeed have a fighting chance, McCain is likely to dominate in this district at the top the ticket, giving a crucial advantage to the somewhat damaged McClintock.

  • NE-02 (Terry): Safe Republican to Likely Republican

    Nebraska's 2nd CD featured a surprisingly close contest in 2006, when Democrat Jim Esch fell short of incumbent Lee Terry by 10 points. However, there are signs that this Omaha-based district may be competitive on the presidential level this year, with a recent poll by SurveyUSA showing Obama within spitting distance of McCain here. Indeed, Terry has been quite vocal about Obama's strength in the district, even going so far as to attempt to tie himself to Obama by hyping the many "Obama-Terry voters" who are sprouting up across the district, looking for "the right kind of change". That kind of talk raises serious alarm bells.

    Jim Esch is back for a rematch and has raised a fairly considerable amount of start-up money since he kicked off his bid in late February. An upset can't be ruled out here.

  • OH-07 (Open): Safe Republican to Likely Republcan

    Few expected this R+6 open seat to become competitive after state Sen. Steve Austria stepped up for the GOP here and early Democratic recruitment efforts bore no fruit. But Democratic attorney Sharen Neuhardt has raised a respectable amount of money, and had a cash-on-hand parity with Austria at the beginning of April. A recent poll for Neuhardt turned a lot of heads: it showed Austria leading only by a 41-35 margin, and on the generic ballot, Democrats had 46-33 advantage over the Republicans. Moreover, Austria may not be all that and a bag o' chips; in the GOP primary, the Dayton Daily News gave him the most tepid of endorsements, saying that while he "has offended no important person or constituency," he does not share retiring Rep. Dave Hobson's "tough independence of mind and political incisiveness" and would likely spend his career of ho-hum service on the back benches.

    Races like this one will serve as a key test of just how bad 2008 will be for the GOP.

  • TX-10 (McCaul): Safe Republican to Likely Republican

    Last summer, we singled out TX-10 as a district that could turn some heads this year. Despite its R+13 lean, it is trending in the right direction: Gore won 34% of its vote in 2000, while Kerry earned 38% in 2004. And without a home state hero at the top of the ticket, the Democratic performance here could improve once again.

    The biggest tell here may have been McCaul's 2006 performance, where he badly outspent his unknown Democratic opponent yet only walked away with a 55-41 result to show for it. However, McCaul won't have the luxury of facing off with an underfunded opponent this year. Democrat Larry Joe Doherty, an attorney and local cable TV celebrity, has already raised an impressive amount, and a recent poll by the Texas-based IVR Polls shows McCaul leading Doherty only by six points.

    Keep an eye on this one.

  • What's your take?

    James L. :: SSP's Competitive House Race Ratings (6/8/08)
    Tags: , (All Tags)
    Print Friendly View Send As Email
    PA-06
       The general election contest will be Jim "51%" Gerlach vs. Bob "Some Dude" Roggio.  Obviously this was a big recruitment disappointment.  But PA-06 is still willing to elect a Democrat not named Lois Murphy.  It escaped notice, but PA-06 was included in the Democracy Corps among the districts where the Democratic challenger was leading by (at 51%) 8 over the Republican incumbent.  That's something.

    John McCain lets lobbyists shape his economic policy

    Question
    Why the downgrade in CA-04? As was said, McClintock won the primary last week, and he was indeed the weaker candidate - what exactly has changed in the GOP's favor?

    To be honest
    The real answer is that it was in the wrong column to begin with.  I think "Lean R" was a bit too generous a call here given the redness of the district.  So this was essentially a correction.  That said, if Brown continues to put up strong poll numbers, we could shift that race back to Lean.

    [ Parent ]
    Good for the most part
    More cautious than my ratings.  I'd definately make these moves:

    AL-05 - from Tossup to Lean Dem - I think it's obvious that Griffith had a solid advantage over the 3rd tier at best recruits running on the republican side.

    AZ-01 - from Tossup to Lean Dem - I'd be shocked if the republican candidate comes within 10 points of Kirkpatrick here.  This race is similar to AZ-08 in 2006 where republicans nominated a far-right divisive candidate.

    NY-13 and NY-26 - from tossups to Lean Dem - Republican utterly failed in both districts to get even a 2nd tier recruit.  These should be easy wins.

    OH-16 - from tossup to Lean Dem - Another race where we have a top tier recruit who shoujld win easily.

    CT-04, IL-10, LA-04, MI-07, NC-08, NV-03, WA-08 - from Lean Rep to Tossups.  Charlie Cook has already shifted most of these to Tossup status and these are all races where we have top-notch candidates.


    A few comments.
    I appreciate the discussion.

    Regarding AZ-01, I think Sydney Hay could very well be the next Randy Graf, so: advantage Dems.  However, McCain might have some coattails at home, which is a plus for Hay.

    NY-13 is a prime candidate to be upgraded, but we'll wait and see.

    As for NY-26, I'm not yet ready to call that one an "easy win".  The GOP got a wealthy self-funder here, Christopher Lee.  Obviously not their first choice, the jury is still out on what kind of a candidate he'll be.  However, on our side, things are a bit dicier, with a crowded four-way field.  And while I like Jon Powers, this kind of publicity isn't the good kind.  Let's also not forget that this is an R+3.5 district that went to Bush by 12 points in 2004.

    OH-16: Yeah, Boccieri is good, but let's not get ahead of ourselves in an R+3.6 district.  Schuring may not be exciting anyone, but he hasn't screwed up yet.


    [ Parent ]
    NC-10
    Glad to see NC-10 under races to watch.  We've got some real potential there with a solid candidate in a wave year.

    TN-4
    The Republicans would love to knock off Davis in TN-4, but anybody that knows Tennessee politics would know how much we hate change. Bredesen, a Democrat, swept every county in the state when he was up for re-election. Conservative or Liberal, we do oh so love our incumbents.

    I don't see Davis losing his seat unless the Republicans can somehow connect him to gay marriage or abortion, and they can't really do either with his record.

    -Zak


    Great rankings, some very minor suggested corrections
    As usual, great stuff James.  I think you read my mind with just about all of these :-).  A handful of races I would re-consider, just for the sake of quibbling and making discussion:

    CA-46.  I know a couple people here at SSP are working for the Democratic recruit, but this seat is safely in Rohrabacher's hands until proven otherwise.  And at this point, no such proof has been put forward.  Race to watch for sure, however.

    KS-02.  I would rank this as a toss-up.  From the looks of it, Ryun is going to plow through Jenkins in the primary and retains universal name recognition in the district.  

    NE-02.  I would just call this one a race to watch.  There is no polling from the race indicating Terry is in any trouble.  I think Obama will be competitive in Nebraska, but I am not a believer in our chances here congressional right now.  

    OH-07.  I would not move this race into a competitive column just yet.  That poll is very nice, but it is but a single poll and and it is a Democratic one at that.  I would stil include this as a race to watch.

    TX-10.  Another race I would call safely GOP, at least for now.  One poll does not convince me this is not still safely in McCaul's hands.  That being said, I have been reading up a little on this, and along with TX-07, these are the two GOP-controlled Texas districts where Bush's vote went down the most between 2000 and 2004.  So, from that standpoint, I think this is a race to watch along with Skelly-Culberson, has some intrigue.  I have really gotten into both of them.  

    WY-AL.  This is a tough one, and maybe I have too much optimism because I like Trauner, but we have had two polls with very similar results: one with Trauner up 41-40 and the other 44-40.  In any other race, those would be toss-up numbers; in Wyoming, we know they are not.  That being said, leans Dem seems like a fair ranking--at this stage.  You could go either way, however, and I understand your thought process.  

    The others are all spot-on, in my opinion.  I think NY-13 will be leans Dem pretty soon but not right this minute, KY-03 has the potential to become a toss-up based on Northup's strengths, AZ-05 should be leans Dem soon, ditto AL-05, and C0-04 and IL-10 could be moved into the toss-up column given the Obama impact on those respective districts.


    It's refreshing...
    To be challenged for being too OPTIMISTIC for once. :)

    Thanks for the comments.  I think "Likely R" is a broad enough category for these races to fit in, especially if you take the CQ Politics definition of the rating:

    Republican Favored: The Republican nominee has/will have a strong lead and appears likely to win, but an upset cannot be completely ruled out.


    [ Parent ]
    unRefreshing
    Sorry, I'll give that common criticism.

    Two ways to do this: Look at each race, each district, voting history, candidate strength, fundraising, etc. You took that route and do a very nice job. Fine. The other way is to aggregate, the way Democracy Corps did with its polling, and get a broad view. (To be fair to Dem Corps, their polling does get down to "named opponent" in the districts they polled.) Their method came up with a ballpark gain of half the 45 or so districts they looked at, or 20-25 seats.

    Another way is to look at the resignations, roughly 30 now while we wait for another DWI or corruption case to come to light, and calculate what share of those will go with the party that has abandoned them. I think we'll take about 25 of the 30 open seats.

    To me the fundamental decision is to decide if this will be a wave year election or not. Of course, wave year elections are not the usual. But they do exist. If you look back at the history of American politics, this year has all the markings of a wave year. You don't see it?

    If we take your categories, Toss Up has 2 Dems and 11 Repubs, so toss the coin and one of the Dems loses and half the Repubs lose, or a 5/6 seat gain. I don't think so. As I said before, I'd shift all the names one column to the left, at least. You've got 13 Repubs in Lean Repub column. I think we'll take most of them.

    So, to conclude, I predict we'll win 10 of your Toss-Ups, and 10 of your Lean Repubs, and 5 or 10 of your Likely Repubs, and -- broaddus answer -- we'll take maybe 5 of the unlisted or Races to Watch "Safe Repub" seats too, to win 30+ seats.


    [ Parent ]
    WY-AL (and TX-07 and KS-02)
    First, I kinda agree with you about TX-07--I want to see more first.  Then again, I do kinda like to take the opportunity to be the first to support candidates that have potential but aren't yet in the spotlight.

    As for KS-02, note that this is an election year, and there might be more Republican turnout.  However, on the other hand, McCain lacks turnout power for conservatives, so that kinda diminishes that advantage.

    As for WY-AL:

    I think the two polls show a small enough margin with enough non-decided that I'd rate the race a toss-up if it were R+7 or so or less R.  Given that it's R+19, I'd rate it at most a toss-up, or a lean R.  I think it's better than squarely in likely R, granted, but then again, as I mentioned above, presidential turnout.  I don't know much about Wyoming Republicans, but I have a feeling they're generally less conservative than Kansas Republicans...

    Bill Posey is not half-alligator...and is outclassed by Davy Crockett anyway: http://www.washingtonmonthly.c...


    [ Parent ]
    I too am very intrigued by Texas and Wyoming
    I think we are both interested in the same, longshot races.  I am going to follow the Skelly and Trauner races extremely closely until November.  I think they both present good and very unique opportunities for us.  Having been reading a lot about Skelly, as I am sure you have, I think he is a spectacular nominee, and more, just the type of leader we need in Washington.  I do not know if there is a bigger gap in competence between any two nominees in America, then the chasm between Michael Skelly and John Culberson.  

    In terms of Wyoming, I understand James' argument here.  The polling for us is excellent, but it is still Wyoming and Barbara Cubin is off the ballot and John McCain, Mike Enzi, and John Barrasso are all going to be on it.  But I am optimistic here.  I get a sense, from the limited stuff I have seen and read, that Wyoming voters like and respect Trauner and are willing to pull the lever for him.  It should be tight again, and hopefully he can cobble together high Dem and Indie turnout and just enough GOPers splitting their ballots to win.  

    In the next couple weeks I am going to make some posts on what I have been reading on TX-07 and WY-AL, in case you are interested.  


    [ Parent ]
    TX-7
    As a former resident of the district, I look forward to your post on TX-7.  Skelly sure looks like a great candidate and Culberson is a non-entity.

    [ Parent ]
    CA registration stats (CA-11)
    Since Jerry McNerney was elected, the voter registration statistics for CA-11 have swung markedly in his favor.  In October 23, 2007, registered Republicans outnumbered registered Democrats in the District by 20,000 voters (152,192 to 132,227).  By May 19, 2008, the margin has shrunk to just 8,000 (144,903 to 136,391).  Tom McClintock has a much harder road to hoe than Richard Pombo.

    FWIW, all 19 Republican districts have a Republican registration edge.  All but one of the 34 Democratic districts have a Democratic edge and CA-11 is the most closely split district in the state by a fairly comfortable margin.  The two most vulnerable Republican districts by voter registration stats are CA-3 where Dan Lungren has a 15,000 registrant edge over Bill Durston and CA-25 where Buck McKeon's edge is just 16,000 over Jackie Conaway.

    I'm surprised and looking bullish on McNerney.


    McClintock is running in the 4th, not the 11th.
    Dean Andal is the GOP's choice this year to lose to McNerney.

    Check out the 2010 California races (http://2010californiaracetracker.wetpaint.com) and help us take back Red California! (http://www.takebackredcalifornia.org)

    [ Parent ]
    Sorry
    About three hours after I typed this, I got one of those thoughts.  Did I say McClintock is running in CA-11?  I hope not.  Well, I did and you were alert.  Nonetheless, 11 looks good this year.  I agree with you that Andal is positioned fror a surprising (to him and the GOP) loss thgis year.

    [ Parent ]
    I think NJ-03 has a Democratic lean at this point
    Adler has tons of cash, the Republican candidate is broke, the Republican primary was nasty, and the district is almost 50-50. It's definitely more likely to flip than NJ-07.

    both NJ seats should be lean Dem
    I'd be rather surprised if we don't pick up both NJ-3 and NJ-7 this year.

    [ Parent ]
    New data from Alaska
    Berkowitz defeats Young comfortably but Young loses to Parnell narrowly in the GOP primary. Berkowitz is still competitive with Parnell however.

    http://newsminer.com/news/2008...


    WV-02 on the move
    Anne Barth is getting a lot of traction in WV-02 and proving herself to be a great campaigner.

    I wish I had more tangibles to point to beyond her winning her primary decisively last month (e.g., polls, updated fund-raising, etc.).  The way Barth has been working so hard and getting a great reception at events is unlike past challengers.

    I see this as a race that could easily move to Lean R from Likely R.


    that seat is gonna get hurt by obama
    but its interesting none the less

    [ Parent ]
    May be helped by Clinton
    There's a huge number of second tier races featuring Democratic women who just need a little money and a little help to get over the top. I would figure that the best use of Hillary Clinton, for her supporters, herself, and the Party, would be to raise money and campaign for women, hispanics and gays.  Anne Barth fits the profile to a T.

    I also think that after running Bobby Byrd's office for 20 years, Anne must have just about the best rolodex in the state.  Maybe it won't show for fundraising but will show in GOTV.


    [ Parent ]
    Minnesota's 3rd
    Madia in Minnesota's 3rd is a great story. He has never held office , is an Iraqi Veteran, has an openly gay brother, and scored a huge primary upset.  


    Copyright 2003-2010 Swing State Project LLC

    Primary Sponsor

    Talk to your supporters, not tech support. Campaign Engine is the powerful, affordable Progressive Campaign Software.

    Menu

    Make a New Account

    Username:

    Password:



    Forget your username or password?


    About the Site

    SSP Resources

    SSP Race Ratings

    Blogroll

    Powered by: SoapBlox